Re: [OSM-talk-be] AGIV

2013-08-30 Thread Ben Abelshausen
Hi,

Maybe we should wait until Pieter has some kind of response for us. I would
like to send something to the DWG that can be verified and is backed by
some facts. Otherwise there will a be discussion about technicalities that
might not matter at all.

We will have less difficulty if we have all the details before we ask the
DWG or send something to the imports-list.

Also a translation of the license can still be useful.

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Best regards,

Ben Abelshausen

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Kurt Roeckx  wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 04:11:04PM +0200, Ben Abelshausen wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > There is a new episode in the AGIV-CRAB-OSM story.
> >
> > Today they released the CRAB database using the new flanders open data
> > licence [1]. This means that now we can start the process of verification
> > with the Imports-list and the DWG that the licence is ok and we can start
> > using AGIV as a source when mapping.
> >
> > I will take care of this but help is always welcome. If there is someone
> > dutch-speaking here with a verifiable legal experitse that could help me
> > translate the licence into english and discuss with the DWG that would be
> > nice.
> >
> > What I understand from reading the licence [2] using this data in the
> > context of OSM should not be a problem anymore except for the need to
> > mention the source when distributing the data. This should not be a
> problem
> > because I have confirmation from someone at AGIV that a source-mention on
> > the wiki is enough for them. This means they will consider themselves one
> > of the "© OpenStreetMap contributors" :-) !
>
> Reading the license, I can see no problem at all.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean with "verifiable legal experitse".  I'm
> not a lawyer, but I did read many license to check that they are
> free or not.  If that is good enough I'm willing to help with
> getting this officially approved.
>
>
> Kurt
>
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] AGIV

2013-08-30 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 04:11:04PM +0200, Ben Abelshausen wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> There is a new episode in the AGIV-CRAB-OSM story.
> 
> Today they released the CRAB database using the new flanders open data
> licence [1]. This means that now we can start the process of verification
> with the Imports-list and the DWG that the licence is ok and we can start
> using AGIV as a source when mapping.
> 
> I will take care of this but help is always welcome. If there is someone
> dutch-speaking here with a verifiable legal experitse that could help me
> translate the licence into english and discuss with the DWG that would be
> nice.
> 
> What I understand from reading the licence [2] using this data in the
> context of OSM should not be a problem anymore except for the need to
> mention the source when distributing the data. This should not be a problem
> because I have confirmation from someone at AGIV that a source-mention on
> the wiki is enough for them. This means they will consider themselves one
> of the "© OpenStreetMap contributors" :-) !

Reading the license, I can see no problem at all.

I'm not sure what you mean with "verifiable legal experitse".  I'm
not a lawyer, but I did read many license to check that they are
free or not.  If that is good enough I'm willing to help with
getting this officially approved.


Kurt


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] AGIV

2013-08-30 Thread Nicolas Pettiaux
2013/8/30 eMerzh 

> Yeah good news indeed ...
> After Brussels, if this is true ... we need only smth from wallonia and
> osm in Belgium will be awesome :)
>
indeed

We can hope that such a process (Brussels and Flanders sharing ther data)
will help persuade Wallonia to do the same.
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] AGIV

2013-08-30 Thread Pieter Colpaert

FYI,

I've forwarded this to some legal people at OKFN and to the Flemish 
government department responsible for the licenses.


Pieter

On 08/30/2013 04:11 PM, Ben Abelshausen wrote:

Hello,

There is a new episode in the AGIV-CRAB-OSM story.

Today they released the CRAB database using the new flanders open data 
licence [1]. This means that now we can start the process of 
verification with the Imports-list and the DWG that the licence is ok 
and we can start using AGIV as a source when mapping.


I will take care of this but help is always welcome. If there is 
someone dutch-speaking here with a verifiable legal experitse that 
could help me translate the licence into english and discuss with the 
DWG that would be nice.


What I understand from reading the licence [2] using this data in the 
context of OSM should not be a problem anymore except for the need to 
mention the source when distributing the data. This should not be a 
problem because I have confirmation from someone at AGIV that a 
source-mention on the wiki is enough for them. This means they will 
consider themselves one of the "© OpenStreetMap contributors" :-) !


Met vriendelijke groeten,
Best regards,

Ben Abelshausen

[1] http://agiv.be/gis/nieuws/?artid=2179
[2] http://agiv.be/gis/producten/?artid=2101



___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be



___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] AGIV

2013-08-30 Thread André Pirard

  
  
On 2013-08-30 16:11, Ben Abelshausen
  wrote :
  
...

Today they released the CRAB database using the
  new flanders open data licence [1]. This means that now we can
  start the process of verification with the Imports-list and
  the DWG that the licence is ok and we can start using AGIV as
  a source when mapping.
  ...

  
  On 2013-08-30 16:59, eMerzh wrote :


  Yeah good news indeed ... 
After Brussels, if this is true ... we need only smth from
wallonia and osm in Belgium will be awesome :)
  

It's now 3 to 4 years that I asked the SPW directly and through
various channels to at least support ESPG:4326 etc. (instead of just
Lambert), and now WMS, on their existing servers to be able
to do something serious manually.  I corrected mapping that
was 10, 20, 50 and up to 120m away.
Lately, that was answering to a survey asking "what do you need?".

Cheers,


  

  André.

  


  


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] AGIV

2013-08-30 Thread eMerzh
Yeah good news indeed ...
After Brussels, if this is true ... we need only smth from wallonia and osm
in Belgium will be awesome :)
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] AGIV

2013-08-30 Thread Julien Fastré

good news !

Julien

Le 30/08/13 16:11, Ben Abelshausen a écrit :

Hello,

There is a new episode in the AGIV-CRAB-OSM story.

Today they released the CRAB database using the new flanders open data 
licence [1]. This means that now we can start the process of 
verification with the Imports-list and the DWG that the licence is ok 
and we can start using AGIV as a source when mapping.


I will take care of this but help is always welcome. If there is 
someone dutch-speaking here with a verifiable legal experitse that 
could help me translate the licence into english and discuss with the 
DWG that would be nice.


What I understand from reading the licence [2] using this data in the 
context of OSM should not be a problem anymore except for the need to 
mention the source when distributing the data. This should not be a 
problem because I have confirmation from someone at AGIV that a 
source-mention on the wiki is enough for them. This means they will 
consider themselves one of the "© OpenStreetMap contributors" :-) !


Met vriendelijke groeten,
Best regards,

Ben Abelshausen

[1] http://agiv.be/gis/nieuws/?artid=2179
[2] http://agiv.be/gis/producten/?artid=2101



___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


[OSM-talk-be] AGIV

2013-08-30 Thread Ben Abelshausen
Hello,

There is a new episode in the AGIV-CRAB-OSM story.

Today they released the CRAB database using the new flanders open data
licence [1]. This means that now we can start the process of verification
with the Imports-list and the DWG that the licence is ok and we can start
using AGIV as a source when mapping.

I will take care of this but help is always welcome. If there is someone
dutch-speaking here with a verifiable legal experitse that could help me
translate the licence into english and discuss with the DWG that would be
nice.

What I understand from reading the licence [2] using this data in the
context of OSM should not be a problem anymore except for the need to
mention the source when distributing the data. This should not be a problem
because I have confirmation from someone at AGIV that a source-mention on
the wiki is enough for them. This means they will consider themselves one
of the "© OpenStreetMap contributors" :-) !

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Best regards,

Ben Abelshausen

[1] http://agiv.be/gis/nieuws/?artid=2179
[2] http://agiv.be/gis/producten/?artid=2101
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be