Re: [swinog] Swinog BE132 ZRH

2014-05-07 Thread Martin Ebnoether
On the Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:18:37PM -0700, Stanislav Sinyagin blubbered:

Hoi Stan.

> [yahoo mail composer sucks]

[Mutt via SSH FTW!]

> Debian Treff: I thought you just put the image onto a flash
> and boot from it, what else is there to discuss?

True, but before this can happen, someone has to develope it
first. And that can lead to long and extensive discussions which
is best done with a beer and some good food. =:o)

But of course also mere user (like me) are welcome to the Debian
Treff. Meetings are usually on the first tuesday in a month in
the Restaurant St. Gallerhof near Zuerich HB, Tramhaltestelle
"Sihlquai".

https://www.lugs.ch/lugs/termine/

CU, Venty

-- 
„Wollen Sie mir gütigst sagen,“ fragte Alice etwas furchtsam, 
denn sie wusste nicht recht, ob es sich für sie schicke zuerst
zu sprechen, „warum Ihre Katze so grinst?“ 
„Es ist eine Grinse-Katze,“ sagte die Herzogin, „darum!“  😻  


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


[swinog] nic.ch no NS

2014-05-07 Thread Daniel Rechsteiner

Hi everyone,

nic.ch seems to have dropped out from the .ch root servers:

dig @130.59.1.80 nic.ch ns

does not give me any nameservers. Also "whois nic.ch" does not show any 
name servers (although the domain still exists).


Daniel


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] nic.ch no NS

2014-05-07 Thread Daniel Stirnimann
nic.ch is in the ch zone itself. So it's not a zone of its own.

You will find it in whois so that people see that it's not available
anymore.

btw. SOA record reveals that:

dig nic.ch soa

; <<>> DiG 9.8.5-P1 <<>> nic.ch soa
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28601
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;nic.ch.IN  SOA

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
ch. 3582IN  SOA a.nic.ch. helpdesk.nic.ch. 
2014050715 900 600 1209600 3600


Daniel,
SWITCH


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] nic.ch no NS

2014-05-07 Thread swinog-list
On Wed, 07 May 2014 16:15:32 +0200
Daniel Stirnimann  wrote:

> nic.ch is in the ch zone itself. So it's not a zone of its own.

Hhmm... in times long gone, it was possible to register  MX
records for domains that were only used for mail directly in the CH tld.
This was later stopped, claiming the tld should exclusively be used for
domain delegations, not direct resource records. While I understand the
intention of putting nic.ch directly as a resource record into .ch,
isn't this a violation of that rule that was established then?

Cheers,
Markus


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] nic.ch no NS

2014-05-07 Thread Daniel Rechsteiner

nic.ch is in the ch zone itself. So it's not a zone of its own.

You will find it in whois so that people see that it's not available
anymore.
Thanks. I suspected something like that, so I compared this to other 
ccTLDs and it's different there, e.g. for nic.fr and denic.de you get NS 
records:


dig @ns1.denic.de denic.de ns
dig @ns1.nic.fr nic.fr ns

Why is this different for nic.ch?

Daniel


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] nic.ch no NS

2014-05-07 Thread gall
My colleague daniel has already gone home, so I'll chime in here as
the person who included nic.ch in the ch zone a few years back :)

On Wed, 07 May 2014 16:55:45 +0200, Daniel Rechsteiner  
said:

>> nic.ch is in the ch zone itself. So it's not a zone of its own.
>> 
>> You will find it in whois so that people see that it's not available
>> anymore.
> Thanks. I suspected something like that, so I compared this to other 
> ccTLDs and it's different there, e.g. for nic.fr and denic.de you get NS 
> records:

> dig @ns1.denic.de denic.de ns
> dig @ns1.nic.fr nic.fr ns

> Why is this different for nic.ch?

To avoid unnecessary redirection for the resolution of the ch name
servers, which are part of the nic.ch domain (a.nic.ch, b.nic.ch
etc). If nic.ch were a zone itself, we would need to make it as
available as the ch zone to avoid certain failure modes.  This would
suggest to host it on the same set of servers that ch lives on.
That's achieved automatically by making nic.ch part of the ch zone in
the first place.

The se TLD does the same thing with ns.se, btw.

-- 
Alex


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] nic.ch no NS

2014-05-07 Thread Daniel Rechsteiner

Interesting. I never noticed this.

Thanks for the explanation, always nice to learn something new.

Daniel


g...@switch.ch 
7. Mai 2014 17:42
My colleague daniel has already gone home, so I'll chime in here as
the person who included nic.ch in the ch zone a few years back :)

On Wed, 07 May 2014 16:55:45 +0200, Daniel Rechsteiner  
said:


nic.ch is in the ch zone itself. So it's not a zone of its own.

You will find it in whois so that people see that it's not available
anymore.

Thanks. I suspected something like that, so I compared this to other
ccTLDs and it's different there, e.g. for nic.fr and denic.de you get NS
records:



dig @ns1.denic.de denic.de ns
dig @ns1.nic.fr nic.fr ns



Why is this different for nic.ch?


To avoid unnecessary redirection for the resolution of the ch name
servers, which are part of the nic.ch domain (a.nic.ch, b.nic.ch
etc). If nic.ch were a zone itself, we would need to make it as
available as the ch zone to avoid certain failure modes.  This would
suggest to host it on the same set of servers that ch lives on.
That's achieved automatically by making nic.ch part of the ch zone in
the first place.

The se TLD does the same thing with ns.se, btw.

Daniel Rechsteiner 
7. Mai 2014 16:55
Thanks. I suspected something like that, so I compared this to other 
ccTLDs and it's different there, e.g. for nic.fr and denic.de you get 
NS records:


dig @ns1.denic.de denic.de ns
dig @ns1.nic.fr nic.fr ns

Why is this different for nic.ch?

Daniel


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] nic.ch no NS

2014-05-07 Thread gall
On Wed, 7 May 2014 16:44:44 +0200,  said:

> On Wed, 07 May 2014 16:15:32 +0200
> Daniel Stirnimann  wrote:

>> nic.ch is in the ch zone itself. So it's not a zone of its own.

> Hhmm... in times long gone, it was possible to register  MX
> records for domains that were only used for mail directly in the CH tld.
> This was later stopped, claiming the tld should exclusively be used for
> domain delegations, not direct resource records. While I understand the
> intention of putting nic.ch directly as a resource record into .ch,
> isn't this a violation of that rule that was established then?

I'm not going to comment this, but maybe the following anecdote will
make you feel better.  I originally wanted to use ns.ch for the ch
name servers.  This was turned down internally because it would
violate our "two-letter second level domain rule", which, I'm sure you
know, makes these domains unavailable for registration with the
exception of the "Kantonskürzel", which are assigned to the proper
authorities.

-- 
Alex


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] nic.ch no NS

2014-05-07 Thread Tonnerre LOMBARD
Salut,

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:54:07PM +0200, g...@switch.ch wrote:
> I'm not going to comment this, but maybe the following anecdote will
> make you feel better.  I originally wanted to use ns.ch for the ch
> name servers.  This was turned down internally because it would
> violate our "two-letter second level domain rule", which, I'm sure you
> know, makes these domains unavailable for registration with the
> exception of the "Kantonskürzel", which are assigned to the proper
> authorities.

So the domain ns.ch is kept available in case the cantons of northern
switzerland ever fusion into one big one. Very clever, reveals a lot of
foresight!

Tonnerre


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


[swinog] Area41

2014-05-07 Thread Adrian Leuenberger
Hi all,

After seeking permission from the Swinog Core Team I'd like to draw your
attention to the Area41 conference (http://area41.io).

The conference happens at the Komplex457 in Zurich on June 2nd/3rd 2014
and is organized by members of DEFCON Switzerland (DC4131, a local
Defcon chapter).

We have published this year's schedule recently. Check it out at
http://area41.io/agenda/ and if you like it, book your ticket.

Best regards and hope to see you at Area41,
Adrian

-- 
DEFCON Switzerland
adr...@defcon-switzerland.org
GPG: 0xE85F6BDB
http://www.defcon-switzerland.org
@defconch / @a41con


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog