Re: [Talk-de] Hundekottütenspender tagging
> Am 26.04.2015 um 00:24 schrieb Andreas Goss : > > Vorher war da der Text aus dem proposal: > > "Vending machines do appear more and more in very different kinds. As they > are increasingly a part of everybody’s life, there is also a need to bring > them on maps or in to routing devices. In most cases there should also be > given a hint to the type of goods the machine offers. " das ist eine extrem schlechte Definition weil gar nichts gesagt wird. Klingt eher nach einem "Reasoning" Gruß Martin ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Osmose QA available on Germany (english)
Le 26/04/2015 12:40, Simon Poole a écrit : Am 26.04.2015 um 11:50 schrieb Frédéric Rodrigo: Hi, We have finish the coverage of Germany by Osmose QA. Osmose QA is a Quality Assurance tool. It detects and reports errors based on more than 200 rulesets. The major issue with osmose is that it invokes the notion of being authoritative when it is not, and by that motivates mappers to fix things (well actually break them) which are simply false positives. This is mainly a language issue in that you keep on using "error" all over the place instead of "potential issue" or whatever that is not such an absolute. It's the first time I hear this argument. But we can evol on this, it's not a problem for me. Nevertheless we try to only show issues when there is no problem with the definition of what it may be. We already remove rules cause of this, or disable some specifically for country of different local mapping usage. Regards. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Osmose QA available on Germany (english)
Am 26.04.2015 um 11:50 schrieb Frédéric Rodrigo: > Hi, > > We have finish the coverage of Germany by Osmose QA. > > Osmose QA is a Quality Assurance tool. It detects and reports errors > based on more than 200 rulesets. The major issue with osmose is that it invokes the notion of being authoritative when it is not, and by that motivates mappers to fix things (well actually break them) which are simply false positives. This is mainly a language issue in that you keep on using "error" all over the place instead of "potential issue" or whatever that is not such an absolute. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Osmose QA available on Germany (english)
Hi, We have finish the coverage of Germany by Osmose QA. Osmose QA is a Quality Assurance tool. It detects and reports errors based on more than 200 rulesets. http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmose Germany coverage was done by split the country in two parts. One is checked by the Osmose Czech server and the other by the USA server sponsored by Mapbox. If some one is interested in running a specific server for Germany it will be much appreciated and save the other servers to support other areas. Fell free to report over checked errors or check rules no adapted to your country. We also take ideas (and code) for new rules. The Osmose QA team. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
