[biofuel] Bashing biodiesel (esp. homebrew) online

2004-08-07 Thread Pool, Ryan

I've just had this thread brought to my attention on thedieselpage.com.  There 
looks to be a lot of people over there bashing biodiesel as holding too much 
water and potentially destroying the high pressure injection systems on the 
Chevrolet duramax diesel.  
 
They are being especially harsh on homebrew and on fuel made from waste oil.  
One or two of the people who are defending biodiesel in general sound like they 
are talking the NBB line about homebrewers and waste oil causing quality 
problems and suggesting everyone stay away from it.
 
I don't yet have the experience or the hard numbers to defend biodiesel, but 
I'm sure more than one person on here does.  
 
Here's the link:
http://forum.thedieselpage.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=007240
 
Thanks,
Ryan


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
~- 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [biofuel] Bashing biodiesel (esp. homebrew) online

2004-08-07 Thread Keith Addison

Hello Ryan

Comments below.

I've just had this thread brought to my attention on 
thedieselpage.com.  There looks to be a lot of people over there 
bashing biodiesel as holding too much water and potentially 
destroying the high pressure injection systems on the Chevrolet 
duramax diesel.

They are being especially harsh on homebrew and on fuel made from 
waste oil.  One or two of the people who are defending biodiesel in 
general sound like they are talking the NBB line about homebrewers 
and waste oil causing quality problems and suggesting everyone stay 
away from it.

I don't yet have the experience or the hard numbers to defend 
biodiesel, but I'm sure more than one person on here does.

Here's the link:
http://forum.thedieselpage.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=007240

Thanks,
Ryan

Yeah, the usual mindless knee-jerk reaction - of course big industry 
would do it right and produce quality fuel, of course a bunch of 
scruffy amateurs would produce poor-quality sub-spec junk in their 
backyards.

It turns out that the truth is the very opposite, and there's plenty 
of evidence of it. It's all in the list archives for anyone to find, 
if they want to. I'll extract some for you, and add some more.

I've just had a message from Aleks Kac. It refers to the basic quality test:
Quality testing
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_vehicle.html#quality

This is the most useful all-round test, and it's very simple: Put 
150 ml of unwashed biodiesel (settled, with the glycerine layer 
removed) in a half-litre glass jar. Add 150 ml of water, screw the 
lid on tight and shake it up and down violently for 10 seconds or 
more. Then let it settle. The biodiesel should separate from the 
water in half an hour or less, with amber biodiesel on top and milky 
water below. This is quality fuel, a completed product with minimal 
contaminants, well within the standard specifications. Wash it and 
then use it with confidence.

But if it turns into something that looks like mayonaisse 
(emulsifies) and won't separate, or if it only separates very slowly, 
with a thick white layer sandwiched between water and biodiesel, it's 
not quality fuel and your process needs improvement. Either you've 
used too much catalyst and made soap (better titration), or a poor 
conversion has left you with mono- and diglycerides (try more 
methanol, better agitation, longer processing time, better 
temperature control), or both.

Whichever, you're headed for washing problems. Super-gentle washing 
techniques might avoid the problems, but you'll still be left with 
poor-quality fuel laced with contaminants that are bad for the engine 
and the fuel system. Even normal bubble-washing is quite gentle, and 
it's worth repeating the test with some washed fuel -- it should 
separate from the water cleanly within 10 minutes.

Aleks wrote:

For nosyness' sake I tried the ole' test - mix a little water in your finished
product and watch the separation - but with a commercial biodiesel sample from
Austria. Horrifying results: it created a thick white foam between 
the water and
bio layers. The le white foam thinned to 1/4 of thickness in 2 
weeks, but hasn't dis-
saspeared. After 2 weeks the fuel still hasn't cleared.
Conclusion: Commercial bio is not washed with water! I suspect it 
has merely distilled
its meth out and neutralized in a solid acid bed.

Bad fuel!!!

We did the same here with some commercial brew, and got the same 
result. Bad fuel! We used some of our own production as a control 
(normal production, nothing special), it separated cleanly within 
minutes, NO white layer. The commercial stuff took SIX MONTHS to 
clear.

This is from a previous message:

Some months back there was a fuss in California after World Energy 
distributed a consignment of sub-spec biodiesel. Details here:

http://archive.nnytech.net/sgroup/BIOFUEL/25291/ Bad quality at 
World Energy? what's that again about Now what's that again about 
homebrewers, quality, and out-of-spec fuel, and the quality control 
standards that only industry can provide??

http://archive.nnytech.net/sgroup/BIOFUELS-BIZ/2888/ Re: even more 
shady quality control in commercial biodiesel

World Energy withdrew the consignment, and their VP Sales Graham 
Noyes posted this explanation:

First, this biodiesel is crappy not because it is Yellow Grease 
(aka recycled) biodiesel but because it is out of spec biodiesel. 
Prior to triggering this railcar, we received lab analysis showing 
that it met ASTM spec. The good work of Dr. Dan alerted us that 
there might be an issue with the fuel. We sent samples to an 
independent lab and found it did not meet spec. We then pulled all 
product and stopped supplying. If you have product that does not 
meet spec, we will replace it with ASTM spec fuel. We guarantee that 
our fuel meets ASTM spec and back that up as necessary.

I asked him how it was possible that the first lab had okayed it but 
he didn't reply. There's been quite a lot of this