Re: [systemd-devel] remote-fs dependency/ordering on network
Jan Synacek píše v Út 23. 06. 2015 v 15:39 +0200: Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes: On Mon, 22.06.15 14:49, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote: Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com writes: Jan Synáček píše v Čt 18. 06. 2015 v 15:41 +0200: Is remote-fs.target somehow dependent/ordered on network.target or network-online.target? I can't find anything that would suggest it actually is. Cheers, If I am not mistaken remote-fs.target should be after all netdev mounts and netdev mounts should be after network-online.target. I'm sure it should, but I don't see any evidence that it really is. My mnt-nfs.mount that was generated by the fstab generator is ordered before remote-fs.target, which is correct. However, I can't find any dependency between remote-fs.target, and network*. I'm quite puzzled how NFS mounts mounted on boot can actually work correctly right now. There's also remote-fs-pre.target. That's ordered before all NFS mounts, and that's what the online stuff should be ordered before. All seems to be in order when the system is booting up. However, during shutdown, the order in which network* and remote* are taken down seems to be incorrect. If you could take a look at [1], that would help a bit, since I'm really clueless right now. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214466 Cheers, There is something messed up on that system. Jun 23 07:30:56 acer.greshko.com systemd[1523]: Fixing conflicting jobs -.slice/start,-.slice/stop by deleting job -.slice/stop Jun 23 07:30:56 acer.greshko.com systemd[1523]: Fixing conflicting jobs shutdown.target/stop,shutdown.target/start by deleting job shutdown.target/stop Jun 23 07:30:56 acer.greshko.com systemd[1523]: Deleting job -.slice/start as dependency of job shutdown.target/stop Jun 23 07:30:56 acer.greshko.com systemd[1546]: Fixing conflicting jobs shutdown.target/stop,shutdown.target/start by deleting job shutdown.target/stop ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] remote-fs dependency/ordering on network
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes: On Mon, 22.06.15 14:49, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote: Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com writes: Jan Synáček píše v Čt 18. 06. 2015 v 15:41 +0200: Is remote-fs.target somehow dependent/ordered on network.target or network-online.target? I can't find anything that would suggest it actually is. Cheers, If I am not mistaken remote-fs.target should be after all netdev mounts and netdev mounts should be after network-online.target. I'm sure it should, but I don't see any evidence that it really is. My mnt-nfs.mount that was generated by the fstab generator is ordered before remote-fs.target, which is correct. However, I can't find any dependency between remote-fs.target, and network*. I'm quite puzzled how NFS mounts mounted on boot can actually work correctly right now. There's also remote-fs-pre.target. That's ordered before all NFS mounts, and that's what the online stuff should be ordered before. All seems to be in order when the system is booting up. However, during shutdown, the order in which network* and remote* are taken down seems to be incorrect. If you could take a look at [1], that would help a bit, since I'm really clueless right now. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214466 Cheers, -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] remote-fs dependency/ordering on network
On Mon, 22.06.15 14:49, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote: Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com writes: Jan Synáček píše v Čt 18. 06. 2015 v 15:41 +0200: Is remote-fs.target somehow dependent/ordered on network.target or network-online.target? I can't find anything that would suggest it actually is. Cheers, If I am not mistaken remote-fs.target should be after all netdev mounts and netdev mounts should be after network-online.target. I'm sure it should, but I don't see any evidence that it really is. My mnt-nfs.mount that was generated by the fstab generator is ordered before remote-fs.target, which is correct. However, I can't find any dependency between remote-fs.target, and network*. I'm quite puzzled how NFS mounts mounted on boot can actually work correctly right now. There's also remote-fs-pre.target. That's ordered before all NFS mounts, and that's what the online stuff should be ordered before. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] remote-fs dependency/ordering on network
Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com writes: Jan Synáček píše v Čt 18. 06. 2015 v 15:41 +0200: Is remote-fs.target somehow dependent/ordered on network.target or network-online.target? I can't find anything that would suggest it actually is. Cheers, If I am not mistaken remote-fs.target should be after all netdev mounts and netdev mounts should be after network-online.target. I'm sure it should, but I don't see any evidence that it really is. My mnt-nfs.mount that was generated by the fstab generator is ordered before remote-fs.target, which is correct. However, I can't find any dependency between remote-fs.target, and network*. I'm quite puzzled how NFS mounts mounted on boot can actually work correctly right now. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
[systemd-devel] remote-fs dependency/ordering on network
Is remote-fs.target somehow dependent/ordered on network.target or network-online.target? I can't find anything that would suggest it actually is. Cheers, -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] remote-fs dependency/ordering on network
Jan Synáček píše v Čt 18. 06. 2015 v 15:41 +0200: Is remote-fs.target somehow dependent/ordered on network.target or network-online.target? I can't find anything that would suggest it actually is. Cheers, If I am not mistaken remote-fs.target should be after all netdev mounts and netdev mounts should be after network-online.target. Lukas ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] remote-fs dependency/ordering on network
On Thu, 18.06.15 15:46, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote: Jan Synáček píše v Čt 18. 06. 2015 v 15:41 +0200: Is remote-fs.target somehow dependent/ordered on network.target or network-online.target? I can't find anything that would suggest it actually is. Cheers, If I am not mistaken remote-fs.target should be after all netdev mounts and netdev mounts should be after network-online.target. yeah, pretty much. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
