Re: [Talk-ca] canvec data offset

2012-01-31 Thread Bégin , Daniel
Bonjour Frank,

The problem is not related to a NAD27-NAD83 conversion. With Michael's example, 
I am now sure that the problem is related to the quadtree clipper. I must find 
a way to round quadtree's tiles coordinates to a proper value.

Thanks to Michael

Best regard,
Daniel
 

-Original Message-
From: Frank Steggink [mailto:stegg...@steggink.org] 
Sent: January 31, 2012 11:56
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] canvec data offset

I've seen some of these deviations as well during Canvec import. Because they 
are so small (< 1 meter), I just decided to glue the polygons together, so any 
slivers are gone.

It is inconvenient though. Could it be related to that some sheets were 
originally still in NAD27, instead of NAD83 (which is approximately WGS84, as 
used by OSM)?

Frank

On 31-1-2012 15:06, michael bishop wrote:
> the south east corner of 021O10.0 is at 47.534 by -66.7500013 the 
> north east corner of 021O07.1 (should be exact same node), is at 
> 47.500 by -66.750 the exact offset differs from corner to 
> corner, some are off more then others, some are off in a different 
> direction
>
>
> On 01/31/2012 08:11 AM, Bégin, Daniel wrote:
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> I'll have a look to see if I can do something for it in the next 
>> release.
>>
>> I suspect that might be caused by data resolution. Lat and Lon are 
>> stored in decimal degrees with 7 digits precision (48.1234567). The 
>> 7th digit will provide a precision around 0.001 meter. The 6th digit 
>> a precision around 0.027 meter witch look like your 0.03 meter.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Daniel
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: michael bishop [mailto:cle...@nbnet.nb.ca]
>> Sent: January 30, 2012 16:11
>> To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
>> Subject: [Talk-ca] canvec data offset
>>
>> ive been working with canvec for a few days now, and ive noticed some 
>> of the data is offset by 0.03 meters its not matching up with nearby 
>> tiles
>>
>> for example 021O10 doesnt match up with 021O07
>>
>> ive noticed the problem on other tiles aswell, but didnt think to 
>> write them down
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] canvec data offset

2012-01-31 Thread Frank Steggink
I've seen some of these deviations as well during Canvec import. Because 
they are so small (< 1 meter), I just decided to glue the polygons 
together, so any slivers are gone.


It is inconvenient though. Could it be related to that some sheets were 
originally still in NAD27, instead of NAD83 (which is approximately 
WGS84, as used by OSM)?


Frank

On 31-1-2012 15:06, michael bishop wrote:

the south east corner of 021O10.0 is at 47.534 by -66.7500013
the north east corner of 021O07.1 (should be exact same node), is at 
47.500 by -66.750
the exact offset differs from corner to corner, some are off more then 
others, some are off in a different direction



On 01/31/2012 08:11 AM, Bégin, Daniel wrote:

Bonjour,

I'll have a look to see if I can do something for it in the next 
release.


I suspect that might be caused by data resolution. Lat and Lon are 
stored in decimal degrees with 7 digits precision (48.1234567). The 
7th digit will provide a precision around 0.001 meter. The 6th digit 
a precision around 0.027 meter witch look like your 0.03 meter.


Cheers
Daniel

-Original Message-
From: michael bishop [mailto:cle...@nbnet.nb.ca]
Sent: January 30, 2012 16:11
To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: [Talk-ca] canvec data offset

ive been working with canvec for a few days now, and ive noticed some 
of the data is offset by 0.03 meters its not matching up with nearby 
tiles


for example 021O10 doesnt match up with 021O07

ive noticed the problem on other tiles aswell, but didnt think to 
write them down



___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca




___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca




___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] canvec data offset

2012-01-31 Thread michael bishop

the south east corner of 021O10.0 is at 47.534 by -66.7500013
the north east corner of 021O07.1 (should be exact same node), is at 
47.500 by -66.750
the exact offset differs from corner to corner, some are off more then 
others, some are off in a different direction



On 01/31/2012 08:11 AM, Bégin, Daniel wrote:

Bonjour,

I'll have a look to see if I can do something for it in the next release.

I suspect that might be caused by data resolution. Lat and Lon are stored in 
decimal degrees with 7 digits precision (48.1234567). The 7th digit will 
provide a precision around 0.001 meter. The 6th digit a precision around 0.027 
meter witch look like your 0.03 meter.

Cheers
Daniel

-Original Message-
From: michael bishop [mailto:cle...@nbnet.nb.ca]
Sent: January 30, 2012 16:11
To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: [Talk-ca] canvec data offset

ive been working with canvec for a few days now, and ive noticed some of the 
data is offset by 0.03 meters its not matching up with nearby tiles

for example 021O10 doesnt match up with 021O07

ive noticed the problem on other tiles aswell, but didnt think to write them 
down


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca




___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] canvec data offset

2012-01-31 Thread Bégin , Daniel
Bonjour,

I'll have a look to see if I can do something for it in the next release. 

I suspect that might be caused by data resolution. Lat and Lon are stored in 
decimal degrees with 7 digits precision (48.1234567). The 7th digit will 
provide a precision around 0.001 meter. The 6th digit a precision around 0.027 
meter witch look like your 0.03 meter.

Cheers
Daniel

-Original Message-
From: michael bishop [mailto:cle...@nbnet.nb.ca] 
Sent: January 30, 2012 16:11
To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: [Talk-ca] canvec data offset

ive been working with canvec for a few days now, and ive noticed some of the 
data is offset by 0.03 meters its not matching up with nearby tiles

for example 021O10 doesnt match up with 021O07

ive noticed the problem on other tiles aswell, but didnt think to write them 
down


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca