[OSM-talk] missing some relations after osm2pgsql-import
hi, got my planet-import with osm2pgsql running but now i'm missing some "special" relations. Could someone who has the planet or at least europe online please enter this query and post the result? -111 and -2463632 are missing in my planet_osm_polygon. they are "super-Relations" containing Multiline-Relations as members. May be osm2pgsql doesn't "like" them? http://openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/111 http://openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2463632 i'm running osm2pgsql 0.83 from svn btw: is there an error-log in osm2pgsq which would give some infos? Regards Walter - [url=http://osm.wno-edv-service.de/residentials] Missing Residentials Map 1.17[/url] [url=http://osm.wno-edv-service.de/plz] Postcode Map 2.0.2[/url] -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/missing-some-relations-after-osm2pgsql-import-tp5783305.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] missing some relations after osm2pgsql-import
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Walter Nordmann wrote: > -111 and -2463632 are missing in my planet_osm_polygon. they are > "super-Relations" containing Multiline-Relations as members. May be > osm2pgsql doesn't "like" them? osm2pgsql doesn't support "super-relations". And you should better ask such questions on the dev@ mailing list. Pieren ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] missing some relations after osm2pgsql-import
Pieren wrote > osm2pgsql doesn't support "super-relations". Thanks. > And you should better ask such questions on the dev@ mailing list. That was a simple question to the users of osm2pgsql. Knowing *now*, that it is not my fault, i can ask the developers if they can change it. Or do it by my own. Regards Walter - [url=http://osm.wno-edv-service.de/residentials] Missing Residentials Map 1.17[/url] [url=http://osm.wno-edv-service.de/plz] Postcode Map 2.0.2[/url] -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/missing-some-relations-after-osm2pgsql-import-tp5783305p5783355.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] missing some relations after osm2pgsql-import
Walter Nordmann wrote > > Pieren wrote >> osm2pgsql doesn't support "super-relations". > Thanks. >> And you should better ask such questions on the dev@ mailing list. > That was a simple question to the users of osm2pgsql. Knowing * > now * > , that it is not my fault, i can ask the developers if they can change it. > Or do it by my own. > > Regards > Walter In case you are interested in such an option in osm2pgsql, so am I. FYI I opened a ticket on github for that (If you feel you want to tackle some C++ code ;-) ) : https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/issues/101 And sorry for contributing to this off topic, I'm subscribed to [dev] to continue the discussion over there if needed -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/missing-some-relations-after-osm2pgsql-import-tp5783305p5783535.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
