RE: perplexing outlook attachment, Window-Eyes Knowledge Base Article
Rebecca: Thanks for your reply. I will look into this. Since you saw Rod's reply, I will paste below what I replied back to him. Regards: Ted Larson Rod: I started doing what you suggested. First, within the body of the email that was sent to me with the attachment that I wanted to read, I did control-alt-A. When nothing happened, I got out of the body and just highlighted the message in question. Then I did control-alt-A to see if this would make a difference. This time, the search query came up. Tabbing or down arrowing, I passed by the following: submit search, current mailbox, the email item I just had highlighted, all, and then an unread button. Anyway, thanks for your attempt to help. Regards: Ted Larson -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+ted.larson=yahoo@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Rebecca Lineberger via Talk Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 3:55 PM To: Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: perplexing outlook attachment, Window-Eyes Knowledge Base Article In addition to Rod's suggestion, here's an article written by Jeremy Curry several years ago. I assume it applies to later versions of Microsoft Office as well. Rebecca Here's the link, with the text below. http://www.gwmicro.com/Support/Knowledge_Base/?kbnumber=GWKB2049 GWKB2049 - Exit Protected View In Microsoft Office Author: Jeremy Curry Date Added : 12/02/2013 Last Modified : 12/02/2013 When a document is in Protected View, you will not be able to read or edit the document. When this happens, you will hear "Protected View" announced after the file name. Documents will open in Protected View if Office 2010 or 2013 determine that the file originated from the internet or a potentially unsafe location (such as a shared folder on your local network or an email attachment). To exit Protected View, perform the following steps: 1.Press F6 2.Tab to the Enable Editing button 3.Press Enter If you find that the above steps are not working for you, there is an alternate way to exit Protected View. To use this method, perform the following steps: 1.Press Alt 2.Press F to open the File button 3.Press I to focus the Info tab 4.Press E to activate the Enable Editing button You will then exit Protected View and you can begin working with the document. For a video tutorial on how to turn off Protected View, please visit http://www.gwmicro.com/Training/Tutorials/ Permanently Disable Protected View It is possible to completely turn off Protected View, so that you do not need to turn it off on a per document basis. To permanently disable Protected View, perform the following steps: 1.Press Alt-F to open the File button 2.Press T to open Options 3.Down Arrow to Trust Center 4.Press Alt-T to activate the Trust Center Settings button 5.Down Arrow to Protected View 6.Tab to the Enable Protected View for files originating from the Internet check box 7.Press Space to uncheck the box 8.Tab to the Enable Protected View for files located in potentially unsafe locations check box 9.Press Space to uncheck the box 10.Tab to the Enable Protected View for Outlook attachments check box 11.Press Space to uncheck the box 12.Tab to the OK button 13.Press Enter and the Trust Center dialog will close 14.Tab to the OK button 15.Press Enter and the Word Options dialog will close -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+drlineberger=embarqmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Rod Hutton via Talk Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2017 3:34 PM To: Ted Larson; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: perplexing outlook attachment Hi Ted, Rather than Alt-7, Control-Alt-A brings up a dialog for saving attachments. Protected view denotes a document originating on the web. You can designate it as unprotected by viewing its properties in the folder where you saved it. Within the properties dialog, find a control named unblock, activate this, and then tab to Ok to save the setting. Hth, Rod -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+rod_hutton=hotmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Ted Larson via Talk Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 12:10 PM To: t...@window-eyes.com Subject: perplexing outlook attachment Dear List: I am using Microsoft office outlook 2016 on my windows ten computer. I received an email saying it had an attachment. When I hit the alt-7 it said attachment not found. In the process of forwarding it to my wife to see if the attachment would show up on her computer, I did the control-F to set up forwarding and as I tabbed past t
perplexing outlook attachment, Window-Eyes Knowledge Base Article
In addition to Rod's suggestion, here's an article written by Jeremy Curry several years ago. I assume it applies to later versions of Microsoft Office as well. Rebecca Here's the link, with the text below. http://www.gwmicro.com/Support/Knowledge_Base/?kbnumber=GWKB2049 GWKB2049 - Exit Protected View In Microsoft Office Author: Jeremy Curry Date Added : 12/02/2013 Last Modified : 12/02/2013 When a document is in Protected View, you will not be able to read or edit the document. When this happens, you will hear "Protected View" announced after the file name. Documents will open in Protected View if Office 2010 or 2013 determine that the file originated from the internet or a potentially unsafe location (such as a shared folder on your local network or an email attachment). To exit Protected View, perform the following steps: 1.Press F6 2.Tab to the Enable Editing button 3.Press Enter If you find that the above steps are not working for you, there is an alternate way to exit Protected View. To use this method, perform the following steps: 1.Press Alt 2.Press F to open the File button 3.Press I to focus the Info tab 4.Press E to activate the Enable Editing button You will then exit Protected View and you can begin working with the document. For a video tutorial on how to turn off Protected View, please visit http://www.gwmicro.com/Training/Tutorials/ . Permanently Disable Protected View It is possible to completely turn off Protected View, so that you do not need to turn it off on a per document basis. To permanently disable Protected View, perform the following steps: 1.Press Alt-F to open the File button 2.Press T to open Options 3.Down Arrow to Trust Center 4.Press Alt-T to activate the Trust Center Settings button 5.Down Arrow to Protected View 6.Tab to the Enable Protected View for files originating from the Internet check box 7.Press Space to uncheck the box 8.Tab to the Enable Protected View for files located in potentially unsafe locations check box 9.Press Space to uncheck the box 10.Tab to the Enable Protected View for Outlook attachments check box 11.Press Space to uncheck the box 12.Tab to the OK button 13.Press Enter and the Trust Center dialog will close 14.Tab to the OK button 15.Press Enter and the Word Options dialog will close -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+drlineberger=embarqmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Rod Hutton via Talk Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2017 3:34 PM To: Ted Larson; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: perplexing outlook attachment Hi Ted, Rather than Alt-7, Control-Alt-A brings up a dialog for saving attachments. Protected view denotes a document originating on the web. You can designate it as unprotected by viewing its properties in the folder where you saved it. Within the properties dialog, find a control named unblock, activate this, and then tab to Ok to save the setting. Hth, Rod -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+rod_hutton=hotmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Ted Larson via Talk Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 12:10 PM To: t...@window-eyes.com Subject: perplexing outlook attachment Dear List: I am using Microsoft office outlook 2016 on my windows ten computer. I received an email saying it had an attachment. When I hit the alt-7 it said attachment not found. In the process of forwarding it to my wife to see if the attachment would show up on her computer, I did the control-F to set up forwarding and as I tabbed past the subject, it listwed the attachment and it said to use alt-down arrow to open the options menu selected button. By doing that, I got into the context menu and I arrowed down to open and then I hit enter there. It opened the document saying it was in protected view. I was able to read the document with no trouble. My question is, why did my initial alt-7 say there were no attachments and what do I need to know about protected view? Thanks for any clarification. Regards: Ted Larson ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/rod_hutton%40h otmail.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ An
RE: perplexing outlook attachment
Hi Ted, Rather than Alt-7, Control-Alt-A brings up a dialog for saving attachments. Protected view denotes a document originating on the web. You can designate it as unprotected by viewing its properties in the folder where you saved it. Within the properties dialog, find a control named unblock, activate this, and then tab to Ok to save the setting. Hth, Rod -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+rod_hutton=hotmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Ted Larson via Talk Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 12:10 PM To: t...@window-eyes.com Subject: perplexing outlook attachment Dear List: I am using Microsoft office outlook 2016 on my windows ten computer. I received an email saying it had an attachment. When I hit the alt-7 it said attachment not found. In the process of forwarding it to my wife to see if the attachment would show up on her computer, I did the control-F to set up forwarding and as I tabbed past the subject, it listwed the attachment and it said to use alt-down arrow to open the options menu selected button. By doing that, I got into the context menu and I arrowed down to open and then I hit enter there. It opened the document saying it was in protected view. I was able to read the document with no trouble. My question is, why did my initial alt-7 say there were no attachments and what do I need to know about protected view? Thanks for any clarification. Regards: Ted Larson ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/rod_hutton%40hotmail.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
RE: WinEyes and licensing
David, I was merely commenting on the history of how Window-Eyes was distributed a number of years ago. I cannot make any comment at all regarding how Window-Eyes is currently being distributed. I was responding to the subject line of the e-mail. Regards, John Tel: +44 (0) 1442 259243 Mob: +44 (0) 7815 056076 -Original Message- From: David [mailto:trailerda...@hotmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2017 5:32 PM To: john_far...@btinternet.com; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'; 'Loy'; 'Pamela Dominguez' Subject: Re: WinEyes and licensing Apparently, GW and their licensing deals quite differently from one place to the other. Locally, Yes we can install WE in a locale version, on how many computers we want. But should I decide to go for an English version, I am under restrictions of something like three or five computers. Believe me, I have discussed this with the local dealer, and even took the whole issue directly to Doug, questioning why you in the UK can run unlimited installations of the English version, and in one of your neighboring countries, we are all the sudden restricted on the very same version. And, yes we too are well aware of all what a Copyright means. I am not going to argue their rights to restrict. I just wonder why they restrict the paid version, whereas I am free to download as many copies of the screen reader I ever desire, in ANY of the supported languages, if I go for the free version. If I, in my local area want to BUY an English version, I am under restrictions. Do I want the very same English, fully working version, and I download the FREE version, hey now I have no further restrictions from the manufacturer. That is where my logic ends. Go ahead, restrict the users, but do so all over the board. And at least, if you want to restrict, why only restrict the paid version, leaving the free version unrestricted? Doesn't that encourage the user to go for the free version? And all you said about copyright, does make sense. Except from the fact that people in all coutries, can get the unrestricted versions for free, only if you pay, you likely will be messing with the Copyright, so let's have you restricted. Smile. I just don't get the logic in that. OK then, it is not of the biggest issues either, only I wonder if that will encourage people in such areas to keep paying. And that was my real initial point, that we might see less people paying, and eventually that might lead to the fall of the development's priority, on behalf of the screen reader. The best thing, like I stated, would have been if they simply made one big and multi-lingual version, leaving the users the chance of deciding which installation or functionality will be most suitable for her at any time. First they have given all language-specific versions away for free the last few years, I am not sure wherein the show-stopper would be, in making it all combined into one and same license. After all, many other pieces of software are released in multi-lingual versions. And even when tied to one language, your license would typically be equal, no matter which language you decide to run. Should I - for instance - want to run Windows itself in German, even if I was located in the North-Americas, I would be entitled the exact same rights and restrictions as if I was running an English version. Microsoft - to all my knowledge - does not give me one set of rules for a Spanish version of Windows, and if I happen to live outside Spain, another set of rules. Or, if I want to run in french, even if my area is mostly running Italian, Microsoft would not get far if they posed a drastic reduction in my rights. If they want to go International, and apparently they do, then they might want to revise some of the ways they deal with the linguistic issues. What's more, did they develop one multi-lingual version, it could have saved them a load of extra work on every new release. every user could get one and same version, so they did not have to make specific packages for every locality. When they released version 9.5.4, they even ended up in a situation, where they released the locale version over here, with some of the files in English. That caused some issues, which they had to fix. Now, had they only one worldwide version, such would not have been an issue at all. One way it could have been done, is that you would get the license for the software, and then install a Main Core. Then you would download a set of files, holding the language-specific files. Or, these could have been packed on the installation DVD, did you go for a hard-copy installation. If you only use one language, your installation would only hold the files for that language. for those who use five languages, it would mean a few extra KBytes of disk space, as the installation would include a few extra files. In modern technology, that means nothing. Far as I am aware, and p
Re: WinEyes and licensing
Apparently, GW and their licensing deals quite differently from one place to the other. Locally, Yes we can install WE in a locale version, on how many computers we want. But should I decide to go for an English version, I am under restrictions of something like three or five computers. Believe me, I have discussed this with the local dealer, and even took the whole issue directly to Doug, questioning why you in the UK can run unlimited installations of the English version, and in one of your neighboring countries, we are all the sudden restricted on the very same version. And, yes we too are well aware of all what a Copyright means. I am not going to argue their rights to restrict. I just wonder why they restrict the paid version, whereas I am free to download as many copies of the screen reader I ever desire, in ANY of the supported languages, if I go for the free version. If I, in my local area want to BUY an English version, I am under restrictions. Do I want the very same English, fully working version, and I download the FREE version, hey now I have no further restrictions from the manufacturer. That is where my logic ends. Go ahead, restrict the users, but do so all over the board. And at least, if you want to restrict, why only restrict the paid version, leaving the free version unrestricted? Doesn't that encourage the user to go for the free version? And all you said about copyright, does make sense. Except from the fact that people in all coutries, can get the unrestricted versions for free, only if you pay, you likely will be messing with the Copyright, so let's have you restricted. Smile. I just don't get the logic in that. OK then, it is not of the biggest issues either, only I wonder if that will encourage people in such areas to keep paying. And that was my real initial point, that we might see less people paying, and eventually that might lead to the fall of the development's priority, on behalf of the screen reader. The best thing, like I stated, would have been if they simply made one big and multi-lingual version, leaving the users the chance of deciding which installation or functionality will be most suitable for her at any time. First they have given all language-specific versions away for free the last few years, I am not sure wherein the show-stopper would be, in making it all combined into one and same license. After all, many other pieces of software are released in multi-lingual versions. And even when tied to one language, your license would typically be equal, no matter which language you decide to run. Should I - for instance - want to run Windows itself in German, even if I was located in the North-Americas, I would be entitled the exact same rights and restrictions as if I was running an English version. Microsoft - to all my knowledge - does not give me one set of rules for a Spanish version of Windows, and if I happen to live outside Spain, another set of rules. Or, if I want to run in french, even if my area is mostly running Italian, Microsoft would not get far if they posed a drastic reduction in my rights. If they want to go International, and apparently they do, then they might want to revise some of the ways they deal with the linguistic issues. What's more, did they develop one multi-lingual version, it could have saved them a load of extra work on every new release. every user could get one and same version, so they did not have to make specific packages for every locality. When they released version 9.5.4, they even ended up in a situation, where they released the locale version over here, with some of the files in English. That caused some issues, which they had to fix. Now, had they only one worldwide version, such would not have been an issue at all. One way it could have been done, is that you would get the license for the software, and then install a Main Core. Then you would download a set of files, holding the language-specific files. Or, these could have been packed on the installation DVD, did you go for a hard-copy installation. If you only use one language, your installation would only hold the files for that language. for those who use five languages, it would mean a few extra KBytes of disk space, as the installation would include a few extra files. In modern technology, that means nothing. Far as I am aware, and please correct me should I be wrong, NVDA for one comes in a multi-lingual version. My former screen reader - Blindows, now taken over by Baum - was in a multi-lingual version. Do I want to run a well-reputed software like Malwarebytes, it is in Multi-Lingual version. I can get my Anti-Virus in any of its supported languages, with no differences in rights and restrictions. Even certain versions of Windows, used to come in multi-lingual versions, with no differences in rights, no matter which language I chose to install or activate at any given time.
perplexing outlook attachment
Dear List: I am using Microsoft office outlook 2016 on my windows ten computer. I received an email saying it had an attachment. When I hit the alt-7 it said attachment not found. In the process of forwarding it to my wife to see if the attachment would show up on her computer, I did the control-F to set up forwarding and as I tabbed past the subject, it listwed the attachment and it said to use alt-down arrow to open the options menu selected button. By doing that, I got into the context menu and I arrowed down to open and then I hit enter there. It opened the document saying it was in protected view. I was able to read the document with no trouble. My question is, why did my initial alt-7 say there were no attachments and what do I need to know about protected view? Thanks for any clarification. Regards: Ted Larson ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
Re: punctuation spoken in emails and on firefox
Hi Rod Thank you for your quick reply. Have lots to do today but will sit down and learn to use this app soon. I wish I had asked this when I was doing medical transcription as it would have been handy. An offshoot of this question is - will App Central continue to be updated and managed? thanks again, Brenda On 2/3/2017 9:23 PM, Rod Hutton via Talk wrote: Pardon me, Brenda, the hot key is Insert-Accent, not Control-Accent for toggling punctuation after installing Toggle Punctuation and More 1.72, available here: http://www.gwmicro.com/App_Central/Apps/App_Details/?scriptid=1276 Best, Rod -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+rod_hutton=hotmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Rod Hutton via Talk Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 9:20 PM To: bjn...@windstream.net; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: punctuation spoken in emails and on firefox Hi Brenda, You can change punctuation from the Screen node within the WE control panel, but I've found the easiest solution is to use the hot key Control-Accent, but this is available only after installing the following app: http://www.gwmicro.com/App_Central/Apps/App_Details/?scriptid=1276 hth, Rod -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+rod_hutton=hotmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Brenda via Talk Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 8:25 PM To: Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: punctuation spoken in emails and on firefox Hi List When I type and read emails or read an article in a web page punctuation is spoken i.e. the words"comma", "period" "quotation" etc are read. what do I have to change so I don't hear punctuation marks spoken when I read a document? I don't want to do too much trial and error. Thanks brenda W-E 9.5.4, win7, Thunderbird & Firefox ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/rod_hutton%40hotmail.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/rod_hutton%40hotmail.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/bjnite%40windstream.net. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
RE: WinEyes and licensing
David, North America and most of Europe, including the UK can run Window-Eyes without authentication on each occasion that the version being used is correctly licenced. That is, without a dongle or other mechanical means of licence authentication. This may also be the case in Australia and New Zealand, but I am not too sure of that. There may be a Knowledge Base item which details where this applies. This was done originally as there are many parts of the world outside of the North American continent where software piracy, or euphemistically software sharing, is rife. Software producers, not just GW-Micro, follow such a practice in order to protect their income stream, which is a perfectly valid think to do. As far as the accent of the speech is concerned I have most of my speech output set to use UK English, although I need to accept the use of an American accent for the Window-Eyes elements of the speech output. Like the UK the USA has many localised accents in use in pronouncing the spoken word. Most people can accept the use of such localised accents. The real difference in the use of English between our two continents is the simplified spelling of many words used in the USA as opposed to that being used in the UK, where the spellings originated from (smile). Regards, John Tel: +44 (0) 1442 259243 Mob: +44 (0) 7815 056076 -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+john_farley=btinternet@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of David via Talk Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2017 12:30 AM To: Loy; Window-Eyes Discussion List; Pamela Dominguez Subject: Re: WinEyes and licensing Nope. All messages, menus and so forth, will be in ONE, and only ONE language. The voices are there only to let you read other languages. Yet, say you have turned on Eloquence french, due to you mainly working with French documents and websites. If your WinEyes is installed under an English license, all the WinEyes produced messages, will be send as English phrases to a French synthesizer. Try for a moment yourself, and see what it all will sound like. You don't think there are all that many phrases, so it can't be that much of an issue? Well, try to scroll down a website. All the screen reader produced messages like: Link, Paragraph, Combobox, Editbox, Read-Only, and so forth, are send in the language of your screen reader installation, no matter which language is supported by your currently chosen voice. Or, try it under your favorite Email program. The phrases like: Read, Unread, Attachment, And so on, again are send in the language of your installation. Try to listen too a Spanish voice, or an Italian one, pronounce the English phrases. Judge for yourself. Been the trouble with WE for all times, that they never understood people could have more than one language, and would need to switch several times in a day. Hey all you Canadians, you would at least know what it means to read more than one language. Greatest thing would be if they could release a multi-lingual license - holding all supported languages. And now, if they then could let it even be set to switch automatically to the language supported by the currently active synth, they would have done a great job. But all my requests for such features, have been met with loads of excuses and words about being unable, due to licensing and worries of piracy. Not sure what would make such a multi-lingual version more vulnerable to piracy, but that is the explanation GW has been offering me for the last decade. Well, just wanted to illustrate a point for you all. Other International and non-English users will know what i am talking about, and may be able to offer you more illustrative cases. Yet, may I ask you who are all English-speaking users, how would you accept if I released a screen reader that gave all its menus and internal messages in German? So every time you browsed the net, or every time you pressed the Ctrl-Home in a text document, you got the phrases from the screen reader, with German text pronounced by your English voice? Here, let me save you all the hazzle. Simply let your current English voice read the following messages, and imagine your day being filled with this kind of working conditions. Then, you please come back and tell me how many of you would pay for the product. Smile. nur-Lese, Eingabefeld für den, ungelesen, Lesen, Anlage, Anfang des Dokuments, Zeilenende. On 2/4/2017 12:55 AM, Loy via Talk wrote: > Window Eyes paid version comes with synthesizers in multi languages. Don't know if the program is in other languages or not. >- Original Message - >From: Pamela Dominguez via Talk >To: David ; Window-Eyes Discussion List >Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 6:27 PM >Subject: Re: WinEyes and licensing > > >I didn't know we only get one language. I was lead to believe that all the >languages were in
