[Sursound] The Sound of Vision (Mirage-sonics?)

2012-06-02 Thread Eric Carmichel
.
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120602/bb7c646d/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


Re: [Sursound] Chasing flies with ambisoinics?

2012-06-02 Thread David Pickett

At 11:49 02/06/2012, Dave Malham wrote:

>Okay, understood. In the course of thinking about this, I've come to
>the idea that maybe the problem is with the whole concept of spreading
>like this. When we localise a sound source, there's a lot of
>information in the transients, which will, of course, have a different
>spectral signature to the more stead state parts of the sound. The
>likelihood is therefore that the transients will be panned differently
>which will, in turn, make for inconsistent imaging, which would
>explain what I've been hearing with mgspreadpan.

When I listened to the Trinnov demo recording of the Tuba Mirum from 
Mozart's Requiem, I noticed this effect: the transients (e.g. 
sibyllants) of the singers were in a different place from the rest of 
their voices.


David

___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


Re: [Sursound] Chasing flies with ambisoinics?

2012-06-02 Thread Dave Malham
Okay, understood. In the course of thinking about this, I've come to
the idea that maybe the problem is with the whole concept of spreading
like this. When we localise a sound source, there's a lot of
information in the transients, which will, of course, have a different
spectral signature to the more stead state parts of the sound. The
likelihood is therefore that the transients will be panned differently
which will, in turn, make for inconsistent imaging, which would
explain what I've been hearing with mgspreadpan.

Dave

On 1 June 2012 17:41, Fons Adriaensen  wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 03:26:18PM +0100, Dave Malham wrote:
>
>> Have you compared the results of having separate X,Y,U,V,P,Q
>> filters to generate the "panning" (which is how I interpret what you say
>> above) with pre-filtering the sounds then panning the filter outputs?
>
> Not sure if I understand the question correctly... But if I do, that is
> how it works, except that the filtering and panning operations have been
> collapsed into a single operation. The IRs of all the panned filter outputs
> are summed, the result is a set of seven filters (the one for W is just a
> delay, as the others are linear-phase). So for a mono source we get a
> 1 by 7 convolution matrix, which in this case is the equivalent of 2048
> individually panned filter outputs.
>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> FA
>
> A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
> It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
> and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
>
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound



-- 

These are my own views and may or may not be shared by my employer

Dave Malham
Music Research Centre
Department of Music
The University of York
Heslington
York YO10 5DD
UK
Phone 01904 322448
Fax     01904 322450
'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio'
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


Re: [Sursound] Catching the same fly twice (and a curious question)

2012-06-02 Thread Augustine Leudar
Interesting - must be an aspect of the cocktail effect ...

On 2 June 2012 04:13, umashankar mantravadi  wrote:

>
> as a location sound mixer, i exploited the visual reinforcement of sound
> in many situations. if you are recording half a dozen people speaking, and
> the camera focus on one - provided the sound is in synch - the person in
> picture will sound louder, nearer the mic, than the others. it is a
> surprisingly strong effect, and one side benefit is you can check for synch
> very quickly using it. umashankar
>
> i have published my poems. read (or buy) at
> http://stores.lulu.com/umashankar
>  > Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 03:09:40 +0100
> > From: augustineleu...@gmail.com
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120602/051eb4c4/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound