Re: [OSM-talk-be] Wrong tagging of name bicycle_rental

[Yves bxl-forever]

Yes, this is clearly a mistake caused by careless bulk imports or someone 
blindly copying information directly from the Villo! website because the text 
strings match.

When we see names such as "Station n° 312 CENTRE CULTUREL / CULTUREEL CENTRUM - 
BD DU SOUVERAIN FACE 282 / VORSTLAAN VOOR 282" we should change that and move 
the information into the appropriate keys: name (name=), address (addr:*=) and 
reference number (ref=).

In recent weeks I have done some work and fixed most stations in the city 
centre already.  It’s tricky because it is not only a tagging problem but quite 
often the nodes are not located correctly, so this requires proper surveying 
too.  Doing the rest of the network is part of my personal to-do list, but if 
someone else is willing to contribute, any help is welcome.

Cheers.
Yves



On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:47:28 +0100
Jakka  wrote:

> What must be done here? finding the mapper ? or organisation?
> The mapper puts into the "name" tag the adress...I thought adress are in 
> adress tagfor sure
> example this node... See also the relation 271476 of the rentals...
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.83401997926138/4.457859929800588
> Are these the correct names or was it to show it on the maps..
> Have a nice day.
> 
> 
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Wrong tagging of name bicycle_rental

[Jonathan Beliën]

Hello,

Indeed the full address in the name is not very sexy on the map...

Here is the station you mentionned : 
* http://www.villo.be/Toutes-les-stations/Carte-des-stations/%28id%29/357
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3905108607

I would 
1. add only "Station n° 357" for the name (or something like "Villo! Station 
357") ;
2. Add ref:villo = 357
3. Maybe add the address (in this case, it's an intersection) in the 
description tag ?

That is what I would do, but I'll be to learn how it "should" be tagged :D

Good afternoon everyone !


Jonathan Beliën

-Message d'origine-
De : Jakka [mailto:vdmfrank...@gmail.com] 
Envoyé : mardi 31 janvier 2017 16:47
À : talk-be@openstreetmap.org
Objet : [OSM-talk-be] Wrong tagging of name bicycle_rental

What must be done here? finding the mapper ? or organisation?
The mapper puts into the "name" tag the adress...I thought adress are in adress 
tagfor sure example this node... See also the relation 271476 of the 
rentals...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.83401997926138/4.457859929800588
Are these the correct names or was it to show it on the maps..
Have a nice day.


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

[OSM-talk-be] Wrong tagging of name bicycle_rental

[Jakka]

What must be done here? finding the mapper ? or organisation?
The mapper puts into the "name" tag the adress...I thought adress are in 
adress tagfor sure

example this node... See also the relation 271476 of the rentals...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.83401997926138/4.457859929800588
Are these the correct names or was it to show it on the maps..
Have a nice day.


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be