Is there a problem with crossing ways? Why do they need a shared node when they are different admin levels?
On Fri., 19 Oct. 2018, 5:56 pm Joel H., <jo...@disroot.org> wrote: > Just took a look at the crossing boarders without ways error, and it > seems some level 10 boundaries are indeed overlaping. Check out > -22.5639465 147.0726169 in Queensland. > > As for way too long, I also don't think that needs fixing, just some > automated JOSM warning not taking context into consideration. > > On 18/10/18 12:30 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > I tried to find out more about two JOSM warnings but I couldn't. > > > > 1. Way segment too long > > > > What's wrong with long way segments? I'm not convinced we should add > > nodes where they aren't necessary for detail. > > > > 2. Crossing borders without a shared way. > > > > This should only happen when you have an LGA boundary crossing a > > Suburb/Locality boundary, do we need a shared node between these? > > > >> I can see your point about not wanting to upload ways and nodes that > just going to be deleted immediately after. However if we don't then it's > going to make my idea for QA harder. > > Could we delay that QA step until after these have been manually fixed > > up to use the existing state borders? > > > >> I'd assumed that we'd be uploading valid multi-polygons which means > that we could use Overpass and the JOSM validator for QA. I guess we might > be able to come up with another approach but I'm not sure it's worth the > effort just to avoid adding and removing a few tens of thousands of nodes > in comparison to the size of the import. > > I was leaning this way to avoid this import dumping duplicates on top > > of existing mappers work on the state boundaries. > > > > > > On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 at 12:46, Andrew Davidson <thesw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:29 PM Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> So I guess at this point do people want to checkout the simplified OSM > >>> files for any issues? > >>> > >> They look OK, but I would like to have an opportunity to clean up the > JOSM warnings before we upload them (except the relations with the same > members warning as these are real). > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-au mailing list > > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
