[OSM-talk] Beaches at lower zoom levels

2010-08-18 Thread Gaz Davidson
Beaches are missing at zoom=12 in Mapnik and zoom=13 in Osmarender, either
that or the sea is rendered over them. Is this by design or a bug?

For example, here's my hometown:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.6457&lon=-2.999&zoom=13

Moving the coastline seems excessive, is there a way around this?

Cheers

Gaz
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Flattr donation button

2010-08-13 Thread Gaz Davidson
On 14 August 2010 00:08, Dave F.  wrote:
>
> " When you're registered to flattr, you pay a small monthly fee. You set
> the amount yourself. In the end of the month, that fee is divided between
> all the things you flattered."
>
> So, what if I haven't seen anyone worth 'flattering' or just one? Would
> they be worth my whole months fee?
>

Wikileaks is worth the monthly fee alone!

What happens if I've flattered no -one?
>

Apparently your money is donated to charity.


> I've haven't seen yet how this site makes it money. Commission?
>

They take a cut, 10% of money deposited into the system.


> Most current of all; I hardly want to contribute *anything* to a site that
> potentially calls me 'poisonous' let alone my hard earned cash.
>

Context?


Gaz





>
> Dave F.
>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] Flattr donation button

2010-08-13 Thread Gaz Davidson
Hi

I just signed up for this new Flattr micropayments thing for donating small
amounts to projects you love (flattr.com), and noticed there had been no
discussion about it here. It would be a nice experiment to add a Flattr
button to the main site and see how much is made in microdonations.

OSM would need an account with a minimum of 2eu a month (which is shared
between other subscribers when you click their Flattr buttons). It must be
worth a few euros to try it out!

Gaz
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] www.openaddresses.org BETA launched

2010-03-30 Thread Gaz Davidson
2010/3/30 Cédric MOULLET :
> Don't hesitate to add your own address, the address of your friends and of
> the friends of your friends ;-)

I'm sure that everyone on this list has already done this in OSM... I
hope you'll be using that data, my fingers are sore from typing so
many postcodes into OSM, FreeThePostCode and PostcodeDB!

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically adding open wireless access points

2010-03-29 Thread Gaz Davidson
On 26 March 2010 13:51, Emilie Laffray  wrote:
> have you looked at a project called openbmap? Essentially a few months ago,
> I suggested to those people to merge their data in OSM. However, it became
> clear they didn't want it to be done, as there was plenty of problem to do
> so, and I accepted the fact that it belongs in something other than OSM.

Oh, I missed this. This is cool. Maybe I should make my app for
openbmap instead, I'll do that providing I can download the database
and play with it. Thank you :-)

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically adding open wireless access points

2010-03-29 Thread Gaz Davidson
On 26 March 2010 20:15, Gregory  wrote:
> I seem to remember certain BT home packages you can use their network for
> free when your out and about. But then it lets other BT customers connect to
> your wifi. Hopefully they explained this in large enough print. Just put
> this here for interest.

I think they actually have two WiFi signals going on in these ones.
They're usually accompanied by a BT Home Hub which is locked down.

On 29 March 2010 12:16, Joseph Reeves  wrote:
> -1
>
> I'd rather see collaboration with www.wigle.net rather then adding
> Access Point information to the OSM DB.

http://wigle.net/eula.html

Do you know of anything with a better license? These guys make a
fortune from selling their data to the likes of SkyHookWireless, I
doubt they'd give it away for free.

Gaz

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically adding open wireless access points

2010-03-26 Thread Gaz Davidson
On 26 March 2010 11:39, Gregory  wrote:
> I think you would need a separate database for the collection.
> Then every week or so you have a rule that estimates the access point
> location and says where a few people have seen this network, and it has been
> seen recently, then add it to OSM and update your db with the OSM node id.

Yep, I was thinking of just using a flat file for the collection
(published to the world) then a database to keep track of the nodes
which have been imported (node IDs, last known positions etc)

> Some information might be best kept in your database, some might be good in
> OSM. It is helpful to be able to add the osm tags operator (e.g. T-Mobile,
> BT OpenWhatsit,  or LocalTon Free Wifi), url, and maybe something to say if
> it is free or not.

I was thinking I'd avoid the BT OpenZone and other non-free networks,
they personally irritate me and there are hundreds of thousands of
them (I think they piggyback other people's connections). If the tool
can log in via the wifi and make a connection to my server, then it's
a good one.

> How do you deal with nodes(tags and/or location) being changed in the OSM
> data not by your tool?

In this case I think we can assume that humans are always better at
setting locations, but software is better at SSIDs and other machiney
things. I guess just don't update the location in future once a user
has moved it (maybe

> What if your tool adds a node which is already there?

That's a bit harder. I guess it would need to search for both the
ESSID and the SSID before adding a node, and be aware that the node ID
might change (ie be deleted by a user)

> I know of a village that has a free wifi setup (by residents) that I would
> like to know the points of but you have to give an e-mail address to 'log
> in'. I suppose I would have to login and then use your tool if I wanted it
> recorded.

I suppose you'd have to add this one manually, the tool would see the
open network, connect try to post data to my collection page but be
redirected to the login page. It would then assume that this network
is a private/pay one and locally blacklist the ESSID so it doesn't
connect multiple times to pinpoint the location.

> I think a possible objection is like the legally-grey use of open networks.
> Home routers usually come open as default(it aids installation), you have
> not been authorised to use them but maybe the settings being left open is
> authorisation(so you tell yourself). Well more worse that you taking their
> bandwidth, is you plotting a  big X on their house (yeah, I know their fault
> for not closing the network).

I can only speak for the UK, but all the ISP provided routers I've
seen in the past few years come with a key printed on the bottom of
them, plus you have to actually press a button on the device to
authorize it. The open wifi anarchy of the recent past doesn't seem to
apply to home users anymore.

I guess it could just stop updating the node once a user has deleted
it from OSM's database, but I wouldn't remove it from my source list.

Gaz



>
> On 26 March 2010 03:34, Gaz Davidson  wrote:
>>
>> On 25 March 2010 19:13, Claudius  wrote:
>> > Am 25.03.2010 15:09, Gaz Davidson:
>> >> (...)  at some later time the positions of all
>> >> known access points can be estimated and imported into OSM's database.
>> >
>> > I think WiFi are too temporary a feature to be added to the main OSM
>> > database. Why not keep it in a seperate project database?
>>
>> I suppose I could keep it separate, but it sucks to have all kinds of
>> city geo-data split across multiple databases in different formats. It
>> makes using them more awkward. Also, I've not seen any evidence that a
>> large number of open wireless networks are temporary, unless you mean
>> that the technology ages fast? All the ones I've found are
>> deliberately open and belong to businesses, at least in the UK it's no
>> longer the open wifi free-for-all that it was several years ago (all
>> new routers come with WEP enabled by default, access points are used
>> until the hardware dies).
>>
>> Perhaps store the last seen date, then we can auto-purge them from the
>> database. Maybe have the site collect complete user traces so that we
>> can see when people went past a now dead hotspot (though users may not
>> like this, specially if the data is PD!)
>>
>> > Besides: Nice idea. But will it be needed in times of 3G access?
>>
>> Well, you could say the same about amenity=phone_box, I can't remember
>> the last time I used one of those. Open wireless networks are of
>> interest to me personally, probably lots of other people t

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically adding open wireless access points

2010-03-26 Thread Gaz Davidson
On 25 March 2010 19:13, Claudius  wrote:
> Am 25.03.2010 15:09, Gaz Davidson:
>> (...)  at some later time the positions of all
>> known access points can be estimated and imported into OSM's database.
>
> I think WiFi are too temporary a feature to be added to the main OSM
> database. Why not keep it in a seperate project database?

I suppose I could keep it separate, but it sucks to have all kinds of
city geo-data split across multiple databases in different formats. It
makes using them more awkward. Also, I've not seen any evidence that a
large number of open wireless networks are temporary, unless you mean
that the technology ages fast? All the ones I've found are
deliberately open and belong to businesses, at least in the UK it's no
longer the open wifi free-for-all that it was several years ago (all
new routers come with WEP enabled by default, access points are used
until the hardware dies).

Perhaps store the last seen date, then we can auto-purge them from the
database. Maybe have the site collect complete user traces so that we
can see when people went past a now dead hotspot (though users may not
like this, specially if the data is PD!)

> Besides: Nice idea. But will it be needed in times of 3G access?

Well, you could say the same about amenity=phone_box, I can't remember
the last time I used one of those. Open wireless networks are of
interest to me personally, probably lots of other people too. When I'm
out and about and realise I need a 700MB file it doesn't make sense to
use 3G for this. On my old prepay plan it would have cost me £14 to
download 700MB, on my current contract it would eat a week's worth of
data allowance.

Gaz

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] Automatically adding open wireless access points

2010-03-25 Thread Gaz Davidson
Hi

I've just got a Google Nexus One and was thinking about making an
application for it. The first thing that came to mind was a minimalist
app to add open WiFi networks as points of interest. I imagine it
working something like this:

The app continuously scans nearby WiFi access points. When one is
found, it connects to it and posts the GPS position, accuracy, WiFi
strength, (E)SSID, connection type and recent user movement to a
script running on the web. If it doesn't get the correct response then
that access point is blacklisted (avoiding paid but open networks
which redirect to a login page). The data is released into the public
domain (or maybe CC:SA?) and at some later time the positions of all
known access points can be estimated and imported into OSM's database.
Some clever rules could be used to avoid moving hotspots which have
been moved manually, or to delete ones which haven't been seen in a
long time.

I know that there are already companies and communities doing this,
but I can't find anyone with data that's free enough for my liking.
There are also objections to adding wifi hotspots on the wiki, but no
sensible ones as far as I can see. Open wireless access points are
useful to me, I work away from home and often need to find the closest
place with free wifi so I don't use all my data allowance when
downloading large files.

Thoughts, objections or suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

Gaz

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Still interest in an Android POI collector?

2010-03-08 Thread Gaz Davidson
I agree, great summary :-)

I'm getting a Google Nexus One soon and will be looking to do some POI
mapping and uploading of geo-tagged photos. I'd also like to see if
it's feasible to use the GPS, accelerometer, camera and touch-screen
to calculate and store the heights of buildings, which sounds like a
fun programming project!

One thing I would like to know about Android devices is whether the
GPS is aware of altitudes. Google's API appears to support this via
the hasAltitude and getAltitude methods of location objects, but I
guess it would depend on the device and drivers supplying this
information to the API. Has anyone with an Android handset seen any
applications which are aware of altitude?

Thanks

Gaz

On 8 March 2010 21:05, Graham Jones  wrote:
> Andrew,
> That is a really good summary - you have found some applications that I
> hadn't heard of - I'll go and try them.
> I don't know if there is a decent Android page on the wiki,  but the info
> you have collected would be good to go on that.
>
> Graham.
>
> On 8 March 2010 17:05, Andrew Chadwick (email lists)
>  wrote:
>>
>> (Argh, let's try that again from a subscribed email address)
>>
>> Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>>
>> > The other thing I have in mind to do is a POI collector for Android
>> > devices. I seem to remember there being an interest in this before
>> > Christmas when the Mapzen collector for the iPhone was launched - and
>> > I've
>> > just got hold of an Android phone (HTC Hero) and fancy having a play.
>> > Would there still be interest in this? What I'll probably do is work on
>> > both apps - time permitting - but prioritise the one which has the most
>> > current interest.
>>
>> Other people have mentioned Vespucci and BTC Mapper, which are closer to
>> what you're probably thinking of. I think they're both incomplete and
>> buggy though, and release very infrequently for Android 1.5. I tend to
>> work with GPS export traces and photos, and I've dug around a bit in the
>> marketplace for stuff that seems to work (for me): mini-reviews:
>>
>>
>> For offline data gathering, I'm using GPS Logger for Android <
>> http://gpslogger.codeplex.com/ > most right now, which allows text
>> annotation and produces GPX that plays quite nicely in JOSM. That plus
>> my Hero's camera app. It's said to be comparatively frugal with battery
>> use if dialed down to infrequent polling. Under fairly enthusiastic
>> development and release, good stuff.
>>
>> OSM Tracker for Android[tm] <
>> http://code.google.com/p/osmtracker-android/ > is looking good too, and
>> gets updates about as often: it's recently grown the ability to make
>> photo records as well as voice notes, and seems to have some hardcoded
>> presets. Faintly funky WinMo-esque UI that seems to be improving :)
>>
>> I'm hoping that Open GPS Tracker <
>> http://code.google.com/p/open-gpstracker/ > will show OSM background
>> layers in a future release: currently it only displays Google Maps maps,
>> so it's of no use to OSMers. But it behaves very nicely, it's open
>> source, seems to be updated fairly frequently, and I'd really quite like
>> to use it for the task of -seeing where I've been- when out mapping.
>> Looks like a good project to hack on, or at least to vote up wishlist
>> items you want on :)
>>
>> RMaps < http://code.google.com/p/rmaps/ > can show various OSM layers
>> including the public transport one, but doesn't seem able to cache
>> downloaded tiles. Open-source. Annoying bug that sometimes crashes the
>> app when tapping around in the map display.
>>
>> Maps(-) (no source URL; think it's just freeware) can cache downloaded
>> tiles on the SD card for offline use, but can't be worked on publicly
>> (AFAICT), and has had "ad releases" in the past without any warning,
>> behaviour which I dislike intensely.
>>
>>
>>
>> And, erm, that's what I actually use.
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Chadwick
>>
>> ___
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Graham Jones
> Hartlepool, UK
> email: grahamjones...@gmail.com
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] OpenGeoData

2010-03-08 Thread Gaz Davidson
Have all the old posts on OpenGeoData been lost forever?

I was looking for the old announcement about Yahoo! giving permission
to use the satellite imagery, I just get the front page with no 404
error, redirect or warning that the content has moved :-(

http://opengeodata.org/?p=120

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] wikipedia: towns/cities pages include a osm-direct-link

2010-03-08 Thread Gaz Davidson
On 7 March 2010 00:59, Tirkon  wrote:
> The developers also think about integrating the georeferenced Commons
> photos into an OSM map as it is known from Google Maps together with
> http://www.panoramio.com/.

That's a really cool idea. It would also be nice if there was a way to
add locations to Commons images using some form of embedded OSM
widget, like how it's done on Panoramio.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Google StreetMap embedding Flickr photos

2010-03-03 Thread Gaz Davidson
On 1 March 2010 22:44,   wrote:
> In my case (the street sign picture) they are purely displaying it as a
> whole so I guess that they are a collective work, however in the new fancy
> stuff they are actively blending photos into a mosasic which surely is a
> derriative work.

I guess that the new position, orientation and other metadata would be
derived works, while the mosaic itself would be just a combination of
everything and therefore a collective work. It would be really cool
for OSM-like projects if we could force Google to publish this new
metadata under a CC:SA license rather than have them remove CC:SA
images from their maps.

If this happened we could upload our own sloppily geo-tagged images to
Flickr or other hosting services under CC:SA licenses, then pull the
metadata back out from Google once they'd used their streetview images
to perfectly align them, then people could do all kinds of cool stuff
with the data: make our own street view, run them through Bundler to
get point clouds for the outlines of buildings for tracing, have
someone start a rival to Photosynth, maybe even a fully textured 3D
streetmap one day.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Serious consideration of "Newbie Editor"

2010-02-25 Thread Gaz Davidson
If there are plans for a new web editor, can avoiding Flash be part of
the considerations?

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] XFN links from user pages

2010-02-14 Thread Gaz Davidson
Hi

New user here, apologies if I'm posting this in the wrong place, I
asked about this on IRC and was redirected here.

I've been playing with this new Google Buzz thing and realised that
privacy issues aside, it's a great step forward in encouraging the
growth of the semantic web. Social networks of the future won't be
owned by one entity like with Facebook, MySpace and LinkedIn, but
instead spread across the whole of the web and linked together with
RSS feeds and microformats like XFN and FoaF.

So, I think it would be cool if we could have the XFN profile
attribute in the head tag of our OSM profile pages and a rel="me" link
back to some user defined URL. There would also need to be similar
links to combine sub-pages (rel="chapter me", rel="index me"). This
info could then be used by Buzz right now, friends could see my edits
and maybe get sucked into OSM that way, but the important thing is
that social web apps of the future would be able to use this data too.

Anyone else think this is a great idea?

Regards

Gaz

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk