Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] grouping simple tag proposals
On 04/02/2008, Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i think it would be a good idea to group a lot of these tags together in one proposal, [...] [] I guess, lot's of the simple tags are not that simple when you look more close at it, but let's have a try at Robins idea ... ok, i've started a page with all the shop tags on, feel free to add your own to the list/make comments http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/shops_%28multiple%29 thanks ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] grouping simple tag proposals
On 04/02/2008, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: lot of proposed 'shop' tags on the proposals page, something which is overwhelming and time-consuming to solve using our current method of tag proposal/ratifying i think it would be a good idea to group a lot of these tags together in one proposal, [...] [] I guess, lot's of the simple tags are not that simple when you look more close at it, but let's have a try at Robins idea ... it might be a good idea to try it with 'sport' tags also - we'll see how the shop ones go first, and if there are no problems i might try the same with those ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] grouping simple tag proposals
Hello, On Feb 3, 2008, at 20:20, Robin Paulson wrote: taking on board one of Frederic's comments from last week: there are a lot of proposed 'shop' tags on the proposals page, something which is overwhelming and time-consuming to solve using our current method of tag proposal/ratifying i think it would be a good idea to group a lot of these tags together in one proposal, [...] any tags that get even the slightest objection/comments, etc can be spun out to their own proposal and discussed in more depth as usual sounds good, but why not go a step further: There could be a page on the wiki for simple proposals, and anything that gets no objections for a week is automatically approved and added to Map Features. Cheers Rob ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] grouping simple tag proposals
On 04/02/2008, Robert Vollmert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sounds good, but why not go a step further: There could be a page on the wiki for simple proposals, and anything that gets no objections for a week is automatically approved and added to Map Features. i'm not too comfortable with that - there's enough anecdotal evidence that a lot of tags are not as simple as they seem at first, and we generally learn a fair bit form these discussions that can be applied elsewhere ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] grouping simple tag proposals
Robert Vollmert schrieb: Hello, On Feb 3, 2008, at 20:20, Robin Paulson wrote: taking on board one of Frederic's comments from last week: there are a lot of proposed 'shop' tags on the proposals page, something which is overwhelming and time-consuming to solve using our current method of tag proposal/ratifying i think it would be a good idea to group a lot of these tags together in one proposal, [...] any tags that get even the slightest objection/comments, etc can be spun out to their own proposal and discussed in more depth as usual sounds good, but why not go a step further: There could be a page on the wiki for simple proposals, and anything that gets no objections for a week is automatically approved and added to Map Features. Because I want to have good proposals, not fast ones ;-) I guess, lot's of the simple tags are not that simple when you look more close at it, but let's have a try at Robins idea ... Regards, ULFL ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
