Re: [swinog] IRC Server dead ?

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Marco Fretz


Boris Meyer wrote:
 no one cares about security and I think swinog should care about security!

 use IRC, install one of the thousands IRC clients available and ask your
 security guru to open the port, or do it on your own ^^
   
 You can connect via SSL for a little bit of enhanced security (and the 
 connection between the servers is also encrypted).
 
 As alternative of Skype, we can take it to the max and use the 
 chat-system of World of Warcraft. We just have to choose, if we play for 
 Alliance or Horde and may use the guild chat (the famous n00b-pwning 
 Swinog-Guild) /badhumour

good one :-) we can also use pro7.de chat  :P haha

 
 Boris.
 
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] IRC Server dead ?

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Rainer Duffner
Stanislav Sinyagin schrieb:
 From: Martin Ebnoether [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


   
 All that is needed to take Skype down is an automatic windows
 update of some thousand computers.

 Remember last summer?
 http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20070819
 

 hey Venty, long time no see :)

 if you remember, back in 2003-2004 there were viruses which knocked down 
 hundreds 
 of thousands of windows PCs. So what, we're still using that :)

   

Well, you maybe - I don't ;-)
But then, I also didn't use Windows in 2003, either...
Nowadays, the viruses don't knock down the Windows-boxes, they just use
them as Spam-Zombies or attack-drones or whatever the people that rent
them want to use them for.


 If the tool serves my needs, I don't really care if it's open source - I'm 
 not 
 going to compile anything on my desktop anyway. And if it collects any 
 marketing 
 stats, so what, everyone is doing that, and we're helping them (Coop Supercard
 for example).


I don't have any of those, either.


  There's nothing bad about companies knowing better what I might 
 buy from them :-)
   

I think you are oversimplifying and trivializing what these databases
can be used for.
Nowadays, these giant databases of consumer buying-behavior are probably
also used to find potential terrorists.
Who bought box-cutters and what did they buy with them?
Who bought box-cutters only?
Who bought the other items alone that the people buying box-cutters and
other items bought?

It's hilarious, but that's how some people actually believe the war
against terror can be won.

Also, I think you should do some reading regarding the Skype application.
I think that if it wasn't for its widespread use, most AV-programs would
consider it malware.
The executable itself is packed and encrypted and actively tries to
avoid debugging/reverse-engineering by in-memory debuggers.
The communication itself is encrypted with an unknown encryption-method.
And of course, yes, no source code is available (for the general public).

I did sign up for an account and used it for a few times - but just
because I didn't have time to setup my own Jabber server and experiment
with iChat ;-)
I've got a _very_ bad feeling using this app - it's just scary.



Rainer

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] IRC Server dead ?

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden roger
i was requesting twice on http://www.warmduscher-
abc.ch/warmduscher_abc.asp 

to add the term Skype-Benutzer

but as the maintainer seems to be an skype fan it getting ignored

Roger



Am 7 Oct 2008 um 9:32 hat Marco Fretz geschrieben:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  IRC is cool - IRC is a geek tool ,-))
  skype is something for warmduscher (well, i've got an account since 2 
  days...) ,-))
 
 yes, IRC is old-school. it's just great, coding own bots, irc clients,
 etc... lot of possibilities.
 
 Skype is like MSN Messenger, just another ugly overloaded communication
 tool. if I have to choose between skype and MSN, it's MSN, because there
 are a lot of opensource and freeware alternatives to the bad Live
 Messenger from Microschrott, ah Microsoft... :-)
 
  
  -steven
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stanislav 
  Sinyagin
  Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 4:02 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [swinog] IRC Server dead ?
  
  why doesn't someone create a public Skype chat for SwiNOG?
  I think more people on this list have skype than IRC client software (me, 
  for example :-)
  
  
  
  - Original Message 
  From: Boris Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 3:51:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [swinog] IRC Server dead ?
 
 
  PS: The actual list of all available servers is listed at:
  http://irc.subcult.ch
  As a result of a DDoS against the SwissIX IP-Range the prefix of
  SwissIX is at the moment only reachable by its peers.
 
  We are working towards bringing the irc-server back online. But in
  the mean time eiher use another server of the mesh or have a
  SwissIX-connected ISP ;).
 
 
  ___
  swinog mailing list
  swinog@lists.swinog.ch
  http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
  
  ___
  swinog mailing list
  swinog@lists.swinog.ch
  http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
  ___
  swinog mailing list
  swinog@lists.swinog.ch
  http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] IRC Server dead ?

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Boris Meyer

12:54 -!- Irssi: Connecting to irc.subcult.ch [213.180.174.250] port 6667
12:54 -!- Irssi: Connection to irc.subcult.ch established
12:54 !irc.subcult.ch *** Looking up your hostname...
12:54 !irc.subcult.ch *** Checking Ident
12:54 !irc.subcult.ch *** No Ident response
12:54 !irc.subcult.ch *** Found your hostname
12:54 -!- Welcome to the SubCultNET Internet Relay Chat Network boris

etc etc...

Don't see your problem. Maybe some client issues? Anyway, there are 4 
possible servers, just check http://irc.subcult.ch

Regards,
Boris
 [Tue.06:07] -irc.subcult.ch- *** Checking Ident
 -
 [Tue.06:07] -irc.subcult.ch- *** Found your hostname

 and thats it .. stays there .. after 4 minutes the client disc. and retry to 
 connect. 


 will be shure in 30 minutes everything will be fine again 

 so i really would be happy when irc.swinog.ch is back on the net, there i 
 never experienced that

 Roger

 Am 7 Oct 2008 um 1:27 hat Scott Weeks geschrieben:

   
 I can't resist.

 ...if it collects any marketing stats, so what, everyone is doing that...

 Only from the unknowledgeable that don't control Javascript (NoScript), 
 flash (etc.), cookies or 'stuff'.  Therefore, you have skewed stats.

 ...There's nothing bad about companies knowing better what I might buy from 
 them...

 Yes, there is.


 scott

































 ---
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

 


 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

   

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Hot Red Flames (Was: IRC Server dead ?)

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Tonnerre Lombard
Salut, Per,

On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:38:56 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
 The idea of open source is not so much that you get to check it
 yourself, but much more that it is open for hundreds of thousands of
 other people to check.  If for instance the quality/security of a
 piece of code is proportional to the number of times it's been
 reviewed, then yes, open source is quite possibly more secure. 

You should read the more recent publications on the subject. The idea
that this actually happens is a pure illusion.

I think that the advantage of Open Source does indeed lie in the fact
that you have the ability to fix things yourself, and that, whatever
you start, you have a large pool of preexistent code you can build on.
And the ability to learn from it etc.

Tonnerre


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


[swinog] Embedded Linux practicing

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Stanislav Sinyagin
ok guys, now some real stuff :)

I've got one of these boards
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4514239441.html
in order to practice my skills in embedded linux applications.

My first mini-project is to build a small Wifi (or even Bluetooth?) 
hotspot (only for home use, of course) which would take its Internet feed 
from one of those mobile USB GPS modems that you get for few francs a month 
from Swisscom or Sunrise. 

any ideas what else could be an interesting project? Or probably you have a
real project in mind?

cheers,
stan

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Embedded Linux practicing

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Stanislav Sinyagin
Bernard, this one looks really nice. If you've got the sponsoring, then I'm in 
:)



- Original Message 
 From: Bernard Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2008 2:18:29 PM
 Subject: Re: [swinog] Embedded Linux practicing
 
 Hello,
 
 Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
  any ideas what else could be an interesting project? Or probably you have a
  real project in mind?
 
 What about :
 - a device that would be installed in cars ,
 - to build a mesh wifi 2.45GHz between cars,
 - and a 5.4GHz to some external relays when available,
 - to allow for transmission between cars of :
. fast alarm (strong acceleration/deccelaration) ;
. relative positionning ;
. voip diffusion to close cars ;
. engine technical parameters (for maintenance) ;
 - and dynamic internet relaying to closer external relays ;
 - available with open source (Linux+bsd).
 
 ?
 
 Best regards,
 -- 
   __Bernard DUGAS _
 |  IS Production s.a. Innovative Solutions Production |
 |  Technoparc Pays de Gex[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
 |  30 Rue Auguste Piccard   Mob.: +33 615 333 770 |
 |  01630 St Genis Pouilly - FRANCE -Fax : +33 450 205 106 |
 |_|
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Guazzoni Daniele, CH
Open does not implicitly mean crap and closed also don’t mean automatically 
good...
Actually I'm sick and tired of discussions regarding opensource as most of the 
time they just flame up (as here).

My 2 cts:
Use whatever you want, have your idea about it, but don't try to convince 
others about what is right or wrong.
I have my idea about it and if someone what to know more he can contact me 
offlist.

Have a nice day :-)

Daniele


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen Massar
Sent: Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2008 14:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [swinog] open source illusions

Silvan Gebhardt wrote:
 I guess it's not about Fixing but also expanding
 
 small example: I use a extension to my gnome panel called SSH Menu
 
 
 I can add hosts which it opens me a ssh session in a terminal just by 
 clicking on the menu entry.
 
 now I wanted to expand that to include RDP Sessions - okay - took the 
 code, and have it rewritten.
 so that IS actually an advantage! and I did not have to consult the 
 developers at all, I just checked out the code

And there is your illusion, as you will want to stay up-to-date, and as such, 
you will have to get the new version (because it is cooler, or actually because 
it contains so many security fixes because the code quality is really really 
bad, which is the case in a lot of projects), and then you find out that 
getting your cool little fix into their code is most likely not going to 
happen, unless you can persuade them really well or take a long time 
campaigning for it, and then they change the API or complete structure of the 
code and you have to redo your change, for small changes that might be fine, 
for larger ones, you are basically peeped.

Better then to pay the closed source folks and let them do it, as they will 
also maintain the changes for yo.

Greets,
 Jeroen


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1665 - Release Date: 10/6/2008 5:37 
PM

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1665 - Release Date: 10/6/2008 5:37 
PM


This e-mail, any associated files and the information contained in them are 
confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received 
this message in error please notify the originator and delete the email 
immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this 
message is strictly forbidden. E-mails to and from the company are monitored 
for operational reasons and in accordance with lawful business practices. Any 
opinions expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily represent 
the views of the company. The company does not conclude contracts by email and 
all negotiations are subject to contract. We make every effort to maintain our 
network free from computer viruses but accept no responsibility for any viruses 
which might be transferred by this e-mail.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Beat Rubischon
Hello!

Am 07.10.08 14:33 schrieb Jeroen Massar unter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Better then to pay the closed source folks and let them do it, as they
 will also maintain the changes for yo.

Each day I work with Open Source and Closed Source tools and applications.
Usually I see commercial software coming with a better usability and
OpenSource with better stability and performance.

The major advantage for OpenSource is the visibility of the code - no code
monkey is able to hide 20 years old buggy crap when he needs to provide the
sources. Believe me, this is a great motivation for a lot of coders out
there ;-)

Even more, when you pay licenses host or by CPU, which means today
_per_core_, why should a commercial software supplier optimize their
binaries? Even simple tasks like using a commercial compiler instead of gcc,
which gives 10-100% additional performance, is often not done as the
compiler costs $1000 extra - compare this with the several hundred thousends
the scoftware company usually earns per year...

Beat

-- 
 \|/   Beat Rubischon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ( 0^0 ) http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/
oOO--(_)--OOo---
Meine Erlebnisse, Gedanken und Traeume: http://www.0x1b.ch/blog/


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Jeroen Massar
Guazzoni Daniele, CH wrote:
 Open does not implicitly mean crap and closed also don’t mean automatically 
 good...
 Actually I'm sick and tired

I hope you get better soon *wink*

 of discussions regarding opensource as most of the time they just
flame up (as here).

See the subject line that I made it, unfortunately it got changed again.

 My 2 cts:
 Use whatever you want, have your idea about it, but don't try to convince 
 others about what is right or wrong.

Same counts for every religion ;)

Greets,
 Jeroen



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Embedded Linux practicing

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Bernard Dugas
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:

 Bernard, this one looks really nice. If you've got the sponsoring, then I'm 
 in :)

I was answering to ideas question, no sponsoring question :-)

But anybody else interested in sponsoring ?

any ideas what else could be an interesting project?

Best regrads,
-- 
  __Bernard DUGAS _
|  IS Production s.a. Innovative Solutions Production |
|  Technoparc Pays de Gex [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  30 Rue Auguste Piccard   Mob.: +33 615 333 770 |
|  01630 St Genis Pouilly - FRANCE -Fax : +33 450 205 106 |
|_|
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Embedded Linux practicing

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Bernard Dugas
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:

 Bernard, this one looks really nice. If you've got the sponsoring, then I'm 
 in :)

I was answering to ideas question, no sponsoring question :-)

But anybody else interested in sponsoring ?

any ideas what else could be an interesting project?

Best regards,
-- 
  __Bernard DUGAS _
|  IS Production s.a. Innovative Solutions Production |
|  Technoparc Pays de Gex [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  30 Rue Auguste Piccard   Mob.: +33 615 333 770 |
|  01630 St Genis Pouilly - FRANCE -Fax : +33 450 205 106 |
|_|
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Jeroen Massar
Beat Rubischon wrote:
 Hello!
 
 Am 07.10.08 14:33 schrieb Jeroen Massar unter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
 Better then to pay the closed source folks and let them do it, as they
 will also maintain the changes for yo.
 
 Each day I work with Open Source and Closed Source tools and applications.
 Usually I see commercial software coming with a better usability and
 OpenSource with better stability and performance.

I think it all depends on where it comes from and how much the authors
of the tool love it and how much time they can spend on it.

 The major advantage for OpenSource is the visibility of the code - no code
 monkey is able to hide 20 years old buggy crap when he needs to provide the
 sources. Believe me, this is a great motivation for a lot of coders out
 there ;-)

Which is why for instance that great Open Source thing called Linux
contains so much junk I guess ;)

Yes, the visibility is there, but there are only few people who can
actually understands what it does. That nice Debian prng issue of late
comes to mind as an awesome example here, even though it was very
visible that it was changed, clearly nobody ever really checked upto
then, thus it went completely unnoticed.

 Even more, when you pay licenses host or by CPU, which means today
 _per_core_, why should a commercial software supplier optimize their
 binaries?

To be better, cheaper, faster etc than the competition?
Or to just make sure that there is no competition as they suck compared
to what you do. Some people pride their work ;)

 Even simple tasks like using a commercial compiler instead of gcc,
 which gives 10-100% additional performance, is often not done as the
 compiler costs $1000 extra - compare this with the several hundred thousends
 the scoftware company usually earns per year...

ICC++

But gcc is getting quite upto par actually as a certain company has
donated a lot of code to the compiler to beef it up quite a bit. I am
one of those 'commercial' folks who also does open source stuff, and for
a certain project has one single challenge: be better than everybody
else. That includes making it very scalable and very fast. If those
components where not in there, then what would be the fun.

Again, it all depends where you get your stuff from, and like mostly
everything you can vote by not using it.

Greets,
 Jeroen



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] IRC Server dead ?

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden roger
so .. we have to be carefull what we buy .. 
more difficult than buy something 1938 .. where you could be sued for 
buying electronic parts which could enable you to hear other Radio 
programms than göbbels-schnauze

never buy more than one cutter-knive at one time, or you could be a possi 
ble suspect for mass-murdering ...lol

Roger


 Stanislav Sinyagin schrieb:
  From: Martin Ebnoether [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 

  All that is needed to take Skype down is an automatic windows
  update of some thousand computers.
 
  Remember last summer?
  http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20070819
  
 
  hey Venty, long time no see :)
 
  if you remember, back in 2003-2004 there were viruses which knocked down 
  hundreds 
  of thousands of windows PCs. So what, we're still using that :)
 

 
 Well, you maybe - I don't ;-)
 But then, I also didn't use Windows in 2003, either...
 Nowadays, the viruses don't knock down the Windows-boxes, they just use
 them as Spam-Zombies or attack-drones or whatever the people that rent
 them want to use them for.
 
 
  If the tool serves my needs, I don't really care if it's open source - I'm 
  not 
  going to compile anything on my desktop anyway. And if it collects any 
  marketing 
  stats, so what, everyone is doing that, and we're helping them (Coop 
  Supercard
  for example).
 
 
 I don't have any of those, either.
 
 
   There's nothing bad about companies knowing better what I might 
  buy from them :-)

 
 I think you are oversimplifying and trivializing what these databases
 can be used for.
 Nowadays, these giant databases of consumer buying-behavior are probably
 also used to find potential terrorists.
 Who bought box-cutters and what did they buy with them?
 Who bought box-cutters only?
 Who bought the other items alone that the people buying box-cutters and
 other items bought?
 
 It's hilarious, but that's how some people actually believe the war
 against terror can be won.
 
 Also, I think you should do some reading regarding the Skype application.
 I think that if it wasn't for its widespread use, most AV-programs would
 consider it malware.
 The executable itself is packed and encrypted and actively tries to
 avoid debugging/reverse-engineering by in-memory debuggers.
 The communication itself is encrypted with an unknown encryption-method.
 And of course, yes, no source code is available (for the general public).
 
 I did sign up for an account and used it for a few times - but just
 because I didn't have time to setup my own Jabber server and experiment
 with iChat ;-)
 I've got a _very_ bad feeling using this app - it's just scary.
 
 
 
 Rainer
 
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions (was: Hot Red Flames (Was: IRC Server dead ?))

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Per Jessen
Tonnerre Lombard wrote:

 Salut, Per,
 
 On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:01:24 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
 fixing something yourself is also pretty much an illusion, except for
 those few people who are sufficiently involved.  When have you last
 _had_ to fix anything yourself in a stable release of any open source
 project?
 
 Being a member of the security scene, I write patches for Open Source
 software almost every day. And what about you?
 

I am 99% an open source _user_, and I have only written very few
patches.  Which proves my point, I think. 



/Per Jessen, Herrliberg

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Per Jessen
Silvan Gebhardt wrote:

 I guess it's not about Fixing but also expanding
 
 small example: I use a extension to my gnome panel called SSH Menu
 
 
 I can add hosts which it opens me a ssh session in a terminal just by
 clicking on the menu entry.
 
 now I wanted to expand that to include RDP Sessions - okay - took the
 code, and have it rewritten.
 so that IS actually an advantage! and I did not have to consult the
 developers at all, I just checked out the code

Sure, this is very possible with open source, and it's certainly one of
the advantages - nonetheless, most open source users still do not make
use of this possibility.  Which is why it is mostly an illusion.


/Per Jessen, Herrliberg

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] IRC Server dead ?

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden roger
back to the orginal topic, 
today the same again 

[Tue.06:07] -irc.subcult.ch- *** Checking Ident
-
[Tue.06:07] -irc.subcult.ch- *** Found your hostname

and thats it .. stays there .. after 4 minutes the client disc. and retry to 
connect. 


will be shure in 30 minutes everything will be fine again 

so i really would be happy when irc.swinog.ch is back on the net, there i 
never experienced that

Roger

Am 7 Oct 2008 um 1:27 hat Scott Weeks geschrieben:

 
 
 I can't resist.
 
 ...if it collects any marketing stats, so what, everyone is doing that...
 
 Only from the unknowledgeable that don't control Javascript (NoScript), flash 
 (etc.), cookies or 'stuff'.  Therefore, you have skewed stats.
 
 ...There's nothing bad about companies knowing better what I might buy from 
 them...
 
 Yes, there is.
 
 
 scott
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


[swinog] open source illusions (was: Hot Red Flames (Was: IRC Server dead ?))

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Per Jessen
Tonnerre Lombard wrote:

 I think that the advantage of Open Source does indeed lie in the fact
 that you have the ability to fix things yourself, 

Hi Tonnerre

fixing something yourself is also pretty much an illusion, except for
those few people who are sufficiently involved.  When have you last
_had_ to fix anything yourself in a stable release of any open source
project? 


/Per Jessen, Herrliberg ZH

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Embedded Linux practicing

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Steven.Glogger
go and contact Swisscom Innovations - they probably would try to sell this - as 
long as it's using the MOBILE network (wifi/umts) ,-)

-steven

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stanislav 
Sinyagin
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [swinog] Embedded Linux practicing

- Original Message 

 From: Bernard Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was answering
 to ideas question, no sponsoring question :-)

what you described is actually

a) quite expensive to build. I would estimate the development work as few 
hundred thousand euro, if not more -- if we're talking of a consumer-ready 
product, not just a bunch of sources everyone is free to compile at his own 
risk :)

b) is what the car manufacturers should sponsor, as it's them who is interested 
in selling more cars with luxury options like you've mentioned  :) 
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Hot Red Flames (Was: IRC Server dead ?)

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Attila Kinali
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:11:45 +0200
Tonnerre Lombard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:38:56 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
  The idea of open source is not so much that you get to check it
  yourself, but much more that it is open for hundreds of thousands of
  other people to check.  If for instance the quality/security of a
  piece of code is proportional to the number of times it's been
  reviewed, then yes, open source is quite possibly more secure. 
 
 You should read the more recent publications on the subject. The idea
 that this actually happens is a pure illusion.

Can you name some of these recent publications?
I'd be much interested to read them.


Attila Kinali
-- 
If you want to walk fast, walk alone.
If you want to walk far, walk together.
-- African proverb
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Silvan Gebhardt
I guess it's not about Fixing but also expanding

small example: I use a extension to my gnome panel called SSH Menu


I can add hosts which it opens me a ssh session in a terminal just by
clicking on the menu entry.

now I wanted to expand that to include RDP Sessions - okay - took the
code, and have it rewritten.
so that IS actually an advantage! and I did not have to consult the
developers at all, I just checked out the code


Per Jessen schrieb:
 Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
 
 I think that the advantage of Open Source does indeed lie in the fact
 that you have the ability to fix things yourself, 
 
 Hi Tonnerre
 
 fixing something yourself is also pretty much an illusion, except for
 those few people who are sufficiently involved.  When have you last
 _had_ to fix anything yourself in a stable release of any open source
 project? 
 
 
 /Per Jessen, Herrliberg ZH
 
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Jeroen Massar
Silvan Gebhardt wrote:
 I guess it's not about Fixing but also expanding
 
 small example: I use a extension to my gnome panel called SSH Menu
 
 
 I can add hosts which it opens me a ssh session in a terminal just by
 clicking on the menu entry.
 
 now I wanted to expand that to include RDP Sessions - okay - took the
 code, and have it rewritten.
 so that IS actually an advantage! and I did not have to consult the
 developers at all, I just checked out the code

And there is your illusion, as you will want to stay up-to-date, and as
such, you will have to get the new version (because it is cooler, or
actually because it contains so many security fixes because the code
quality is really really bad, which is the case in a lot of projects),
and then you find out that getting your cool little fix into their code
is most likely not going to happen, unless you can persuade them really
well or take a long time campaigning for it, and then they change the
API or complete structure of the code and you have to redo your change,
for small changes that might be fine, for larger ones, you are basically
peeped.

Better then to pay the closed source folks and let them do it, as they
will also maintain the changes for yo.

Greets,
 Jeroen



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Attila Kinali
Hoi Beat,

On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:07:45 +0200
Beat Rubischon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The major advantage for OpenSource is the visibility of the code - no code
 monkey is able to hide 20 years old buggy crap when he needs to provide the
 sources. Believe me, this is a great motivation for a lot of coders out
 there ;-)

I've never seen 20y old code in any OSS project (ok, i've never
bothered to look at such old projects), but i know more than one
project that contains crap code that is 10y old and nobody dares
to touch it, because nobody fully understands it. So that argument
is pretty much void ;-)
 
 Even more, when you pay licenses host or by CPU, which means today
 _per_core_, why should a commercial software supplier optimize their
 binaries? Even simple tasks like using a commercial compiler instead of gcc,
 which gives 10-100% additional performance, is often not done as the
 compiler costs $1000 extra - compare this with the several hundred thousends
 the scoftware company usually earns per year...

Anyone who has ever written more than a few lines of C code knows
that gcc is crap... unfortunately, it's the best compiler out there.
The comercial compilers usualy segfault at every second file of my
favorite compiler testbench, commonly known as  FFmpeg. Well, at least
Intel did a good job of fixing most of their bugs, but it took them years.
How long it will take sun to fix their compiler, which is even worse is
anyones guess.

And i'm not yet talking about compiler that emit incorrect code.

Attila Kinali
-- 
If you want to walk fast, walk alone.
If you want to walk far, walk together.
-- African proverb
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] IRC Server dead ?

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Martin Ebnoether
On the Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:26:37AM -0700, Stanislav Sinyagin blubbered:

Hoi Stan!

  All that is needed to take Skype down is an automatic windows
  update of some thousand computers.
  
  Remember last summer?
  http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20070819
 
 hey Venty, long time no see :)
 
 if you remember, back in 2003-2004 there were viruses which knocked down 
 hundreds 
 of thousands of windows PCs. So what, we're still using that :)

Well, I'm typing on a Mac at the office, using SSH to connect to
a NetBSD box at home. =:-) My last Windows installation is a
Windows 2000, which is slowly falling apart.

 If the tool serves my needs, I don't really care if it's open source - I'm 
 not 
 going to compile anything on my desktop anyway. And if it collects any 
 marketing 
 stats, so what, everyone is doing that, and we're helping them (Coop Supercard
 for example). There's nothing bad about companies knowing better what I might 
 buy from them :-)

Well, yes, if it serves the purpose, sure. Though if the
company/product has a bad reputation in terms of security and
spying on the user, I do think twice about using it. Skype is
one of these companies/products actually. As said before, I use
Skype at most with the PSPs built-in client which can do phone
calls and thats it. I'm not much online there though.

CU, Venty

-- 
What we're planning here is World Domination!

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Hot Red Flames (Was: IRC Server dead ?)

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Tonnerre Lombard
Salut, Marco,

On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:47:41 +0200, Marco Fretz wrote:
 I usually don't have a look at the code at all. But point is, it's
 code, tested and build by a community not a closed company with their
 own, secret business goals...! I don't want be a victim of global
 marketing data collection and stuff like that...

Maybe you noticed already, maybe not, but in reality, Open Source
communities tend to care a lot about marketing. This is why they try to
disguise security patches as performance enhancement - oh wait, that
was Apple.

But indeed such things happen, in large amounts, even in the Open
Source world.

Tonnerre


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions (was: Hot Red Flames (Was: IRC Server dead ?))

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Tonnerre Lombard
Salut, Per,

On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:01:24 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
 fixing something yourself is also pretty much an illusion, except for
 those few people who are sufficiently involved.  When have you last
 _had_ to fix anything yourself in a stable release of any open source
 project? 

Being a member of the security scene, I write patches for Open Source
software almost every day. And what about you?

Tonnerre


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Embedded Linux practicing

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Bernard Dugas
Hello,

Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
 any ideas what else could be an interesting project? Or probably you have a
 real project in mind?

What about :
- a device that would be installed in cars ,
- to build a mesh wifi 2.45GHz between cars,
- and a 5.4GHz to some external relays when available,
- to allow for transmission between cars of :
   . fast alarm (strong acceleration/deccelaration) ;
   . relative positionning ;
   . voip diffusion to close cars ;
   . engine technical parameters (for maintenance) ;
- and dynamic internet relaying to closer external relays ;
- available with open source (Linux+bsd).

?

Best regards,
-- 
  __Bernard DUGAS _
|  IS Production s.a. Innovative Solutions Production |
|  Technoparc Pays de Gex [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  30 Rue Auguste Piccard   Mob.: +33 615 333 770 |
|  01630 St Genis Pouilly - FRANCE -Fax : +33 450 205 106 |
|_|
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Tonnerre Lombard
Salut, king of the huns,

On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:40:13 +0200, Attila Kinali wrote:
 Anyone who has ever written more than a few lines of C code knows
 that gcc is crap... unfortunately, it's the best compiler out there.
 The comercial compilers usualy segfault at every second file of my
 favorite compiler testbench, commonly known as  FFmpeg. Well, at least
 Intel did a good job of fixing most of their bugs, but it took them
 years. How long it will take sun to fix their compiler, which is even
 worse is anyones guess.

WFM with SUNWcc on sol10u5.

Tonnerre


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] IRC Server dead ?

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Scott Weeks


I can't resist.

...if it collects any marketing stats, so what, everyone is doing that...

Only from the unknowledgeable that don't control Javascript (NoScript), flash 
(etc.), cookies or 'stuff'.  Therefore, you have skewed stats.

...There's nothing bad about companies knowing better what I might buy from 
them...

Yes, there is.


scott

































---
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Per Jessen
Marc Balmer wrote:

 actually indent(1), a program to indent and format C program source
 bears a copyright from 1976:
 
  * Copyright (c) 1976 Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois.
 
 32 years.  And still useful.  And this is the oldest copyright I could
 find in an operating system (OpenBSD) that still ships today.

You probably don't have the access anywhere, but try looking at IBMs TPF
and you'll find stuff dating back to the early sixties.  Surprisingly,
TPF has always been open source - for license holders. 


/Per Jessen, Herrliberg

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Embedded Linux practicing

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Marc SCHAEFER
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:50:34AM -0700, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
 My first mini-project is to build a small Wifi (or even Bluetooth?) 
 hotspot (only for home use, of course) which would take its Internet feed 
 from one of those mobile USB GPS modems that you get for few francs a month 
 from Swisscom or Sunrise. 

It is quite easy to do with the WL-500g WiFi access point, which has the
advantage of

   a) being compatible with standard systems (e.g. DD-WRT GNU/Linux)

   b) having an USB port you can plug the Swisscom Unlimited dongle
  inside (the one which pretends to be a CD-ROM, uh, a tty)

I think it costs about 120.-.  I have done it, and it works (routing the
Swisscom Unlimited net to the internal switch, not the WiFi, in my case)

PS: the discussion on OSS gets annoying. Use whatever tool you find
appropriate, as long as you can fix it when required.

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Embedded Linux practicing

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Stanislav Sinyagin
Marc, the goal is not to build it from commodity parts, 
but to learn how to build such systems in general :)
From scratch, starting with custom kernel build, then 
tailored busybox, then web management and stuff... 


that's what I call open source: working with the source :-)


- Original Message 
 From: Marc SCHAEFER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2008 6:56:06 PM
 Subject: Re: [swinog] Embedded Linux practicing
 
 On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:50:34AM -0700, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
  My first mini-project is to build a small Wifi (or even Bluetooth?) 
  hotspot (only for home use, of course) which would take its Internet feed 
  from one of those mobile USB GPS modems that you get for few francs a month 
  from Swisscom or Sunrise. 
 
 It is quite easy to do with the WL-500g WiFi access point, which has the
 advantage of
 
a) being compatible with standard systems (e.g. DD-WRT GNU/Linux)
 
b) having an USB port you can plug the Swisscom Unlimited dongle
   inside (the one which pretends to be a CD-ROM, uh, a tty)
 
 I think it costs about 120.-.  I have done it, and it works (routing the
 Swisscom Unlimited net to the internal switch, not the WiFi, in my case)
 
 PS: the discussion on OSS gets annoying. Use whatever tool you find
 appropriate, as long as you can fix it when required.
 
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Embedded Linux practicing

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Marc SCHAEFER
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:44:42AM -0700, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
 Marc, the goal is not to build it from commodity parts, 
 but to learn how to build such systems in general :)
 From scratch, starting with custom kernel build, then 
 tailored busybox, then web management and stuff... 

You are talking software here. So, do it yourself. Start by recompiling
DD-WRT and download the firmware, see if it works. Then you can do it
even more low-level. You can even choose how much low-level you want to
be, while still remaining software-oriented.

Another approach could be a hardware approach: taking an Ethernut
(http://www.ethernut.de/), add-on a USB child card, and develop the
drivers for the interface.

That will be very teachy!

 that's what I call open source: working with the source :-)

You are right.


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] IRC Server dead ?

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden roger
got to nazgul and it worked the first second, 
opened an second irc client tried subcult .. timeout 

Roger


Am 7 Oct 2008 um 12:59 hat Boris Meyer geschrieben:

 
 12:54 -!- Irssi: Connecting to irc.subcult.ch [213.180.174.250] port 6667
 12:54 -!- Irssi: Connection to irc.subcult.ch established
 12:54 !irc.subcult.ch *** Looking up your hostname...
 12:54 !irc.subcult.ch *** Checking Ident
 12:54 !irc.subcult.ch *** No Ident response
 12:54 !irc.subcult.ch *** Found your hostname
 12:54 -!- Welcome to the SubCultNET Internet Relay Chat Network boris
 
 etc etc...
 
 Don't see your problem. Maybe some client issues? Anyway, there are 4 
 possible servers, just check http://irc.subcult.ch
 
 Regards,
 Boris
  [Tue.06:07] -irc.subcult.ch- *** Checking Ident
  -
  [Tue.06:07] -irc.subcult.ch- *** Found your hostname
 
  and thats it .. stays there .. after 4 minutes the client disc. and retry 
  to 
  connect. 
 
 
  will be shure in 30 minutes everything will be fine again 
 
  so i really would be happy when irc.swinog.ch is back on the net, there i 
  never experienced that
 
  Roger
 
  Am 7 Oct 2008 um 1:27 hat Scott Weeks geschrieben:
 

  I can't resist.
 
  ...if it collects any marketing stats, so what, everyone is doing that...
 
  Only from the unknowledgeable that don't control Javascript (NoScript), 
  flash (etc.), cookies or 'stuff'.  Therefore, you have skewed stats.
 
  ...There's nothing bad about companies knowing better what I might buy 
  from them...
 
  Yes, there is.
 
 
  scott
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ---
  ___
  swinog mailing list
  swinog@lists.swinog.ch
  http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 
  
 
 
  ___
  swinog mailing list
  swinog@lists.swinog.ch
  http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 

 
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Hot Red Flames (Was: IRC Server dead ?)

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Ihsan Dogan
Am 7.10.2008 8:47 Uhr, Marco Fretz schrieb:

 That's not the point. Of course we don't check the whole source code. I
 usually don't have a look at the code at all. But point is, it's code,
 tested and build by a community not a closed company with their own,
 secret business goals...! I don't want be a victim of global marketing
 data collection and stuff like that...

One of the big reasons why people are buying commercial software
products is, that they can get support and SLA. Most of the open source
projects cannot provide that.

99% people don't check the code and don't write the patches. So, where
is the difference? There is none.
What really matters is, that the interfaces (file format, protocol,
hardware documention) are open an can be accesses by anyone.




Ihsan

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://blog.dogan.ch/
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] IRC Server dead ?

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Ihsan Dogan
Am 7.10.2008 9:32 Uhr, Marco Fretz schrieb:

 Skype is like MSN Messenger, just another ugly overloaded communication
 tool. if I have to choose between skype and MSN, it's MSN, because there
 are a lot of opensource and freeware alternatives to the bad Live
 Messenger from Microschrott, ah Microsoft... :-)

Well, it might be ugly, but at least it works in almost every situation.



Ihsan

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://blog.dogan.ch/
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


[swinog] Migros and coop privacy violence

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden roger

 On the Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:26:37AM -0700, Stanislav Sinyagin blubbered:
 
 Hi.
 
  going to compile anything on my desktop anyway. And if it collects any 
  marketing 
  stats, so what, everyone is doing that, and we're helping them (Coop 
  Supercard
  for example). There's nothing bad about companies knowing better what I 
  might 
  buy from them :-)
well would be not surprised when in a DB scan they recognizing you as 
single buying so much .. they think your making business with it, and 
noticing the tax department.

or like a neighbour .. he got sued to throw liter in ilegal bags .. because 
they 
verifyed the list of items he was buying .. found a receipt with his name .. 
and they got him .. but as the letter arrived he was just back from holiday, 
and all the items where still in his house 
but they didnt accept that 

 Well...
 Actually, the Supercard (and the Cumulus as well) are quite easy
 to exploit and throw a monkey wrench up Coops and Migros
 database.
 
 I have both cards but I share them with my parents. That is one
 thing, one can do, share the card.
 
 Then, I don't have the card with me all of the time. (In fact I
 do have them with me, but oh well...). In that case, if the
 grandma before or after me has a card, I just ask her if she
 wants my Cumulus points on her account. Sure they do, classical
 win-win situation. She is happy, Migros database is confused
 (what does the 90 year old lady buys beer, CD-Rs and condoms
 for?) and the clerk won't mind anyway. 
 
 This also works the other way. If someone at the checkout does
 not have a card, why not ask them, if you can have their points
 on your account? Just ask nicely, most people without a card
 won't mind. Another win-win situation here. 
 
 For your listening pleasure, download the Privacy song:
 http://three-dead-trolls-in-a-baggie-the-privac-mp3-download.kohit.net/_/61880
 
 CU, Venty
 
 -- 
 What we're planning here is World Domination!
 
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


[swinog] Migros and coop privacy violence

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden roger

 On the Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:26:37AM -0700, Stanislav Sinyagin blubbered:
 
 Hi.
 
  going to compile anything on my desktop anyway. And if it collects any 
  marketing 
  stats, so what, everyone is doing that, and we're helping them (Coop 
  Supercard
  for example). There's nothing bad about companies knowing better what I 
  might 
  buy from them :-)
well would be not surprised when in a DB scan they recognizing you as 
single buying so much .. they think your making business with it, and 
noticing the tax department.

or like a neighbour .. he got sued to throw liter in ilegal bags .. because 
they 
verifyed the list of items he was buying .. found a receipt with his name .. 
and they got him .. but as the letter arrived he was just back from holiday, 
and all the items where still in his house 
but they didnt accept that 

 Well...
 Actually, the Supercard (and the Cumulus as well) are quite easy
 to exploit and throw a monkey wrench up Coops and Migros
 database.
 
 I have both cards but I share them with my parents. That is one
 thing, one can do, share the card.
 
 Then, I don't have the card with me all of the time. (In fact I
 do have them with me, but oh well...). In that case, if the
 grandma before or after me has a card, I just ask her if she
 wants my Cumulus points on her account. Sure they do, classical
 win-win situation. She is happy, Migros database is confused
 (what does the 90 year old lady buys beer, CD-Rs and condoms
 for?) and the clerk won't mind anyway. 
 
 This also works the other way. If someone at the checkout does
 not have a card, why not ask them, if you can have their points
 on your account? Just ask nicely, most people without a card
 won't mind. Another win-win situation here. 
 
 For your listening pleasure, download the Privacy song:
 http://three-dead-trolls-in-a-baggie-the-privac-mp3-download.kohit.net/_/61880
 
 CU, Venty
 
 -- 
 What we're planning here is World Domination!
 
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 


--- Ende der weitergeleiteten Nachricht / End of forwarded message ---


WPM$3937.PM$
Description: Nachrichtentext
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


[swinog] open source patch to coop and migros

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Zorg 421
I'm very much involved in the scene of goumoens-la-ville (doing theatre) and
I must admit I don't write enough patches.The first real pride of mine in
this area was fixing, well, not really, almost beeing able to fix a bug
in... the linux kernel (waouw, tremendous!).
it was about a kernel lockup when booting on some hardware.
I've spent one night a one day investing, adding printk, recompiling,
rebooting, pressing the reset button.
it was in the keyboard driver (rocket science, the keyboard driver).
Almost came with a patch (after some guidance from some genuinely nice folks
on the LK mailing-list) to notice that
when connecting both the mouse and the keyboard, not just the keyboard, the
problem was solved (ohhh shit almost became famous).
I threw away my patch, plugged the mouse, swallowed my pride, and, well,
life is not too bad like this either.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Hot Red Flames (Was: IRC Server dead ?)

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Tonnerre Lombard
Hey, Ihsan,

On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:53:28 +0200, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
 One of the big reasons why people are buying commercial software
 products is, that they can get support and SLA. Most of the open
 source projects cannot provide that.

Not by themselves, but you can get that support through other means,
either from a distributor like Red Hat or Univention or from a
solutions provider like us.

Tonnerre


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] open source illusions (was: Hot Red Flames (Was: IRC Server dead ?))

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Peter Keel
* on the Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:01:24PM +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
 fixing something yourself is also pretty much an illusion, except for
 those few people who are sufficiently involved.  When have you last
 _had_ to fix anything yourself in a stable release of any open source
 project? 

We've found bugs in just about everything we use. FreeBSD kernel, libc,
apache-modules, pdns, nfs, and so on. And we fix them if we have the 
source. We're not involved in any of those projects. 

Cheers
Seegras
-- 
Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve 
neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
It's also true that those who would give up privacy for security are 
likely to end up with neither. -- Bruce Schneier
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Hot Red Flames (Was: IRC Server dead ?)

2008-10-07 Diskussionsfäden Peter Keel
* on the Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 06:50:54PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
  I've done too much cmputer security, and now I've got a
  déformation professionelle. I won't use closed software
  for anything crucial like communication;
 
 You don't use Cisco's or Junipers? How do you use the Internet actually?

It's a very different matter if a client is wired to use some specific 
server of some company to initiate communication, and uses a closed 
protocol too. For all I know this is like re-routing my communication
trough skypes servers so they can wiretap it.

Cheers
Seegras
-- 
Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve 
neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
It's also true that those who would give up privacy for security are 
likely to end up with neither. -- Bruce Schneier
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog