Re: [talk-au] Tagging silos?

[stevea]

I'm not saying it should, but it could:  somebody sees both usefulness to 
specify and usefulness to tag (heavily implying serious usefulness to "seeing 
the bigger picture of data" after they are entered and become geospatial) and 
makes a proposal that craftily "gathers" silos together into one of many 
flavors (what are we at, 19 different types?) of OSM's relations.  (A 
relation's type=* key).  I might imagine type=collection could be a good start, 
then those sort themselves into various agricultural "divisions" or so...and 
then somebody starts a thread on the tagging mail-list about "silo groups" (I'm 
simply making that up in a fantasy) and people begin to back-channel a 
proposal, which gets traffic on its Talk (Discussion) page and might get voted 
on and Approved... and used in the real world / real map as "sane, well 
specified, harmonious, agreed upon with a certain amount of consensus..." and 
so on.

How very OSM that would be.

At this point in time, I'll say "rather nice as entered" (as a little cluster 
of silos) and whoever wants to dream of mapping silos in some fancy fashion 
certainly could.  And might someday.  Bean Growers Australia, I wave from 
California!

Such a wonderful plastic map...uh, I mean database, we have here.

> On Aug 10, 2022, at 6:51 PM, Phil Wyatt  wrote:
> 
> They look fine – I have also done one set as ways which is the other 
> alternative
>  
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/-26.55069/151.83033
>  
> Cheers - Phil
>  
> From: Graeme Fitzpatrick  
> Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2022 11:08 AM
> To: Ewen Hill 
> Cc: OSM-Au 
> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Tagging silos?
>  
> Tried the first group of them: 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-26.55053/151.83027
>  
> Still not convinced that individual is the way to go?
>  
> Thanks
>  
> Graeme
>  

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Tagging silos?

[Phil Wyatt]

They look fine – I have also done one set as ways which is the other alternative

 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/-26.55069/151.83033

 

Cheers - Phil

 

From: Graeme Fitzpatrick  
Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2022 11:08 AM
To: Ewen Hill 
Cc: OSM-Au 
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Tagging silos?

 

Tried the first group of them: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-26.55053/151.83027

 

Still not convinced that individual is the way to go?

 

Thanks

 

Graeme

 

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Tagging silos?

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

Tried the first group of them:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-26.55053/151.83027

Still not convinced that individual is the way to go?

Thanks

Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Tagging silos?

[Ewen Hill]

Wow, that's a lot of small silos in several clumps. Surely you could call
it silo (albeit with multiple skins) when they are so closely
packed together?

Ewen

On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 20:11, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On 10/8/22 09:23, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> Just been adding some details around here:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-26.55047/151.82936.
>
> They should all be tagged as silos, but I'm not sure about mapping every
> one of them individually, as it'll be *very* crowded?
>
> Would it work just putting one silo tag in the middle of each group?
>
> Is there such a thing as a "quantity" tag to say there's 10 silos here?
>
>
> Individually ...
>
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689552470#map=19/-36.37656/142.99683
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684276590
>
>
> The map handles the crowd.
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>


-- 
Warm Regards

Ewen Hill
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Tagging silos?

[Warin]

On 10/8/22 09:23, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Just been adding some details around here: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-26.55047/151.82936 
.


They should all be tagged as silos, but I'm not sure about mapping 
every one of them individually, as it'll be /very/ crowded?


Would it work just putting one silo tag in the middle of each group?

Is there such a thing as a "quantity" tag to say there's 10 silos here?



Individually ...


https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689552470#map=19/-36.37656/142.99683

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684276590


The map handles the crowd.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] Tagging silos?

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

 Just been adding some details around here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-26.55047/151.82936.

They should all be tagged as silos, but I'm not sure about mapping every
one of them individually, as it'll be *very* crowded?

Would it work just putting one silo tag in the middle of each group?

Is there such a thing as a "quantity" tag to say there's 10 silos here?

Thanks

Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au