[Talk-ca] Seasonal ferry routes

2014-03-10 Thread berniejconnors
Hello,
    The ferry route from Deer Island, NB to Campobello Island, NB 
is seasonal but it is not properly tagged as seasonal:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117143395

                 I have a friend who was routing a car trip to Campobello 
Island and the route included the above ferry link which is currently out of 
service.  Does anybody have any good examples of seasonal ferry routes that are 
properly tagged to show out of service dates?  Will routing software respect 
conditional restrictions on ferry routes? I was looking at the conditional 
restrictions in the wiki:


http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

              I would like to use the following tags:

route=ferry


route:conditional=no @ (Oct-May)

name= Deer Island-Campobello Island Ferry

operator=East Coast Ferries Ltd

url=http://www.eastcoastferriesltd.com/Fares-Schedule.html

duration=00:15

foot=yes

motorcar=yes

motor_vehicle=yes

bicycle=yes

fee=yes

    Any comments or suggestions?



Thanks,

Bernie. 

--

Bernie Connors

New Maryland, NB

bernie.conn...@unb.ca___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Seasonal ferry routes

2014-03-10 Thread Harald Kliems
Hi Bernie,

I believe I looked into this a while ago and came to the conclusion that no
routing engine currently supports conditional access. It's possible that
this has changed in the meantime. But as there is an approved proposal you
should go ahead and add the proper tags, maybe in addition to a short human
readable note=only runs June to September.
I'd say that if you're in Eastern Canada and your route includes a ferry
you should be prudent enough to check for yourself if it's running all-year.

Harald.


On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:18 PM, berniejconnors berniejconn...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello,

 The ferry route from Deer Island, NB to Campobello Island,
 NB is seasonal but it is not properly tagged as seasonal:

 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117143395

  I have a friend who was routing a car trip to Campobello
 Island and the route included the above ferry link which is currently out
 of service.  Does anybody have any good examples of seasonal ferry routes
 that are properly tagged to show out of service dates?  Will routing
 software respect conditional restrictions on ferry routes? I was looking at
 the conditional restrictions in the wiki:

 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
 restrictions

   I would like to use the following tags:

 route=ferry

 route:conditional=no @ (Oct-May)

 name= Deer Island-Campobello Island Ferry

 operator=East Coast Ferries Ltd

 url=http://www.eastcoastferriesltd.com/Fares-Schedule.html

 duration=00:15

 foot=yes

 motorcar=yes

 motor_vehicle=yes

 bicycle=yes

 fee=yes

 Any comments or suggestions?


 Thanks,

 Bernie.

 --

 Bernie Connors

 New Maryland, NB

 bernie.connors@unb. bernie.conn...@unb.caca

 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca




-- 
Please use encrypted communication whenever possible!
Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Telecommunications Buildings

2014-03-10 Thread Colin McGregor
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Adam Martin s.adam.mar...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hey all,

 Quick question regarding tagging buildings. I've come across several that
 are owned and maintained by a local telecom company. These are buildings,
 usually located in residential areas, look somewhat like houses, but are
 there to provide switching and distribution of communications equipment
 (telephone, Internet, etc). What should these be tagged as? My assumption
 would be building = yes and a Works = tag. Thoughts?

 Adam


Excellent question that I would love an answer for.

In similar fashion our local electric power company (Toronto Hydro) has put
up a number of houses (and other buildings), basically fake building
shells to hide electrical transformers (with signs on/beside the door
noting the building ownership and warning of possible electrocution to
trespassers (in other words the buildings and their role is not super
secret, but also not announced loudly). How should these building shells be
tagged?

Colin.
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Telecommunications Buildings

2014-03-10 Thread Philip Barnes
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 13:35 -0400, Colin McGregor wrote:
 
 
 
 On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Adam Martin s.adam.mar...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Hey all,
 
 
 Quick question regarding tagging buildings. I've come across
 several that are owned and maintained by a local telecom
 company. These are buildings, usually located in residential
 areas, look somewhat like houses, but are there to provide
 switching and distribution of communications equipment
 (telephone, Internet, etc). What should these be tagged as? My
 assumption would be building = yes and a Works = tag.
 Thoughts?
 
 
 Adam
 
 
 
 Excellent question that I would love an answer for. 
 
 In similar fashion our local electric power company (Toronto Hydro)
 has put up a number of houses (and other buildings), basically fake
 building shells to hide electrical transformers (with signs on/beside
 the door noting the building ownership and warning of possible
 electrocution to trespassers (in other words the buildings and their
 role is not super secret, but also not announced loudly). How should
 these building shells be tagged?
 
 
There are fake buildings used to avoid gaps in terraces on the London
Underground.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1210778/Dont-believe-eyes--Pizza-delivery-men-tricked-pranksters-ordering-food-fake-houses.html

Useful to know if you don't like your local pizza delivery company.

Phil (trigpoint)



___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Telecommunications Buildings

2014-03-10 Thread Philip Barnes
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 13:48 -0400, Harald Kliems wrote:
 Since this phenomenon is not specific to Canada (see for
 example 
 http://www.messynessychic.com/2013/01/29/the-fake-townhouses-hiding-mystery-underground-portals/
  ) it might be a good idea to ask on the general tagging list. I quickly 
 looked up the examples mentioned in the article and didn't see any specific 
 tagging in OSM.
  Harald.
 
23 and 24 Leinster Gardens are tagged as building=facade.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95307263

Phil (trigpoint)

 
 On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Colin McGregor
 colin.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 
 On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Adam Martin
 s.adam.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hey all,
 
 
 Quick question regarding tagging buildings. I've come
 across several that are owned and maintained by a
 local telecom company. These are buildings, usually
 located in residential areas, look somewhat like
 houses, but are there to provide switching and
 distribution of communications equipment (telephone,
 Internet, etc). What should these be tagged as? My
 assumption would be building = yes and a Works =
 tag. Thoughts?
 
 
 Adam
 
 
 
 Excellent question that I would love an answer for. 
 
 In similar fashion our local electric power company (Toronto
 Hydro) has put up a number of houses (and other buildings),
 basically fake building shells to hide electrical transformers
 (with signs on/beside the door noting the building ownership
 and warning of possible electrocution to trespassers (in other
 words the buildings and their role is not super secret, but
 also not announced loudly). How should these building shells
 be tagged?
 
 
 Colin.
 
 
 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Please use encrypted communication whenever possible!
 Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565
 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca



___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Telecommunications Buildings

2014-03-10 Thread Harald Kliems
Since this phenomenon is not specific to Canada (see for example
http://www.messynessychic.com/2013/01/29/the-fake-townhouses-hiding-mystery-underground-portals/)
it might be a good idea to ask on the general tagging list. I quickly
looked up the examples mentioned in the article and didn't see any specific
tagging in OSM.
 Harald.


On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Colin McGregor colin.mc...@gmail.comwrote:




 On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Adam Martin s.adam.mar...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hey all,

 Quick question regarding tagging buildings. I've come across several that
 are owned and maintained by a local telecom company. These are buildings,
 usually located in residential areas, look somewhat like houses, but are
 there to provide switching and distribution of communications equipment
 (telephone, Internet, etc). What should these be tagged as? My assumption
 would be building = yes and a Works = tag. Thoughts?

 Adam


 Excellent question that I would love an answer for.

 In similar fashion our local electric power company (Toronto Hydro) has
 put up a number of houses (and other buildings), basically fake building
 shells to hide electrical transformers (with signs on/beside the door
 noting the building ownership and warning of possible electrocution to
 trespassers (in other words the buildings and their role is not super
 secret, but also not announced loudly). How should these building shells be
 tagged?

 Colin.

 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca




-- 
Please use encrypted communication whenever possible!
Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca