Re: [OSM-talk] Potlatch2 almost down?
Dave F. wrote: > > I get a 404 error for P2 via Mapquest & through geowiki It loads the > editor & displays a selected background but no data, even after 10-15 > minutes. I've zoomed in to z17 so it only displays a few residential > roads so no that much data. > I sometimes (including now) get this in PL1, where it takes a while to load the data (usually less than 15 minutes though), and each panning compounds the issue. I attribute it to the API being slow (just as when JOSM takes a while to download referrers). -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Potlatch2-almost-down-tp5780052p5780099.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Potlatch2 almost down?
Dave F. wrote: > I get a 404 error for P2 via Mapquest & through geowiki It loads > the editor & displays a selected background but no data Could you try the Geowiki instance again? I've just tweaked a little problem that was showing up. (I tend to forget people use the Yahoo imagery. Roll on Bing. :) ) cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Potlatch2-almost-down-tp5780052p5780072.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Potlatch2 almost down?
Hi Is it just me? I get a 404 error for P2 via Mapquest & through geowiki It loads the editor & displays a selected background but no data, even after 10-15 minutes. I've zoomed in to z17 so it only displays a few residential roads so no that much data. Potlatch 1 works as expected. Anybody else? Ta Dave F. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] I am running osm2pgsql against the planet-101117.osm.bz2 file in slim mode and so far I have gotten (3) excepton caught processing way errors (listed below).
I am running osm2pgsql against the planet-101117.osm.bz2 file in slim mode and so far I have gotten (3) *excepton caught processing way * errors (listed below). Will it be OK to utilize this data after importing via osm2pgsql? Thanks, John - Reading in file: /drivej/OpenStreetMaps/World4/planet-101117.osm.bz2 Unknown node type 8 Processing: Node(839194k) Way(70314k) Relation(85k) *excepton caught processing way id=110802 excepton caught processing way id=110803 *Processing: Node(839194k) Way(70314k) Relation(121k) *excepton caught processing way id=153858 *Processing: Node(839194k) Way(70314k) Relation(258k) - -- John J. Mitchell ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Suggestion for an Unconference
SteveC asklater.com> writes: >>For addressing, I guess it is usually sufficient to have a street name - the >>exact addr:housenumber stuff is not needed I assume? > >Imagine a country where many streets are miles and miles long. Then yes, it >matters as you could be 10 miles out Ah, yes. So if we wanted to aim for a geocoding accuracy of one kilometre as a minimum, then any road longer than one kilometre needs house numbers. >>Turn restrictions are also hard to survey manually. >>They might possibly be suggested from analysis of GPS traces, >>provided we have a large number of traces for an area and they are clearly >>tagged to show which ones are for travelling by car. This is one reason why a >>standard tagging scheme for GPS traces is needed. > >You can expose it with things like routing. I don't understand what you mean - do you mean that OSM-based routing apps could submit a trace back to the server as you drive along? -- Ed Avis ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
