Re: [talk-au] Most insanely dissected street ?
That's a good question. I've just had a look at the ACTMAPI site that used to have house/block numbers, but they've dissappeared. I'l keep searching.. Nick On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Franc In Canberra we have a good example of the reverse problem - the not-yet-put-together street. (Horse Park Drive). It's been in two well seperated bits for years now and will be so for a couple more. And yes being on the wrong bit can be a big issue. Will the numbering clash when they get joined ? Cheers Nick ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au -- Franc ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Most insanely dissected street ?
Ah-ha. I think there is a simple answer. Despite being a really long road/s I don't think anyone actually lives on it. There's always space between it and the houses, so I'm not sure there will ever be any 33 Horse Park Drive Cheers Nick PS - ACTMAPI site must be under change, even the road names have gone missing :-( On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Franc In Canberra we have a good example of the reverse problem - the not-yet-put-together street. (Horse Park Drive). It's been in two well seperated bits for years now and will be so for a couple more. And yes being on the wrong bit can be a big issue. Will the numbering clash when they get joined ? Cheers Nick ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au -- Franc ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Most insanely dissected street ?
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote: Ah-ha. I think there is a simple answer. Despite being a really long road/s I don't think anyone actually lives on it. There's always space between it and the houses, so I'm not sure there will ever be any 33 Horse Park Drive Ahh yes - I've come across this before when hunting for house numbers - very confusing when it's not obvious that the houses are nunbered on a different street cheers Cheers Nick PS - ACTMAPI site must be under change, even the road names have gone missing :-( On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Franc In Canberra we have a good example of the reverse problem - the not-yet-put-together street. (Horse Park Drive). It's been in two well seperated bits for years now and will be so for a couple more. And yes being on the wrong bit can be a big issue. Will the numbering clash when they get joined ? Cheers Nick ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au -- Franc ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au -- Franc ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] nearmap LWG minutes
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm a bit late to the game but the one of the LWG minutes talks about nearmap... It isn't apparent from the link, but for the information of those reading them here without checking the original document, the minutes that you quote are from 14 September 2010 From part 4 of the LWG minutes https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_83gvxm3xgdpli=1 - Automated deriving [ ... ] Nor would I want to see them limiting CC-BY-SA derived works to those only uploaded to OSM (just like Microsoft is doing). The Microsoft image donation did not happen until about two months later. It was great to have Ben join us on the call to discuss Nearmap's concerns. Thanks for raising this topic again, Andrew. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Most insanely dissected street ?
Hi, We've got a few roads around here (Narre Warren South/Lynbrook) that are split and not yet joined. One such road is Glasscocks Road, which runs from Dandenong Frankston Road, through through Lynbrook and Narre Warren South to Clyde Road in Berwick. It is currently in three parts, and you can visualise where it is planned to go in future. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-38.0687lon=145.2707zoom=14layers=M It looks like there are a few hold-out land owners that have not yet sold their properties for redevelopment, but as soon as they do, the road will get filled in. I'm not sure about property numbering at this point. There are portions of Glasscocks Road with houses on, some portions without. Regards, Ah-ha. I think there is a simple answer. Despite being a really long road/s I don't think anyone actually lives on it. There's always space between it and the houses, so I'm not sure there will ever be any 33 Horse Park Drive Cheers Nick PS - ACTMAPI site must be under change, even the road names have gone missing :-( On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Franc In Canberra we have a good example of the reverse problem - the not-yet-put-together street. (Horse Park Drive). It's been in two well seperated bits for years now and will be so for a couple more. And yes being on the wrong bit can be a big issue. Will the numbering clash when they get joined ? Cheers Nick ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au -- Franc ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au -- John Berkers ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
