Re: [talk-au] Putting streams into OSM

2023-05-27 Thread Tom Brennan
My main area of interest from a stream point of view is the Hawkesbury 
Catchment, outside the Sydney suburban boundaries.


I haven't been involved in any imports so you'll have to excuse my 
ignorance.


Could the dataset be split into say urban/non-urban and the non-urban 
parts imported? Or do partial imports just create more work? What sort 
of sanity checks need to be carried out?


cheers
Tom

Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com

On 27/05/2023 11:49 am, Andrew Davidson wrote:

On 27/5/23 08:39, nwastra nwastra wrote:
I should add that I have only used the Surface Hydrology Lines from 
GeoScience Aust dataset for Qld catchments and as the data is drawn 
for many different sources across the country the perenniality may be 
not always be included.


I admit I've been too lazy to publish the stuff I'd already done with 
the GA dataset. Rather than making people do it all again I've finally 
got round to putting it on GitHub https://github.com/FrakGart/ga_streams


I have already imported in the named streams in NSW except for the area 
around Sydney. Mostly, again, due to laziness. As already pointed out 
the data all needs to be sanity checked against what's on the ground and 
that's really hard when it's under a city.


The data is organised by AWRC catchment, so for Sydney you are looking at:

https://github.com/FrakGart/ga_streams/blob/main/Basin_II/II12.osm.gz

which is the Hawkesbury River and

https://github.com/FrakGart/ga_streams/blob/main/Basin_II/II13.osm.gz

which is Sydney Coast-Georges River

You can use overpass turbo to see what is already mapped:

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1vpu (Hawkesbury River)
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1vpv (Sydney Coast-Georges River)


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Putting streams into OSM

2023-05-27 Thread Tom Brennan
I hadn't seen that page until Andrew Davidson mentioned it earlier in 
the thread.


But the NSW Water Theme data falls under the DCS Foundational Spatial 
Data, which is listed as having a waiver, and thus usable...


[And I probably should have been more specific with the wording - I knew 
that CC BY 4 is not generally usable by itself. But was aware that many 
datasets for NSW have waivers!]


cheers
Tom

Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com

On 27/05/2023 5:06 pm, Warin wrote:


On 26/5/23 14:51, Tom Brennan wrote:

DCS Base and Topo don't distinguish between perennial and non-perennial

That information is available in the NSW Water Theme data eg:
https://portal.spatial.nsw.gov.au/portal/home/item.html?id=7b0e959effd749c788d304a4179abf8a

That data is licensed under CC BY 4, which I think we have permission 
to use. (I haven't used it, but if allowed, it would make sense rather 
than tracing individual lines).



CC by 4 by it self is not usable for OSM...

With an OSM waiver .. it is usable.

If the data set to be used is listed as having a waiver here 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#New_South_Wales, then it is usable.



(Doting i's and crossing t's so others won't be mislead.)



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Putting streams into OSM

2023-05-27 Thread Andy Mabbett
On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 08:42, Tom Brennan  wrote:

> what's the reason for using relations? Or
> is it specifically for the search that you mentioned?

A relation can also be linked 1:1 with an item for the waterway in
Wikidata, and with the wider web of linked data.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Putting streams into OSM

2023-05-27 Thread Warin


On 27/5/23 16:48, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:




On Sat, 27 May 2023 at 16:34, Tom Brennan  wrote:


But while useful, the question is really whether a full stream
import is
worthwhile.


I would say yes (if it's not too much effort required to do so?)

Thanks

Graeme



I too would 'like' the data.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Putting streams into OSM

2023-05-27 Thread Warin



On 26/5/23 14:51, Tom Brennan wrote:

DCS Base and Topo don't distinguish between perennial and non-perennial

That information is available in the NSW Water Theme data eg:
https://portal.spatial.nsw.gov.au/portal/home/item.html?id=7b0e959effd749c788d304a4179abf8a 



That data is licensed under CC BY 4, which I think we have permission 
to use. (I haven't used it, but if allowed, it would make sense rather 
than tracing individual lines).



CC by 4 by it self is not usable for OSM...

With an OSM waiver .. it is usable.

If the data set to be used is listed as having a waiver here 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#New_South_Wales, 
then it is usable.



(Doting i's and crossing t's so others won't be mislead.)



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Putting streams into OSM

2023-05-27 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Sat, 27 May 2023 at 16:34, Tom Brennan  wrote:

>
> But while useful, the question is really whether a full stream import is
> worthwhile.
>

I would say yes (if it's not too much effort required to do so?)

Thanks

Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Putting streams into OSM

2023-05-27 Thread Tom Brennan

On 26/05/2023 2:10 pm, Kim Oldfield via Talk-au wrote:
> I also find streams useful to indicate the surrounding ground is
> downhill towards them. Being at the bottom of a valley it is also
> fairly obvious when you encounter one in person.
>
> They are often hard to map from aerial imagery as they may hidden by
> tree cover. This is one reason why many are missing from OSM. Adding
> more of them would be good.

In NSW at least, there are options to map from other than aerial imagery 
(various DCS sources).


There's also the option to generate them from the DEM, which in my 
experience is more accurate 95%+ of the time.


But while useful, the question is really whether a full stream import is 
worthwhile.


cheers
Tom

Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au