Re: [OSM-talk] Naming bridges (and roads over them)
LeedsTracker leedstrac...@gmail.com writes: Hello all, I usually name bridges with name=x but this often interrupts a highway's name. It would make sense to me to have bridge:name=x since we have already have bridge=yes How about using a relation for the bridge? This would also be desirable because there are bridges with multiple carriageways on them. Matthias What about naming the road with a relation and use the bridge's name in the name tag? Works both ways. -- Brgds Aun Johnsen (Over Web Mail) ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Naming bridges (and roads over them)
Hello all, I usually name bridges with name=x but this often interrupts a highway's name. It would make sense to me to have bridge:name=x since we have already have bridge=yes I see this was discussed over a year ago on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:bridge I would like to get a consensus and put it up on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge cheers, LT ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Naming bridges (and roads over them)
LeedsTracker leedstrac...@gmail.com writes: Hello all, I usually name bridges with name=x but this often interrupts a highway's name. It would make sense to me to have bridge:name=x since we have already have bridge=yes How about using a relation for the bridge? This would also be desirable because there are bridges with multiple carriageways on them. Matthias ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
