Re: [OSM-talk] redundant proposal? - man_made=fenced_compounds
Robin Paulson schrieb: On 04/01/2008, Michael Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there an acknowledged way of removing them, without going through the whole comments/opinions/voting process? Ye, it would certainly be good to be more aggressive in cleaning up up the Proposals page, it is hard to casually browse for live proposals. very hard, i think that's part of the reason so few people look through - there's so much rubbish I wouldn't call it rubbish ;-) What about moving proposals not actively worked upon to a new inactive_proposals page (or simply to the rejected features page)? Simply removing stuff has the disadvantage that the former discussion get's lost for future reference. Regards, ULFL ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] redundant proposal? - man_made=fenced_compounds
On 04/01/2008, Michael Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there an acknowledged way of removing them, without going through the whole comments/opinions/voting process? Ye, it would certainly be good to be more aggressive in cleaning up up the Proposals page, it is hard to casually browse for live proposals. very hard, i think that's part of the reason so few people look through - there's so much rubbish Currently, the only mechanism is to move proposals into the Needs cleanup/modification and Works in Progress/Pending sections at the bottom - which are roughly equivalent to the place sick proposals go to die. yeah, i saw that, but i'm not a fan. a vast % fall into one of those categories I propose: 1) Mark redundant proposals with This proposal appears to be redundant or duplicated. Unless there are any objections it will be removed on or after dd-mm- and leave it there until you or someone else is next doing a clean-up round. that's a very good idea, i will do that for lots. i've already moved some duplicates, see earlier concerning roundend/turning_circle 2) More generally, any proposal that has been there for more than a year (see the pages history tab) be removed. Looking at a few other proposals, this may be a little too aggressive as the riverbank http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Large_rivers proposal would go (or perhaps is should?). An alternative would be to remove any proposal that has been there a year and had no substantive activity for 6 months. i'll stick with the warning, and give each one two weeks to be resurrected Here the dates for your example: Created - 29 August 2006 Last substantive comment - Dec 2006 Last comment of any kind - Apr 2007 yes, there's a lot of that rob ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] redundant proposal? - man_made=fenced_compounds
Is there a reason why the waterway=riverbank has not gone through voting? With the multipolygon relation for islands it seems to work well. cheers, Chris - Original Message From: Michael Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, 4 January, 2008 8:25:19 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] redundant proposal? - man_made=fenced_compounds At 01:22 AM 1/4/2008, Robin Paulson wrote: in my quest to tidy the proposals page on the wiki, some proposals have come up which appear to be redundant is there an acknowledged way of removing them, without going through the whole comments/opinions/voting process? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Fenced_compounds is a good example thanks Ye, it would certainly be good to be more aggressive in cleaning up up the Proposals page, it is hard to casually browse for live proposals. Currently, the only mechanism is to move proposals into the Needs cleanup/modification and Works in Progress/Pending sections at the bottom - which are roughly equivalent to the place sick proposals go to die. I propose: 1) Mark redundant proposals with This proposal appears to be redundant or duplicated. Unless there are any objections it will be removed on or after dd-mm- and leave it there until you or someone else is next doing a clean-up round. 2) More generally, any proposal that has been there for more than a year (see the pages history tab) be removed. Looking at a few other proposals, this may be a little too aggressive as the riverbank http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Large_rivers proposal would go (or perhaps is should?). An alternative would be to remove any proposal that has been there a year and had no substantive activity for 6 months. Here the dates for your example: Created - 29 August 2006 Last substantive comment - Dec 2006 Last comment of any kind - Apr 2007 Mike Stockholm ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk __ Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] redundant proposal? - man_made=fenced_compounds
in my quest to tidy the proposals page on the wiki, some proposals have come up which appear to be redundant is there an acknowledged way of removing them, without going through the whole comments/opinions/voting process? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Fenced_compounds is a good example thanks ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
