[Tagging] Waterway length

2019-01-29 Thread Eugene Podshivalov
Hi all,
The relation:waterway wiki page
 recommends using
"distance" tag for "the total length of river in km". Was there any
discussion of this choice?
It seems a bit incorrect and confusing, because "distance" is more suitable
for routes as discribed on its proper page
. The existing "length"
tag would fit better, woudn't it?

Cheers,
Eugene
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch

2019-01-29 Thread marc marc
Le 29.01.19 à 16:13, Eugene Podshivalov a écrit :
> How to we proceed with this topic? Should a proposal be created or the 
> wiki pages can be updated straight away by someone or myself based on 
> this discussion?

maybe it's a good idea to write a small-summary-only post
to check if there is a consensus on this, because there are probably 
many participants who have dropped out given the number of emails that 
the subject has generated
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch

2019-01-29 Thread Eugene Podshivalov
How to we proceed with this topic? Should a proposal be created or the wiki
pages can be updated straight away by someone or myself based on this
discussion?

Cheers,
Eugene

вс, 27 янв. 2019 г. в 17:22, Paul Allen :

> On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 10:37, Eugene Podshivalov 
> wrote:
>
>> When drain and ditch were originally introduced, was it supposed to
>> differentiate them in size?
>> If you read the current definitions closely you can notice the following:
>>
> [...]
>
> My guess is that this is a practical matter rather than a definitional
> one.  If you need
> a large channel with a lot of water flow (even intermittently) then you're
> probably
> going to line it with concrete.  And if it's a narrow channel with lower
> water flow
> you're probably not going to bother with the concrete.  Particularly if
> it's for drainage
> where you want the groundwater to seep into the channel.
>
> Maybe reword the descrtiptions:  "Typically unlined, smaller" and
> "typically lined, larger."
>
> --
> Paul
>
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Top up v4

2019-01-29 Thread Daniele Santini
The first voting for the Top up  proposal was rejected. I have changed the
proposal removing the most disliked parts and started a new voting:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Top_up
Kind regards
-- 
Daniele Santini
http://www.dsantini.it
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging