Re: [OSM-talk] pic4review | Re: 140 000 shops of unspecified type
Hello, Great to see Pic4Review being used :-) Note that missions can be configured with ready-to-use answers, mission creator set the possible answers (one per shop=* value, picture/symbol can be associated) so that contributors don't need to write shop value themselves when reviewing. This can take few minutes to configure for mission creator, but make task really easier / faster for contributors. I can provide some help if needed. Regards, Adrien P. Le 15/03/2019 à 12:52, Rory McCann a écrit : On 15/03/2019 11:08, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: how to find it? JOSM validator since latest released version complains about shop=yes - just download data and run validator Osmose has support for displaying JOSM validator complaints http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=9002&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable= shows JOSM deprecation warnings http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/H0S - you can navigate to your area and press run pic4review ( https://pic4review.pavie.info/ ) is a new editor which uses Mapillary & OpenStreetCam to make targetted edits to OSM objects. I've been exploring it for changing shop=yes tags and it's pretty useful. This is for Dublin, but you can duplicate it elsewhere https://pic4review.pavie.info/#/mission/417 With street level imagery like that, remote mapping is much more reliable. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing wiki* -> brand:wiki*
Hello, Thank you for this query, which will be very useful for detecting these issues. I'm not sure if this is possible in the current state of Wikidata, but can't we retrieve all shop chains brands, and then query OSM to find object having wikidata tag pointing to one of the brands ? If data is structured enough on Wikidata side, we would have a better way to retrieve more of the OSM issues. Regards, Adrien. Le 27/09/2017 à 00:47, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit : Here is a query that finds all wikidata IDs frequently used in "brand:wikidata", and shows OSM objects whose "wikidata" points to the same. I would like to replace all such wikidata/wikipedia tags with the corresponding brand:wikidata/brand:wikipedia. Most of them are in India, but there are some in Europe and other places. This query can be used directly from JOSM as well. http://tinyurl.com/y72afjpy BTW, this type of queries might be good for maproulette challenges once they can work more like osmose. -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] WhatOSM, a guide for contribution tools
+1, taking pictures for Mapillary or OpenStreetCam is not really competiting with time for OSM contribution. Moreover, I gave a talk about using street-level imagery for contributing to OSM [1] to this year State of the Map. Clearly, pictures taken by other people allowed me to spend hours contributing remotely, which I could'nt have done without this data source (as my city is already pretty well mapped). > For new contributors, the recommendations feel a bit too focused on > niche use cases, and not enough on core OSM. When people have a few > hours or days to spare and want to contribute to OSM, then I would > almost always recommend that they start mapping in their local area > using iD or JOSM (depending on computer skills). Well, we can also add traditionnal OSM editors in the list ;-) But the original idea was to make people discover new thematic tools. I think when someone introduce you to OSM, the person always mention mainstream editors. And if you have any idea of interesting tools for less "niche" cases, let me know. > Something else to consider is that "outside" and "remotely" does not > cover the entire OSM experience. In fact, the traditional way to > contribute is to collect data outside, and enter it back at home. Right > now, that's not an option with your tool. In fact we already manage tools working in both cases (working both on desktop and smartphone, like OSM notes). And for applications needing ground data but only working on desktop, even if it's not explicit in the app, if you don't have info then you will instinctively go find it on the ground. Like OpenBeerMap, it doesn't work well on smartphone, so you will mainly use it on desktop. But if you can't remember which beer is served on a given pub, the best solution is to go buy some by yourself and then input data (be careful of drunk data) :-) > Hope this mail doesn't come across as too negative! I mostly focussed on > potential improvements rather than the things that worked fine for me > (i.e. everything not mentioned here). No worries, as long as it is constructive, it's good to have the feedback ;-) Regards, Adrien. [1] http://my.pavie.info/ftp/p4c-sotm-2017/diapo.pdf Le 22/09/2017 à 12:11, Jo a écrit : I don't really mind having Mapillary in there, but if you do, you'd have to mention OpenStreetCam as well, of course. When I go out to survey using making Mapillary pictures, it's true I'm not adding data using Vespucci or Walking Papers, but I wouldn't do those things anyway. Making automated picture sequences doesn't really get in the way of what I'm actuallly doing, cycling, or walking. When couch mapping they are often really handy to have and work with, so I definitely helps us. Aerial imagery is great, but even at high resolution it's not possible to see every detail on it. Jo 2017-09-22 11:57 GMT+02:00 Tobias Knerr <mailto:o...@tobias-knerr.de>>: On 21.09.2017 19 :45, PanierAvide wrote: > http://projets.pavie.info/whatosm/ <http://projets.pavie.info/whatosm/> This may be controversial, but I don't think a guide for people considering to contribute to OSM should send them away to Mapillary. They aren't part of OSM proper and arguably compete with us for volunteer time. Mapillary let us use their images, of course, but they have that in common with a lot of other orgs that no one would mistake for being part of the OSM project. > It can be used by new contributors, but also more experimented ones, who > don't know what to do anymore in their neighbourhood. For new contributors, the recommendations feel a bit too focused on niche use cases, and not enough on core OSM. When people have a few hours or days to spare and want to contribute to OSM, then I would almost always recommend that they start mapping in their local area using iD or JOSM (depending on computer skills). Something else to consider is that "outside" and "remotely" does not cover the entire OSM experience. In fact, the traditional way to contribute is to collect data outside, and enter it back at home. Right now, that's not an option with your tool. Hope this mail doesn't come across as too negative! I mostly focussed on potential improvements rather than the things that worked fine for me (i.e. everything not mentioned here). Tobias It might be > interested to show this to people when doing mapping parties. User > interface works as well on desktop as on smartphone. > > This project is open source and is available on this repository : > > https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/WhatOSM <https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/WhatOSM>
Re: [OSM-talk] Which tool for OSM, a guide for contribution tools (was WhatOSM)
Hello, Everyone concerned by naming issues might be interested to know that name was changed into "Which tool for OSM ?" in user interface and documentation. Also, a clear disclaimer was added into the repository README about the absence of link with OSMF. I hope this is enough for complying with future trademark policy. Regards, Adrien. Le 21/09/2017 à 19:45, PanierAvide a écrit : Hi everyone, As you may know, OSM has a whole set of tools allowing various thematic editing and contribution. Every contributor can find something to do, however when you are new to this world, you don't where these tools are and which one is made for you. In order to make it easier discovering contribution tools, and find the ones according to what you want to work on, I made a little web guide named WhatOSM. When answering three questions (level of difficulty, available time and if you are indoors/outdoors), you have a list of corresponding tools. You can try it here : http://projets.pavie.info/whatosm/ It can be used by new contributors, but also more experimented ones, who don't know what to do anymore in their neighbourhood. It might be interested to show this to people when doing mapping parties. User interface works as well on desktop as on smartphone. This project is open source and is available on this repository : https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/WhatOSM You can contribute to it by proposing tools which allow contributing more or less directly to OpenStreetMap. Also, if you speak English + another language, you can help translating the application : https://www.transifex.com/openlevelup/whatosm/ If you have any ideas or suggestions, let me know :-) Regards, Adrien. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] WhatOSM, a guide for contribution tools
Hello, Thanks for this idea. In fact these videos can have an interesting value for mapping. I opened an issue on the repository : https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/Pic4Carto.js/issues/33 I'm not very sure yet how to query Wikimedia Commons to retrieve these videos, I have to read some docs ! :-) Regards, Adrien. Le 22/09/2017 à 08:12, Oleksiy Muzalyev a écrit : Good morning Adrien, I have an idea how to improve it. For example, for this lake http://projets.pavie.info/pic4carto/index.html?from=1490466554238#17/46.35173/6.79455 I see three photos from Wikimedia category all right. But I do not see the 1 minute 19 seconds video of this lake in .webm format, which is also in the lake's Wikimeida category and which was published on the same date with these photos: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Lac_de_Lovenex The video files has got the correct coordinates, the same as photos, - I just verified it. I checked with another places, which have a video, for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lac_de_Salanfe . And videos are not shown on the Pic4Carto. A short HD or 4K video, especially filmed in good light conditions from the air, provides a lot of details about a place, what could be sometimes very useful for mapping. By the way, Google Maps recently also announced that short videos, up to 30 seconds could be added to its commercial map. Wikimedia accepts videos only in free .webm format ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebM ). Best regards, Oleksiy On 21.09.17 21:03, PanierAvide wrote: Thank you, let me know if you have any ideas to improve it :-) Regards, Adrien. Le 21/09/2017 à 20:53, Oleksiy Muzalyev a écrit : Hi Adrien, I tested the Pic4Carto application on photos which I added recently to Wikimedia. It works just fine. Very impressive. I will definitively use it. Best regards, Oleksiy ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 157, Issue 41
Thanks for making this clear. I opened an issue on the repository, and will change the name soon accordingly. I hope that, when trademark policy will be stable, we will have a comprehensive, non-lawyer, developer-friendly documentation about possible uses. Nice-to-have feature: a website where you put the name you want to use, and it says if it's OK or not ;-) Regards, Adrien. Le 22/09/2017 à 00:41, Kathleen Lu a écrit : With nominative fair use, you don't need to ask permission, which is easier for everyone. An example of nominative fair use would be calling the tool "What?, a guide tool for OSM" (fairly describing the software's relationship to OSM) And example of a disclaimer would be a simple statement in the website or readme along the lines of "This tool is not an official OSMF product, and it is neither endorsed nor sponsored by OSMF." -Kathleen -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] WhatOSM, a guide for contribution tools
Thank you, let me know if you have any ideas to improve it :-) Regards, Adrien. Le 21/09/2017 à 20:53, Oleksiy Muzalyev a écrit : Hi Adrien, I tested the Pic4Carto application on photos which I added recently to Wikimedia. It works just fine. Very impressive. I will definitively use it. Best regards, Oleksiy On 21.09.17 19:45, PanierAvide wrote: Hi everyone, As you may know, OSM has a whole set of tools allowing various thematic editing and contribution. Every contributor can find something to do, however when you are new to this world, you don't where these tools are and which one is made for you. In order to make it easier discovering contribution tools, and find the ones according to what you want to work on, I made a little web guide named WhatOSM. When answering three questions (level of difficulty, available time and if you are indoors/outdoors), you have a list of corresponding tools. You can try it here : http://projets.pavie.info/whatosm/ It can be used by new contributors, but also more experimented ones, who don't know what to do anymore in their neighbourhood. It might be interested to show this to people when doing mapping parties. User interface works as well on desktop as on smartphone. This project is open source and is available on this repository : https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/WhatOSM You can contribute to it by proposing tools which allow contributing more or less directly to OpenStreetMap. Also, if you speak English + another language, you can help translating the application : https://www.transifex.com/openlevelup/whatosm/ If you have any ideas or suggestions, let me know :-) Regards, Adrien. -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] WhatOSM, a guide for contribution tools
I was reading the famous policy. If I understand well, I cannot name without authorization the project WhatOSM (meaning that I can still ask for authorization ?). But if I name it "What ? OSM !" it is OK, because it doesn't mix OSM with the name, and it uses OSM word mark correctly ? Adrien. Le 21/09/2017 à 20:28, Simon Poole a écrit : They are a) not copyrighted b the TM policy will allow certain community use of the trademarks that previously was not clearly permitted and defines going forward what is acceptable and what not. That said, for the reasons mentioned in the policy, you should avoid *OSM* names. Not to mention that on more general principles they are not a good idea. Simon On 21.09.2017 19:53, James wrote: You might want to reconsider the name as you started this project 2 weeks ago and XYZosm or osmXYZ or OpenXYZMap are "copyrighted" and goes against the new usage policy. On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:45 PM, PanierAvide <mailto:panierav...@riseup.net>> wrote: Hi everyone, As you may know, OSM has a whole set of tools allowing various thematic editing and contribution. Every contributor can find something to do, however when you are new to this world, you don't where these tools are and which one is made for you. In order to make it easier discovering contribution tools, and find the ones according to what you want to work on, I made a little web guide named WhatOSM. When answering three questions (level of difficulty, available time and if you are indoors/outdoors), you have a list of corresponding tools. You can try it here : http://projets.pavie.info/whatosm/ <http://projets.pavie.info/whatosm/> It can be used by new contributors, but also more experimented ones, who don't know what to do anymore in their neighbourhood. It might be interested to show this to people when doing mapping parties. User interface works as well on desktop as on smartphone. This project is open source and is available on this repository : https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/WhatOSM <https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/WhatOSM> You can contribute to it by proposing tools which allow contributing more or less directly to OpenStreetMap. Also, if you speak English + another language, you can help translating the application : https://www.transifex.com/openlevelup/whatosm/ <https://www.transifex.com/openlevelup/whatosm/> If you have any ideas or suggestions, let me know :-) Regards, Adrien. -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk> -- 外に遊びに行こう！ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] WhatOSM, a guide for contribution tools
As this is new, is there a dedicated email contact to reach people handling this ? Regards, Adrien. Le 21/09/2017 à 20:17, James a écrit : You would need to get approval from the OSMF if you wanted to still keep WhatOSM On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:14 PM, PanierAvide <mailto:panierav...@riseup.net>> wrote: Thanks for pointing this out. I'm clearly not an expert of legal issues, so the following may probably not make sense. The goal of this tool is to help new contributors, and making them more easily start contributing to OSM. If we give it an obscure name, not referring to OSM, then where is the link between this tool and OSM ? I understand legal issues, but I hope that we don't loose of sight that we are a community project, and we need some form of cohesion. Our tools don't share so much except that they edit OSM data or help people doing so. According to this policy, JOSM should have been named instead "Java Editor for you-know-which-map-I'm-talking-about" ? Doesn't make sense to me. However, if there is a way to keep the name and sign some sort of contract, implying that I will not misuse the name or so, no problem, that would be fair. But let's keep the fun in creating tools for OSM, and not being able to name it using OSM is clearly boring plus misleading for users. Thanks for reading this nonsense, I'm totally open to find a way to solve this potential naming issue, if someone can give me some hints about it, it would be great. Regards, Adrien. Le 21/09/2017 à 19:53, James a écrit : You might want to reconsider the name as you started this project 2 weeks ago and XYZosm or osmXYZ or OpenXYZMap are "copyrighted" and goes against the new usage policy. On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:45 PM, PanierAvide mailto:panierav...@riseup.net>> wrote: Hi everyone, As you may know, OSM has a whole set of tools allowing various thematic editing and contribution. Every contributor can find something to do, however when you are new to this world, you don't where these tools are and which one is made for you. In order to make it easier discovering contribution tools, and find the ones according to what you want to work on, I made a little web guide named WhatOSM. When answering three questions (level of difficulty, available time and if you are indoors/outdoors), you have a list of corresponding tools. You can try it here : http://projets.pavie.info/whatosm/ <http://projets.pavie.info/whatosm/> It can be used by new contributors, but also more experimented ones, who don't know what to do anymore in their neighbourhood. It might be interested to show this to people when doing mapping parties. User interface works as well on desktop as on smartphone. This project is open source and is available on this repository : https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/WhatOSM <https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/WhatOSM> You can contribute to it by proposing tools which allow contributing more or less directly to OpenStreetMap. Also, if you speak English + another language, you can help translating the application : https://www.transifex.com/openlevelup/whatosm/ <https://www.transifex.com/openlevelup/whatosm/> If you have any ideas or suggestions, let me know :-) Regards, Adrien. -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk> -- 外に遊びに行こう！ -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur -- 外に遊びに行こう！ -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] WhatOSM, a guide for contribution tools
Thanks for pointing this out. I'm clearly not an expert of legal issues,
so the following may probably not make sense.
The goal of this tool is to help new contributors, and making them more
easily start contributing to OSM. If we give it an obscure name, not
referring to OSM, then where is the link between this tool and OSM ? I
understand legal issues, but I hope that we don't loose of sight that we
are a community project, and we need some form of cohesion. Our tools
don't share so much except that they edit OSM data or help people doing
so. According to this policy, JOSM should have been named instead "Java
Editor for you-know-which-map-I'm-talking-about" ? Doesn't make sense to me.
However, if there is a way to keep the name and sign some sort of
contract, implying that I will not misuse the name or so, no problem,
that would be fair. But let's keep the fun in creating tools for OSM,
and not being able to name it using OSM is clearly boring plus
misleading for users.
Thanks for reading this nonsense, I'm totally open to find a way to
solve this potential naming issue, if someone can give me some hints
about it, it would be great.
Regards,
Adrien.
Le 21/09/2017 à 19:53, James a écrit :
You might want to reconsider the name as you started this project 2
weeks ago and XYZosm or osmXYZ or OpenXYZMap are "copyrighted" and
goes against the new usage policy.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:45 PM, PanierAvide <mailto:panierav...@riseup.net>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
As you may know, OSM has a whole set of tools allowing various
thematic editing and contribution. Every contributor can find
something to do, however when you are new to this world, you don't
where these tools are and which one is made for you.
In order to make it easier discovering contribution tools, and
find the ones according to what you want to work on, I made a
little web guide named WhatOSM. When answering three questions
(level of difficulty, available time and if you are
indoors/outdoors), you have a list of corresponding tools. You can
try it here :
http://projets.pavie.info/whatosm/
<http://projets.pavie.info/whatosm/>
It can be used by new contributors, but also more experimented
ones, who don't know what to do anymore in their neighbourhood. It
might be interested to show this to people when doing mapping
parties. User interface works as well on desktop as on smartphone.
This project is open source and is available on this repository :
https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/WhatOSM
<https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/WhatOSM>
You can contribute to it by proposing tools which allow
contributing more or less directly to OpenStreetMap. Also, if you
speak English + another language, you can help translating the
application :
https://www.transifex.com/openlevelup/whatosm/
<https://www.transifex.com/openlevelup/whatosm/>
If you have any ideas or suggestions, let me know :-)
Regards,
Adrien.
--
PanierAvide
Géomaticien & développeur
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk>
--
外に遊びに行こう！
--
PanierAvide
Géomaticien & développeur
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] WhatOSM, a guide for contribution tools
Hi everyone, As you may know, OSM has a whole set of tools allowing various thematic editing and contribution. Every contributor can find something to do, however when you are new to this world, you don't where these tools are and which one is made for you. In order to make it easier discovering contribution tools, and find the ones according to what you want to work on, I made a little web guide named WhatOSM. When answering three questions (level of difficulty, available time and if you are indoors/outdoors), you have a list of corresponding tools. You can try it here : http://projets.pavie.info/whatosm/ It can be used by new contributors, but also more experimented ones, who don't know what to do anymore in their neighbourhood. It might be interested to show this to people when doing mapping parties. User interface works as well on desktop as on smartphone. This project is open source and is available on this repository : https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/WhatOSM You can contribute to it by proposing tools which allow contributing more or less directly to OpenStreetMap. Also, if you speak English + another language, you can help translating the application : https://www.transifex.com/openlevelup/whatosm/ If you have any ideas or suggestions, let me know :-) Regards, Adrien. -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Pic4Carto: efficient pictures viewer for micro-mapping
Hello, Is the loading difficult for every area or just a particular one ? Maybe there are a lot of pictures, and as Pic4Carto requests 100 pictures per HTTP request for a given provider, it's possible that there are a lot for requests running for retrieving all the pictures metadata. Cordially. Le 26/11/2016 à 18:38, Greg Morgan a écrit : PanierAvide, That's very nice. Your system takes 100 pounds of pain out of using Mapillary. There seems to be a few missing items but I cannot put my finger on them. The simplicity is Pic4Carto's best feature. Regards, Greg -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Pic4Carto: efficient pictures viewer for micro-mapping
Hi everyone, There are more and more street-view pictures which are under open license (Mapillary, Wikimedia Commons, Flickr, and OpenStreetView which is changing its name). These pictures are a gold mine containing a lot of interesting informations for OpenStreetMap, however they are not fully used yet. Maybe one explanation of this is that every source has its own web portal, not always simple to use or fast to load. In order to get the best of all pictures, I created a tool to help mappers named Pic4Carto. It allows to see all recent pictures from Mapillary, Flickr and Wikimedia Commons, on a given area, as a slideshow (pictures showing one by one automatically). The goal is to watch fast all the data on the area, to discover features we want to add in OpenStreetMap (for example benches, fire hydrants, billboards, maxspeed signs...). The tool is available here : http://projets.pavie.info/pic4carto/ It's an open-source software (under AGPL license), source code is available on Framagit : https://framagit.org/PanierAvide/Pic4Carto Don't hesitate to make any suggests, report bugs of share any idea for improvements ;-) Cordially. -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] OpenRandomMap
Hello everyone, The OSM project is associated to many tools and online maps, most of the time useful, about various themes. For example, we have OpenSeaMap, OpenCycleMap, OpenBeerMap, OpenSolarMap, OpenEvacMap, OpenLoveMap, OpenTopoMap, OpenEventMap, ... In order to help the community and make it develop even more interesting projects, I just released OpenRandomMap : a name generator for open online maps. The goal is to give ideas to all developers in the community, and let them create new amazing maps. You can use it here : http://github.pavie.info/openrandommap/ It is released under AGPL v3 license, on GitHub : https://github.com/PanierAvide/panieravide.github.io/tree/master/openrandommap I hope we will see soon some new "OpenIceMachineMap" or "OpenPrincipleOfEquivalenceMap" ;) -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] YoHours: opening_hours viewer and editor
Hello, I recently released a new version of YoHours, a website which allows everyone to create and view opening hours in the OSM syntax. It now supports seasons-dependent hours (month, week, day, holiday selectors). It's available here: http://github.pavie.info/yohours/ The code is available on GitHub: https://github.com/PanierAvide/panieravide.github.io/tree/master/yohours [1] If you have any suggestions, let me know :) Cordially, PanierAvide. Links: -- [1] https://github.com/PanierAvide/panieravide.github.io/tree/master/yohours ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
