Re: [talk-au] Mapping tracks from Strava heatmap

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

I must admit to using Strava the other way around.

If somebody leaves a Note to say that "there's another track here" or "this
track is closer to the creek", I'll often look at Strava, & add / move the
track based on it's results.

Thanks

Graeme


On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 17:57, Little Maps  wrote:

> On 27 Feb 2023, at 9:05 am, Tom Brennan  wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like the general consensus is:
> > - Strava heatmap is good for aligning *existing* tracks
> > - Strava shouldn't be used for the creation of new tracks without some
> ground truthing.
>
> Hi all, nice discussion. I agree but would broaden the 2nd point. The
> focus for the thread was walking tracks (paths etc in OSM). For vehicle
> tracks (fire trails etc), there’s not always a need to compare Strava
> against ground truthing (great though this would be) and careful inspection
> of imagery may often suffice. OSM’s vehicle tracks / fire trails are
> incomplete (or absent) in many areas, and Strava’s heat map is a great way
> to prioritise mapping of well used tracks using imagery, using the same
> care as all other mapping from imagery. So, I’d suggest broadening the 2nd
> point to ‘… without ground truthing or careful inspection of imagery, where
> appropriate”.  Cheers Ian
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [Talk-uy] Importación del STM

[muralito]

Hola. Creo que el ref estaria bueno mantenerlo con el codigo de parada. Si bien 
hay muchas vandalizadas, puede servir para identificar las que queden sanas. 

Estuve aprovechando las fotos aereas nuevas de IMM (son de diciembre de 2021) y 
entre otras cosas, reubicando las paradas que se movieron, y etiquetanoles el 
techo a las que se veia. 

Me gustaria validar que todo quede bien cuando produzcas un nuevo .zip para 
importar. 
La validacion global estaba pensando hacerla un poco con muestreo manual, y el 
resto con el plugin conflate del Josm, ¿vos que estabas usando para el chequeo? 

El resto, en mi opinion lo veo bien y de calidad como para hacer la 
importacion. 

Saludos, 
M. 

> De: "VicSanRoPe" 
> Para: "muralito" 
> CC: "talk-uy" 
> Enviados: Domingo, 6 de Noviembre 2022 22:44:07
> Asunto: Re: [Talk-uy] Importación del STM

> Buenas, te respondo:

>* De hecho, tanto el inicio como el final de opening_hours son horas reales
>según los datos, eso no se estira... Pero como recomiendas, hice que los
> horarios no se simplifiquen, con la excepción del límite de 255 
> caracteres.
>* Igualmente hice que se añadieran los intervalos por cada día, y si es 
> posible
> partes del día.
>* Los nombres de las paradas me parece que quedan mejor como calle y 
> esquina,
>queda más completo, además algunas paradas no tienen el nombre de la 
> esquina
> marcado.
>* Como sugieres, eliminé las etiquetas ref de paradas y las variantes de 
> las
> rutas.

> Avisame de cambios a hacer sobre este mapa, o cuándo creas que esté pronto 
> para
> notificar la lista de imports y marcarlo en el catálogo.

> El mapa actualizado, ya con los arreglos manuales importantes

> * muchas paradas sólo marcadas con highway=bus_stop (duplicadas)

> *
> las paradas a la izquierda que se detectan y yo pude resolver
> Sigue en
> https://github.com/VicSanRoPe/STM_Import/raw/master/MontevideoConBuses.osm.zip

2.14.0.0 


___
Talk-uy mailing list
Talk-uy@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-uy

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

[Dave F via talk]

On 25/02/2023 21:44, Andy Mabbett wrote:

shop = watch → shop = watches

This could plausibly mean watch as in "monitor" - in other words
"please watch for developments".


No it can't.

DaveF___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

[Mateusz Konieczny via talk]

Feb 27, 2023, 08:19 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:

>
>
>
> On 26/2/23 20:59, Mateusz Konieczny via  talk wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Feb 26, 2023, 10:20 by >> 61sundow...@gmail.com>> :
>>
>>>
>>> On 26/2/23 06:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:
>>>
 shop = opał → shop = fuel

>>>
>>>
>>> Opal is also a gemstone, Australia being a leading source.  It is 
>>> also a fuel in Australia ... but that would not be sold  in shops 
>>> but petrol stations.
>>>
>> note that it is not opal, it is opał with >> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%81>>  at the end
>>
>
> Not in Australia. Opal with an L. 
>
>
And these will not be affected by my proposed edit (I have not
listed this replacement, right?)

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-ro] Nou MapRoulette challenge "Add Missing Buildings"

[Salim Baidoun]

Salutare comunității din România,
Am revenit către voi cu un nou Challange "Add Missing 
Buildings" în mod particular 
în orașul Constanța.

Această provocare se concentrează în primul rând pe clădirile lipsă de toate 
tipurile (rezidențial, comercial, industrial, etc.) pentru a fi cartografiate 
așa cum este evidențiat. Echipa noastră a comparat datele TomTom și OSM 
utilizând comparații spațiale inclusiv indexi de intersecții și suprapuneri și 
am detectat unele zone unde cladirile lipsesc în OSM; pentru a crește nivelul 
de încredere, echipa a comparat o zonă eșantion și a efectuat analize pentru a 
valida unele clădiri care lipsesc.

Suprafețele lipsă pot fi adăugate prin editare mai multor clădiri sau a unor 
clădiri individuale; alegerea va depinde de verificările cu realitatea și de 
cunoștiințele locale.
Veți găsi mai multe informații în descrierea proiectului de provocare și pe 
pagina Romania 
GitHub.

Sperăm că acest challange va aduce valoare adaugată comunității.

Vă doresc o saptamana minunata.

Multumesc,


Salim A. Baidoun / Community & Partnerships - Global


___
Talk-ro mailing list
Talk-ro@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

[Philip Barnes]

On 26 February 2023 09:09:53 GMT, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

>> 
>> shop=map -> shop=maps
>> or maybe it would be better to change in opposite direction?
>> it is not too late as it is a rarely used tag
>There are few shops selling maps these days .. unfortunately.
>
Specialist shops selling only maps are rare, although they were never common. 
Maybe one or two in a large city.

Shops selling maps are still common however. They are still sold in bookshops, 
garages and small shops still stock the local Ordinance Survey map as they have 
always done.

Phil (trigpoint)
>
>___
>talk mailing list
>talk@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk