[symfony-users] Re: getUriPrefix() not printing port...
Anyone? :| On May 17, 4:52 pm, Sumedh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi friends, I have this line... $this-urlBase = $this-getRequest()-getUriPrefix(); in the action class...but this method does not print the port...it prints the first part (http://dev.example.com) correctly...but not my port...i.e. 8088 Is it some known issues in getUriPrefix() method? - Thanks, Sumedhhttp://sumedhsays.wordpress.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] '%' character won't pass through Ajax 'observe_field' value parameter ...
Hi there !
I use this exact sample of code :
?php echo input_tag('rebate_' . $product_idname,
$product_array['rebate'], array( 'maxlength' = 5, 'size' = 6 )) ?
?php echo observe_field('rebate_' . $product_idname,
array(
'url' =
'orders/productRebate?id=' . $product_idname,
'loading' =
Element.show('loading_div');,
'before' = alert(value);,
'complete' =
Element.hide('loading_div'); .
remote_function(array(
'update' =
'cart_list_content',
'url' =
'orders/cartRefresh',
'loading' =
Element.show('loading_div');,
'complete' =
Element.hide('loading_div');,
'script' =
true)),
'method' = 'get',
'script' = true,
'with' = 'rebate=' + value))
?
The fact is that is use 'rebate' field to input percentages, like
'90%'.
My before trigger on observe_field correctly shows me '90%' (with
alert()), but the action is not triggered (I don't get anything on
productRebate action).
When I input floats (like 0.9) in my rebate field, everything is
working.
So I just believe the percent (%) character is the trouble.
How can I proceed to obtain my f*$ù!ng '90%' on my action ?
Thanks in advance.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Ajax request and cookie handling
Hi there !
I have a problem with my symfony application, and I haven't found any
solution on snippets or any other documentation.
I have a whole secured app (is_secure: on on app's scope
security.yml), except for login and logout actions.
I widely use Ajax requests to display forms on pop-up divs.
I also remember logged users with session persistence (through
cookie).
The fact is, when session expires, my request is naturally forwarded
(probably by sfSecurityFilter) to my login action.
But this one check for an existing cookie and re-log user if cookie
is authenticated.
This works perfectly on normal pages with standard request, but as
soon as a session expires, Ajax requests results are all the login
form ...
Here is the beginning of my login action :
if( $this-getRequest()-getMethod() != sfRequest::POST )
{
$cookie = $this-getRequest()-
getCookie(sfConfig::get('app_cookie_name'));
if( $cookie )
{
Right ...
Is this that Ajax requests doesn't have access to cookie with
getCookie ?
How could I proceed to make Ajax requests checking cookies if it's the
case ?
Thanks in advance.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: getUriPrefix() not printing port...
The sfWebRequest uses the method
/**
* Returns the array that contains all request information ($_SERVER
or $_ENV).
*
* This information is stored in the [sf_path_info_array] constant.
*
* @return array Path information
*/
protected function getPathInfoArray()
{
if (!$this-pathInfoArray)
{
// parse PATH_INFO
switch (sfConfig::get('sf_path_info_array'))
{
case 'SERVER':
$this-pathInfoArray = $_SERVER;
break;
case 'ENV':
default:
$this-pathInfoArray = $_ENV;
}
}
return $this-pathInfoArray;
}
to get the port information. So you have to check which
'sf_path_info_array' is used, and then check if the port value is set.
Thomas
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Sumedh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone? :|
On May 17, 4:52 pm, Sumedh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi friends,
I have this line...
$this-urlBase = $this-getRequest()-getUriPrefix();
in the action class...but this method does not print the port...it
prints the first part (http://dev.example.com) correctly...but not my
port...i.e. 8088
Is it some known issues in getUriPrefix() method?
- Thanks,
Sumedhhttp://sumedhsays.wordpress.com
--
Thomas Rabaix
Internet Consultant
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: sfGuardPlugin DB Layout Question
nobody using sfGuard for complex projects? Common :) I dont see a problem i using the profile_id to link it with site content, but it would need 2 joins then to get the username. eg: $article-getMemberProfile()-getsfGuardUser()-getUsername() That would result in more complex queries, which might be slower especially when there is a list to be displayed with many entries and usernames. Really wondering how people do it, if you use the sfguarduser table you have to get the sfguard schema.yml into your main schema and then you have the problems i described above. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: sfGuardPlugin DB Layout Question
Make the user_profile-sfGuardUser a 1:1 relationship, then you don't need to do a join - the profile ID will always be the same as the user id. Realistically, are users ever going to have more than 1 profile? On 19 May 2008, at 10:34, kayoone wrote: nobody using sfGuard for complex projects? Common :) I dont see a problem i using the profile_id to link it with site content, but it would need 2 joins then to get the username. eg: $article-getMemberProfile()-getsfGuardUser()-getUsername() That would result in more complex queries, which might be slower especially when there is a list to be displayed with many entries and usernames. Really wondering how people do it, if you use the sfguarduser table you have to get the sfguard schema.yml into your main schema and then you have the problems i described above. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] XML Schema and sfAlternativeSchemaPlugin?
Is anybody using XML schema with sfAlternativeSchemaPlugin? Or is it planned to support XML schema's soon? I can't use Propel validators at the same time as sfAlternativeSchemaPlugin at the moment... Ofcourse, adding Propel validators to the YML syntax would also solve this problem :) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: Breadcrumb best practice
How about Motilee, it also uses bread crumbs, via a slot. I can't seem to find any files in the Motilee download resembling the above, I was wondering if anyone knows off the top of their head how Motile implements their breadcrumbs? (Before I dig too much further...) Thank you --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: Breadcrumb best practice
Ah, I got it. The Motile breadcrumb is implemented via a helper in sfSimpleForumHelper.php M On May 19, 10:23 pm, markchicobaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about Motilee, it also uses bread crumbs, via a slot. I can't seem to find any files in the Motilee download resembling the above, I was wondering if anyone knows off the top of their head how Motile implements their breadcrumbs? (Before I dig too much further...) Thank you --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: sfGuardPlugin DB Layout Question
Yes, but with a 1:1 relationship they'll both be the same number. They should never be different unless you've manually altered your database. But you can use constraints to further enforce this :) On 19 May 2008, at 13:31, kayoone wrote: but propel objects need their own a primary key, otherwise they wont work. But i will try if that works, still the profile_id will be different from the user_id On 19 Mai, 12:21, Lee Bolding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Make the user_profile-sfGuardUser a 1:1 relationship, then you don't need to do a join - the profile ID will always be the same as the user id. Realistically, are users ever going to have more than 1 profile? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: sfGuardPlugin DB Layout Question
mmh...the thing is, i dont want to have the sfGuard schema in my main schema because of the problems described above, and the relation betweet sfguarduser and the profile table is just set via the config, there is no real relationship i guess. The getProfile() method of the sfGuardPlugin is looking for the profile table name in the config and fetching the profile via the foreign key field which is also defined in the config so there is no way for me to change that behavior without changing the plugin code. However i can just use the user_id Foreign key field to make relationships to site content since thats also a primary key and we have only one profile per user, but that wont solve the problem that i have to do extra joins to get the username, also $article-getSfGuardUser() wont work then either i think. I really wonder how other people do this. On 19 Mai, 16:30, Lee Bolding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, but with a 1:1 relationship they'll both be the same number. They should never be different unless you've manually altered your database. But you can use constraints to further enforce this :) On 19 May 2008, at 13:31, kayoone wrote: but propel objects need their own a primary key, otherwise they wont work. But i will try if that works, still the profile_id will be different from the user_id On 19 Mai, 12:21, Lee Bolding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Make the user_profile-sfGuardUser a 1:1 relationship, then you don't need to do a join - the profile ID will always be the same as the user id. Realistically, are users ever going to have more than 1 profile? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: sfGuardPlugin DB Layout Question
There's a MUCH simpler way - leave out the id column in sf_guard_user_profile, and use a user_id column (foreign key to sf_guard_user). Works for me :) I end up doing most of my stuff by working with user profiles, because that contains the data I need most often - firstname, lastname etc. Rarely do I actually need to modfiy the data in sf_guard_user table... so it doesn't make sense to be working with user objects directly. I'm not sure if that's the *correct* way of doing it, but it's efficient, and it works for me :) On 19 May 2008, at 16:08, kayoone wrote: mmh...the thing is, i dont want to have the sfGuard schema in my main schema because of the problems described above, and the relation betweet sfguarduser and the profile table is just set via the config, there is no real relationship i guess. The getProfile() method of the sfGuardPlugin is looking for the profile table name in the config and fetching the profile via the foreign key field which is also defined in the config so there is no way for me to change that behavior without changing the plugin code. However i can just use the user_id Foreign key field to make relationships to site content since thats also a primary key and we have only one profile per user, but that wont solve the problem that i have to do extra joins to get the username, also $article-getSfGuardUser() wont work then either i think. I really wonder how other people do this. On 19 Mai, 16:30, Lee Bolding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, but with a 1:1 relationship they'll both be the same number. They should never be different unless you've manually altered your database. But you can use constraints to further enforce this :) On 19 May 2008, at 13:31, kayoone wrote: but propel objects need their own a primary key, otherwise they wont work. But i will try if that works, still the profile_id will be different from the user_id On 19 Mai, 12:21, Lee Bolding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Make the user_profile-sfGuardUser a 1:1 relationship, then you don't need to do a join - the profile ID will always be the same as the user id. Realistically, are users ever going to have more than 1 profile? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Bug in the sfValidatorChoice
I think you have some bug in the sfValidatorChoice. The validation don't
passes, when the values and text of options are different.
The function doClean of sfValidatorChoice should be:
protected function doClean($value)
{
$choices = $this-getOption('choices');
if ($choices instanceof sfCallable)
{
$choices = $choices-call();
}
//fixed bug
$choices = array_keys($choices);
if (!in_array($value, $choices))
{
throw new sfValidatorError($this, 'invalid', array('value' =
$value));
}
return $value;
}
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Setting charset in symfony 1.1
Hi list, i have a DB with LATIN1(iso-8859-1) in production with other applications, so i can't change it to utf-8. I'm using symfony 1.1 to develop another app using same DB, i've configured these changes to charset: frontend/config/settings.yml all: .settings: charset:iso-8859-1 databases.yml all: -- John Arévalo GNU/Linux User #443701 http://counter.li.org/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: Setting charset in symfony 1.1
Hi list, i have a DB with LATIN1(iso-8859-1) in production with other applications, so i can't change it to utf-8. I'm using symfony 1.1 to develop another app using same DB, i've configured these changes to charset: frontend/config/settings.yml all: .settings: charset:iso-8859-1 databases.yml all: propel: param: encoding: iso-8859-1 all is working fine except by configure:author task, have é character, in file appears @author ArÃ(c)valo how can i configure this task to iso-8859-1? Thanks, PD: excuse me 2 post, sending premature -- John Arévalo GNU/Linux User #443701 http://counter.li.org/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Validation problems
Hi,
I'm trying to valídate the data inserted in a form. For that reason I created a
file called AdicionarLicencias.yml inside the /validate folder in my module.
This is the content of the file:
/valídate/AdicionarLicencias.yml
fillin:
enabled: true
fields:
nombre:
required:
msg: El campo Nombre no se puede dejar vacío
sfStringValidator:
min: 3
min_error: El campo Nombre no puede tener menos de 5 carácteres
max: 150
max_error: El campo Nombre no puede tener más de 150 carácteres
dvd:
required:
msg: El campo DVD no se puede dejar vacio
sfNumberValidator:
type: float
fecha_adq:
required:
msg: El campo Fecha de Adquisición no se puede dejar vacio
fecha_ven:
required:
msg: El campo Fecha de Vencimiento no se puede dejar vacio
sitio:
sfUrlValidator:
msg: Dirección no valida
Then in my class I have a method called AdicionarLicencias() with this code:
public function executeAdicionarLicencias()
{
if ($this-getRequest()-getMethod() != sfRequest::POST) {
// Some irrelevant operations, for this enviroment, to
retrieval data from DB
return sfView::SUCCESS;
} else {
// Insert the data and redirect to @listar_licencias
$this-redirect('@listar_licencias');
}
}
And I have also the function for handle the Error:
public function handleErrorAdicionarLicencias()
{
// Some irrelevant operations, for this enviroment, to retrieval data
from DB - This are the same as the AdicionarLicencias method before POST
return sfView::SUCCESS;
}
Al lis good now. If I send the form ,with caused errors, I mean fields empty or
others cases, to test if validation Works I get this error:
[sfRenderException]
The template /_MainMenu.php does not exist in:
stack trace
* at ()
in SF_SYMFONY_LIB_DIR/view/sfView.class.php line 463 ...
460. if (!is_readable($template))
461. {
462. // the template isn't readable
463. throw new sfRenderException(sprintf('The template %s
does not exist in: %s', $template, $this-directory));
464. }
465.
466. // check to see if this is a decorator template
¿Can any tell me or give me any idea why Symfony call __MainMenu.php partial
when this belong to another module and haven't any relationship with this one?
Cheers and thanks in advance
Ing. Reynier Pérez Mira
Grupo Soporte al Desarrollo - Dirección Técnica IP
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: sfGuardPlugin DB Layout Question
i think i tried that already and that didnt really work because as far as i know propel objects need their own primary key to work correct. But ill try that again... I also dont need the user table often, but when i need a nickname, i need a user table. Problem is i cant make a relationship between the profile table and eg the article table because symfony needs a auto increment primary key for make a FK relationship...so that cant work they way you said !? how to you connect the user table to a content table ? On 19 Mai, 17:48, Lee Bolding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's a MUCH simpler way - leave out the id column in sf_guard_user_profile, and use a user_id column (foreign key to sf_guard_user). Works for me :) I end up doing most of my stuff by working with user profiles, because that contains the data I need most often - firstname, lastname etc. Rarely do I actually need to modfiy the data in sf_guard_user table... so it doesn't make sense to be working with user objects directly. I'm not sure if that's the *correct* way of doing it, but it's efficient, and it works for me :) On 19 May 2008, at 16:08, kayoone wrote: mmh...the thing is, i dont want to have the sfGuard schema in my main schema because of the problems described above, and the relation betweet sfguarduser and the profile table is just set via the config, there is no real relationship i guess. The getProfile() method of the sfGuardPlugin is looking for the profile table name in the config and fetching the profile via the foreign key field which is also defined in the config so there is no way for me to change that behavior without changing the plugin code. However i can just use the user_id Foreign key field to make relationships to site content since thats also a primary key and we have only one profile per user, but that wont solve the problem that i have to do extra joins to get the username, also $article-getSfGuardUser() wont work then either i think. I really wonder how other people do this. On 19 Mai, 16:30, Lee Bolding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, but with a 1:1 relationship they'll both be the same number. They should never be different unless you've manually altered your database. But you can use constraints to further enforce this :) On 19 May 2008, at 13:31, kayoone wrote: but propel objects need their own a primary key, otherwise they wont work. But i will try if that works, still the profile_id will be different from the user_id On 19 Mai, 12:21, Lee Bolding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Make the user_profile-sfGuardUser a 1:1 relationship, then you don't need to do a join - the profile ID will always be the same as the user id. Realistically, are users ever going to have more than 1 profile? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: Breadcrumb best practice
Usually breadcrumbs refer to the full path and NOT the recent history Balaji On May 19, 2008, at 10:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may be wrong, but what I call breadcrumb is a list of the recently visited page by the visitor (like in wikis, or in sugarCRM). And what you call breadcrumb seems to be the full path where the user is currently in, what I call rootline. What are the official terms ? On 19 mai, 14:30, markchicobaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, I got it. The Motile breadcrumb is implemented via a helper in sfSimpleForumHelper.php M On May 19, 10:23 pm, markchicobaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about Motilee, it also uses bread crumbs, via a slot. I can't seem to find any files in the Motilee download resembling the above, I was wondering if anyone knows off the top of their head how Motile implements their breadcrumbs? (Before I dig too much further...) Thank you --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Javascript form validation built in?
I'm curious if there is a standard library or practice for form validation using JS just as there is for PHP. It is sort of baffling to me as to why symfony would omit something as useful as this. Seems silly that if symfony knows a form field is required, what kind of form element it is, what it's name/id is, and even what error message to display, that it can't plug these into some standard JS functions. In fact there's even a form_tag() that could be used to automatically stick in the proper onSubmit handler. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] How do I access a validate .yml setting in my template?
In my modules\user\validate\register.yml file I have: usernameSizeValidator: class: sfStringValidator param: min:4 min_error: Username must be 4 or more characters max:15 max_error: Username must be 15 or less characters How can I access the min and max values to display in my registerSuccess.php page? As in, No spaces minimum 4 characters, maximum 15 characters. Username will be shown publicly. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] Re: Referer null sometimes...
Anyone has any idea? would I have to maintain the value myself in session? :| On May 19, 11:51 am, Sumedh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah...I am not talking about putting it in browser... I am following a link...and getting it correctly sometimes...and null sometimes...in the same browser (Firefox)... On May 17, 5:51 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And it depends on browsers. Never rely on this value! If you need to be sure, track your urls in the users session. Michael On 17 Mai, 14:46, Tom Haskins-Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know you've probably thought of this, but the referer will be null if you enter the address in the browser's location bar rather than following a link. Sumedh wrote: Hi guys... Facing a weird problem... I am getting the request-getReferer() as null sometimes...there is no pattern in the behavior...happening randomly, as far as I saw today... Any known issues with it? -- Tom Haskins-Vaughan Temple Street Media: Design and Development for the Web [EMAIL PROTECTED] |www.templestreetmedia.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[symfony-users] fillin:true through code
Can we set fillin as true through code, if I don't want to use YAML file for validation? YAML file is creating a strange problem...when I use it, my form_remote_tag on the success page (after validation and form submission) doesn't work!!! the template just goes blank!!! Don't know what is the connection... So I am doing validation through code...but repopulating the form manually is very tedious... :| --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups symfony users group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
