Re: [talk-au] place=?

2008-12-03 Thread Jim Croft
How about this?
http://www.gisca.adelaide.edu.au/web_aria/aria/aria.html
a remoteness index for Australia
http://www.gisca.adelaide.edu.au/products_services/ariav2_about.html

You could invent a 'townyness' metric based on the product of the
variables of the settlement's population and its remoteness...  :)

jim

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Sam Couter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ian Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Should we tag rural towns and localities as significant centres to
 accurately reflect their role in the surrounding area, even when they have
 a low population?

 + Yes, Some towns have very low population counts, but are very significant
 administrative and service centres to the surrounding communities.  They
 are a real towns, and not just localities.  We should reflect this reality
 on the map with the place= tag.

 You're asking people to make a subjective judgement here. This will vary
 greatly and cause arguments that can't really be settled.

 Population data shouldn't be entered at all.. It just extra information to
 get out of date, and it can be obtained elsewhere.  Lets focus on what OSM
 does best, mapping to reflect the reality on the ground.

 Population count is reality, and it's objective and hard to argue with.

 A compromise may be to note the population in the shire/county rather
 than just within the town itself. This often reflects its importance in
 the region. And of course the renderer may become smart enough to
 consider smaller places more important when they're a long way from
 other places.
 --
 Sam Couter |  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 OpenPGP fingerprint:  A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05  5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

 iEYEARECAAYFAkk2Vf0ACgkQhTADrt6Jx1w1HACcDNZ5cNRramKYWy3em1AMgq0F
 MjYAnRWbUTSkxzsYO0YOmdzAdD2KZgYW
 =zBXc
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au





-- 
_
Jim Croft ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ +61-2-62509499

Words, as is well known, are the great foes of reality.
- Joseph Conrad, author (1857-1924)

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] place=?

2008-12-03 Thread Liz
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Jim Croft wrote:
 How about this?
 http://www.gisca.adelaide.edu.au/web_aria/aria/aria.html
 a remoteness index for Australia
 http://www.gisca.adelaide.edu.au/products_services/ariav2_about.html

 You could invent a 'townyness' metric based on the product of the
 variables of the settlement's population and its remoteness...  :)

 jim

Sorry Jim but ARIA is about to be redone (again).


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] place=?

2008-12-03 Thread Liz
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Janet Hawtin wrote:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_in_Australia

 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

A useful list indeed.
Is that Kim in disguise? or another entity called Janet?


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] place

2008-12-03 Thread Neil Penman
I don't have a problem with subjective and I think maybe we should use some of 
Liz's criteria.  One of the great things about OSM is that it doesn't just 
reflect what the government believes should be the situation as do the maps 
from PSMA.  I think there is merit in basing the significance of a place on 
subjective criteria which should be openly stated but may never be agreed to by 
100% of the mapping population.  For example one of these remote places with a 
population of 200 may be signposted from a distance of several hundred 
kilometers, have a clearly defined centre, a library, many shops even a bank as 
it may serve a much larger rural population.  I'd probably classify this as a 
town.  Whereas there are places with 200 people 20k or so outside of urban 
areas that are virtually impossible to spot.  I've been tagging these as 
hamlets even though there doesn't seem to be a centre at all, just two signs 
one at either end of a stretch of road with a few
 roofs poking through the trees.

Regards

Neil





From: Liz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, 3 December, 2008 9:11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] place

On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Sam Couter wrote:
 Population count is reality, and it's objective and hard to argue with.

Not exactly, its a moving target, and subject to collection errors.

I've had one of those quick looks with my usual search engine 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town#Australia
In Australia, the status of a town is formally applied in only a few states. 
Most states do define cities, and towns are commonly understood to be those 
centres of population not formally declared to be cities and usually with a 
population in excess of about 250 people.


http://www.dictionary.net/village
Village \Village\ (?; 48), n. [F., fr. L. villaticus belonging to a country 
house or villa. See Villa, and cf. Villatic.]

A small assemblage of houses in the country, less than a town or city.
Village cart, a kind of two-wheeled pleasure carriage without a top.
Syn: Village, Hamlet, Town, City.
Usage: In England, a hamlet denotes a collection of houses, too small to have 
a parish church. A village has a church, but no market. A town has both a 
market and a church or churches. A city is, in the legal sense, an 
incorporated borough town, which is, or has been, the place of a bishop's 
see. In the United States these distinctions do not hold.
Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070915103226AALZGhW
What is the difference between a village, town, and city?
The place I live considers itself a village. It's not under populated or that 
highly populated. There are about 35,000 people here. What determines if it 
is a town, village, or city?
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
Population for each actually varries depending on where you are. Here is some 
information that might help.

A hamlet is a small settlement, too small to be considered a village. The 
name comes from the diminutive of a Germanic word for an enclosed piece of 
land or pasture.


A village is a clustered human settlement or community, larger than a hamlet,

A town is a community of people ranging from a few hundred to several 
thousands, although it may be applied loosely even to huge metropolitan 
areas. Usually, a town is thought of as larger than a village but smaller 
than a city. The words city and village came into English from Latin 
via French. Town and borough (also burrow, burgh, bury, etc.) are 
of native Germanic origin, from Old English burg, a fortified settlement, and 
tūn, an enclosed piece of land

A city is an urban settlement with a particularly important status which 
differentiates it from a town.

City is primarily used to designate an urban settlement with a large 
population. However, city may also indicate a special administrative, legal, 
or historical status.

In the United States, city is primarily a legal term meaning an urban area 
with a degree of autonomy (i.e. a township), rather than meaning an entire 
large settlement (metropolitan area). Outside the United States, city 
implies an entire settlement or metropolitan area, although there are notable 
exceptions, e.g. the term City of London. In the UK, a city is a settlement 
with a charter (letters patent) from the crown.

http://www.npsp.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=1360
mentions Kent Town Village in the City of Norwood Payneham  St Peters

http://phorums.com.au/showthread.php?t=193110
wHAT THE?!??! The smallest city/town/village/hamlet in the 
world ?!?!?!?
discusses some of the very small towns and villages.



The problem exists because the Poms have one set of definitions and we don't 
have identical definitions in the remainder of (or the majority of) the 
English-speaking world.
The English definitions of 
place_with_no_church=hamlet
place_with_church_and_no_market=village
place_with_church_and_market=town