Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [osmose-backend] Missing Parent Tag for all highways with bicycle = yes (#1)

2013-03-24 Thread Marc Gemis
I think anyone can remove them. Of course, it would be better to also
contact whoever added them, so they do not make the same mistake again.

Osmose seems to be rather stupid, and decides that if x number of objects
has certain tag combinations, all objects that have one of the tags, should
also have the others. It does not verify if the tag is appropriate for the
object (node, way, relation). But it is still a valuable tool.

So feel free to remove the route=bicycle if you have the time

regards

m




On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:45 AM, André Pirard Papou 
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:

  On 2013-03-22 21:32, Marc Gemis wrote :

 This is the reply I got on my bug report to osmose.

  Do we have to locate those ways with route=bicycle ?

  m


 It makes no sense.
 route=bicycle is a tag for a relation, not for a way.
 It's very surprising that Osmose commands to repeat such a tag on ever
 cycling way !!!
 How could we identify a cycling route if all the cycling ways contained
 route=bicycle 

 Either Osmose removes that test.
 Or the authors remove that tag (I bcc: one of them).
 Or I can remove 28 of them that I have ready after my selection.

 Your choice?

 Cheers,

   André.

  -- Forwarded message --
 From: frodrigo notificati...@github.com
 Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:12 PM
 Subject: Re: [osmose-backend] Missing Parent Tag for all highways with
 bicycle = yes (#1)
 To: osm-fr/osmose-backend osmose-back...@noreply.github.com
 Cc: marcgemis marc.ge...@gmail.com


 Missing parent tag is a statistical analysis. Osmose suggest to add
 route=bicycle because this tag value is already a key as bicycle=yes, and
 more over because there is more than 50 ways with route=bicycle +
 bicycle=yes in Belgium.

 Maybe we need to apply this analysis on relative value inside of just 50.

 —
 Reply to this email directly or view it on 
 GitHubhttps://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/issues/1#issuecomment-15319079
 .



 ___
 Talk-be mailing 
 listTalk-be@openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be



 ___
 Talk-be mailing list
 Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [osmose-backend] Missing Parent Tag for all highways with bicycle = yes (#1)

2013-03-23 Thread André Pirard Papou

On 2013-03-22 21:32, Marc Gemis wrote :

This is the reply I got on my bug report to osmose.

Do we have to locate those ways with route=bicycle ?

m


It makes no sense.
route=bicycle is a tag for a relation, not for a way.
It's very surprising that Osmose commands to repeat such a tag on ever 
cycling way !!!
How could we identify a cycling route if all the cycling ways contained 
route=bicycle 


Either Osmose removes that test.
Or the authors remove that tag (I bcc: one of them).
Or I can remove 28 of them that I have ready after my selection.

Your choice?

Cheers,

André.



-- Forwarded message --
From: *frodrigo* notificati...@github.com 
mailto:notificati...@github.com

Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [osmose-backend] Missing Parent Tag for all highways with 
bicycle = yes (#1)
To: osm-fr/osmose-backend osmose-back...@noreply.github.com 
mailto:osmose-back...@noreply.github.com

Cc: marcgemis marc.ge...@gmail.com mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com


Missing parent tag is a statistical analysis. Osmose suggest to add 
route=bicycle because this tag value is already a key as bicycle=yes, 
and more over because there is more than 50 ways with route=bicycle + 
bicycle=yes in Belgium.


Maybe we need to apply this analysis on relative value inside of just 50.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub 
https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/issues/1#issuecomment-15319079.





___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be