Re: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

2023-06-06 Thread Tom Brennan

ICMS principles state:
"In Australia, whichever of the two names of the same feature that is 
most likely to be used by the local community is to be used first in a 
sequence [Refer Appendix A, § 4.5]. The sequence of the name should be 
reviewed at regular intervals. If a visual separator is required, it 
shall be a solidus preceded and followed by a space ‘. / . ‘."


Which is why in NSW most dual names are *currently* rendered "European 
name / Aboriginal name".


The latest vector tiles from DCS Spatial Service have these names 
rendered on them:

https://portal.spatial.nsw.gov.au/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?useExisting=1&layers=de92791f686843e1b2e32e908f241b9c

(See Fort Denison or Shark Island for examples).

All this seems to support the following approach in OSM (basically what 
Phil said)


name:Bradleys Head / Booraghee
name:en=Bradleys Head
name:aus=Booraghee (replace 'aus' if definitively known)

cheers
Tom

Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com

On 6/06/2023 5:01 pm, Little Maps wrote:

On 6 Jun 2023, at 2:29 pm, Ian Sergeant  wrote:


I think including a "slash" character in a name tag is really ugly.  
That's not the way that the GNB record them.  Unless someone can find 
some information on the ground that records it that way?


Ian, I stand corrected. NSW National Parks use a dash, not a slash, in 
the example I gave from The Rock Nature Reserve - Kengal Aboriginal 
Place. Sorry for the confusion.



Having said that, Australian geographic names boards do use slashes for 
dual names. This extract is from the Vic Gov guidelines…



“If a visual separator is required for clarity, it should be a solidus ( 
/ ) preceded and followed by a space…. The following examples would be 
acceptable:


Nambruc / Aberfeldy State Forest

Colquhoun State Forest / Boyanga Gidi.”


“Dual names once registered are to be used in full, shortened versions 
are not to be used.”



(Hence dual names are not seen as alternatives.)


 From “Naming rules for places in Victoria 2022 - Statutory requirements 
for naming roads, features and localities”



https://www.land.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/word_doc/0018/501093/Official-Naming-rules-for-places-in-Victoria-2022.docx


The Vic Gov report refers to the National “Principles for the Consistent 
Use of Place Names. Includes Principles for the Use of Aboriginal and 
Torres Strait Islander Place Names and Dual Naming Depiction Principles” 
which also recommends that a “solidus” (i.e. a slash) is the recommended 
standard.



https://www.icsm.gov.au/sites/default/files/consistent_place_names_principles.pdf


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

2023-06-06 Thread Warin


On 6/6/23 17:06, Phil Wyatt wrote:


Does anyone know of examples overseas with dual naming?



Wales will be full of it. :)  Example

Way: Craig Cerrig Gleisiad a Fan Frynych National Nature Reserve (374428119)

name= Craig Cerrig Gleisiad a Fan Frynych National Nature Reserve
name:cy=Gwarchodfa Natur Genedlaethol Craig Cerrig Gleisiad a Fan Frynych


Yes... after you.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

2023-06-06 Thread Warin

Naming for Ayres Rock/Uluru was discussed in talk-au on October 2019...

We need to put this on the Australian tagging guidelines once some 
consensus is determined.


Presently ---

alt_name:en=Ayers Rock
alt_name=Ayers Rock
name:en=Uluṟu
name=Uluṟu

official_name:en=Uluru / Ayers Rock
official_name=Uluru / Ayers Rock

-

I don't think Uluru is 'english'. And I'd not use old_name for 'Ayres 
Rock' as I'd think 'Uluru' would be older.



Note: One of the past names was 'Uluru (Ayers Rock)'.


On 6/6/23 14:26, Ian Sergeant wrote:
I think including a "slash" character in a name tag is really ugly.  
That's not the way that the GNB record them.  Unless someone can find 
some information on the ground that records it that way?



'Uluru / Ayers Rock'  used to be the signage there, I have no idea if 
'Ayres Rock' has been removed.


.



I understand the desire to not diminish either name when they are dual 
named, but I think it's wrong to think of alt_name as a "lesser" 
name.  Alternative means just that, it's an equally valid, but 
alternative name.  It's looks like exactly the type of scenario 
envisioned by the tag.


IMO it's a bad outcome to end up with multiple names in one tag 
separated by a slash.




I am for


name:en=Ayres Rock

name:aus=Uluru  If the language code is known then use that .. possibly 
use both for redundancy ???



The name= tag should be what is 'on the ground' if there is a slash then 
there should be a slash.



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

2023-06-06 Thread Little Maps
On 6 Jun 2023, at 2:29 pm, Ian Sergeant  wrote:
> 
> I think including a "slash" character in a name tag is really ugly.  That's 
> not the way that the GNB record them.  Unless someone can find some 
> information on the ground that records it that way?

Ian, I stand corrected. NSW National Parks use a dash, not a slash, in the 
example I gave from  The Rock Nature Reserve - Kengal Aboriginal Place. Sorry 
for the confusion.

Having said that, Australian geographic names boards do use slashes for dual 
names. This extract is from the Vic Gov guidelines…

“If a visual separator is required for clarity, it should be a solidus ( / ) 
preceded and followed by a space…. The following examples would be acceptable:
Nambruc / Aberfeldy State Forest
Colquhoun State Forest / Boyanga Gidi.”

“Dual names once registered are to be used in full, shortened versions are not 
to be used.”

(Hence dual names are not seen as alternatives.)

From “Naming rules for places in Victoria 2022 - Statutory requirements for 
naming roads, features and localities”

https://www.land.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/word_doc/0018/501093/Official-Naming-rules-for-places-in-Victoria-2022.docx
 

The Vic Gov report refers to the National “Principles for the Consistent Use of 
Place Names. Includes Principles for the Use of Aboriginal and Torres Strait 
Islander Place Names and Dual Naming Depiction Principles” which also 
recommends that a “solidus” (i.e. a slash) is the recommended standard.

https://www.icsm.gov.au/sites/default/files/consistent_place_names_principles.pdf
 ___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

2023-06-06 Thread Phil Wyatt
Hi Ian,

 

I cant actually find a FULL policy in NSW

 

https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/policy-and-legislation/aboriginal-land-use-planning/nsw-dual-naming-policy

https://www.gnb.nsw.gov.au/aboriginal_place_naming/dual_naming

 

However sixmaps does find indigenous names and seems to use the reverse of 
Tasmania with the English name first then the slash then the indigenous name 
(search for wahluu)

 

Interestingly, in Tasmania the Aboriginal and dual naming layer in LIST has the 
indigenous name in the ‘name’ field and a separate ‘Dualname’ field for the 
extended naming. However the actual mapping shows only the dualname which 
abides by the actual policy. Not all indigenous named features are dual named.

 

https://maps.thelist.tas.gov.au/listmap/app/list/map?bookmarkId=884426 and 
click on the orange polygons

 

Maybe over time the dual naming will be replaced with indigenous names only, 
but only time will tell. In the meantime, in Tassie, I will stick with the 
options below to give data users the most options.

 

name=kunanyi / Mount Wellington

name:en=Mount Wellington

name:xtz=kunanyi

 

 

Does anyone know of examples overseas with dual naming?

 

Cheers - Phil

 

From: Ian Sergeant  
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2023 2:26 PM
To: Ben Ritter 
Cc: OSM Australian Talk List 
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

 

I think including a "slash" character in a name tag is really ugly.  That's not 
the way that the GNB record them.  Unless someone can find some information on 
the ground that records it that way?

 

I understand the desire to not diminish either name when they are dual named, 
but I think it's wrong to think of alt_name as a "lesser" name.  Alternative 
means just that, it's an equally valid, but alternative name.  It's looks like 
exactly the type of scenario envisioned by the tag.

 

IMO it's a bad outcome to end up with multiple names in one tag separated by a 
slash.

 

Ian.

 

On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 12:45, Ben Ritter mailto:benjaminarit...@gmail.com> > wrote:

I agree that in places where a joint name is in use, that should be documented 
as `name=Booraghee / Bradleys Head`as. From a data perspective, I think it is 
also useful to know that the english called it (in english spelling) 
`name:en=Bradleys Head` and the locals called it (in local romanised spelling) 
`name:aus=Booraghee`.

 

I have no great understanding of the languages involved, but I want to see it 
as "Booraghee / Bradleys Head" on most maps (because that's part of our 
cultural style, as documented in the quoted policy). On the other hand, when I 
hook up a routing text-to-speech engine, I'm going to have a much better time 
pronouncing the spelling of `name:en` and `name:aus`. Even better after someone 
in the know replaces the vague and non-specific `:aus` form with the actual 
language(s).

 

On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 09:27, Little Maps mailto:mapslit...@gmail.com> > wrote:

This may depend on the specific place but in many places I believe Phil’s 
interpretation is correct and Andrew’s is inappropriate. Many places and 
reserves now have joint management or co-ownership, and dual/joint names. Joint 
names are not alternative names. John Roberts-Smith is John Roberts-Smith. He 
is not John Roberts and/or alt-name John Smith. The Rock Nature Reserve / 
Kengal Aboriginal Place is a legislated reserve. This is the legislated name, 
as described in the management plan and signposted on all new signs. Since OSM 
maps what is on the ground, we should include the entire joint name in the one 
name tag. We are not listing alternatives, we are presenting the entire, 
signposted, legal name in the one tag.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org> 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org> 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

2023-06-05 Thread Ian Sergeant
I think including a "slash" character in a name tag is really ugly.  That's
not the way that the GNB record them.  Unless someone can find some
information on the ground that records it that way?

I understand the desire to not diminish either name when they are dual
named, but I think it's wrong to think of alt_name as a "lesser" name.
Alternative means just that, it's an equally valid, but alternative name.
It's looks like exactly the type of scenario envisioned by the tag.

IMO it's a bad outcome to end up with multiple names in one tag separated
by a slash.

Ian.

On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 12:45, Ben Ritter  wrote:

> I agree that in places where a joint name is in use, that should be
> documented as `name=Booraghee / Bradleys Head`as. From a data
> perspective, I think it is also useful to know that the english called it
> (in english spelling) `name:en=Bradleys Head` and the locals called it (in
> local romanised spelling) `name:aus=Booraghee`.
>
> I have no great understanding of the languages involved, but I want to see
> it as "Booraghee / Bradleys Head" on most maps (because that's part of
> our cultural style, as documented in the quoted policy). On the other hand,
> when I hook up a routing text-to-speech engine, I'm going to have a much
> better time pronouncing the spelling of `name:en` and `name:aus`. Even
> better after someone in the know replaces the vague and non-specific `:aus`
> form with the actual language(s).
>
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 09:27, Little Maps  wrote:
>
>> This may depend on the specific place but in many places I believe Phil’s
>> interpretation is correct and Andrew’s is inappropriate. Many places and
>> reserves now have joint management or co-ownership, and dual/joint names.
>> Joint names are not alternative names. John Roberts-Smith is John
>> Roberts-Smith. He is not John Roberts and/or alt-name John Smith. The Rock
>> Nature Reserve / Kengal Aboriginal Place is a legislated reserve. This is
>> the legislated name, as described in the management plan and signposted on
>> all new signs. Since OSM maps what is on the ground, we should include the
>> entire joint name in the one name tag. We are not listing alternatives, we
>> are presenting the entire, signposted, legal name in the one tag.
>> ___
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

2023-06-05 Thread Ben Ritter
I agree that in places where a joint name is in use, that should be
documented as `name=Booraghee / Bradleys Head`as. From a data perspective,
I think it is also useful to know that the english called it (in english
spelling) `name:en=Bradleys Head` and the locals called it (in local
romanised spelling) `name:aus=Booraghee`.

I have no great understanding of the languages involved, but I want to see
it as "Booraghee / Bradleys Head" on most maps (because that's part of our
cultural style, as documented in the quoted policy). On the other hand,
when I hook up a routing text-to-speech engine, I'm going to have a much
better time pronouncing the spelling of `name:en` and `name:aus`. Even
better after someone in the know replaces the vague and non-specific `:aus`
form with the actual language(s).

On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 09:27, Little Maps  wrote:

> This may depend on the specific place but in many places I believe Phil’s
> interpretation is correct and Andrew’s is inappropriate. Many places and
> reserves now have joint management or co-ownership, and dual/joint names.
> Joint names are not alternative names. John Roberts-Smith is John
> Roberts-Smith. He is not John Roberts and/or alt-name John Smith. The Rock
> Nature Reserve / Kengal Aboriginal Place is a legislated reserve. This is
> the legislated name, as described in the management plan and signposted on
> all new signs. Since OSM maps what is on the ground, we should include the
> entire joint name in the one name tag. We are not listing alternatives, we
> are presenting the entire, signposted, legal name in the one tag.
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

2023-06-05 Thread Little Maps
This may depend on the specific place but in many places I believe Phil’s 
interpretation is correct and Andrew’s is inappropriate. Many places and 
reserves now have joint management or co-ownership, and dual/joint names. Joint 
names are not alternative names. John Roberts-Smith is John Roberts-Smith. He 
is not John Roberts and/or alt-name John Smith. The Rock Nature Reserve / 
Kengal Aboriginal Place is a legislated reserve. This is the legislated name, 
as described in the management plan and signposted on all new signs. Since OSM 
maps what is on the ground, we should include the entire joint name in the one 
name tag. We are not listing alternatives, we are presenting the entire, 
signposted, legal name in the one tag.___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

2023-06-05 Thread Andrew Harvey
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 08:11, Tom Brennan  wrote:

> There are an increasing number of places/features in NSW that are
> getting dual (aboriginal) naming.
>
> For example:
> - Booraghee / Bradleys Head
> - Cooyoyo / The Castle
> - Fort Denison / Muddawahnyuh
>
>  From the point of view of the Geographic Names Board, there doesn't
> appear to be any primacy given to one name or the other.
>
> Is there a view as to how to record these in OSM?
>

At a minimum they should have:

name:en=Bradleys Head (name in English)
name:aus=Booraghee (name in Australian Aboriginal Language (non-specific)

This allows data consumers to choose what they display to users and how.


> The specific aboriginal language is not necessarily known.
>

You can/should use the Australian Aboriginal Language (non-specific)
language code "aus", ie. name:aus=*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:aus


> There are obviously tags like 'alt_name' that can be used to store a
> second name, but not sure if that's most appropriate in cases like this.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

2023-06-05 Thread Phil Wyatt
Hi Folks,

In Tasmania I have started to use the following for dual named locations

name=kunanyi / Mount Wellington
name:en=Mount Wellington
name:xtz=kunanyi

where xtz is the language code for the indigenous language of the area

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australia%
27s_First_Peoples#Indigenous_Languages_and_Place_Names
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tasmanian_languages

Most states are also likely have some policy on implementation.

https://nre.tas.gov.au/Documents/Aboriginal-and-Dual-Naming-Policy-2-Jul20.p
df

5.9 Both parts of a dual name are to be shown on all official signage,
directories, maps and all
official documents and publications without any distinction between the two,
other than the
sequence. The Aboriginal name will appear first, separated by a solidus to
be preceded, and
followed by spaces.

5.10 Official signage, maps and other information products will be updated
incrementally as
maintenance budgets for signage allow, or as new editions of maps and
visitor information
publications are released.

Hope this helps

Cheers - Phil


-Original Message-
From: Tom Brennan  
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2023 8:06 AM
To: OSM Australian Talk List 
Subject: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

There are an increasing number of places/features in NSW that are getting
dual (aboriginal) naming.

For example:
- Booraghee / Bradleys Head
- Cooyoyo / The Castle
- Fort Denison / Muddawahnyuh

 From the point of view of the Geographic Names Board, there doesn't appear
to be any primacy given to one name or the other.

Is there a view as to how to record these in OSM?

The specific aboriginal language is not necessarily known.

There are obviously tags like 'alt_name' that can be used to store a second
name, but not sure if that's most appropriate in cases like this.

cheers
Tom

Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning Bushwalking? try
http://bushwalkingnsw.com

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

2023-06-05 Thread Ian Bennett
I'm struggling to word this reply without being labelled racist or 
discriminatory, but I believe the
English names should remain and the "alt_name" field be used for local names.
Anything else will render OSM data unusable to the majority of people in this 
country.

Ian

On 6/6/23 8:06 am, Tom Brennan wrote:
> There are an increasing number of places/features in NSW that are getting 
> dual (aboriginal) naming.
> 
> For example:
> - Booraghee / Bradleys Head
> - Cooyoyo / The Castle
> - Fort Denison / Muddawahnyuh
> 
> From the point of view of the Geographic Names Board, there doesn't appear to 
> be any primacy given
> to one name or the other.
> 
> Is there a view as to how to record these in OSM?
> 
> The specific aboriginal language is not necessarily known.
> 
> There are obviously tags like 'alt_name' that can be used to store a second 
> name, but not sure if
> that's most appropriate in cases like this.
> 
> cheers
> Tom
> 
> Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
> Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com
> 
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> 

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] Dual naming in NSW

2023-06-05 Thread Tom Brennan
There are an increasing number of places/features in NSW that are 
getting dual (aboriginal) naming.


For example:
- Booraghee / Bradleys Head
- Cooyoyo / The Castle
- Fort Denison / Muddawahnyuh

From the point of view of the Geographic Names Board, there doesn't 
appear to be any primacy given to one name or the other.


Is there a view as to how to record these in OSM?

The specific aboriginal language is not necessarily known.

There are obviously tags like 'alt_name' that can be used to store a 
second name, but not sure if that's most appropriate in cases like this.


cheers
Tom

Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au