Is there a problem with crossing ways? Why do they need a shared node when
they are different admin levels?
On Fri., 19 Oct. 2018, 5:56 pm Joel H., wrote:
> Just took a look at the crossing boarders without ways error, and it
> seems some level 10 boundaries are indeed overlaping. Check out
> -22.5639465 147.0726169 in Queensland.
>
> As for way too long, I also don't think that needs fixing, just some
> automated JOSM warning not taking context into consideration.
>
> On 18/10/18 12:30 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> > I tried to find out more about two JOSM warnings but I couldn't.
> >
> > 1. Way segment too long
> >
> > What's wrong with long way segments? I'm not convinced we should add
> > nodes where they aren't necessary for detail.
> >
> > 2. Crossing borders without a shared way.
> >
> > This should only happen when you have an LGA boundary crossing a
> > Suburb/Locality boundary, do we need a shared node between these?
> >
> >> I can see your point about not wanting to upload ways and nodes that
> just going to be deleted immediately after. However if we don't then it's
> going to make my idea for QA harder.
> > Could we delay that QA step until after these have been manually fixed
> > up to use the existing state borders?
> >
> >> I'd assumed that we'd be uploading valid multi-polygons which means
> that we could use Overpass and the JOSM validator for QA. I guess we might
> be able to come up with another approach but I'm not sure it's worth the
> effort just to avoid adding and removing a few tens of thousands of nodes
> in comparison to the size of the import.
> > I was leaning this way to avoid this import dumping duplicates on top
> > of existing mappers work on the state boundaries.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 at 12:46, Andrew Davidson
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:29 PM Andrew Harvey
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So I guess at this point do people want to checkout the simplified OSM
> >>> files for any issues?
> >>>
> >> They look OK, but I would like to have an opportunity to clean up the
> JOSM warnings before we upload them (except the relations with the same
> members warning as these are real).
> > ___
> > Talk-au mailing list
> > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
