Re: [OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-10 Thread Nic Roets
This problem can elegantly be solved as a "layer" on the output e.g. a
hyperlink / ballon on web based map.

OSM only need to indicate which nodes already has wikipedia entries
and what their identifiers are. Then we can prevent duplicates from
being rendered.

> I suspect the most likely explanation is that they simply don't
> realise it's not legal - I'd expect discussion on the page if they

Or it's legal because it's fair use because it's small scale and not for profit.

If Google Maps contain a feature that automatically displays WGS
coordinates, then it's only logical that normal people will manually
copy those coordinates into other documents that they freely share
with other interested parties. IMHO The Berne convention (and probably
a whole lot of other case law / common law) prevents someone from
distributing a product under "All rights reserved" and then afterwards
making extremely broad claims against a significant proportion of
their customer base.

A copyright holder can't have it both ways : Upfront revenues and
guaranteed penalties from their customers.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-10 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Robin Paulson wrote:

> i'm slightly lost now, wondering how osm fits in to this. if wp users
> can do it (i assume their legat team has looked through it?), why not
> osm

I suspect the most likely explanation is that they simply don't  
realise it's not legal - I'd expect discussion on the page if they  
thought it was the case. And it's such a small part of Wikipedia that  
Google et al are hardly going to risk the bad press by going after  
them, whereas for us it's our raison d'etre.

There are a couple of possible alternative explanations (copyright of  
geodata under US law, GFDL licensing of each article individually so  
it doesn't form a database) but ignorance is the most likely.

cheers
Richard


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-09 Thread Robin Paulson
On 10/01/2008, Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [co-ordinates on Wikipedia]
> > really, that sounds like it would contravene wikipedia's rules and
> > google's terms of use? and is it our responsibility to pre-guess what
> > wp editors are doing? i think taking their data at face value is
> > acceptable
>
> Please read
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Obtaining_geographic_coordinates
>
> It actively recommends getting co-ordinates from Google Maps,
> Multimap, Microsoft etc. etc. etc.

it does, cheers

i'm slightly lost now, wondering how osm fits in to this. if wp users
can do it (i assume their legat team has looked through it?), why not
osm

i guess it's ok, because they're using it for illustrative purposes
(fair use?), rather than as a basis for their content

ok, i'll keep looking and keep thinking. thanks

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-09 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Robin Paulson wrote:

> [co-ordinates on Wikipedia]
> On 08/01/2008, Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > These are almost certainly derived from Google Maps et al, therefore
> > unsuitable for OSM.
>
> really, that sounds like it would contravene wikipedia's rules and
> google's terms of use? and is it our responsibility to pre-guess what
> wp editors are doing? i think taking their data at face value is
> acceptable

Please read
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Obtaining_geographic_coordinates

It actively recommends getting co-ordinates from Google Maps,  
Multimap, Microsoft etc. etc. etc.

cheers
Richard


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-09 Thread Robin Paulson
On 08/01/2008, Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > while i was looking up some info on wikipedia [1], i noticed that a
> > lot of pages have a lat/lon value to describe their location; this
> > strikes me as something we could use to increase the amount of data in
> > OSM
>
> These are almost certainly derived from Google Maps et al, therefore
> unsuitable for OSM.

really, that sounds like it would contravene wikipedia's rules and
google's terms of use? and is it our responsibility to pre-guess what
wp editors are doing? i think taking their data at face value is
acceptable

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-09 Thread Gervase Markham
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Well no matter where they came from, being Wikipedia they're 
> GNU FDL and if we incorporated them we'd have to switch to GNU FDL as
> well, at least that's how I read virulent licenses.

Wikipedia are working with the FSF to make the FDL "compatible" with 
CC-BY-SA 3. I expect that this will happen by the FSF adding a clause to 
the FDL saying "If you have no front-cover texts, no back-cover texts 
etc. etc, you may relicense this work under CC-BY-SA 3".

This is something we need to consider if we move away from CC-BY-SA. I 
can see the arguments for it, but unless we are careful, it does move us 
further away from the growing area of license compatibility.

Gerv


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-07 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi,

> These are almost certainly derived from Google Maps et al, therefore  
> unsuitable for OSM.

Well no matter where they came from, being Wikipedia they're 
GNU FDL and if we incorporated them we'd have to switch to GNU FDL as
well, at least that's how I read virulent licenses.

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ##  N49°00.09' E008°23.33'


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-07 Thread Bruce Cowan

On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 22:41 +, Richard Fairhurst wrote:

> These are almost certainly derived from Google Maps et al, therefore  
> unsuitable for OSM.

I got the lat/long for the Erskine Bridge from my GPS, so at least it's
fine.
-- 
Bruce Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-07 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Anselm Hook wrote:

> Maybe somebody should start the pragmatic street maps project

I think the pragmatic "free use, we don't care that much about the  
licensing" project is over at http://maps.google.com/ ;)

cheers
Richard

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-07 Thread Anselm Hook
Maybe somebody should start the pragmatic street maps project

 - a


On Jan 7, 2008 2:41 PM, Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Robin Paulson wrote:
>
> > while i was looking up some info on wikipedia [1], i noticed that a
> > lot of pages have a lat/lon value to describe their location; this
> > strikes me as something we could use to increase the amount of data in
> > OSM
>
> These are almost certainly derived from Google Maps et al, therefore
> unsuitable for OSM.
>
> cheers
> Richard
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-07 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Robin Paulson wrote:

> while i was looking up some info on wikipedia [1], i noticed that a
> lot of pages have a lat/lon value to describe their location; this
> strikes me as something we could use to increase the amount of data in
> OSM

These are almost certainly derived from Google Maps et al, therefore  
unsuitable for OSM.

cheers
Richard

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-07 Thread Robin Paulson
On 08/01/2008, Robin Paulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> while i was looking up some info on wikipedia [1], i noticed that a
> lot of pages have a lat/lon value to describe their location; this
> strikes me as something we could use to increase the amount of data in
> OSM
>
> it would require a mass download of data from all the pages that
> contain these values, matching to relevant tags and importing into
> OSM.
>
> dos anyone here have the experience to query the wikipedia db in a way
> that could pull out just those pages with location info?
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southdown_Train_Station

bad i know, but replying to my own mail:

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProjekt_Georeferenzierung/Wikipedia-World/en

has a database of all georeferenced POIs in SQL format

i realise a lot of these will be in OSM already, so there would need
to be some cross-referencing/filtering to prevent duplication

suggestions, comments? has this been done already?

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] POIs from wikipedia

2008-01-07 Thread Robin Paulson
while i was looking up some info on wikipedia [1], i noticed that a
lot of pages have a lat/lon value to describe their location; this
strikes me as something we could use to increase the amount of data in
OSM

it would require a mass download of data from all the pages that
contain these values, matching to relevant tags and importing into
OSM.

dos anyone here have the experience to query the wikipedia db in a way
that could pull out just those pages with location info?

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southdown_Train_Station

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk