Re: [swinog] Connectivity problems with .255 IP Adress
Hi Mike! On 31.03.11 09:44, Mike Kellenberger wrote: One of our customers got a .255 IPv4 address assigned by sunrise. he can't reach any of our Windows Server 2003 hosts Sounds familiar. I had this problem with Windows 9x last time and avoided the usage of .255 and .0 since those days. Windows 2008 has a lot of improvements in the IP stack, so I'm not surprised when it works now. Beat -- \|/ Beat Rubischon b...@0x1b.ch ( 0-0 ) http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/ oOO--(_)--OOo--- Meine Erlebnisse, Gedanken und Traeume: http://www.0x1b.ch/blog/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] IPV6 Go (lazy providers)
Hello! Quite interesting discussion you have! Am 26.02.09 11:17 schrieb Andy Davidson unter a...@nosignal.org: - There seems to be no consensus about how to serve end user addressing for ipv6 I see some open points which must be addressed in advance before IPv6 could be delivered to anyone - not only to geeks like me. Think about Cable. It's easy there - you have a modem with one or more Ethernet ports. Some RA announcements for the customers /64 and everyone is happy. Think about the advantage of two computers when using IPv4 and an infinite amount of computers when using IPv6 for only 29.95 per month. What a motivation for the customer to use it ;-) Of course all the Router / Blackbox Firewall users are lost. ADSL is a bit more problematic. Standard ppp handles just the link layer addresses. Who should get the /64? The ppp endpoint itself or the network behind? Apple for example goes the simple way and passes all the configuration to the user. ppp devices won't accept RA announcements. How does Windows behave? I don't now. Next point: DNS. DHCPv6 is IMHO only supported by some Linux distros. Apple once again uses the DNS configured by IPv4 DHCP or manually configured ones. Windows has some site wide addresses out of a deprecated space predefined (fec0:0:0:::1~3). The approach to pack DNS IPs into RA is yet too young and not standardized or even implemented. So we have still a lot of work in front of us. Even more work will come for small and medium business networks. Today there is a NAT gatway in front of the network and tunneling VPN for the remote workers or office interconnect. There is usually an internal DNS (Windows AD) carrying the local addresses. Everyone knows the basics and how to set up such environemnts. What about the future? Route IPv6 directly to the clients? What about remote workers? Delegate the reverse and forward lookup to the internal DNS? Of course all those questions are answered when you operate an open network. Like universities or ISPs usually do. Or when you run an independend company network only connected by proxies. But for other usage, like SOHO users, there are still open points. Beat -- \|/ Beat Rubischon b...@0x1b.ch ( 0^0 ) http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/ oOO--(_)--OOo--- Meine Erlebnisse, Gedanken und Traeume: http://www.0x1b.ch/blog/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] ADSL 2 Router wiht VLAN
Hello! Am 07.01.09 16:29 schrieb Marco Fretz unter mailingl...@blah.li: Xaver Aerni wrote: I'm looking for a ADSL 2 Router or a VDSL Router which has VLAN. It ist urgent, that it works fine. Cisco 1841 with HWIC for xDSL... or Cisco 800 series for ADSL At least the Cisco 83x line is not VLAN aware. Beat -- \|/ Beat Rubischon b...@0x1b.ch ( 0^0 ) http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/ oOO--(_)--OOo--- Meine Erlebnisse, Gedanken und Traeume: http://www.0x1b.ch/blog/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] open source illusions
Hello! Am 07.10.08 14:33 schrieb Jeroen Massar unter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Better then to pay the closed source folks and let them do it, as they will also maintain the changes for yo. Each day I work with Open Source and Closed Source tools and applications. Usually I see commercial software coming with a better usability and OpenSource with better stability and performance. The major advantage for OpenSource is the visibility of the code - no code monkey is able to hide 20 years old buggy crap when he needs to provide the sources. Believe me, this is a great motivation for a lot of coders out there ;-) Even more, when you pay licenses host or by CPU, which means today _per_core_, why should a commercial software supplier optimize their binaries? Even simple tasks like using a commercial compiler instead of gcc, which gives 10-100% additional performance, is often not done as the compiler costs $1000 extra - compare this with the several hundred thousends the scoftware company usually earns per year... Beat -- \|/ Beat Rubischon [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 0^0 ) http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/ oOO--(_)--OOo--- Meine Erlebnisse, Gedanken und Traeume: http://www.0x1b.ch/blog/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Skype
Hello! Am 17.8.2007 17:17 Uhr schrieb Xaver Aerni unter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I love the verry old Swisscom Relay Telefonzentale. (ratter... ratter... ratter...) This are working and working and working. Stop! Wait! Not so fast! My grandfather was working for the good old PTT and had a real Willy's Jeep. My mother often told me the story of cold winter nights where her father went out of the house to some PBX in the mountains and clean the relay contacts using some kind of sandpaper. Also the good old days had their problems :-) Beat -- \|/ Beat Rubischon [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 0^0 ) http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/ oOO--(_)--OOo--- Meine Erlebnisse, Gedanken und Traeume: http://www.0x1b.ch/blog/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: AW: [swinog] oe Switch.ch
Hello! Am 25.11.05 schrieb Xaver Aerni: Sitch accept the oe Symbol. What is with the American DNS Servers? I think many of the US DNS couldn't handle ä, ö ü and oe? To put umlouds in the DNS-Servers, you don't need any changes at the DNS protocoll or the servers itself. Everything is handled in the application like the browser. See [1] as an example. [1] http://übel.lugs.ch/ [2] http://xn--bel-goa.lugs.ch/ You will notice that a modern Mozilla / Firefox / Opera converts the entered umloud automatically to the punycode. You will also notice that IE is not able to handle this URL. I don't understand Switch, why the still try to earn money with such a useless thing... Gruss Beat -- \|/ Beat Rubischon [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 0^0 ) http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/ oOO--(_)--OOo--- Meine Erlebnisse, Gedanken und Traeume: http://www.0x1b.ch/blog/ ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] smokeping hosts in der schweiz.
Hello! Am 28.07.05 schrieb Robert Depenbrock: Was fuer hosts benutzt ihr um Latenzen innerhalb von der Schweiz zu messen? Also welche Hosts sind pingbar in welchen verschiedenen Netzen? I just use my own hosts - my private boxes and my business servers. I would never use someone else's bandwith regularly to plot some graphs without the knowledge of the owner. Beat -- \|/ Beat Rubischon [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 0^0 )http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/ oOO--(_)--OOo-- # wigwam.lugs.ch, Linux 2.4.31-pre2, up 76 days, 20:41, load: 0.25 ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] ADSL CHAP authentication
Hello! Am 17.07.05 schrieb Michel Renfer: Since the adsl outage last friday we have reports (from customers and internally), that CHAP authentication is not working anymore. No problems here. CHAP only, ISP Dolphins, Location Obstalden, GL, operated from Rapperswil. Beat -- \|/ Beat Rubischon [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 0^0 )http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/ oOO--(_)--OOo-- # wigwam.lugs.ch, Linux 2.4.31-pre2, up 64 days, 5:17, load: 0.73 ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] hotmail requires sender id
Hello! Am 28.06.05 schrieb Daniel Lorch: Do you have more information? This documents were very short and summarized Sender-ID very well: ... Thanks for the links. And here is the part which is incompatible with Classic SPF. The records are the same, but while Classic SPF ONLY used them to check the envelope from (Return-Path), Sender ID uses the SAME records to check for From. I see. Classic mailsetups as I use for my private emails will work. My SPF-record should be working for both aproaches. Complex mailsetups like the one from my employer ethz.ch will never ever be compatible with one or both solutions. A wildcard entry will be the solution if Hotmail will continue to follow Sender-Id... Beat -- \|/ Beat Rubischon [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 0^0 )http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/ oOO--(_)--OOo-- # wigwam.lugs.ch, Linux 2.4.31-pre2, up 46 days, 2:35, load: 0.66 ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] hotmail requires sender id
Hello! Am 26.06.05 schrieb Jeroen Massar: http://www.mail-spf.org/ Which has quite some up-to-date info. There is a lot of political and rare technical discussions on the net. I found a nice discussion while Googeling: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13622 I was not able to find a usable howto for understanding Sender-Id or creating a working environement. Usually, I don't need more then half a day to understand a new technology - but Sender-Id takes more time ;-) As long as no one has written a cookbook for implementing Sender-Id, only Hotmail users will be able to create Hotmail compliant mails. So: Who cares? Beat -- \|/ Beat Rubischon [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 0^0 )http://www.0x1b.ch/~beat/ oOO--(_)--OOo-- # wigwam.lugs.ch, Linux 2.4.31-pre2, up 43 days, 21:17, load: 2.68 ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
