[swinog] SwiNOG-BE87 - Beer Event 87 - 12th of July 2010 @ Pumpstation / ZH

2010-06-24 Diskussionsfäden Steven Glogger

hi everybody


here's the announcement for the next beer event.
i hope weather will be good, if not we have to go to the outback lodge.

please check the WEBSITE until 12:00 on the event-day to be sure about 
the place.



the facts for the next event:
-
Date: 12th of July 2010

Time: starting around 18.30 o'clock

Location: @lake in restaurant "Pumpstation" (see image; 
www.pumpstation.ch)


backup location if bad weather: Outback Lodge.


Registration deadline: 10.07.2010 12:00:00


-

Please register here: http://swinog.mrmouse.ch/ since we have to make
reservations, i need to know who's coming and who not. If you cannot
attend and you're registered please inform me asap (+41 79 277 92 35).

-steven


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


[swinog] Huge delays in 1.4.e164.arpa NAPTR lookups?

2010-06-24 Diskussionsfäden Benoit Panizzon
Hi out there

The last few days I noticed quite a large delay when I first dial a number 
from my asterisk server.

I found that the problem is that the 1.4.e164.arpa lookup takes enormous time 
to return a NXDOMAIN

  == ast_get_enum(num='+41618269309', tech='sip', suffix='e164.arpa', 
options='', record=1
  == ast_get_enum() profiling: FAIL, 9.0.3.9.6.2.8.1.6.1.4.e164.arpa, 5148 ms

compared to the e164.org or e164.info lookups:

  == ast_get_enum(num='+41618269309', tech='sip', suffix='e164.org', 
options='', record=1
  == ast_get_enum() profiling: FAIL, 9.0.3.9.6.2.8.1.6.1.4.e164.org, 141 ms

  == ast_get_enum(num='+41618269309', tech='sip', suffix='e164.info', 
options='', record=1
  == ast_get_enum() profiling: FAIL, 9.0.3.9.6.2.8.1.6.1.4.e164.info, 167 ms

Of course, as soon as the NXDOMAIN is in the local DNS cache, dialing the same 
number is fast again.

Also the previously working ETHZ e164.arpa test-tone number cannot be resolved 
anymore:

  == ast_get_enum(num='+41446580004', tech='sip', suffix='e164.arpa', 
options='', record=1
  == ast_get_enum() profiling: FAIL, 4.0.0.0.8.5.6.4.4.1.4.e164.arpa, 5150 ms

Has switch ceased to offer e164.arpa entries? 1.4.e164.arpa does not seem to 
be delegated anymore:

; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R1 <<>> NS 1.4.e164.arpa.
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 49396
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;1.4.e164.arpa. IN  NS

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
e164.arpa.  10784   IN  SOA ns-pri.ripe.net. 
e164-contacts.ripe.net. 2010062458 14400 3600 2419200 14400

Deleagions found by dnsbajaj:
Subdomains: 0.1.8.7.8.e164.arpa , 0.2.4.e164.arpa , 0.3.e164.arpa , 
0.4.e164.arpa , 0.6.e164.arpa , 0.7.3.e164.arpa , 0.8.3.e164.arpa , 
0.9.2.e164.arpa , 0.9.5.e164.arpa , 1.2.4.e164.arpa , 1.3.e164.arpa , 
1.6.e164.arpa , 1.7.9.e164.arpa , 1.8.e164.arpa , 2.6.2.e164.arpa , 
2.6.9.e164.arpa , 2.6.e164.arpa , 2.8.e164.arpa , 3.2.4.e164.arpa , 
3.3.e164.arpa , 3.4.e164.arpa , 3.5.3.e164.arpa , 3.6.e164.arpa , 
4.3.2.8.8.e164.arpa , 4.4.e164.arpa , 4.5.3.e164.arpa , 4.7.3.e164.arpa , 
4.8.e164.arpa , 4.9.5.e164.arpa , 5.5.2.e164.arpa , 5.5.e164.arpa , 
5.6.e164.arpa , 6.3.e164.arpa , 6.4.2.e164.arpa , 6.4.e164.arpa , 
6.6.e164.arpa , 6.8.3.e164.arpa , 6.8.8.e164.arpa , 6.8.e164.arpa , 
6.9.5.e164.arpa , 7.4.2.e164.arpa , 7.4.e164.arpa , 8.0.5.e164.arpa , 
8.4.e164.arpa , 8.5.3.e164.arpa , 9.3.e164.arpa , 9.4.e164.arpa , 
9.5.3.e164.arpa

-BenoƮt-


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] IronPort E-Mail Reputation

2010-06-24 Diskussionsfäden Markus Wild
> 4) Loopback*
> 
> MSN/Hotmail
> http://postmaster.msn.com/Services.aspx#SenderSolutions

Has anyone managed to register their AS or simply some networks with
SNDS ? I keep getting the very helpful "We're sorry! An error has
occurred" error on the registration page, and requesting (repeated)
help from the contact email msn-s...@microsoft.com returns
zip/null/nada... It's like sending mail into a black hole...

Cheers,
Markus


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] IronPort E-Mail Reputation

2010-06-24 Diskussionsfäden Peter Keel
* on the Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 03:33:00PM +0200, Patrick Studer wrote:
> So, we tried to get some help from the cisco ironport support. There
> answer wasn't very helpful either. They told us, that senderbase.org
> is a complete other company and they don't have any contact and
> we should try their website www.senderbase.org. Otherwise, if we don't
> have a IronPort box, they will not help us.

Sounds much alike to Microsofts "Smartscreen" (which, of course, is
very stupid indeed, as everytime Microsoft calls something "smart"):
http://seegras.discordia.ch/Blog/abused-by-microsoft/

Most solutions were already mentionned, I consider the rotating of
IP-addresses (every time after you end up in blacklists AND you
have fixed the problem) the most useful one. If this is too much
a chore, you probably should ditch MDaemon for some other MTA which
hasn't any problems with hat, like Exim or Postfix...

Cheers
Seegras
-- 
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve 
neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
"It's also true that those who would give up privacy for security are 
likely to end up with neither." -- Bruce Schneier


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog