Re: [Biofuel] Made in China? - Final Thoughts (long), Happy New Year, Over and Out.

2005-01-01 Thread Keith Addison




Hi Keith ;

--- Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Peter, you've misunderstood me. I didn't say and
 didn't mean that you
 were angry.

Ok Keith, never mind this very minor thing. No problem
at all.

 Dealing with the forces that interfere with and
 manipulate human nature for
 their own ends is a much less daunting challenge,
 more possible, more
 achievable, than trying to change perceived inherent
 inadequacies in
 human nature itself.

Yes true, but the forces are formidable, well
organized, and clearly extend through multiple
generations.   Huge.  They can bring down the towers
in front of our eyes, kill 3,000 people,  and get away
with it.  Sobering.


Whatever happened there, they can and have done a lot worse. I 
don't think there's any Yes, but... Peter. Of course they're 
formidable and extend through multiple generations (thousands?), 
nothing new there. Well organised? Less so than I'd thought, it 
seems. They've been making more and more errors of judgment in the 
last few years, including some grave ones, and I've never seen that 
before. WE are getting stronger all the time, growing, spreading, 
consolidating, THEY are getting weaker, their grip is weakening, 
their vision and scope is not broad or deep enough to perceive the 
true nature of the new (yes!) threat they're facing, nor to meet it 
and counter it, let alone forestall it. They're dinosaurs, I've often 
said so. It's only a matter of time.


We have plenty of parallels and examples of this blindness. For a 
start their arrogance and overconfidence make them blind.


Why is it that, for instance, we here on this list and a few others, 
people with no power at all, in no way a formidable force, by all 
appearances without significance, the much derided and sneered at 
grass-roots sector, if you can even call it a sector, of the 
biodiesel industry, which includes some mighty names, can do these 
three things?


1. We consistently make better fuel than the big guys do. NOT a myth 
- the myth is that they make good fuel and we can't. Look what Rob 
Del Bueno said about it a few days ago:



Funny thing about the commercially manufactured biodiesel... One of the
big arguments against backyard biodiesel (from industry folks) is quality,
yet every batch that I have made, and every batch I have seen by a homebrew
biodiesel maker has been much better than the fuel I am reselling.

http://wwia.org/pipermail/biofuel/Week-of-Mon-20041227/004126.html
[Biofuel] New Car

That is widely corroborated, from other sources and by events on both 
sides of the Atlantic (and in Japan). See, for instance:

http://wwia.org/pipermail/biofuel/Week-of-Mon-20041213/003725.html
[Biofuel] Newbie Question: TDI and homemade fuel

Do they take it in, learn anything, improve their practices, try to 
develop a different relationship with us instead of slagging us all 
the time, try to adapt in any way? No. They continue in denial.


2. Without any resources or megabuck PR budgets, fancy agencies in 
Madison Avenue, Rolexes, Armanis or long lunches, we consistently do 
a better and more effective job than they do of promoting biodiesel 
and educating the public about it. They've admitted this and it's 
demonstrably true. They succeed somewhat in promoting it at the 
business and industry level - on the Business pages - while we get 
feature stories on front pages. And much besides.


3. The world over, in many countries, in the last five years, we've 
made and used MILLIONS of gallons of biodiesel and failed to put 
MILLIONS of dollars in the coffers of governments and the petroleum 
corporations. We sail right under their radar, and they still haven't 
figured it out. It's too late to stop us now, even though they'll no 
doubt get round to trying, sooner or later. They've got about as much 
chance as the Prohibition did. Just a drop in the ocean, our millions 
of gallons? Yes, if you want to compare it with overall consumption 
and incomes, which is what they'll do, and thus fail to see until 
it's too late that it's not just a drop in the ocean, it's a rapidly 
widening crack in their concrete.


Another picture - how is it that most any schoolkid can make a better 
and more effective, more influential, website on green issues, say, 
than a massive auto manufacturer can? (What?? No Flash banner 
page??? Bad design, hmphh - he's got absolutely no excuse for getting 
10 times more hits than we do.)


How is it that sinister and sleazy tactics like those of Monsanto via 
the Bivings group to insinuate corporate trolls into Internet 
discussion groups get rumbled and backfire on them? Yes, they have a 
strategy for this, and huge budgets to back it, they hold business 
seminars on it, but it doesn't work. (Do an achive search for 
Bivings.)


I could go on and on. Okay okay, so I DO go on and on, right? LOL!


 Nor will you find me labelling people as negative
 when they have
 the courage to admit the existence of dark realities
 rather than
 pretend about 

Re: [Biofuel] Made in China? - Final Thoughts (long), Happy New Year, Over and Out.

2004-12-31 Thread Guag Meister

Hello Keith and All ;

Keith wrote :
 You really should check this out, IMHO, there's 
 no need to be so pessimistic, and I don't think it's
your nature.

I wouldn't say I was pessimistic, but I agree it may
appear that way.

 I've been there, I was angry for years, angry about
all the callous 
 injustice in the world. Indeed I had so much to be
angry about, I was 
 encountering it face to face all the time in my
work. 

Angry is not a word that I would use to describe
myself, but I agree in a short post, it may seem that
way.  Sadly frustrated is more like it.  My faith
gives me an unusual perspective on this.  

An analogy for you.  I was always good in school
without trying too hard.  I view adversity in life as
like a school test.  A good student likes hard tests. 
It is the only way to differentiate the class after
all.  Only a poor student likes easy tests.  If the
test is easy, everyone passes and looks the same.  A
statistically relevant test must be hard enough that
some students fail, and it gives the opportunity for
the bright students to shine.  Without hard tests
there would be no bright students.  I always liked the
hard tests.

Jesus came bearing the staggering gift of eternal life
to give to the people of Israel and they beat Him,
hung Him on a cross, and killed Him.  Talk about being
wronged, and hanging there has GOT to hurt, but Jesus
did not complain in the face of the most overwhelming
wrong anyone could ever imagine right to the end.  So
I don't look at callous injustice or anything else as
causes for anger or revenge.  Instead, I view
adversity and callous injustice as opportunities to
demonstrate how close I can follow the infinitely high
standard that Jesus set.  When adversity comes my way,
I thank Jesus for the opportunity to practise this. 
The more adversity the more it give me an opportunity.
 It is not easy and I am not successful many times.

 But, it's the 
 wrong approach. I stopped being angry about 15 years
ago. The sources 
 of the anger remain, or in many (but not all) cases
have increased, I 
 don't pretend about it, I do confront it, I don't
have any time for 
 rose-tinted specs, and, truth to tell, I still do
get angry 
 sometimes, but it's short-lived, and it doesn't
colour my vision.

You are making some very good points, but I think I
have come to terms in my own way,  so I feel I need to
explain my motivation a little more thoroughly.  I
think it is significantly different that you expect.  

There was a movie I saw once,  possibly the name was
The Dead Zone.  I can't remember.  It was about this
guy who could see your future by touching your hand. 
He touches the hand of a politician elect, and in a
vision he sees that in the future this politician will
become president and launch nuclear missiles.  So he
ponders this difficult question and determines to
assinate the politician and spend the rest of his life
in jail rather than let the world fall into nuclear
war.  Someone out there may remember this movie.  

Anyway, in the movie he touched the hand his young son
and he saw that his son would go ice skating later in
the day, but the ice would break and he would fall
into the icy water and drown.  So of course he didn't
let his son go ice skating.  Now a nice, well meaning
neighbor came over with her son and they were going
ice skating.  He touched the hand of the neighbor's
son and once again he saw the ice breaking.  He tried
to convince this very nice bubbly neighbor that the
ice would break, but the neighbor told him every
reason why it wouldn't break, ie. it is too early in
the spring season for thaw, the ice is thick, everyone
is skating, etc.  No matter what he said the neighbor
was not convinced that the ice would break.  Finally
he smashed his cane on the table and screamed at the
top of his lungs THE ICE IS GONNA BREAK!!.  (You're
being so negative!)

That's a lot like how I feel. The ice is gonna break.

Keith wrote :

 Washington and Beijing (and the WTO)
notwithstanding, there's much 
 more common cause between the *people* of the US and
the *people* of 
 China than there's cause for distrust, rivalry and
enmity.

Yes, agreed, but the question remains whether this
common cause is enough.  It hasn't been in the past. 
The powers sometimes self inflict damage to get
everybody riled up.  Once everyone is riled up and the
war drums beating,  anything is possible.  Therefore
as humans we must ignore what someone appears to have
done to someone else or even us if we want to defeat
this strategy.  It will not be easy to make this
change.

Keith wrote :

 We ordinary people, Gustl's common 
 people, will win this age-old game in the end, it's
our destiny.

Absolutely, ABSOLUTELY  correct, but its going to be
one heck of a roller coaster ride until then.

Keith wrote :
 As for trouble being inevitable, I don't agree with
that either, 
 regardless of what the intentions might be (on both
sides).

 An article titled Slowly but steadily, India will
overtake 

Re: [Biofuel] Made in China? - Final Thoughts (long), Happy New Year, Over and Out.

2004-12-31 Thread Guag Meister

Hi All ;

Opps.  Sorry if I forgot anybody (Walt).  Happy New
Year to you all!!

Peter G.





__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [Biofuel] Made in China? - Final Thoughts (long), Happy New Year, Over and Out.

2004-12-31 Thread Keith Addison


were angry. I was angry, I said you were pessimistic, and that indeed 
you have been, or sadly frustrated, if you prefer. Check the quotes I 
included. You despair of human goodwill and of the human capacity to 
learn much-needed lessons, yet in another post you include in this 
the critical factor of mass-manipulation - if you'd added that to 
your original sum it would have come out different, less pessimistic 
about human nature and abilities or not at all pessimistic. Dealing 
with the forces that interfere with and manipulate human nature for 
their own ends is a much less daunting challenge, more possible, more 
achievable, than trying to change perceived inherent inadequacies in 
human nature itself. Rather than a need to change people beyond their 
capacities, maybe all that's needed is to leave them alone and let 
them get on with it without interference.


I compared your pessimism to the anger I'd felt for many years, 
because it seems to me the two are comparable in their contexts. I 
could find a resolution of that, and you can resolve this. There's no 
contradiction between realism and optimism.


Nor will you find me labelling people as negative when they have 
the courage to admit the existence of dark realities rather than 
pretend about it - I said that. But there are better ways of dealing 
with it, denial NOT included! (I think we mentioned the Titanic 
previously, didn't we? We certainly agreed about that.)


Also, in both there being trouble ahead and in the changes needed for 
betterment,there absolutely have to be many unforeseen factors that 
you're not calculating for, nor can you calculate for them. But 
they're not likely to be significant because the major factors at 
play are so clearcut and decisive, the die is cast? But with 
complexities such as these with their infinities of variables, it's 
quite impossible to predict which factors, whether massive or 
imperceptible, will initiate change. Social change doesn't need 
critical threshold levels of people to act before it can happen, 
maybe it only needs one person to plant the right seed in the right 
place at the right time and in the right way, perhaps even by 
accident, without any knowledge of what they're doing nor any such 
intention, and nobody will ever know what caused it, least of all 
that person. Needed change happens via a creative minority, not by 
agreement of the majority. Creative acts do not necessarily follow a 
logical progression that can easily be predicted. Meanwhile we can 
all do what we can do and keep trying to do it better.



Keith wrote :

 Washington and Beijing (and the WTO)
notwithstanding, there's much
 more common cause between the *people* of the US and
the *people* of
 China than there's cause for distrust, rivalry and
enmity.

Yes, agreed, but the question remains whether this
common cause is enough.  It hasn't been in the past.


It was so easy to smash it, if you just happened to control all the 
resources and all the power. That has almost certainly changed, as 
Gustl hinted. Now we have a situation where five ordinary folks with 
a couple of computers and a telephone could bring the mighty Monsanto 
to its knees. There's something new under the sun, for a change. Just 
one battle, it's true (and they warned of that), but not the only 
one, and instead of being nullified and swept aside as before, 
there's a powerful multiplier effect at work - it spreads like a 
fire, and there's no way of stopping it. Even the mainstream US press 
has referred to the Other Superpower:


There may still be two superpowers on the planet: the United States 
and world public opinion. - The New York Times


http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20030414s=schell
The Nation | Article | The Other Superpower | Jonathan Schell
March 27, 2003


Keith wrote :

 We ordinary people, Gustl's common
 people, will win this age-old game in the end, it's
our destiny.

Absolutely, ABSOLUTELY  correct, but its going to be
one heck of a roller coaster ride until then.


It's seldom been anything else. There've been worse times, and 
better. After all, this is what our history is all about, the problem 
of power. No progress? A HUGE amount of progress, it's a story of 
progress, always overcoming the constant setbacks that beset us at 
every turn. We lose all the battles yet we never stop advancing and 
gaining ground, and we will most definitely win the war.


Did you ever read this?

http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/BIOFUEL/32840/
Re: [biofuel] The Oil we eat (Harper's)

The original article is here:

http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/31846/1/


Keith, of the list participants you are the first time
zone for the new year, so I would like to say HAPPY
NEW YEAR to you and Midori first,


Thankyou Peter! But is that right? How does Bob rate? Is it tomorrow 
yet Bob? Anyway Peter you're not far behind.



and then to all list
particpants as the earth spins around its axis at
around 1,000 mph and hurtles through space 

Re: [Biofuel] Made in China? - Final Thoughts (long), Happy New Year, Over and Out.

2004-12-31 Thread Guag Meister

Hi Keith ;

--- Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Peter, you've misunderstood me. I didn't say and
 didn't mean that you 
 were angry.

Ok Keith, never mind this very minor thing. No problem
at all.

 Dealing with the forces that interfere with and
 manipulate human nature for 
 their own ends is a much less daunting challenge,
 more possible, more 
 achievable, than trying to change perceived inherent
 inadequacies in 
 human nature itself. 

Yes true, but the forces are formidable, well
organized, and clearly extend through multiple
generations.   Huge.  They can bring down the towers
in front of our eyes, kill 3,000 people,  and get away
with it.  Sobering.

 Nor will you find me labelling people as negative
 when they have 
 the courage to admit the existence of dark realities
 rather than 
 pretend about it - I said that. But there are better
 ways of dealing 
 with it, denial NOT included! (I think we mentioned
 the Titanic 
 previously, didn't we? We certainly agreed about
 that.)

I didn't mean to direct this at you at all.  I joke
like this with my friend many times when they raise
legitimate concerns about my high flying plans.  No
problem at all again.  LOL.

 Also, in both there being trouble ahead and in the
 changes needed for 
 betterment,there absolutely have to be many
 unforeseen factors that 
 you're not calculating for, nor can you calculate
 for them. 

Yes  true.

 It was so easy to smash it, if you just happened to
 control all the 
 resources and all the power. That has almost
 certainly changed, as 
 Gustl hinted. Now we have a situation where five
 ordinary folks with 
 a couple of computers and a telephone could bring
 the mighty Monsanto 
 to its knees. There's something new under the sun,
 for a change. Just 
 one battle, it's true (and they warned of that), but
 not the only 
 one, and instead of being nullified and swept aside
 as before, 
 there's a powerful multiplier effect at work - it
 spreads like a 
 fire, and there's no way of stopping it. Even the
 mainstream US press 
 has referred to the Other Superpower:

Yes this effort to rein in Monsanto is outstanding and
commendable.  But I think we need to just agree to
differ on this point.  My humble opinion on this is
that our opponents are not stupid, in fact they are
brilliant strategists, the best there ever was or ever
will be, and some small victories for our cause can be
expected.  But GM crops are still flooding the market
and it is only the beginning.  Eventually the patent
enforcement that you see now will become widespread. 
Their plan is not static and they will act quickly to
eliminate the internet threat.  Internet censorship is
already a reality and I expect  it to get a lot worse.
 How?  The great game of Thesis, antithesis,
synthesis.   One example. Right now there are
criminals in jail on death row who have fan club
followings over the internet where they describe their
murders in great detail. This is understandably
painful for the victims families so they are clamoring
to have prisoners barred from internet access. Many
convicts, particularly internet fraud cases,  are
already barred from using the internet.   Don't people
realize that this power will eventually be used
against  you and me? It surely will.

My strategy is work diligently and never miss a chance
to make change for the better,  hope for the best, and
plan for the worst.  This is not suitable for
everyone.

 Did you ever read this?
 
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/BIOFUEL/32840/
 Re: [biofuel] The Oil we eat (Harper's)
 
Yes I am quite very enthusiastic about integrated
agriculture for my project.  I visited with Dr.
Preston of UTA a few years ago in Cambodia about
attending some training classes and hiring some of his
graduates.   I still plan on doing this.

Hey I forgot Gustl and Peggy - Happy New Year to you
both!!

Best Regards,

Peter G.
Thailand





__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more. 
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/