Re: [talk-au] suburb boundaries

2009-03-20 Thread Darrin Smith
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:29:52 +1030
Darrin Smith bel...@beldin.org wrote:

 On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:46:44 +1100
 Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hi all,
  
  The upload has completed (much faster running from dev).
  
  There were a couple of problems:-]
  
   * Gruyere and 'Wandin North - Bar' in Victoria, which I
  *believe* I have fixed
   * Beatrice and Ellinjaa in Queensland which are too complex for
  me to fix
 as I don't have local knowledge
  
  cheers
  
 
 That made a serious difference the the speed of things, wow.
 
 Now to resolve the differences between my own boundary work and the
 ABS stuff in northern adelaide, and at a first glance I must say I'm
 glad I told you to upload the data anyway, because there's a couple
 of places where I think the ABS is more correct than my results (and
 a few the other way also of course ;) Going to be fun correlating the
 two. :)
 

Futher poking around I've found the 'Unclassified SA' 'suburb',
containing over 100 segments scattered all over the state, I assume
most other states will have a similar object, what's the thoughts of
everyone on this case? Is it really needed? (I assume it's just a
category in the ABS data that's come across wholesale). Seems to me
anything not in side a suburb boundary would be considered unclassified
anyway?

-- 

=b

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] suburb boundaries

2009-03-20 Thread Ross Scanlon
Hi Franc,

Great job.

One thing I've noticed, in my area anyway (Whitsundays), is that it's given the 
outlines of some of the national parks.  Cape Conway NP but not Dryander NP.

So these could be updated as part of the relation as well.

Having said that what would be the best way to go about it, tag etc.



-- 
Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com




On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:46:44 +1100
Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 The upload has completed (much faster running from dev).
 
 There were a couple of problems:-]
 
  * Gruyere and 'Wandin North - Bar' in Victoria, which I *believe* I
 have fixed
  * Beatrice and Ellinjaa in Queensland which are too complex for me to
 fix
as I don't have local knowledge
 
 cheers
 
 -- 
 Franc
 

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] suburb boundaries

2009-03-20 Thread Franc Carter
[snip]



 That made a serious difference the the speed of things, wow.


Yep, latency is really nasty for this sort of thing




 Now to resolve the differences between my own boundary work and the ABS
 stuff in northern adelaide, and at a first glance I must say I'm glad I
 told you to upload the data anyway, because there's a couple of places
 where I think the ABS is more correct than my results (and a few the
 other way also of course ;) Going to be fun correlating the
 two. :)


Yes, my head is spinning even from the small number of bit I have looked at.
A friend very conveniently recently moved to the street that appears to
define
a border in the area I am in. However here address is the 'other' suburb
from
what the ABS data says. To throw a spanner in the works the ABS data seem
very reasonable from my local knowledge, so the question is how to find out
which is 'right'

cheers




 --

 =b

 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au




-- 
Franc
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] suburb boundaries

2009-03-20 Thread Franc Carter
[snip]


 Futher poking around I've found the 'Unclassified SA' 'suburb',
 containing over 100 segments scattered all over the state, I assume
 most other states will have a similar object, what's the thoughts of
 everyone on this case? Is it really needed? (I assume it's just a
 category in the ABS data that's come across wholesale). Seems to me
 anything not in side a suburb boundary would be considered unclassified
 anyway?


I noticed a small number of those in NSW and decided to ignore them and just
put them, that might have been a bad idea ;-(

cheers




 --

 =b

 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au




-- 
Franc
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] suburb boundaries

2009-03-20 Thread Darrin Smith
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:38:40 +1100
Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote:

 [snip]
 
 
  Futher poking around I've found the 'Unclassified SA' 'suburb',
  containing over 100 segments scattered all over the state, I assume
  most other states will have a similar object, what's the thoughts of
  everyone on this case? Is it really needed? (I assume it's just a
  category in the ABS data that's come across wholesale). Seems to me
  anything not in side a suburb boundary would be considered
  unclassified anyway?
 
 
 I noticed a small number of those in NSW and decided to ignore them
 and just put them, that might have been a bad idea ;-(

LOL, Well I guess we just need to decide if a 'unclassified' suburb is
appropriate or not. If we decide it's not we blow away the relation and 
problem solved :) Or if keep it should we somehow flag it
slightly differently so that we know it's not an actual suburb called
'Unclassified', although there are weirder names around ;)

-- 

=b

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] suburb boundaries

2009-03-20 Thread Franc Carter
Yep, sounds like a sensible approach. I'm inclined towards leaving them in
and
adding a tag as deleting them feels like 'information loss', which I have
biases
against . . . .

cheers

On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Darrin Smith bel...@beldin.org wrote:

 On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:38:40 +1100
 Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote:

  [snip]
 
 
   Futher poking around I've found the 'Unclassified SA' 'suburb',
   containing over 100 segments scattered all over the state, I assume
   most other states will have a similar object, what's the thoughts of
   everyone on this case? Is it really needed? (I assume it's just a
   category in the ABS data that's come across wholesale). Seems to me
   anything not in side a suburb boundary would be considered
   unclassified anyway?
 
 
  I noticed a small number of those in NSW and decided to ignore them
  and just put them, that might have been a bad idea ;-(

 LOL, Well I guess we just need to decide if a 'unclassified' suburb is
 appropriate or not. If we decide it's not we blow away the relation and
 problem solved :) Or if keep it should we somehow flag it
 slightly differently so that we know it's not an actual suburb called
 'Unclassified', although there are weirder names around ;)

 --

 =b




-- 
Franc
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] suburb boundaries

2009-03-20 Thread James Andrewartha
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 11:46 +1100, Franc Carter wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 The upload has completed (much faster running from dev).

Are the suburbs rendered, or do they only show up in an editor like
JOSM?

James Andrewartha


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] suburb boundaries

2009-03-20 Thread Franc Carter
Boundaries are rendered on mapnik and osmarender as far as I know

cheers

On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:55 PM, James Andrewartha 
tr...@tartarus.uwa.edu.au wrote:

 On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 11:46 +1100, Franc Carter wrote:
 
  Hi all,
 
  The upload has completed (much faster running from dev).

 Are the suburbs rendered, or do they only show up in an editor like
 JOSM?

 James Andrewartha




-- 
Franc
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] postcode boundaries

2009-03-20 Thread Franc Carter
I have taken a very simple approach to postcode boundaries(1), and extracted
a
separate .osm file which can be used to eyeball the data and add in the
boundaries
to osm.

If anyone wants a subset of these for areas they are familiar with let me
know. I don't
have the bandwidth to make the whole lot available on a web server however.

cheers

(1) Anything else was melting my brain

-- 
Franc
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] suburb boundaries

2009-03-20 Thread Liz
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Franc Carter wrote:
 Hi all,

 The upload has completed (much faster running from dev).

 There were a couple of problems:-]

thanks for letting us know its finished.
my area is very bad - whether this is the council's fault or ABS fault I don't 
know, but the suburb boundaries are not right and I can't find any division 
between postcode 2680 and 2681. I don't know where the line is either, and 
probably not many people do know, as we don't have postal delivery and it 
isn't of practical importance.

LIz

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] suburb boundaries

2009-03-20 Thread Franc Carter
oops, not to the list

On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.comwrote:


 I'm in the inner west of Sydney and am find that the boundaries are only
 *mostly correct* - so i'm not too surprised that outside the main cities
 they are a worse. Hopefully on a country wide basis it is still better
 than nothing.

 cheers


 On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:

 On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Franc Carter wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  The upload has completed (much faster running from dev).
 
  There were a couple of problems:-]

 thanks for letting us know its finished.
 my area is very bad - whether this is the council's fault or ABS fault I
 don't
 know, but the suburb boundaries are not right and I can't find any
 division
 between postcode 2680 and 2681. I don't know where the line is either, and
 probably not many people do know, as we don't have postal delivery and it
 isn't of practical importance.

 LIz

 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au




 --
 Franc




-- 
Franc
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] suburb boundaries

2009-03-20 Thread Franc Carter
Glad to see not all of NSW has been incorporated ;-)

cheers

On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:

 On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Franc Carter wrote:
  I noticed a small number of those in NSW and decided to ignore them and
  just put them, that might have been a bad idea

 NSW has a huge one, the unincorporated area

 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au




-- 
Franc
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au