[Talk-ca] Addressing in Canvec.osm

2010-05-12 Thread Bégin , Daniel
Hi Tyler,

What distance did you use? I was to use 0.0001 degree (about 10 meters in 
Halifax) for addressing in Canvec.osm.  What would you suggest?

For all, concerning adderssing tags, I am going to use...

interpolation line
- addr:interpolation

First/Last node of interpolation line
- addr:housenumber
- addr:street
- addr:city

This is what is described as required from the wiki, except for addr:city that 
is optional.  I can remove it from the schema but I can't replace it with 
anything else because this is all I can get from Canvec (and obviously GeoBase) 
content.

Proposal?

Daniel

-Original Message-
From: talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org 
[mailto:talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Tyler Gunn
Sent: 11 mai 2010 23:49
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] First usage of StatCan NRN data..


Here's a small area I have applied the converted StatCan NRN address data to.  
In my first attempt I definitely put the address interpolation ways FAR too 
close to the streets; I just fixed this so it may or may not be visible.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.78783lon=-97.17772zoom=17layers=B000FTF

Comments?

Thanks,
Tyler


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Addressing in Canvec.osm

2010-05-12 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi,

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Bégin, Daniel 
daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca wrote:

 Hi Tyler,

 What distance did you use? I was to use 0.0001 degree (about 10 meters in
 Halifax) for addressing in Canvec.osm.  What would you suggest?

 For all, concerning adderssing tags, I am going to use...

 interpolation line
 - addr:interpolation

 First/Last node of interpolation line
 - addr:housenumber
 - addr:street
 - addr:city


So (from how i understand it)
It would actually be a simple process of manually copying over each way
segment and pasting it with an offset, looking at it and adjusting the size
of it... so it lines up to where we see the 1st house (from imagery) to
where we see the last house/building.
or ...
As oh... the direction of the way is from lower # to higher house number? so
it would be 3 separate passes through the data to get the
1 - road name
2 - left side (2 house numbers) - adjust .0001 degress
3 - right side (2 house numbers) - adjust  -.0001 degrees

If thats automatic.. that'll be awesome!
...
I also cc'd feralbob for comments :)

Cheers,
Sam


 This is what is described as required from the wiki, except for addr:city
 that is optional.  I can remove it from the schema but I can't replace it
 with anything else because this is all I can get from Canvec (and obviously
 GeoBase) content.

 Proposal?

 Daniel

 -Original Message-
 From: talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:
 talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Tyler Gunn
 Sent: 11 mai 2010 23:49
 To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 Subject: [Talk-ca] First usage of StatCan NRN data..


 Here's a small area I have applied the converted StatCan NRN address data
 to.  In my first attempt I definitely put the address interpolation ways FAR
 too close to the streets; I just fixed this so it may or may not be visible.

 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.78783lon=-97.17772zoom=17layers=B000FTF

 Comments?

 Thanks,
 Tyler


 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Addressing in Canvec.osm

2010-05-12 Thread Victor Bielawski
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Bégin, Daniel
daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca wrote:
 What distance did you use? I was to use 0.0001 degree (about 10 meters in 
 Halifax) for addressing in Canvec.osm.  What would you suggest?

Please please *please* use metres. Merkaartor has some code that
generates address interpolation ways using degrees, and it results in
the distance from streets depending on the street's orientation, and
looks plain ugly in any projection apart from latlon.

As for the distance itself, I'd prefer 14-17 metres for
highway=tertiary and below, and 20-23 metres for highway=secondary and
above, if such a distinction is possible. This is based on
observations from Toronto and area; I don't know about other cities.

-- 
Victor Bielawski

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Addressing in Canvec.osm

2010-05-12 Thread simon

   2  12
 Interpolation Way:O---O
 Street:O=O

 This way at intersections all the numbers don't jumble on top of each
 other.

Hi Tyle,
The work you are doing is excellent, I just wanted to alert you to an
issue with rural numbering (in case you are unaware of it).

Our 'street' (subdivision) does not have linear numbering; that is the
number sequence increases from the start of the road, but has gaps ie.
1,5,7,13,19,21.

It seems to be in 100m's from start of road, with odds on the right and
evens on the left. I believe that it is done this way to help emergency
services find the correct residence in an emergency.

There is a document from the local MD which has explanation/example plans
(which I have a copy of if you want it, 745kByte) or I can send you a
lat/long to check out.

Cheers,
Simon.



___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Addressing in Canvec.osm

2010-05-12 Thread Tyler Gunn

 Hi Tyle,
 The work you are doing is excellent, I just wanted to alert you to an
 issue with rural numbering (in case you are unaware of it).
 Our 'street' (subdivision) does not have linear numbering; that is the
 number sequence increases from the start of the road, but has gaps ie.
 1,5,7,13,19,21.
 It seems to be in 100m's from start of road, with odds on the right and
 evens on the left. I believe that it is done this way to help emergency
 services find the correct residence in an emergency.

Hi Simon,
Thanks for bringing that up to me!  I hadn't considered that as I haven't
run into it yet in the urban areas I'm dealing with.  

 There is a document from the local MD which has explanation/example
plans
 (which I have a copy of if you want it, 745kByte) or I can send you a
 lat/long to check out.

Sure, please send that information along to me and I can keep it in mind
when I get into the rural areas of Manitoba.
I haven't looked at how the StatCan data works in rural areas; they may
only have address information on the specific part of the road where its
necessary, but I'm not sure.  The complication I can see myself running
into with irregular numbering is matching where the numbered portion starts
and ends in the OSM data compared to the NRN data.  In the city the
numbering starts at an intersection and goes to the next intersection so
its easy to fit the NRN interpolation ways into the OSM data, even if
they're not the same size/shape as the OSM data   If there is a segment of
addressed data in the middle of a rural road it might be fun to try and
figure out where that maps to in the OSM data.  I'll have to look at the
NRN data more closely to see if I can find an instance of this in Manitoba.

Thanks!
Tyler

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Addressing in Canvec.osm

2010-05-12 Thread john whelan
Not all street numbers are used even in the suburbs.  For example in Ottawa
houses with 50 foot lots have their numbers incremented in fours not two.  I
don't think it matters too much the interpolation will give you an
approximate location which can be corrcted by some one on the ground if
there seems to be a major problem.

Cheerio John

On 12 May 2010 11:12, si...@mungewell.org wrote:


2  12
  Interpolation Way:O---O
  Street:O=O
 
  This way at intersections all the numbers don't jumble on top of each
  other.

 Hi Tyle,
 The work you are doing is excellent, I just wanted to alert you to an
 issue with rural numbering (in case you are unaware of it).

 Our 'street' (subdivision) does not have linear numbering; that is the
 number sequence increases from the start of the road, but has gaps ie.
 1,5,7,13,19,21.

 It seems to be in 100m's from start of road, with odds on the right and
 evens on the left. I believe that it is done this way to help emergency
 services find the correct residence in an emergency.

 There is a document from the local MD which has explanation/example plans
 (which I have a copy of if you want it, 745kByte) or I can send you a
 lat/long to check out.

 Cheers,
 Simon.



 ___
 Talk-ca mailing list
 Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca