David and I’ll look at this soon. We’ll try to figure out how this happened and
whether the problem is bigger than this.
— DM Smith
> On Apr 3, 2021, at 5:40 PM, David Haslam wrote:
>
>
> Hi Troy,
>
> I will discuss the reported issue with DM as and when I have enough free
> time.
>
> We should definitely not revert to 2.4 as that would simply undo all the good
> work from 2.5 through 2.9
>
> If there’s a mistake, we can include the corrections in version 2.10 which is
> still in preparation and has been for several years.
>
> I didn’t respond earlier simply because I’ve had other matters to attend to
> today.
>
> Happy Easter!
>
> David
>
> Sent from ProtonMail for iOS
>
>
>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 21:42, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>> A bit more investigation, this seems to be introduced between versions of
>> our KJV 2.4 and 2.5.
>>
>> 2.4 reads correctly. 2.5 has this problem. Unfortunately we have
>> uninformative information in our History .conf entries between these
>> versions.
>>
>> I am tempted to roll back this module to 2.4.
>>
>> Can anyone speak to the issue of how Strong's number values could possibly
>> change between version 2.4 and 2.5; and when we discover how this could
>> happen, what other problems this might have introduced in revision 2.5?
>>
>> Troy
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/3/21 7:58 AM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>>> This is a bit disturbing I just check our lastest KJV and TR modules (which
>>> was the base for the Strong's markup in the KJV). I can confirm that Romans
>>> 3:25 has Strong's 3688 whereas the TR does not.
>>>
>>> DM and David have been the primary curators of our KJV text. Any
>>> speculation on how an error like this could have entered the text and how
>>> that might be the cause of other corruptions?
>>>
>>> Troy
>>>
>>> On April 3, 2021 4:18:01 AM MST, vtamara wrote:
Sorry, I made mistake in my previos email, Romans 3:25 would show that
the word with Strong number 3688 is also τω. But according to
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G3688=KJV
the word with strong number 3688 is ὄνος (donkey).
https://biblehub.com/greek/3688.htm also shows that the word would be
ὄνος
Even KVJ module in verse John 12:15 shows that the word with Strong
number G3688 is ὄνος:
an
ass’s
(so as well as in Mat 21:2, Mat 21:5, Mat 21:6, Luk 13.15, Luk 14:5).
Anyway I think in Romans 3:25 and 3:26 the word τῷ should have Strong
number 3588.
I see similar problem with G3688 in the following verses of the KJV
module:
* Mat 26:11
* Mat 26:12
* Mat 26:45
* Mat 26:69
* Mat 27:46
* Mark 1:9
* Mark 5:30
* Mark 13:20
* Luke 2:38
* Luke 8.46
* Luke 14:21
* Luke 16:9
* II Corinthians 1:8
* II Corinthians 1:9
* II Corinthians 8:14
* Revelation of John 11:4
* Revelation of John 14:7
Blessings.
El 2021-04-03 06:34, vtamara escribió:
> Good morning in the Lord
>
>
> For the module KJV the markup of Romans 3:26 is:
>
> morph="robinson:T-DSM robinson:N-DSM" src="12 14">time
>
> that says that word number 12 in Greek is τω with Strong number 3688
>
> However Romans 3:25 shows that the word with Strong number 3688 is
> αιματι:
> morph="robinson:T-DSN robinson:N-DSN" src="10 12">blood
>
> And for example at
> https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G3588=KJV
> I read that the Strong number 3588 corresponds to ὁ that is
> interchangeable
> with τῷ.
>
> Then I think the Markup for the word number 12 of Romans 3:26 should
> stay as τῷ but with Strong number 3588.
>
> Blessings
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>
>>> ___
>>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
>>> http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
>
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
