Re: [talk-au] "Hidden" National Park boundary

[Andrew Harvey]

On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 14:11, nwastra  wrote:

> Geez…and a proper link to Protected areas of Queensland dataset
>
> http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/search.page?q=Protected+areas+of+Queensland
>

The original link does work, just only if you click through twice.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] "Hidden" National Park boundary

[nwastra]

Geez…and a proper link to Protected areas of Queensland dataset 
http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/search.page?q=Protected+areas+of+Queensland
 

Nev

> On 22 Apr 2019, at 1:26 pm, nwastra  wrote:
> 
> corrected link...
> Looks like plenty of edits in the area by Scott and Fizzie …
> https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=12=-28.07234=153.43583=BTT
>  
> 
>  
> Nev
>  
> 
> 
>> On 22 Apr 2019, at 1:20 pm, nwastra > > wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Graeme
>> the boundary of Burleigh Head National Park was last updated using CAPAD 
>> 2016 http://www.environment.gov.au/land/nrs/science/capad/2016 
>>  (CAPAD 2018 
>> should be out soon)
>> and the later 2018 download of Protected areas of Queensland 
>> http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/detail.page?fid={07E360E3-A191-4C24-9671-1471362F0B1B}
>>  
>> 
>>  has the same boundary
>> 
>> The latest Protected areas of Queensland dated 14 Mar 2019 is now available 
>> and boundary is unchanged in that dataset too.
>> 
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue 
>>  
>> 
>> Burleigh Head National Park boundary 
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104759342#map=16/-28.0950/153.4516 
>>  
>> 
>> I wouldn’t adjust the gazetted boundaries to other things like the 
>> shoreline, beaches, rivers, roads, treelines, etc as the next person who 
>> updates the gazetted boundaries with later released data with need to unglue 
>> all those joins to other data before replacing the geometry.
>> 
>> I suggest using JOSM when editing boundary relations.   
>> 
>> Looks like plenty of edits in the area by Scott and Fizzie  
>> https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=12=-27.19668=152.96101=BTT=-nevw=1
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> Nev
>> 
>>> On 22 Apr 2019, at 12:10 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Could you please have a look at 
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-28.09588/153.45869 
>>>   
>>> 
>>> You can see that the boundary of Burleigh Head National Park is shown as 
>>> being out in the water of Tallebudgera Creek, which may actually be the 
>>> correct boundary?, but doesn't make a lot of sense?
>>> 
>>> I was wondering about adjusting it to follow the shoreline, but when I go 
>>> into edit (iD) I can't "find" the actual Boundary on the map - it just 
>>> doesn't appear to be there?
>>> 
>>> Is it hidden in some way, or am I just not clicking on the right pixel?!
>>> 
>>> Incidentally, over the last few days, I've added detail along the riverbank 
>>> to show the beaches & rock walls, but they're also not showing? Hidden 
>>> "under" the National Park / Nature Reserve perhaps?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Graeme
>>> ___
>>> Talk-au mailing list
>>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org 
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au 
>>> 
>> 
> 

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] "Hidden" National Park boundary

[nwastra]

corrected link...
Looks like plenty of edits in the area by Scott and Fizzie …
https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=12=-28.07234=153.43583=BTT
 

 
Nev
 


> On 22 Apr 2019, at 1:20 pm, nwastra  wrote:
> 
> Hi Graeme
> the boundary of Burleigh Head National Park was last updated using CAPAD 2016 
> http://www.environment.gov.au/land/nrs/science/capad/2016 
>  (CAPAD 2018 
> should be out soon)
> and the later 2018 download of Protected areas of Queensland 
> http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/detail.page?fid={07E360E3-A191-4C24-9671-1471362F0B1B}
>  
> 
>  has the same boundary
> 
> The latest Protected areas of Queensland dated 14 Mar 2019 is now available 
> and boundary is unchanged in that dataset too.
> 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue 
>  
> 
> Burleigh Head National Park boundary 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104759342#map=16/-28.0950/153.4516 
>  
> 
> I wouldn’t adjust the gazetted boundaries to other things like the shoreline, 
> beaches, rivers, roads, treelines, etc as the next person who updates the 
> gazetted boundaries with later released data with need to unglue all those 
> joins to other data before replacing the geometry.
> 
> I suggest using JOSM when editing boundary relations.   
> 
> Looks like plenty of edits in the area by Scott and Fizzie  
> https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=12=-27.19668=152.96101=BTT=-nevw=1
>  
> 
> 
> Nev
> 
>> On 22 Apr 2019, at 12:10 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick > > wrote:
>> 
>> Could you please have a look at 
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-28.09588/153.45869 
>>   
>> 
>> You can see that the boundary of Burleigh Head National Park is shown as 
>> being out in the water of Tallebudgera Creek, which may actually be the 
>> correct boundary?, but doesn't make a lot of sense?
>> 
>> I was wondering about adjusting it to follow the shoreline, but when I go 
>> into edit (iD) I can't "find" the actual Boundary on the map - it just 
>> doesn't appear to be there?
>> 
>> Is it hidden in some way, or am I just not clicking on the right pixel?!
>> 
>> Incidentally, over the last few days, I've added detail along the riverbank 
>> to show the beaches & rock walls, but they're also not showing? Hidden 
>> "under" the National Park / Nature Reserve perhaps?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Graeme
>> ___
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org 
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> 

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] "Hidden" National Park boundary

[nwastra]

Hi Graeme
the boundary of Burleigh Head National Park was last updated using CAPAD 2016 
http://www.environment.gov.au/land/nrs/science/capad/2016 
 (CAPAD 2018 should 
be out soon)
and the later 2018 download of Protected areas of Queensland 
http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/detail.page?fid={07E360E3-A191-4C24-9671-1471362F0B1B}
 

 has the same boundary

The latest Protected areas of Queensland dated 14 Mar 2019 is now available and 
boundary is unchanged in that dataset too.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue 
 

Burleigh Head National Park boundary 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104759342#map=16/-28.0950/153.4516 
 

I wouldn’t adjust the gazetted boundaries to other things like the shoreline, 
beaches, rivers, roads, treelines, etc as the next person who updates the 
gazetted boundaries with later released data with need to unglue all those 
joins to other data before replacing the geometry.

I suggest using JOSM when editing boundary relations.   

Looks like plenty of edits in the area by Scott and Fizzie  
https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=12=-27.19668=152.96101=BTT=-nevw=1
 


Nev

> On 22 Apr 2019, at 12:10 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick  wrote:
> 
> Could you please have a look at 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-28.09588/153.45869 
>   
> 
> You can see that the boundary of Burleigh Head National Park is shown as 
> being out in the water of Tallebudgera Creek, which may actually be the 
> correct boundary?, but doesn't make a lot of sense?
> 
> I was wondering about adjusting it to follow the shoreline, but when I go 
> into edit (iD) I can't "find" the actual Boundary on the map - it just 
> doesn't appear to be there?
> 
> Is it hidden in some way, or am I just not clicking on the right pixel?!
> 
> Incidentally, over the last few days, I've added detail along the riverbank 
> to show the beaches & rock walls, but they're also not showing? Hidden 
> "under" the National Park / Nature Reserve perhaps?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Graeme
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] "Hidden" National Park boundary

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

Could you please have a look at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-28.09588/153.45869

You can see that the boundary of Burleigh Head National Park is shown as
being out in the water of Tallebudgera Creek, which may actually be the
correct boundary?, but doesn't make a lot of sense?

I was wondering about adjusting it to follow the shoreline, but when I go
into edit (iD) I can't "find" the actual Boundary on the map - it just
doesn't appear to be there?

Is it hidden in some way, or am I just not clicking on the right pixel?!

Incidentally, over the last few days, I've added detail along the riverbank
to show the beaches & rock walls, but they're also not showing? Hidden
"under" the National Park / Nature Reserve perhaps?

Thanks

Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [Talk-us] trail tagging

[Rihards]

On 19.04.19 19:34, Kevin Kenny wrote:
...
> the surface. (There's also a law that snowshoes or skis are required
> once the snow is 20 cm deep, but I follow "don't tag the local
> legislation". There's nothing in that law regarding crampons, but any
> time I've been using crampons and met a ranger, the ranger was also
> using them and said nothing about it.)
This seems a bit uncommon (the law, not you meeting the rangers). Got
any reference or more detail on it?
...
-- 
 Rihards

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Footway tagging

[Rihards]

On 21.04.19 23:18, Michael Sidoric via Talk-us wrote:
> 
> Another consideration is accessibility. 
> Not taking sides but besides aesthetics and nomenclature seems there needs to 
> be some way for routing and tags to reflect whether a route is ‘safe’ or 
> accessible. 
> 
> I map for several blind friends and many paths have unexpected (and 
> dangerous) overhead hazards that a cane cannot detect. 

A very interesting challenge that many mappers would not think of.
I don't have a suggestion on how to solve it, but please consider adding
it in
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_for_the_blind#How_to_map_for_the_blind
so the rest of us can add such detail to the map.

> Thoughts?
> 
> Michael Sidoric
> GeoGO Project 
> www.geogo.world-- 
 Rihards

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [talk-cz] zbouraný pavilon

[Jan Macura]

Ahoj,

jo, prefixy životního cyklu používám i u budov a jiných *právě zaniklých*
objektů. Většinou tam i po té zbourané budově zůstanou patrné základy.
Odstraňuji geometrii až když na tom místě vznikne něco jiného (jiná budova,
silnice, atp.) a zbytky původní stavby již nejsou v terénu nalezitelné (OTG
rule everywhere).

H.

On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 21:07, Petr Vozdecký  wrote:

> ahoj,
>
> v areálu brněnského výstaviště došlo před ca rokem ke zbourání pavilonu K.
> Zmizel beze stopy. Má ho tedy stejně tak nechat zmizet i z OSM dat? Asi
> ano, ale je mi to úplně proti srsti - u zaniklých železničních tratí se
> používají prefixy životního cyklu
> 
> a ty počítají i s tagem demolished či removed (např.:
> removed:building=civic).
>
> vop
> ___
> talk-cz mailing list
> talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
> https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz
>
___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Import/Intégration et nom d'élément

[marc marc]

Bonjour,

Le 20.04.19 à 08:50, Yves P. a écrit :
> il faudrait vérifier balise par balise si elle renvoie des données 
> fiables, contacter le club pour avoir des infos complétaires

en plus du problème de qualité, quelqu'un se charge de demander la 
dérogation d'attribution pour rendre les données compatible osm ?
sinon il faudra... un revert/redact :(

Cordialement,
Marc
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

[OSM-talk] We're erasing our history in wiki

[Ilya Zverev]

Hi,

In my research of API 0.6 (which turned ten years old yesterday) I've 
stumbled on this page:


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6/Crowd_sourced_Testing

It was deleted 7 years ago. And this is a disaster. The page was an 
important milestone in our history: authors, dates, items on it could 
bring some more information on how our current API was rolled out. 
Nothing is left.


Please, could we have a deletion policy in our wiki that clearly states 
"No obsolete pages here", forbidding deletion of anything except spam or 
otherwise harmful pages? Deleting our history is plain vandalism, no 
better than physically destroying pieces of human history displayed in 
museums.


It's not like we're pressed for disk space there.

Thank internet gods for the Internet Archive,
Ilya

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-us] Footway tagging

[Michael Sidoric via Talk-us]

Another consideration is accessibility. 
Not taking sides but besides aesthetics and nomenclature seems there needs to 
be some way for routing and tags to reflect whether a route is ‘safe’ or 
accessible. 

I map for several blind friends and many paths have unexpected (and dangerous) 
overhead hazards that a cane cannot detect. 

Thoughts?

Michael Sidoric
GeoGO Project 
www.geogo.world

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [talk-cz] zbouraný pavilon

[Pavel Machek]

Ahoj!

> v areálu brněnského výstaviště došlo před ca rokem ke zbourání pavilonu K.
> Zmizel beze stopy. Má ho tedy stejně tak nechat zmizet i z OSM dat? Asi ano,
> ale je mi to úplně proti srsti - u zaniklých železničních tratí se používají
> prefixy životního cyklu

Ono zanikle zeleznicni trate nemizi beze stopy :-). Proto je dava
smysl drzet v mape. U budov je to jine...
Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

Re: [talk-cz] zbouraný pavilon

[Jan Martinec]

Ahoj,

Prefix demolished, určitě - třeba vůči ortofotům to poskytuje info "budova
tu byla, není tu _už_, a úmyslně" (na rozdíl od "ještě tu není/nevíme). V
ČR to má ještě specifikum, že se nevrací z RÚIANu budovy popravdě smazané,
ale papírově existující (typicky pražská týnská fara, která už tam není sto
padesát let, ale odstranit ji z evidence nejde a nejde a nejde - než mi to
došlo, mazal jsem ji snad natřikrát a drbal si hlavu "tohle už jsem někde
viděl!").

Zdar,
Honza "Piškvor" Martinec

Dne ne 21. 4. 2019 21:07 uživatel Petr Vozdecký  napsal:

> ahoj,
>
> v areálu brněnského výstaviště došlo před ca rokem ke zbourání pavilonu K.
> Zmizel beze stopy. Má ho tedy stejně tak nechat zmizet i z OSM dat? Asi
> ano, ale je mi to úplně proti srsti - u zaniklých železničních tratí se
> používají prefixy životního cyklu
> 
> a ty počítají i s tagem demolished či removed (např.:
> removed:building=civic).
>
> vop
> ___
> talk-cz mailing list
> talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
> https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz
>
___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

Re: [talk-cz] místo odložení psa

[Pavel Machek]

Ahoj!

> máte nápad, jak označit boudu, do které si můžu odložit psa, zatím co jdu
> někam, kam psi nesmí? Na tuto stezku[1] je psům vstup zakázán (dal jsem
> přímo na cesty, ne na relaci), u vstupu do areálu jsou zamykatelné
> boudy[2],
> ke kterým si u obsluhy můžu půjčit klíče, psa tam zamknu, obsluha mu tam
> případně dá misku s vodou a při odchodu si ho zase vyzvednu. Dal jsem
> amenity=animal_boarding, protože nic vhodnějšího jsem na wiki nenašel, ale
> ještě by se asi hodilo nějak vyjádřit, že je to jen dobu prohlídky areálu, a
> ne abych tam psa nechal a odjel na dovolenou.

Ja bych dal amenity=hitching_posts, animal=dog. Obcas se u hospody
najde uvaziste na kone, a uz jsem videl i kruh na uvazani psa (a kozy
:-) ) u obchodu. amenity=hitching_posts je podle me nejbliz.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ohio/Map_features

Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

[talk-cz] zbouraný pavilon

[Petr Vozdecký]

ahoj,




v areálu brněnského výstaviště došlo před ca rokem ke zbourání pavilonu K.
Zmizel beze stopy. Má ho tedy stejně tak nechat zmizet i z OSM dat? Asi ano,
ale je mi to úplně proti srsti - u zaniklých železničních tratí se používají
prefixy životního cyklu
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:P%C5%99edpona_%C5%BEivotn%C3%ADho_cyklu)
a ty počítají i s tagem demolished či removed (např.: removed:building=
civic).




vop
___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

[OSM-talk] Hikar (OSM AR for walkers) - now fixed and available again

[Nick Whitelegg]

Hello everyone,

Apologies for the non-availability of my OSM augmented reality app Hikar
(announced on March 29th) from Google Play over the weekend. Unfortunately
I left some test code in the last release which prevented GPS locations
being processed.

As I was on holiday with no access to a development machine I figured it
was best to temporarily unpublish it.

It's now fixed and published again and you should be getting an update soon
if you haven't already. The corrected version is 0.2.3, the broken version
is 0.2.2.

Apologies once again for the downtime.

Nick
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2019-04-19

[Dave Hansen]

These are based off of Lambertus's work here:

http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl

If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask.  However, please do not send me private mail.  The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@ list, others can benefit.

Downloads:

http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2019-04-19

Map to visualize what each file contains:


http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2019-04-19/kml/kml.html


FAQ



Why did you do this?

I wrote scripts to joined them myself to lessen the impact
of doing a large join on Lambertus's server.  I've also
cut them in large longitude swaths that should fit conveniently
on removable media.  

http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2019-04-19

Can or should I seed the torrents?

Yes!!  If you use the .torrent files, please seed.  That web
server is in the UK, and it helps to have some peers on this
side of the Atlantic.

Why is my map missing small rectangular areas?

There have been some missing tiles from Lambertus's map (the
red rectangles),  I don't see any at the moment, so you may
want to update if you had issues with the last set.

Why can I not copy the large files to my new SD card?

If you buy a new card (especially SDHC), some are FAT16 from
the factory.  I had to reformat it to let me create a >2GB
file.

Does your map cover Mexico/Canada?

Yes!!  I have, for the purposes of this map, annexed Ontario
in to the USA.  Some areas of North America that are close
to the US also just happen to get pulled in to these maps.
This might not happen forever, and if you would like your
non-US area to get included, let me know. 

-- Dave


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[talk-cz] Jak tagovat vinotéku a vinárnu?

[Petr Vozdecký]

Ahoj,




jak tagovat vinotéku a vinárnu?




pod pojmem vinotéka se totiž v ČR vyskytují

1) čisté prodejny shop=wine
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dwine) (ovšem takřka vždy
s možností degustace, tedy nějaký miniaturní prostor pro stání u stolku či
sezení)

2) podniky určené současně pro prodej i posezení shop=beverages
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dbeverages) + amenity=pub
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dpub) nebo amenity=bar
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dbar) (v podstatě
degustační vinárna s rozšířeným prodejem značkových vín).




Druhý případ nemá daleko k vinárně (primárně prodej rozlévaného vína v
prostředí s posezením a dalšími službami jako např. nabídka občerstvení).




Wiki k tomu nemá nějaké jednoznačné stanovisko, na jednu stranu navrhuje
použít jednoduchý tag shop=wine (ale to nerozliší vinárnu od vinotéky), na
stranu druhou složitější kombinace jako např.:
shop=alcohol(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dalcohol) (pro
obchody, které prodávají alkoholické nápoje pro odnesení s sebou)
drink=*(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:drink) (konkrétní
podávané či prodávané nápoje např: drink:wine=* "yes" bez bližšího určení,
"served" pro podávaný nápoj, "retail" pro prodávaný, ovšem myšleno spíše pro
další prodej, "draught" nápoj je čepovaný, "bottled" nápoj je v lahvích)






Konkrétně řeším situaci, kdy dva různí mapeři zmapovali jednu vinotéku
dvakrát:
http://vinarstvibukovsky.cz/vinoteka/




1. varianta(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3792480544) s amenity=bar (by
honny)


2. varianta(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2816695812) s shop=alcohol
(by Francois555)







Osobně se přikláním k tagování:

shop=alcohol
drink:wine=yes (nicméně byly-li by možné kumulace hodnot, pak drink:wine=
bootled; draught ale žiju v domění, že to není možné)







Díky za názory či podnětné reakce, ať tu dvakrát zmapovanou vinárnu můžu
rozseknout:)




vop
___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

[talk-cz] místo odložení psa

[Michal Fabík]

Ahoj,

máte nápad, jak označit boudu, do které si můžu odložit psa, zatím co 
jdu někam, kam psi nesmí? Na tuto stezku[1] je psům vstup zakázán (dal 
jsem přímo na cesty, ne na relaci), u vstupu do areálu jsou zamykatelné 
boudy[2], ke kterým si u obsluhy můžu půjčit klíče, psa tam zamknu, 
obsluha mu tam případně dá misku s vodou a při odchodu si ho zase 
vyzvednu. Dal jsem amenity=animal_boarding, protože nic vhodnějšího jsem 
na wiki nenašel, ale ještě by se asi hodilo nějak vyjádřit, že je to jen 
dobu prohlídky areálu, a ne abych tam psa nechal a odjel na dovolenou.


(Jinak teda psa nemám, ale podobné zařízení vidím poprvé v životě, tak 
mě to zaujalo.)


[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9386280#map=16/49.0322/13.5858

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/685099348

--
Michal Fabík


___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

Re: [Talk-es] Ayuntamiento de València como proveedor de datos.

[Jordi MF]

Hola Santiago,

Ya he actualizado la información en la Wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Espa%C3%B1a/Contribuidores#Ajuntament_de_Val.C3.A8ncia

Tengo entendido que el usuario PauDo [1], que está en el grupo de Telegram
también intentó ponerse en contacto con ellos a través de la página web.
También sin éxito.

Visto que el formulario de la web no resulta, te haré caso. Probaré a llamar
al teléfono de la Delegación de Gobierno Abierto [2] a lo largo de esta
semana. También envié un email en el mes de noviembre, pero no recibí
respuesta.

Os mantendré informados. Muchas gracias.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/PauDo/
[2]
https://www.valencia.es/ayuntamiento/infociudad_accesible.nsf/vDocumentosWebListadov/E9D6CDAA47C7055EC1257E700042CECF?OpenDocument=ayuntamiento/ayuntamiento.nsf=94CF9AC1E0AC87FDC125732A002A501D=2_4=2



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Spain-f5409873.html

___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

Re: [Talk-es] Ayuntamiento de València como proveedor de datos.

[Santiago Crespo]

Hola Jordi,

Gracias por hacer estas solicitudes!

Como la licencia de estos datos abiertos es CC-BY 4.0, puedes usar esta
carta de presentación y plantilla de exención:

https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/File:PermisoCCBY.odt

Tenemos una página en la wiki para documentar las gestiones que vamos
haciendo:

https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/ES:Espa%C3%B1a/Contribuidores

Si no te hacen caso por ahí, yo intentaría buscar un email o teléfono de
alguien responsable de estos datos y contactaría con esa persona
directamente. Dime si te puedo ayudar con este tema, estaré encantado de
hacerlo.

Buena suerte, ojalá respondan positivamente.

Saludos,
Santiago Crespo

On 4/18/19 3:07 PM, Jordi MF wrote:
> Hola a todos,
> 
> El motivo de este mensaje es dejar constancia de nuestra intención por
> conseguir el permiso de utilización de los datos abiertos del Ayuntamiento
> de València [1].
> El 19 de junio de 2018, tras pedir el permiso para poder usar los Datos
> Abiertos, recibí como respuesta que remeterían al departamento
> correspondiente para su consideración. No recibí ninguna respuesta de ese
> departamento.
> Del mismo modo, el 11 de diciembre de 2018 tras volver a insistir recibí
> exactamente la misma respuesta con el mismo resultado.
> 
> El canal de consultas y solicitudes [2], aunque en este caso parece
> infructuoso, en otras ocasiones sí que ha servido para darme respuesta a
> otras cuestiones sobre el callejero de la ciudad.
> 
> Sobre qué datos creo que serían útiles para poder comprobar/mejorar los
> datos en OSM, sin llegar a hacer una importación masiva, pienso en los
> siguientes:
> - Situación de las paradas de transporte público.
> - Tramos de Carriles bici / ciclocalles.
> - Localización de contenedores de reciclaje.
> 
> Sin más, espero que este correo sirva para tener centralizado esta cuestión
> y poder tratar cualquier avance que tenga que ver con la obtención del
> permiso para poder usar, en casi necesario, los datos abiertos del
> Ayuntamiento.
> 
> Saludos,
> Jordi
> 
> [1] http://gobiernoabierto.valencia.es/va/data/
> [2] http://www.valencia.es/suggeriments
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Spain-f5409873.html
> 
> ___
> Talk-es mailing list
> Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
> 

___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

Re: [OSM-talk] An Archive namespace for the OSM wiki?

[Tobias Knerr]

On 21.04.19 07:44, Yves wrote:
> Is there a way to decrease the rank of some pages in the search results
> in MediaWiki?

The possibility of increasing/decreasing the priority of certain search
results based on templates is being discussed at the moment as part of
this topic:
http://wiki.osm.org/Talk:Wiki#Proposal:_new_namespace_for_tagging_proposals

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-pt] Mapeando o Portugal Profundo

[Nuno Pedrosa]

Campo Maior é uma zona porreira… :)

> On 20 Apr 2019, at 18:32, Filohipo  wrote:
> 
> Boa Páscoa para todos
> ___
> Talk-pt mailing list
> Talk-pt@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pt


___
Talk-pt mailing list
Talk-pt@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pt

[talk-cz] Pro nováčky

[Miroslav Suchý]

Přibývají nám sem do konference nováčci - pokud jste to zrovna vy tak:
Vítejte!

Ne každý má odvahu se ptát zde na mailing listu - nebojte se a ptejte se
pokud něčemu nerozumíte!

Pokud hledáte na čem pracovat, tak máme rozjeto několik mapovacích projektů:

Mapování turistických cest:
  http://taskman.poloha.net/

Sbírat fotky rozcestníků a info tabulí:
  https://openstreetmap.cz/fody

Můžete mapovat poštovní schránky nebo přidávat k sídlům odkazy na wiki
  https://openstreetmap.cz/mapovaci-projekty

Doplňovat POI body podle volně dostupných dat:
  https://openstreetmap.cz/poi-importer

Můžete ověřovat a pomáhat vyřešit poznámky od uživatelů:
  https://openstreetmap.cz/poznamky-uzivatelu

Můžete řešit chyby v mapě:
  https://www.keepright.at/

Přidávat chybějící domy z RUIANu
  https://openstreetmap.cz/tracer
  http://ruian.poloha.net/budovy/

Mimo ČR můžete pomáhat mapovat pro humanitární akce:
  https://tasks.hotosm.org/contribute?difficulty=BEGINNER


Mirek Suchý

___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

[Talk-cat] SOTMCAT 19 a Vilanova i la Geltrú

[yo paseopor]

Bon dia gent!
Com sabreu aquest mes anterior en José Luis i jo vam tenir una reunió molt
interessant a la UPC de Vilanova amb Rafael Morillas professor
d'accessibilitat aplicada i molt proper a la informàtica.
En tres hores de bombardeig OSM constant,li vam demostrar algunes de les
coses que pot fer OpenStreetMap.
Es van derivar moltes coses interessants però per la que us escric és per
la possibilitat de celebrar un SotmCat a Vilanova.
Això vol dir que va posar a la nostra disposició la logística que
necessitaríem: sales amb ordinadors,projectors,i fins i tot parlar amb la
cantina de la UPC (i sent jo de la ciutat ja busco restaurant pels que
siguem si cal)
La meva proposta és senzilla: preparem temes que ens interessin, amb la
duració que ens interessi ;muntem escaleta i que ells ens situïn al
calendari (em sembla q va dir q millor en temps no lectiu, però li
preguntaré). Tot i les trobades que hem de seguir fent al PompeuLab fa
quatre anys que no fem presentacions i actes que siguin difonibles amb més
gran format,així que crec que és una bona oportunitat. Què en penseu?
Vindríeu? Què presentaríeu?

Salut i mapes
yopaseopor
___
Talk-cat mailing list
Talk-cat@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cat

[talk-cz] Fody: Neobsahuje datum a čas v EXIF!

[Miroslav Suchý]

Mám nějaké fotky rozcestníků co neobsahují datum a čas v EXIFu. A Fody hlásí
  Neobsahuje datum a čas v EXIF!
a odmítá nahrát fotku. Je pro to nějaký zvláštní důvod?
Mirek

___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz