I've never had anything to post before, but I thought the list might find this
article interesting. It shows a different perspective of human caused climate
change.
Mike
Goodbye sunshine
Each year less light reaches the surface of the Earth. No one is sure what's
causing 'global dimming' - or what it means for the future. In fact most
scientists have never heard of it. By David Adam
http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/feature/story/0,13026,1108853,00.html
Thursday December 18, 2003
The Guardian
In 1985, a geography researcher called Atsumu Ohmura at the Swiss Federal
Institute of Technology got the shock of his life. As part of his studies into
climate and atmospheric radiation, Ohmura was checking levels of sunlight
recorded around Europe when he made an astonishing discovery. It was too dark.
Compared to similar measurements recorded by his predecessors in the 1960s,
Ohmura's results suggested that levels of solar radiation striking the Earth's
surface had declined by more than 10% in three decades. Sunshine, it seemed,
was on the way out.
The finding went against all scientific thinking. By the mid-80s there was
undeniable evidence that our planet was getting hotter, so the idea of reduced
solar radiation - the Earth's only external source of heat - just didn't fit.
And a massive 10% shift in only 30 years? Ohmura himself had a hard time
accepting it. I was shocked. The difference was so big that I just could not
believe it, he says. Neither could anyone else. When Ohmura eventually
published his discovery in 1989 the science world was distinctly
unimpressed. It was ignored, he says.
It turns out that Ohmura was the first to document a dramatic effect that
scientists are now calling global dimming. Records show that over the past 50
years the average amount of sunlight reaching the ground has gone down by
almost 3% a decade. It's too small an effect to see with the naked eye, but it
has implications for everything from climate change to solar power and even the
future sustainability of plant photosynthesis. In fact, global dimming seems to
be so important that you're probably wondering why you've never heard of it
before. Well don't worry, you're in good company. Many climate experts haven't
heard of it either, the media has not picked up on it, and it doesn't even
appear in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
It's an extraordinary thing that for some reason this hasn't penetrated even
into the thinking of the people looking at global climate change, says Graham
Farquhar, a climate scientist at the Australian National University in
Canberra. It's actually quite a big deal and I think you'll see a lot more
people referring to it.
That's not to say that the effect has gone unnoticed. Although Ohmura was the
first to report global dimming, he wasn't alone. In fact, the scientific record
now shows several other research papers published during the 1990s on the
subject, all finding that light levels were falling significantly. Among them
they reported that sunshine in Ireland was on the wane, that both the Arctic
and the Antarctic were getting darker and that light in Japan, the supposed
land of the rising sun, was actually falling. Most startling of all was the
discovery that levels of solar radiation reaching parts of the former Soviet
Union had gone down almost 20% between 1960 and 1987.
The problem is that most of the climate scientists who saw the reports simply
didn't believe them.
It's an uncomfortable one, says Gerald Stanhill, who published many of these
early papers and coined the phrase global dimming. The first reaction has
always been that the effect is much too big, I don't believe it and if it's
true then why has nobody reported it before.
That began to change in 2001, when Stanhill and his colleague Shabtai Cohen at
the Volcani Centre in Bet Dagan, Israel collected all the available evidence
together and proved that, on average, records showed that the amount of solar
radiation reaching the Earth's surface had gone down by between 0.23 and 0.32%
each year from 1958 to 1992.
This forced more scientists to sit up and take notice, though some still
refused to accept the change was real, and instead blamed it on inaccurate
recording equipment.
Solar radiation is measured by seeing how much the side of a black plate warms
up when exposed to the sun, compared with its flip side, which is shaded. It's
a relatively crude device, and we have no way of proving how accurate
measurements made 30 years ago really are. To detect temporal changes you must
have very good data otherwise you're just analysing the difference between data
retrieval systems, says Ohmura.
Stanhill says the dimming effect is much greater than the possible errors
(which anyway would make the light levels go up as well as down), but what was
really needed was an independent way to prove global dimming was real. Last
year
