[symfony-users] Re: sfDoctrineGuardPlugin: anything that advise against adding the profile fields in the sfGuardUser directly instead of define the model Profile?

2009-10-09 Thread tirengarfio

What do you mean with Doctrine simple inheritance??


On Oct 8, 9:50 pm, Tom Boutell t...@punkave.com wrote:
 You'd have to change the schema.yml of the plugin.

 But instead of doing that, you can use Doctrine simple inheritance
 to add the fields to that table.

 Simple inheritance is a lot less of a pain than using profiles and I
 recommend it. it's a shame that the sfDoctrineGuardPlugin manual
 doesn't steer users in that direction instead of just reiterating the
 Symfony 1.0/Propel style recommendation to use a separate profile
 table.

 On Oct 8, 9:32 am, tirengarfio tirengar...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi,

  I have read an article (link below) about adding profiles to the users
  that are generated after building the sfDoctrineGuardPlugin models
  that are defined in its schema.yml.

 http://www.symfony-project.org/blog/2008/11/12/call-the-expert-custom...

  It says that if you want to add a profile to the users you should add
  a new model in schema.yml called for example Profile and that must
  be related to sfGuardUser model.

  My question: Is there anything that advise against adding the profile
  fields in the sfGuardUser directly instead of define the model
  Profile?

  Ciao

  Javi
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[symfony-users] Re: sfDoctrineGuardPlugin: anything that advise against adding the profile fields in the sfGuardUser directly instead of define the model Profile?

2009-10-09 Thread Gábor Fási

http://www.doctrine-project.org/documentation/manual/1_1/en/inheritance#simple

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:04, tirengarfio tirengar...@gmail.com wrote:

 What do you mean with Doctrine simple inheritance??


 On Oct 8, 9:50 pm, Tom Boutell t...@punkave.com wrote:
 You'd have to change the schema.yml of the plugin.

 But instead of doing that, you can use Doctrine simple inheritance
 to add the fields to that table.

 Simple inheritance is a lot less of a pain than using profiles and I
 recommend it. it's a shame that the sfDoctrineGuardPlugin manual
 doesn't steer users in that direction instead of just reiterating the
 Symfony 1.0/Propel style recommendation to use a separate profile
 table.

 On Oct 8, 9:32 am, tirengarfio tirengar...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi,

  I have read an article (link below) about adding profiles to the users
  that are generated after building the sfDoctrineGuardPlugin models
  that are defined in its schema.yml.

 http://www.symfony-project.org/blog/2008/11/12/call-the-expert-custom...

  It says that if you want to add a profile to the users you should add
  a new model in schema.yml called for example Profile and that must
  be related to sfGuardUser model.

  My question: Is there anything that advise against adding the profile
  fields in the sfGuardUser directly instead of define the model
  Profile?

  Ciao

  Javi
 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[symfony-users] Re: sfDoctrineGuardPlugin: anything that advise against adding the profile fields in the sfGuardUser directly instead of define the model Profile?

2009-10-09 Thread tirengarfio

Thanks..

On Oct 9, 1:32 pm, Gábor Fási maerl...@gmail.com wrote:
 http://www.doctrine-project.org/documentation/manual/1_1/en/inheritan...

 On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:04, tirengarfio tirengar...@gmail.com wrote:

  What do you mean with Doctrine simple inheritance??

  On Oct 8, 9:50 pm, Tom Boutell t...@punkave.com wrote:
  You'd have to change the schema.yml of the plugin.

  But instead of doing that, you can use Doctrine simple inheritance
  to add the fields to that table.

  Simple inheritance is a lot less of a pain than using profiles and I
  recommend it. it's a shame that the sfDoctrineGuardPlugin manual
  doesn't steer users in that direction instead of just reiterating the
  Symfony 1.0/Propel style recommendation to use a separate profile
  table.

  On Oct 8, 9:32 am, tirengarfio tirengar...@gmail.com wrote:

   Hi,

   I have read an article (link below) about adding profiles to the users
   that are generated after building the sfDoctrineGuardPlugin models
   that are defined in its schema.yml.

  http://www.symfony-project.org/blog/2008/11/12/call-the-expert-custom...

   It says that if you want to add a profile to the users you should add
   a new model in schema.yml called for example Profile and that must
   be related to sfGuardUser model.

   My question: Is there anything that advise against adding the profile
   fields in the sfGuardUser directly instead of define the model
   Profile?

   Ciao

   Javi
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[symfony-users] Re: sfDoctrineGuardPlugin: anything that advise against adding the profile fields in the sfGuardUser directly instead of define the model Profile?

2009-10-08 Thread Tom Boutell

You'd have to change the schema.yml of the plugin.

But instead of doing that, you can use Doctrine simple inheritance
to add the fields to that table.

Simple inheritance is a lot less of a pain than using profiles and I
recommend it. it's a shame that the sfDoctrineGuardPlugin manual
doesn't steer users in that direction instead of just reiterating the
Symfony 1.0/Propel style recommendation to use a separate profile
table.

On Oct 8, 9:32 am, tirengarfio tirengar...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I have read an article (link below) about adding profiles to the users
 that are generated after building the sfDoctrineGuardPlugin models
 that are defined in its schema.yml.

 http://www.symfony-project.org/blog/2008/11/12/call-the-expert-custom...

 It says that if you want to add a profile to the users you should add
 a new model in schema.yml called for example Profile and that must
 be related to sfGuardUser model.

 My question: Is there anything that advise against adding the profile
 fields in the sfGuardUser directly instead of define the model
 Profile?

 Ciao

 Javi
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[symfony-users] Re: sfDoctrineGuardPlugin: anything that advise against adding the profile fields in the sfGuardUser directly instead of define the model Profile?

2009-10-08 Thread Jake Barnes

I'm curious what you regard as the advantage? Avoiding certain JOINs?

On Oct 8, 9:32 am, tirengarfio tirengar...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I have read an article (link below) about adding profiles to the users
 that are generated after building the sfDoctrineGuardPlugin models
 that are defined in its schema.yml.

 http://www.symfony-project.org/blog/2008/11/12/call-the-expert-custom...

 It says that if you want to add a profile to the users you should add
 a new model in schema.yml called for example Profile and that must
 be related to sfGuardUser model.

 My question: Is there anything that advise against adding the profile
 fields in the sfGuardUser directly instead of define the model
 Profile?

 Ciao

 Javi
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
symfony users group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---