Re: [Talk-GB] NAPTAN import errors

2009-10-06 Thread Thomas Wood
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 19:36 +0100, Chris Hill wrote:
> Russ wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just noticed that some of the bus stops imported from the NAPTAN 
> > import don't have the highway=bus_stop tag. Example:
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.237985&lon=-3.17579&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF
> >
> > This shows two bus stops, one with the tag, one without.
> >
> > Is this a local problem in South Cumbria or more general?
> >
> > Russ
> I think the difference is due to the naptan:BusStopType: CUS tag.  This 
> is a customary stop or an unmarked stop, hence no highway=bus_stop tag.  
> There are no CUS stops in Hull where I'm checking.

Yes, this is the case, you should go and check the stops in question. If
there is physical evidence that buses stop there, it should be upgraded
to a highway=bus_stop


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-GB] Royal Mail lawyers demand closure of postcode lookup site

2009-10-06 Thread David Earl
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/06/royal_mail_ernest_marples_postcodes/

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Royal Mail lawyers demand closure of postcode lookup site

2009-10-06 Thread OJ W
First strike! [jobcentre-plus seem to have been using this data].  Two
more, and we should cut-off the government's internet connection ;)


On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:10 AM, David Earl  wrote:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/06/royal_mail_ernest_marples_postcodes/

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Royal Mail lawyers demand closure of postcode lookup site

2009-10-06 Thread Peter Childs
2009/10/6 OJ W :
> First strike! [jobcentre-plus seem to have been using this data].  Two
> more, and we should cut-off the government's internet connection ;)
>

Actually I think its more along the line of a company that knows its
head is on the line.

The SCO stuff a few years ago spring to mind.

I'm wondering who has actually made there subscription charge for this
data, and I wonder how long it will be before loads of Local Councils
are having trouble with Council Tax and deciding which school is the
closest.

Peter

>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:10 AM, David Earl  
> wrote:
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/06/royal_mail_ernest_marples_postcodes/
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-GB] Announcement - OS 1:25k mapping availability for OSM data contributors

2009-10-06 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
We are all used to drawing in difficult or far away features by referring to
the NPE 1" to 1 mile out of copyright Ordnance Survey mapping in JOSM or
Potlatch. Its great for long linear features but for accurate stuff, like
field boundaries and detailed information about the landscape, especially in
rural areas, it's not enough.

Enter the OS 1:25,000 scale (two and a half inches to the mile)
1st/Provisional edition [1]. Which I'm happy to announce is starting to make
an appearance for the project.

There are two parts to the availability currently. One focused on providing
it via WMS for use in JOSM and the other as tiles for Potlatch.

The first full sheet (NX88 NW or Dumfries [2]) is available for you to try
out in JOSM [3]. Just add the URL as a custom WMS.

For the Potlatch tiles RichardF has worked up some code magic that should
automate the process of rectification and tiling. It may take me a little
time to get that running and the tiles will probably be served from the new
dev machine which is not quite ready yet so there will be a further
announcement on this.

Both the WMS and google format tiles use the same rectification data.

The time consuming part is manually obtaining the pixel co-ordinates for the
corner gridlines of each sheet (which I have to scan in two halves on my A3
scanner). It has to be done manually to get the best accuracy, which should
be generally 10m once available in Potlatch or JOSM. i.e. significantly
better than was possible with NPE, though note that its still only as good
as the OS originally survey it in the late 19th century. Anyway, it means
that this part is a slow process.

Currently I have around 15% of the published sheets with more arriving every
day. More would be welcome, either by way of donated maps, scans, or funds
to purchase more from retail suppliers (higher cost - usually about £3 to £8
each). With 2027 sheets in the series cost is a factor for how quickly I can
grow the set.

I'll keep the index updated on the wiki with progress (both obtaining and
scanning/tiling) so look out for your area turning up. The majority of the
sheets I have are for England and Wales. Scotland never had full coverage
from this series.

Cheers

Andy

[1] "http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Provisional/First_Edition";
[2] "http://osm.org/go/e...@6r";
[3]
"http://warper.freemap.in/layers/wms/1?request=GetMap&version=1.1.1&styles=&;
format=image/png&srs=epsg:4326&exceptions=application/vnd.ogc.se_inimage&"



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Announcement - OS 1:25k mapping availability for OSM data contributors

2009-10-06 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
And in my haste I omitted to thank Chippy for his excellent map
rectification/warping and WMS facilities. Apologies Tim.

Cheers

Andy

>-Original Message-
>From: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) [mailto:ajrli...@googlemail.com]
>Sent: 06 October 2009 3:04 PM
>To: 'talk-gb@openstreetmap.org'
>Subject: Announcement - OS 1:25k mapping availability for OSM data
>contributors
>
>We are all used to drawing in difficult or far away features by referring
>to the NPE 1" to 1 mile out of copyright Ordnance Survey mapping in JOSM or
>Potlatch. Its great for long linear features but for accurate stuff, like
>field boundaries and detailed information about the landscape, especially
>in rural areas, it's not enough.
>
>Enter the OS 1:25,000 scale (two and a half inches to the mile)
>1st/Provisional edition [1]. Which I'm happy to announce is starting to
>make an appearance for the project.
>
>There are two parts to the availability currently. One focused on providing
>it via WMS for use in JOSM and the other as tiles for Potlatch.
>
>The first full sheet (NX88 NW or Dumfries [2]) is available for you to try
>out in JOSM [3]. Just add the URL as a custom WMS.
>
>For the Potlatch tiles RichardF has worked up some code magic that should
>automate the process of rectification and tiling. It may take me a little
>time to get that running and the tiles will probably be served from the new
>dev machine which is not quite ready yet so there will be a further
>announcement on this.
>
>Both the WMS and google format tiles use the same rectification data.
>
>The time consuming part is manually obtaining the pixel co-ordinates for
>the corner gridlines of each sheet (which I have to scan in two halves on
>my A3 scanner). It has to be done manually to get the best accuracy, which
>should be generally 10m once available in Potlatch or JOSM. i.e.
>significantly better than was possible with NPE, though note that its still
>only as good as the OS originally survey it in the late 19th century.
>Anyway, it means that this part is a slow process.
>
>Currently I have around 15% of the published sheets with more arriving
>every day. More would be welcome, either by way of donated maps, scans, or
>funds to purchase more from retail suppliers (higher cost - usually about
>£3 to £8 each). With 2027 sheets in the series cost is a factor for how
>quickly I can grow the set.
>
>I'll keep the index updated on the wiki with progress (both obtaining and
>scanning/tiling) so look out for your area turning up. The majority of the
>sheets I have are for England and Wales. Scotland never had full coverage
>from this series.
>
>Cheers
>
>Andy
>
>[1] "http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Provisional/First_Edition";
>[2] "http://osm.org/go/e...@6r";
>[3]
>"http://warper.freemap.in/layers/wms/1?request=GetMap&version=1.1.1&styles=
>&format=image/png&srs=epsg:4326&exceptions=application/vnd.ogc.se_inimage&"



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Royal Mail lawyers demand closure of postcode lookup site

2009-10-06 Thread Jason Cunningham
2009/10/6 OJ W 

> First strike! [jobcentre-plus seem to have been using this data].  Two
> more, and we should cut-off the government's internet connection ;)
>

Its not the governments jobcentreplus website, its www.jobcentreproplus.com
(note the pro). Its "a clean rewrite of the Job Centre Plus government
website, allowing job seekers to quickly and easily find jobs by keyword
within their local area, and subscribe to email alerts to future additions."
The site was a good example of why we should have free access to postcode
data. I came across a link to a presentation they gave at
rewirdedstate.org"national hack the government day" -
http://blip.tv/file/1853120/

I wonder if Royal Mail would go after councils and government departments
who have failed to pay or keep up with their subscriptions. Its probably not
a good idea to send threatening letters to bodies who could successfully
lobby for things to be changed.

Hopefully this might result in some advertising for free-the-postcode, and
its aims

Jason
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-GB] Ordnance Survey 7th series available

2009-10-06 Thread Steve Chilton
I am pleased to announce that the first of the OS 7th series out-of-copyright 
maps are available for use in OSM.
Very brief details of the sheets and how to access them is available on the 
wiki at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/7th_Series
Thanks to TimSC for rectification work and setting up for WMS for JOSM, and to 
Richard for the Potlatch link.
Those available are just the first of the 23 that are out-of-copyright right 
now, mainly in Scotland. More shortly.
This is an ongoing project, and more sheets will be available to use a) as they 
come out of copyright, and b) are rectified and tiled.
Any problems please contact me.
 
Cheers
STEVE

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Ordnance Survey 7th series available

2009-10-06 Thread Frankie Roberto
2009/10/6 Steve Chilton 

I am pleased to announce that the first of the OS 7th series
> out-of-copyright maps are available for use in OSM.
> Very brief details of the sheets and how to access them is available on the
> wiki at
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/7th_Series
>

Wow, they are beautiful maps!

I've just had a go at using them as a background in Potlatch, looking at
Campbeltown. There are plenty of roads on the map that aren't on OSM.  Is it
reasonably safe to assume that these probably do still exist, and can be
added to OSM (with appropriate source tag?)

Frankie

-- 
Frankie Roberto
Experience Designer, Rattle
0114 2706977
http://www.rattlecentral.com
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Ordnance Survey 7th series available

2009-10-06 Thread Shaun McDonald


On 6 Oct 2009, at 21:24, Frankie Roberto wrote:


2009/10/6 Steve Chilton 

I am pleased to announce that the first of the OS 7th series out-of- 
copyright maps are available for use in OSM.
Very brief details of the sheets and how to access them is available  
on the wiki at

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/7th_Series

Wow, they are beautiful maps!

I've just had a go at using them as a background in Potlatch,  
looking at Campbeltown. There are plenty of roads on the map that  
aren't on OSM.  Is it reasonably safe to assume that these probably  
do still exist, and can be added to OSM (with appropriate source tag?)




Press b in Potlatch to get the source tag added.

I have noticed that the status of some of the roads seem to have  
changed in Dumfries, so I think that local knowledge would be useful  
for this one.


I've noticed that there is an offset in Dumfries that is noticeable  
(the current data is based on GPS). I've not checked to see how  
widespread the problem is.


Shaun



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Ordnance Survey 7th series available

2009-10-06 Thread Steve Chilton
If you can quantify any displacement it would be useful. We intend to try to 
check this and see if any improvements can be made to the process.
 
Cheers
STEVE

-Original Message- 
From: Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk] 
Sent: Tue 06/10/2009 21:36 
To: Frankie Roberto 
Cc: Steve Chilton; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org 
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Ordnance Survey 7th series available




___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Ordnance Survey 7th series available

2009-10-06 Thread Someoneelse
Steve Chilton wrote:
> If you can quantify any displacement it would be useful. We intend to try to 
> check this and see if any improvements can be made to the process.

Another thought - is the displacement constant across the sheet?  I've 
noticed with the NPE sheets that some parts of one sheet are offset one 
way relative to GPS data, whereas a couple of miles away there's a 
different offset (and it doesn't look like a sheet fold / not flat issue).


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Ordnance Survey 7th series available

2009-10-06 Thread Jonathan Bennett
Shaun McDonald wrote:
> I've noticed that there is an offset in Dumfries that is noticeable 
> (the current data is based on GPS). I've not checked to see how 
> widespread the problem is.
Over the other side of the region in Newton Stewart there's a pretty 
good match between some GPS traces I took last year and the scans:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/trace/152649/view

Some of the streets in Newton Stewart itself look a bit out, but it's 
not that consistent -- looks more like a poor fix.

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb