Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
Hi everybody :) here are the latest stats :) As usual, the datas + graph https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Aitf6GpM7KbYdGpvcWtNbVRoMU41VnowZU1nMXdGZEEoutput=html And the tiles... http://osm.bmaron.net/urbis_img/tiles/ We are now at ~60% of the buildings... (stats of yesterday a 20:55) Enjoy :) regards Brice On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:46 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everybody :) here are the latest stats :) So i've added the column on the graph : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Aitf6GpM7KbYdGpvcWtNbVRoMU41VnowZU1nMXdGZEEoutput=html And generated some new tiles... http://osm.bmaron.net/urbis_img/tiles/ We are now a 55% of the buildings... (stats of yesterday a 19:00) Enjoy :) regards Brice On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Nicolas Pettiaux nico...@pettiaux.bewrote: Congratulation. Very nice work Much thanks 2013/9/26 Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.comwrote: nice ! +1 :-) Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be -- Nicolas Pettiaux - +32 496 24 55 01 - http://rmll.info - http://lepacte.be EuroSciPy 2013 co-chair http://www.euroscipy.org/ ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
Hi everybody :) here are the latest stats :) So i've added the column on the graph : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Aitf6GpM7KbYdGpvcWtNbVRoMU41VnowZU1nMXdGZEEoutput=html And generated some new tiles... http://osm.bmaron.net/urbis_img/tiles/ We are now a 55% of the buildings... (stats of yesterday a 19:00) Enjoy :) regards Brice On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Nicolas Pettiaux nico...@pettiaux.bewrote: Congratulation. Very nice work Much thanks 2013/9/26 Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote: nice ! +1 :-) Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be -- Nicolas Pettiaux - +32 496 24 55 01 - http://rmll.info - http://lepacte.be EuroSciPy 2013 co-chair http://www.euroscipy.org/ ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote: nice ! +1 :-) Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
Congratulation. Very nice work Much thanks 2013/9/26 Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote: nice ! +1 :-) Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be -- Nicolas Pettiaux - +32 496 24 55 01 - http://rmll.info - http://lepacte.be EuroSciPy 2013 co-chair http://www.euroscipy.org/ ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
My Qgis is Back \o/ So i've tried (as a test ) to build a web tile map for the usual stats ... it's still not perfect but the result is somewhat ok :) Ben you've asked it .. here it is :p http://osm.bmaron.net/urbis_img/tiles/ On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Great news today, i've processes the stats for yesterday, and we've reached the half of the integration ! As usual, the doc is here : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Aitf6GpM7KbYdGpvcWtNbVRoMU41VnowZU1nMXdGZEEoutput=html in fact we have added more than the half : 50,41% :p so the end is near :) On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:02 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys .. here are latests stats for urbis intagration ... https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Aitf6GpM7KbYdGpvcWtNbVRoMU41VnowZU1nMXdGZEEoutput=html the sneak peak is : 504 | Woluwe-Saint-Pierre - Sint-Pieters-Woluwe 11865 | Woluwe-Saint-Lambert - Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe 4264 | Watermael-Boitsfort - Watermaal-Bosvoorde 4354 | Ville de Bruxelles - Stad Brussel 21601 | Uccle - Ukkel 22802 | Schaerbeek - Schaarbeek 233 | Saint-Josse-ten-Noode - Sint-Joost-ten-Node 152 | Saint-Gilles - Sint-Gillis 0 | Molenbeek-Saint-Jean - Sint-Jans-Molenbeek 13 | Koekelberg 9732 | Jette 6898 | Ixelles - Elsene 80 | Ganshoren 4411 | Forest - Vorst 3663 | Evere 9285 | Etterbeek 1345 | Berchem-Sainte-Agathe - Sint-Agatha-Berchem 6640 | Auderghem - Oudergem 10003 | Anderlecht == 47% of all buildings... Keep up the work :) Regards, Brice On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:57 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: Hey everyone :) here is the weekly update (from data from 2013-07-17T19:00:02Z ) So as usual, the number of ways tagged with ref:UrbIS=* by user Nbr | User ---+- 1 | zors1843 2 | D!zzy 2 | Nicomaque 2 | Casimir EXTREME 3 | Glenn Plas 4 | gllm 4 | landfahrer 9 | adjuva 11 | bparmentier 79 | Tbj 307 | Jowielen 1769 | BenoitL 3826 | Polyglot 8848 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 13089 | Potato_Spirit 17250 | eMerzh 20443 | foxandpotatoes 28712 | FantAntonio99 == total of 94361 polygons imported And this week , a big first, a rough percent estimation of integration completeness (count of urbis polygons vs count of osm+urbis polygons ) In Urbis,In OSM 25455 9058 35,58% Anderlecht 12877 0 0,00% Molenbeek-Saint-Jean - Sint-Jans-Molenbeek 37328 2827 7,57% Ville de Bruxelles - Stad Brussel 12968 491 3,79% Woluwe-Saint-Pierre - Sint-Pieters-Woluwe 3129 13 0,42% Koekelberg 16885 4165 24,67% Ixelles - Elsene 6188 1345 21,74% Berchem-Sainte-Agathe - Sint-Agatha-Berchem 10742 973 9,06% Forest - Vorst 25501 11875 46,57% Uccle - Ukkel 8702 152 1,75% Saint-Gilles - Sint-Gillis 23226 22793 98,14% Schaerbeek - Schaarbeek 9320 6392 68,58% Etterbeek 12326 11865 96,26% Woluwe-Saint-Lambert - Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe 3910 233 5,96% Saint-Josse-ten-Noode - Sint-Joost-ten-Node 10366 6640 64,06% Auderghem - Oudergem 4531 80 1,77% Ganshoren 9171 3208 34,98% Watermael-Boitsfort - Watermaal-Bosvoorde 7380 1882 25,50% Evere 9867 9737 98,68% Jette So, a total estimated to 37.32% of every buildings Here is the link as usual for the preview http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=7bcd072eb81b72d66dbb010f6db49932 Regards :) ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
Ben you've asked it .. here it is :p http://osm.bmaron.net/urbis_img/tiles/ nice ! m ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
Hi Guys .. here are latests stats for urbis intagration ... https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Aitf6GpM7KbYdGpvcWtNbVRoMU41VnowZU1nMXdGZEEoutput=html the sneak peak is : 504 | Woluwe-Saint-Pierre - Sint-Pieters-Woluwe 11865 | Woluwe-Saint-Lambert - Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe 4264 | Watermael-Boitsfort - Watermaal-Bosvoorde 4354 | Ville de Bruxelles - Stad Brussel 21601 | Uccle - Ukkel 22802 | Schaerbeek - Schaarbeek 233 | Saint-Josse-ten-Noode - Sint-Joost-ten-Node 152 | Saint-Gilles - Sint-Gillis 0 | Molenbeek-Saint-Jean - Sint-Jans-Molenbeek 13 | Koekelberg 9732 | Jette 6898 | Ixelles - Elsene 80 | Ganshoren 4411 | Forest - Vorst 3663 | Evere 9285 | Etterbeek 1345 | Berchem-Sainte-Agathe - Sint-Agatha-Berchem 6640 | Auderghem - Oudergem 10003 | Anderlecht == 47% of all buildings... Keep up the work :) Regards, Brice On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:57 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: Hey everyone :) here is the weekly update (from data from 2013-07-17T19:00:02Z ) So as usual, the number of ways tagged with ref:UrbIS=* by user Nbr | User ---+- 1 | zors1843 2 | D!zzy 2 | Nicomaque 2 | Casimir EXTREME 3 | Glenn Plas 4 | gllm 4 | landfahrer 9 | adjuva 11 | bparmentier 79 | Tbj 307 | Jowielen 1769 | BenoitL 3826 | Polyglot 8848 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 13089 | Potato_Spirit 17250 | eMerzh 20443 | foxandpotatoes 28712 | FantAntonio99 == total of 94361 polygons imported And this week , a big first, a rough percent estimation of integration completeness (count of urbis polygons vs count of osm+urbis polygons ) In Urbis,In OSM 25455 9058 35,58% Anderlecht 12877 0 0,00% Molenbeek-Saint-Jean - Sint-Jans-Molenbeek 37328 2827 7,57% Ville de Bruxelles - Stad Brussel 12968 491 3,79% Woluwe-Saint-Pierre - Sint-Pieters-Woluwe 3129 13 0,42% Koekelberg 16885 4165 24,67% Ixelles - Elsene 6188 1345 21,74% Berchem-Sainte-Agathe - Sint-Agatha-Berchem 10742 973 9,06% Forest - Vorst 25501 11875 46,57% Uccle - Ukkel 8702 152 1,75% Saint-Gilles - Sint-Gillis 23226 22793 98,14% Schaerbeek - Schaarbeek 9320 6392 68,58% Etterbeek 12326 11865 96,26% Woluwe-Saint-Lambert - Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe 3910 233 5,96% Saint-Josse-ten-Noode - Sint-Joost-ten-Node 10366 6640 64,06% Auderghem - Oudergem 4531 80 1,77% Ganshoren 9171 3208 34,98% Watermael-Boitsfort - Watermaal-Bosvoorde 7380 1882 25,50% Evere 9867 9737 98,68% Jette So, a total estimated to 37.32% of every buildings Here is the link as usual for the preview http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=7bcd072eb81b72d66dbb010f6db49932 Regards :) ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
Hey everyone :) here is the weekly update (from data from 2013-07-17T19:00:02Z ) So as usual, the number of ways tagged with ref:UrbIS=* by user Nbr | User ---+- 1 | zors1843 2 | D!zzy 2 | Nicomaque 2 | Casimir EXTREME 3 | Glenn Plas 4 | gllm 4 | landfahrer 9 | adjuva 11 | bparmentier 79 | Tbj 307 | Jowielen 1769 | BenoitL 3826 | Polyglot 8848 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 13089 | Potato_Spirit 17250 | eMerzh 20443 | foxandpotatoes 28712 | FantAntonio99 == total of 94361 polygons imported And this week , a big first, a rough percent estimation of integration completeness (count of urbis polygons vs count of osm+urbis polygons ) In Urbis,In OSM 25455 9058 35,58% Anderlecht 12877 0 0,00% Molenbeek-Saint-Jean - Sint-Jans-Molenbeek 37328 2827 7,57% Ville de Bruxelles - Stad Brussel 12968 491 3,79% Woluwe-Saint-Pierre - Sint-Pieters-Woluwe 3129 13 0,42% Koekelberg 16885 4165 24,67% Ixelles - Elsene 6188 1345 21,74% Berchem-Sainte-Agathe - Sint-Agatha-Berchem 10742 973 9,06% Forest - Vorst 25501 11875 46,57% Uccle - Ukkel 8702 152 1,75% Saint-Gilles - Sint-Gillis 23226 22793 98,14% Schaerbeek - Schaarbeek 9320 6392 68,58% Etterbeek 12326 11865 96,26% Woluwe-Saint-Lambert - Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe 3910 233 5,96% Saint-Josse-ten-Noode - Sint-Joost-ten-Node 10366 6640 64,06% Auderghem - Oudergem 4531 80 1,77% Ganshoren 9171 3208 34,98% Watermael-Boitsfort - Watermaal-Bosvoorde 7380 1882 25,50% Evere 9867 9737 98,68% Jette So, a total estimated to 37.32% of every buildings Here is the link as usual for the preview http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=7bcd072eb81b72d66dbb010f6db49932 Regards :) ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
Hi all, here is quickly another week another stat ... 1 | zors1843 2 | D!zzy 3 | Casimir EXTREME 3 | Glenn Plas 4 | landfahrer 4 | gllm 9 | adjuva 79 | Tbj 307 | Jowielen 1776 | BenoitL 3018 | Polyglot 7740 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 12061 | Potato_Spirit 16060 | eMerzh 20447 | foxandpotatoes 27415 | FantAntonio99 (16 rows) == 88929 ON 2013-07-11T19:00:06Z http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=af94b0289ea53eebd3db89633c219f79 Just to be sure, do you think i should post this kind of info on my blog or anywhere else instead of polluting this ML? (or maybe a little less stats?) what do you think? ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
2013/7/14 eMerzh merz...@gmail.com Hi all, here is quickly another week another stat ... 1 | zors1843 2 | D!zzy 3 | Casimir EXTREME 3 | Glenn Plas 4 | landfahrer 4 | gllm 9 | adjuva 79 | Tbj 307 | Jowielen 1776 | BenoitL 3018 | Polyglot 7740 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 12061 | Potato_Spirit 16060 | eMerzh 20447 | foxandpotatoes 27415 | FantAntonio99 (16 rows) == 88929 ON 2013-07-11T19:00:06Z http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=af94b0289ea53eebd3db89633c219f79 Just to be sure, do you think i should post this kind of info on my blog or anywhere else instead of polluting this ML? (or maybe a little less stats?) what do you think? Personally I don't think one stat a week hurts the ML very much. Jo ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
Some news on this as requested by some of you :) (from metro extract instead of overpass) On 01/07 : Number Of ways / Users count | osm_user ---+- 1 | zors1843 2 | D!zzy 3 | Casimir EXTREME 4 | Glenn Plas 54 | Tbj 308 | Jowielen 1776 | BenoitL 2797 | Polyglot 3781 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 8331 | Potato_Spirit 10436 | FantAntonio99 13555 | eMerzh 19620 | foxandpotatoes == total : 60668 since 20-06 (last stat ) we've got : + 14718 ways that give us : +1338 ways per day i would like to make an estimation on what's left but i struggle a bit with loading all urbis in my small db :p As usual, the map http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=afd7205a672d8a7e36e376d0def5f5c2 (don't trust too much those stats, they might be completely false :p ) Brice On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:19 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: First, *Thanks everybody for the hard work on this!* Please again people, check what you do... i've corrected many errors from Urbis Import I think it's better to integrate thing slowly but w-o having to go back to correct everything... i've fixed a lot things like : - Street name does not match the relation/addr:street tags - Self intersecting buildings (ok they are in urbis but please, fix them ...) - buildings imported 2 times You can use 3 Tools to verify your things : - The Josm Validator Tool - Osmose http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ - Osmihttp://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresseslon=4.37768lat=50.82996zoom=13overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,no_addr_street,street_not_found,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads(datas lag a bit but still usefull) Now, let's play a bit with stats : A small update on stats from 19-06 at 23:50 :p Number of Nodes/User 1 | Aldrak 3 | Capitaine Igloo 4 | meet00 6 | Toi 17 | orioane 17 | toSc 893 | Tbj 1444 | Jowielen 14959 | BenoitL 15353 | Polyglot 16415 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 19668 | FantAntonio99 36760 | Potato_Spirit 60926 | eMerzh 115603 | foxandpotatoes == total : 282069 Number Of ways /Users count | osm_user ---+- 1 | zors1843 3 | Casimir EXTREME 93 | Tbj 308 | Jowielen 1769 | BenoitL 2816 | Polyglot 2901 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 3794 | FantAntonio99 6227 | Potato_Spirit 11818 | eMerzh 16220 | foxandpotatoes == total : 45950= So since +- 1 week we have: + 99199 nodes + 15001 ways http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=d6669abfb0c21a236ee53a239c86242a Number of Point Addresses now in OSM : 5355 Number of Way addresses now in OSM : 31969 it may follows with other stat if i have time On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote: would be nice to overlay this on the osm-map! just saying... :-) Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:44 AM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: No i was not in contact with them ... and yes it's ok for me to publish the thing it may be interesting to do a better version of it but ... maybe this w-e :) On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote: Is it OK if I put this document on twitter (osm_be)? I think osm_be is followed by the urbis people. Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Julien Fastré jul...@fastre.infowrote: Hi, I was just wondering... Did you try to be in contact with Urbis ? I think the people working there will be interested in the work you're doing ! Julien Le 14/06/13 11:09, eMerzh a écrit : Hi, We've played a bit with Urbis, and the integration process of addresses and buildings is really growing... A few remarks Though : * Adding source=urbis on every node/way is not necessary as long as we put the tag on the changeset . I'm not really fan of that source=* tag and if we want to retrieve every urbis-only buildings w-o looking for changset tags we might use the ref:urbis=* tag. * I still thing that copy pasting the Associated street Relation is better than putting every tag of the relation on every building /node of the street ...(postcode, city, ...) * Don't forget to remove unnecessary nodes when you see them :) Here are a few stats about the importation : * Number of Building from Urbis/user : 1 | zors1843 1 | Tbj 3 | Casimir EXTREME 524 | BenoitL 1992 | FantAntonio99 2528 | Polyglot 2715 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 3929 | Potato_Spirit 8613 | foxandpotatoes 10643 | eMerzh == total : 30949 * Number of
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
Errr it seems that unlike what's written here : http://metro.teczno.com/ the last data i used for my stats where from 2013-06-25 i'll try to take more recent datas soon On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:41 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: Some news on this as requested by some of you :) (from metro extract instead of overpass) On 01/07 : Number Of ways / Users count | osm_user ---+- 1 | zors1843 2 | D!zzy 3 | Casimir EXTREME 4 | Glenn Plas 54 | Tbj 308 | Jowielen 1776 | BenoitL 2797 | Polyglot 3781 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 8331 | Potato_Spirit 10436 | FantAntonio99 13555 | eMerzh 19620 | foxandpotatoes == total : 60668 since 20-06 (last stat ) we've got : + 14718 ways that give us : +1338 ways per day i would like to make an estimation on what's left but i struggle a bit with loading all urbis in my small db :p As usual, the map http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=afd7205a672d8a7e36e376d0def5f5c2 (don't trust too much those stats, they might be completely false :p ) Brice On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:19 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: First, *Thanks everybody for the hard work on this!* Please again people, check what you do... i've corrected many errors from Urbis Import I think it's better to integrate thing slowly but w-o having to go back to correct everything... i've fixed a lot things like : - Street name does not match the relation/addr:street tags - Self intersecting buildings (ok they are in urbis but please, fix them ...) - buildings imported 2 times You can use 3 Tools to verify your things : - The Josm Validator Tool - Osmose http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ - Osmihttp://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresseslon=4.37768lat=50.82996zoom=13overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,no_addr_street,street_not_found,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads(datas lag a bit but still usefull) Now, let's play a bit with stats : A small update on stats from 19-06 at 23:50 :p Number of Nodes/User 1 | Aldrak 3 | Capitaine Igloo 4 | meet00 6 | Toi 17 | orioane 17 | toSc 893 | Tbj 1444 | Jowielen 14959 | BenoitL 15353 | Polyglot 16415 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 19668 | FantAntonio99 36760 | Potato_Spirit 60926 | eMerzh 115603 | foxandpotatoes == total : 282069 Number Of ways /Users count | osm_user ---+- 1 | zors1843 3 | Casimir EXTREME 93 | Tbj 308 | Jowielen 1769 | BenoitL 2816 | Polyglot 2901 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 3794 | FantAntonio99 6227 | Potato_Spirit 11818 | eMerzh 16220 | foxandpotatoes == total : 45950= So since +- 1 week we have: + 99199 nodes + 15001 ways http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=d6669abfb0c21a236ee53a239c86242a Number of Point Addresses now in OSM : 5355 Number of Way addresses now in OSM : 31969 it may follows with other stat if i have time On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote: would be nice to overlay this on the osm-map! just saying... :-) Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:44 AM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: No i was not in contact with them ... and yes it's ok for me to publish the thing it may be interesting to do a better version of it but ... maybe this w-e :) On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote: Is it OK if I put this document on twitter (osm_be)? I think osm_be is followed by the urbis people. Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Julien Fastré jul...@fastre.infowrote: Hi, I was just wondering... Did you try to be in contact with Urbis ? I think the people working there will be interested in the work you're doing ! Julien Le 14/06/13 11:09, eMerzh a écrit : Hi, We've played a bit with Urbis, and the integration process of addresses and buildings is really growing... A few remarks Though : * Adding source=urbis on every node/way is not necessary as long as we put the tag on the changeset . I'm not really fan of that source=* tag and if we want to retrieve every urbis-only buildings w-o looking for changset tags we might use the ref:urbis=* tag. * I still thing that copy pasting the Associated street Relation is better than putting every tag of the relation on every building /node of the street ...(postcode, city, ...) * Don't forget to remove unnecessary nodes when you see them :) Here are a few stats about the importation : * Number of
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
Dear all, eMerzh, thank you for your feedback. I have checked my edits with the two tools you described and I discovered an issue that's above my head: For example node 2342974252 has the tag - addr:street = Square Jean-Baptiste De Greef - Jean-Baptiste De Greefsquare but the square is not yet on Openstreetmap. - Since there are 5 roads crossing, I don't really know how to add the square... Could somebody please have a look? Thank you in advance! Best regards, Anton Square J.B. De Greef 5, 1160 Oudergem On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:19 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: First, *Thanks everybody for the hard work on this!* Please again people, check what you do... i've corrected many errors from Urbis Import I think it's better to integrate thing slowly but w-o having to go back to correct everything... i've fixed a lot things like : - Street name does not match the relation/addr:street tags - Self intersecting buildings (ok they are in urbis but please, fix them ...) - buildings imported 2 times You can use 3 Tools to verify your things : - The Josm Validator Tool - Osmose http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ - Osmihttp://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresseslon=4.37768lat=50.82996zoom=13overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,no_addr_street,street_not_found,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads(datas lag a bit but still usefull) Now, let's play a bit with stats : A small update on stats from 19-06 at 23:50 :p Number of Nodes/User 1 | Aldrak 3 | Capitaine Igloo 4 | meet00 6 | Toi 17 | orioane 17 | toSc 893 | Tbj 1444 | Jowielen 14959 | BenoitL 15353 | Polyglot 16415 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 19668 | FantAntonio99 36760 | Potato_Spirit 60926 | eMerzh 115603 | foxandpotatoes == total : 282069 Number Of ways /Users count | osm_user ---+- 1 | zors1843 3 | Casimir EXTREME 93 | Tbj 308 | Jowielen 1769 | BenoitL 2816 | Polyglot 2901 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 3794 | FantAntonio99 6227 | Potato_Spirit 11818 | eMerzh 16220 | foxandpotatoes == total : 45950= So since +- 1 week we have: + 99199 nodes + 15001 ways http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=d6669abfb0c21a236ee53a239c86242a Number of Point Addresses now in OSM : 5355 Number of Way addresses now in OSM : 31969 it may follows with other stat if i have time On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote: would be nice to overlay this on the osm-map! just saying... :-) Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:44 AM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: No i was not in contact with them ... and yes it's ok for me to publish the thing it may be interesting to do a better version of it but ... maybe this w-e :) On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote: Is it OK if I put this document on twitter (osm_be)? I think osm_be is followed by the urbis people. Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Julien Fastré jul...@fastre.infowrote: Hi, I was just wondering... Did you try to be in contact with Urbis ? I think the people working there will be interested in the work you're doing ! Julien Le 14/06/13 11:09, eMerzh a écrit : Hi, We've played a bit with Urbis, and the integration process of addresses and buildings is really growing... A few remarks Though : * Adding source=urbis on every node/way is not necessary as long as we put the tag on the changeset . I'm not really fan of that source=* tag and if we want to retrieve every urbis-only buildings w-o looking for changset tags we might use the ref:urbis=* tag. * I still thing that copy pasting the Associated street Relation is better than putting every tag of the relation on every building /node of the street ...(postcode, city, ...) * Don't forget to remove unnecessary nodes when you see them :) Here are a few stats about the importation : * Number of Building from Urbis/user : 1 | zors1843 1 | Tbj 3 | Casimir EXTREME 524 | BenoitL 1992 | FantAntonio99 2528 | Polyglot 2715 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 3929 | Potato_Spirit 8613 | foxandpotatoes 10643 | eMerzh == total : 30949 * Number of Node/user: 3 | Capitaine Igloo 4 | meet00 6 | Toi 17 | toSc 41 | Tbj 4377 | BenoitL 10449 | FantAntonio99 13686 | Polyglot 15023 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 23148 | Potato_Spirit 56066 | eMerzh 60050 | foxandpotatoes == total : 182870 I put also a quick pdf i
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
I'll have a look, Anton Georges 2013/6/21 Anton Snoeys antonsno...@gmail.com Dear all, eMerzh, thank you for your feedback. I have checked my edits with the two tools you described and I discovered an issue that's above my head: For example node 2342974252 has the tag - addr:street = Square Jean-Baptiste De Greef - Jean-Baptiste De Greefsquare but the square is not yet on Openstreetmap. - Since there are 5 roads crossing, I don't really know how to add the square... Could somebody please have a look? Thank you in advance! Best regards, Anton Square J.B. De Greef 5, 1160 Oudergem On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:19 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: First, *Thanks everybody for the hard work on this!* Please again people, check what you do... i've corrected many errors from Urbis Import I think it's better to integrate thing slowly but w-o having to go back to correct everything... i've fixed a lot things like : - Street name does not match the relation/addr:street tags - Self intersecting buildings (ok they are in urbis but please, fix them ...) - buildings imported 2 times You can use 3 Tools to verify your things : - The Josm Validator Tool - Osmose http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ - Osmihttp://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresseslon=4.37768lat=50.82996zoom=13overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,no_addr_street,street_not_found,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads(datas lag a bit but still usefull) Now, let's play a bit with stats : A small update on stats from 19-06 at 23:50 :p Number of Nodes/User 1 | Aldrak 3 | Capitaine Igloo 4 | meet00 6 | Toi 17 | orioane 17 | toSc 893 | Tbj 1444 | Jowielen 14959 | BenoitL 15353 | Polyglot 16415 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 19668 | FantAntonio99 36760 | Potato_Spirit 60926 | eMerzh 115603 | foxandpotatoes == total : 282069 Number Of ways /Users count | osm_user ---+- 1 | zors1843 3 | Casimir EXTREME 93 | Tbj 308 | Jowielen 1769 | BenoitL 2816 | Polyglot 2901 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 3794 | FantAntonio99 6227 | Potato_Spirit 11818 | eMerzh 16220 | foxandpotatoes == total : 45950= So since +- 1 week we have: + 99199 nodes + 15001 ways http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=d6669abfb0c21a236ee53a239c86242a Number of Point Addresses now in OSM : 5355 Number of Way addresses now in OSM : 31969 it may follows with other stat if i have time On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote: would be nice to overlay this on the osm-map! just saying... :-) Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:44 AM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: No i was not in contact with them ... and yes it's ok for me to publish the thing it may be interesting to do a better version of it but ... maybe this w-e :) On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote: Is it OK if I put this document on twitter (osm_be)? I think osm_be is followed by the urbis people. Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Julien Fastré jul...@fastre.infowrote: Hi, I was just wondering... Did you try to be in contact with Urbis ? I think the people working there will be interested in the work you're doing ! Julien Le 14/06/13 11:09, eMerzh a écrit : Hi, We've played a bit with Urbis, and the integration process of addresses and buildings is really growing... A few remarks Though : * Adding source=urbis on every node/way is not necessary as long as we put the tag on the changeset . I'm not really fan of that source=* tag and if we want to retrieve every urbis-only buildings w-o looking for changset tags we might use the ref:urbis=* tag. * I still thing that copy pasting the Associated street Relation is better than putting every tag of the relation on every building /node of the street ...(postcode, city, ...) * Don't forget to remove unnecessary nodes when you see them :) Here are a few stats about the importation : * Number of Building from Urbis/user : 1 | zors1843 1 | Tbj 3 | Casimir EXTREME 524 | BenoitL 1992 | FantAntonio99 2528 | Polyglot 2715 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 3929 | Potato_Spirit 8613 | foxandpotatoes 10643 | eMerzh == total : 30949 * Number of Node/user: 3 | Capitaine Igloo 4 | meet00 6 | Toi 17 | toSc 41 | Tbj 4377 | BenoitL 10449 | FantAntonio99 13686 | Polyglot 15023 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 23148 |
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
First, *Thanks everybody for the hard work on this!* Please again people, check what you do... i've corrected many errors from Urbis Import I think it's better to integrate thing slowly but w-o having to go back to correct everything... i've fixed a lot things like : - Street name does not match the relation/addr:street tags - Self intersecting buildings (ok they are in urbis but please, fix them ...) - buildings imported 2 times You can use 3 Tools to verify your things : - The Josm Validator Tool - Osmose http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ - Osmihttp://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresseslon=4.37768lat=50.82996zoom=13overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,no_addr_street,street_not_found,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads(datas lag a bit but still usefull) Now, let's play a bit with stats : A small update on stats from 19-06 at 23:50 :p Number of Nodes/User 1 | Aldrak 3 | Capitaine Igloo 4 | meet00 6 | Toi 17 | orioane 17 | toSc 893 | Tbj 1444 | Jowielen 14959 | BenoitL 15353 | Polyglot 16415 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 19668 | FantAntonio99 36760 | Potato_Spirit 60926 | eMerzh 115603 | foxandpotatoes == total : 282069 Number Of ways /Users count | osm_user ---+- 1 | zors1843 3 | Casimir EXTREME 93 | Tbj 308 | Jowielen 1769 | BenoitL 2816 | Polyglot 2901 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 3794 | FantAntonio99 6227 | Potato_Spirit 11818 | eMerzh 16220 | foxandpotatoes == total : 45950= So since +- 1 week we have: + 99199 nodes + 15001 ways http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=d6669abfb0c21a236ee53a239c86242a Number of Point Addresses now in OSM : 5355 Number of Way addresses now in OSM : 31969 it may follows with other stat if i have time On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote: would be nice to overlay this on the osm-map! just saying... :-) Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:44 AM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: No i was not in contact with them ... and yes it's ok for me to publish the thing it may be interesting to do a better version of it but ... maybe this w-e :) On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote: Is it OK if I put this document on twitter (osm_be)? I think osm_be is followed by the urbis people. Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Julien Fastré jul...@fastre.infowrote: Hi, I was just wondering... Did you try to be in contact with Urbis ? I think the people working there will be interested in the work you're doing ! Julien Le 14/06/13 11:09, eMerzh a écrit : Hi, We've played a bit with Urbis, and the integration process of addresses and buildings is really growing... A few remarks Though : * Adding source=urbis on every node/way is not necessary as long as we put the tag on the changeset . I'm not really fan of that source=* tag and if we want to retrieve every urbis-only buildings w-o looking for changset tags we might use the ref:urbis=* tag. * I still thing that copy pasting the Associated street Relation is better than putting every tag of the relation on every building /node of the street ...(postcode, city, ...) * Don't forget to remove unnecessary nodes when you see them :) Here are a few stats about the importation : * Number of Building from Urbis/user : 1 | zors1843 1 | Tbj 3 | Casimir EXTREME 524 | BenoitL 1992 | FantAntonio99 2528 | Polyglot 2715 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 3929 | Potato_Spirit 8613 | foxandpotatoes 10643 | eMerzh == total : 30949 * Number of Node/user: 3 | Capitaine Igloo 4 | meet00 6 | Toi 17 | toSc 41 | Tbj 4377 | BenoitL 10449 | FantAntonio99 13686 | Polyglot 15023 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 23148 | Potato_Spirit 56066 | eMerzh 60050 | foxandpotatoes == total : 182870 I put also a quick pdf i made (not as finished as i would ...) to show the different area and contributors : http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=f2c2bb12f85b748589a16d5c745c6b74download=1 Regards eMerzh ___ Talk-be mailing listTalk-be@openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
[OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
Hi, We've played a bit with Urbis, and the integration process of addresses and buildings is really growing... A few remarks Though : * Adding source=urbis on every node/way is not necessary as long as we put the tag on the changeset . I'm not really fan of that source=* tag and if we want to retrieve every urbis-only buildings w-o looking for changset tags we might use the ref:urbis=* tag. * I still thing that copy pasting the Associated street Relation is better than putting every tag of the relation on every building /node of the street ...(postcode, city, ...) * Don't forget to remove unnecessary nodes when you see them :) Here are a few stats about the importation : * Number of Building from Urbis/user : 1 | zors1843 1 | Tbj 3 | Casimir EXTREME 524 | BenoitL 1992 | FantAntonio99 2528 | Polyglot 2715 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 3929 | Potato_Spirit 8613 | foxandpotatoes 10643 | eMerzh == total : 30949 * Number of Node/user: 3 | Capitaine Igloo 4 | meet00 6 | Toi 17 | toSc 41 | Tbj 4377 | BenoitL 10449 | FantAntonio99 13686 | Polyglot 15023 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 23148 | Potato_Spirit 56066 | eMerzh 60050 | foxandpotatoes == total : 182870 I put also a quick pdf i made (not as finished as i would ...) to show the different area and contributors : http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=f2c2bb12f85b748589a16d5c745c6b74download=1 Regards eMerzh ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
No i was not in contact with them ... and yes it's ok for me to publish the thing it may be interesting to do a better version of it but ... maybe this w-e :) On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote: Is it OK if I put this document on twitter (osm_be)? I think osm_be is followed by the urbis people. Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Julien Fastré jul...@fastre.infowrote: Hi, I was just wondering... Did you try to be in contact with Urbis ? I think the people working there will be interested in the work you're doing ! Julien Le 14/06/13 11:09, eMerzh a écrit : Hi, We've played a bit with Urbis, and the integration process of addresses and buildings is really growing... A few remarks Though : * Adding source=urbis on every node/way is not necessary as long as we put the tag on the changeset . I'm not really fan of that source=* tag and if we want to retrieve every urbis-only buildings w-o looking for changset tags we might use the ref:urbis=* tag. * I still thing that copy pasting the Associated street Relation is better than putting every tag of the relation on every building /node of the street ...(postcode, city, ...) * Don't forget to remove unnecessary nodes when you see them :) Here are a few stats about the importation : * Number of Building from Urbis/user : 1 | zors1843 1 | Tbj 3 | Casimir EXTREME 524 | BenoitL 1992 | FantAntonio99 2528 | Polyglot 2715 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 3929 | Potato_Spirit 8613 | foxandpotatoes 10643 | eMerzh == total : 30949 * Number of Node/user: 3 | Capitaine Igloo 4 | meet00 6 | Toi 17 | toSc 41 | Tbj 4377 | BenoitL 10449 | FantAntonio99 13686 | Polyglot 15023 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 23148 | Potato_Spirit 56066 | eMerzh 60050 | foxandpotatoes == total : 182870 I put also a quick pdf i made (not as finished as i would ...) to show the different area and contributors : http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=f2c2bb12f85b748589a16d5c745c6b74download=1 Regards eMerzh ___ Talk-be mailing listTalk-be@openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback
would be nice to overlay this on the osm-map! just saying... :-) Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:44 AM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote: No i was not in contact with them ... and yes it's ok for me to publish the thing it may be interesting to do a better version of it but ... maybe this w-e :) On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote: Is it OK if I put this document on twitter (osm_be)? I think osm_be is followed by the urbis people. Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Julien Fastré jul...@fastre.infowrote: Hi, I was just wondering... Did you try to be in contact with Urbis ? I think the people working there will be interested in the work you're doing ! Julien Le 14/06/13 11:09, eMerzh a écrit : Hi, We've played a bit with Urbis, and the integration process of addresses and buildings is really growing... A few remarks Though : * Adding source=urbis on every node/way is not necessary as long as we put the tag on the changeset . I'm not really fan of that source=* tag and if we want to retrieve every urbis-only buildings w-o looking for changset tags we might use the ref:urbis=* tag. * I still thing that copy pasting the Associated street Relation is better than putting every tag of the relation on every building /node of the street ...(postcode, city, ...) * Don't forget to remove unnecessary nodes when you see them :) Here are a few stats about the importation : * Number of Building from Urbis/user : 1 | zors1843 1 | Tbj 3 | Casimir EXTREME 524 | BenoitL 1992 | FantAntonio99 2528 | Polyglot 2715 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 3929 | Potato_Spirit 8613 | foxandpotatoes 10643 | eMerzh == total : 30949 * Number of Node/user: 3 | Capitaine Igloo 4 | meet00 6 | Toi 17 | toSc 41 | Tbj 4377 | BenoitL 10449 | FantAntonio99 13686 | Polyglot 15023 | Paul-Andre Duchesne 23148 | Potato_Spirit 56066 | eMerzh 60050 | foxandpotatoes == total : 182870 I put also a quick pdf i made (not as finished as i would ...) to show the different area and contributors : http://my.bmaron.net/public.php?service=filest=f2c2bb12f85b748589a16d5c745c6b74download=1 Regards eMerzh ___ Talk-be mailing listTalk-be@openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
