Re: [Talk-cz] api.osm.cz
Dobre, priste nebudu linej a napisu celou domenu, nejak jsem si zvykl to zkracovat tam kde je adresatum jasne, ze to ma byt openstreetmap.cz. Skoda ze neni ten chlapik ochoten to osm.cz prodat, i bych mu za to neco zaplatil... Kazdopadne Michal nekdy po 9:30 spravil, takze uz zase jede... Bye Dne 31. května 2018 14:21 Marián Kyral napsal(a): > No api.osm.cz fakt nefunguje. A asi ani nikdy nebude. Zkus > https://api.openstreetmap.cz/ - to mi funguje. > > Marián > > > -- Původní e-mail -- > Od: Tom Ka > Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic > Datum: 31. 5. 2018 14:17:46 > Předmět: [Talk-cz] api.osm.cz > > Ahoj, jen info, api.osm.cz je od dnesniho rana (04:01) nedostupne. > Snad s tim Michal Grezl brzo neco udela. > > Bye > > ___ > Talk-cz mailing list > Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz > https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz > > > ___ > Talk-cz mailing list > Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz > https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz > ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz
Re: [OSM-talk] Remote Sensing / DOP / DIY people
cheaper and simpler would be a kite and a picavet system. I was looking into building a FPV, but just getting it to fly in a pattern gets expensive quickly(even building from scratch) On Thu, May 31, 2018, 9:01 PM Florian Lohoff, wrote: > > Hi, > is there a Mailinglist for the Technical aspects of DIY Remote Sensing > e.g. Aerial imaging? > > I am talking about Drone/Copter/Autonomous flying like Sensefly Ebee > and the like. > > As a lot of people are not capable of buying of the shelve equipment > like the Ebee it might be interesting to get people together with > their DIY projects. Autonomous Fixed Wings could be build in the range > of 300€ - But then IMHO the hard part starts. > > Camera, Georeferencing the GeoTIFFs, creating a WMS service to be > able to use them with Josm etc. Getting together an Open Source > toolchain, docker containers, howtos etc > > > Here is a (German) walk through in building a FPV Wing. We wouldnt need > the FPV parts and this size is most likely not capable of carrying a > camera but its a start. > > https://blog.seidel-philipp.de/fpv-wing-aus-kopter-teilen-bauen-mit-inav/ > > > For somebody who has dealt with electronics in the past its Buildable > but i am having a hard time getting it actually to fly. > > Flo > -- > Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de > UTF-8 Test: The ran after a , but the ran away > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020i and Wikidata
I think it depends on what you are trying to do. There are two parts to BC2020i the first is map the buildings the second is enrich the buildings with tags. The first part can be done best by importing Open Data if the licenses align and at the moment few do and of those that do not all have accurate building data suitable and even if they do it needs specialist knowledge to know all the steps and to do the import. It can be done with mapping from imagery but whilst mapping using the building_tool plugin in JOSM does work well in a mapathon environment using iD seems to give rise to data quality issues and you don't really want to offend to many OpenStreetMap mappers too often. Enriching the tags of existing buildings probably doesn't look so interesting to students but it really is of value especially if its local since the sort of number of levels of the building cannot be seen from imagery that we are licensed to use. Even in Ottawa there are many areas where although we have all the buildings we have many without tags saying how high they are etc. I'm not even sure we have a list of what would be most useful. Streetcomplete an Android app is very useful for adding data. Locally we have houses that are split level, so a garage in the basement with a room over the top but the rest of the house is single storey. I'm not sure how these should be tagged. Is it documented anywhere? What might be interesting is to get them to pull OSM data into R R.org and do some analysis and that might be valuable in places like Africa where they have the same problems but fewer resources. Cheerio John On 31 May 2018 at 10:44, Jonathan Brown wrote: > Has anyone thought of using Wikidata to enhance the BC2020i project work > with secondary and postsecondary students? https://www.wikidata.org/ > wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page > > > > How could structured, linked open data help municipalities and regions > engage students in collaborative research projects? We are exploring ways > to build on the Durham Mapathon event of May 3. At that event, Durham > Region staff collaborated with senior secondary school teachers and > students from Clarington Municipality on policy challenges. The Durham > Region GIS staff provided the technical support. > > > > Jonathan > > > > ___ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020i and Wikidata
There's already an initiative to add wiki data to osm there's a tool that helps you find missing wikidata items in a location where you can validate if they are correctly matched or not: https://osm.wikidata.link/ On Thu, May 31, 2018, 5:50 PM Jonathan Brown, wrote: > Has anyone thought of using Wikidata to enhance the BC2020i project work > with secondary and postsecondary students? > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page > > > > How could structured, linked open data help municipalities and regions > engage students in collaborative research projects? We are exploring ways > to build on the Durham Mapathon event of May 3. At that event, Durham > Region staff collaborated with senior secondary school teachers and > students from Clarington Municipality on policy challenges. The Durham > Region GIS staff provided the technical support. > > > > Jonathan > > > ___ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-es] Enlaces de autopista
Últimamente estoy poniendo al dia también enlaces de autopistas y estoy de acuerdo con lo que se ha dicho en estos correos. Lo único que personalmente prefiero usar la etiqueta "destination" en vez del "exit_to". Me parece mucho mas potente ya que permite también indicar diferentes rutas una vez que se ha salido de la autopista. Esto ocurre mucho en conexiones de dos autopistas. Una vez que sales de la autopista hay otra bifurcación para decidir en que sentido cojes la otra autopista. Y entonces la etiqueta "exit_to" no se puede aplicar. Si pediria que si alguien prefiere la etiqueta "exit_to" la añada pero sin eliminar "destination" cuando ya esta en los enlaces. Un saludo. El 30/05/2018 a las 10:37, A A escribió: La etiqueta destination la estoy utilizando pero lo que quería saber es si hay algún consenso a cerca de las etiquetas "name" y "ref" para ir modificando todos los enlaces y ponerlos todos de una misma manera. ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
