Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-GB] GB Chapter

2010-05-09 Thread Gregory
For finding out when is a good date:
http://doodle.com/gbm9zezspi9tz6m4
Add your name, tick the dates that are good for you.

I see this is on the talk-gb-wetmidlands list, so I'm also sending to
talk-gb-thenorth for anyone who just reads that. We're planning a get
together on a Saturday (for some mapping and) to discuss the formation of a
GB chapter. Somewhere between Birmingham and London.

On 26 April 2010 11:09, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) 
ajrli...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Nick Black [mailto:nickbla...@gmail.com] wrote:
 Sent: 26 April 2010 6:45 PM
 To: Emilie Laffray
 Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists); talk-gb OSM List (E-mail); talk-gb-
 westmidla...@openstreetmap.org; Richard Fairhurst
 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] GB Chapter
 
 I would be super keen on Charlbury.  Richard's beer pitch sold perfectly
 :-
 )

 It'll need to be somewhere needing mapping to get me interested though and
 Charlbury should be a done deal by now ;-)

 Cheers

 Andy


 
 --
 Nick
 
 
 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Emilie Laffray
 emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
  On 26 April 2010 15:18, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
  ajrli...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
  Replying to myself here. Northampton would be another location option.
 Its
  on the London Midland line which has some cheap fares. It's also a very
  very
  unloved town.
 
  For those living near Croydon and not afraid of me driving, this could
 be
 a
  possibility at some point.
 
  Emilie Laffray
 
  ___
  Talk-GB mailing list
  talk...@openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 --
 Nick Black
 twitter.com/nick_b
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.801 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2835 - Release Date: 04/25/10
 19:31:00


 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 talk...@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb




-- 
Gregory
o...@livingwithdragons.com
http://www.livingwithdragons.com
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands


Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-GB] GB Chapter

2010-05-09 Thread Gregory
Oops, but I'm totally accepting whatever comical/deliberate credit I get for
the typo.
Don't be silly, you probably already have mapped the flooded areas and
'ferry' routes the emergency services will take, along with what flooded
areas are like the Red Sea because of a high concentration of salt/grit
bins.

Only 6 replies to the doodle poll, but June 12th is looking like it might be
a winner.

Greg.

On 27 April 2010 04:26, Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com wrote:

  WetMidlands? Has has there been a weather event that I haven't heard
 about? Or is this just a political description? Should we be doing some
 emergency mapping of the flooded areas? O:-)

 Or perhaps it is simply that a meet of this kind could not be dry

 mikh43


 On 19:59, Gregory wrote:

 For finding out when is a good date:
 http://doodle.com/gbm9zezspi9tz6m4
 Add your name, tick the dates that are good for you.

  I see this is on the talk-gb-wetmidlands list, so I'm also sending to
 talk-gb-thenorth for anyone who just reads that. We're planning a get
 together on a Saturday (for some mapping and) to discuss the formation of a
 GB chapter. Somewhere between Birmingham and London.

 On 26 April 2010 11:09, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) 
 ajrli...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Nick Black [mailto:nickbla...@gmail.com] wrote:
 Sent: 26 April 2010 6:45 PM
 To: Emilie Laffray
 Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists); talk-gb OSM List (E-mail); talk-gb-
 westmidla...@openstreetmap.org; Richard Fairhurst
 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] GB Chapter
 
  I would be super keen on Charlbury.  Richard's beer pitch sold
 perfectly :-
 )

  It'll need to be somewhere needing mapping to get me interested though
 and
 Charlbury should be a done deal by now ;-)

 Cheers

 Andy


 
 --
 Nick
 
 
 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Emilie Laffray
 emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
  On 26 April 2010 15:18, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
  ajrli...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
  Replying to myself here. Northampton would be another location option.
 Its
  on the London Midland line which has some cheap fares. It's also a
 very
  very
  unloved town.
 
  For those living near Croydon and not afraid of me driving, this could
 be
 a
  possibility at some point.
 
  Emilie Laffray
 
  ___
  Talk-GB mailing list
  talk...@openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 --
 Nick Black
 twitter.com/nick_b
 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.801 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2835 - Release Date: 04/25/10
 19:31:00


  ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 talk...@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb




 --
 Gregory
 o...@livingwithdragons.com
 http://www.livingwithdragons.com


 --
 *Mike Harris*




-- 
Gregory
o...@livingwithdragons.com
http://www.livingwithdragons.com
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands


Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] GB Chapter

2010-05-09 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Mary Mooney wrote:
Sent: 09 May 2010 8:42 AM
To: Gregory
Cc: Mike Harris; Talk GB; talk-gb-westmidla...@openstreetmap.org; talk-gb-
theno...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-GB] GB Chapter

I do not know why, but this email (12 days old) has only just popped up in
my Inbox.  Perhaps it was stuck in the ether and that is why there are only
a few responses to the Doodle.

I cleared some mail that was pending administrator check. Mostly they are
spam but occasionally there is an OSM related one from someone who is not
subscribed to the list, I usually let those though, even if they are a
little old.

Cheers

Andy



Mary




On 27 April 2010 14:39, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote:


   Oops, but I'm totally accepting whatever comical/deliberate credit I
get for the typo.
   Don't be silly, you probably already have mapped the flooded areas
and 'ferry' routes the emergency services will take, along with what
flooded areas are like the Red Sea because of a high concentration of
salt/grit bins.

   Only 6 replies to the doodle poll, but June 12th is looking like it
might be a winner.

   Greg.


   On 27 April 2010 04:26, Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com wrote:


   WetMidlands? Has has there been a weather event that I
haven't
heard about? Or is this just a political description? Should we be doing
some emergency mapping of the flooded areas? O:-)

   Or perhaps it is simply that a meet of this kind could not
be
dry

   mikh43


   On 19:59, Gregory wrote:

   For finding out when is a good date:
   http://doodle.com/gbm9zezspi9tz6m4

   Add your name, tick the dates that are good for you.

   I see this is on the talk-gb-wetmidlands list, so
I'm
also sending to talk-gb-thenorth for anyone who just reads that. We're
planning a get together on a Saturday (for some mapping and) to discuss the
formation of a GB chapter. Somewhere between Birmingham and London.

   On 26 April 2010 11:09, Andy Robinson
(blackadder-lists)
ajrli...@googlemail.com wrote:


   Nick Black [mailto:nickbla...@gmail.com]
wrote:
   Sent: 26 April 2010 6:45 PM
   To: Emilie Laffray
   Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists);
talk-gb OSM
List (E-mail); talk-gb-
   westmidla...@openstreetmap.org; Richard
Fairhurst

   Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] GB Chapter
   

   I would be super keen on Charlbury.
Richard's
beer pitch sold perfectly :-
   )


   It'll need to be somewhere needing mapping
to get
me interested though and
   Charlbury should be a done deal by now ;-)

   Cheers

   Andy



   
   --
   Nick
   
   
   On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Emilie
Laffray
   emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
   
   
On 26 April 2010 15:18, Andy Robinson
(blackadder-lists)
ajrli...@googlemail.com wrote:
   
Replying to myself here. Northampton
would be
another location option.
   Its
on the London Midland line which has
some cheap
fares. It's also a very
very
unloved town.
   
For those living near Croydon and not
afraid of
me driving, this could be
   a
possibility at some point.
   
Emilie Laffray
   
   
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
   
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
   
   
   
   
   
   --
   --
   Nick Black
   twitter.com/nick_b
   

   No virus found in this incoming message.
   

Re: [Talk-GB] National Map Library of Scotland API

2010-05-09 Thread Jo Walsh
dear Bob, all,

On 08/05/2010 18:17, Bob Kerr wrote:
 Hi, I have been in touch with them and they are keen that we should be
 allowed to use their data so that we can create derived information that
 we can use for Openstreetmap. They have told me that they are willing to
 use the Open Database Licence with OSM they may just need some
 clarification of some minor details

 Is there anyone on the list that has experience with licensing that
 could get in touch with them. I am happy to be an intermediary and I
 have met them more than once and they know me. I would just like a
 little backup because this could be very beneficial to us in
 openstreetmap and to the Library. It would be beneficial to the library
 because they get more interest and recognition for their work

Okay, Chris Fleet (the Map Librarian at NLS) will be presenting this 
service at Open Knowledge Scotland, and relevantly, Charlotte Waelde and 
Andres Guadamuz, old colleagues of Jordan Hatcher (of Open Data 
Commons/ODBL) at SCRIPT, they'll be doing a clinic on open data 
licensing issues.

So we can make sure everyone meets - Bob i see you're on the okscotland 
attendee list already which is great because we're well overcapacity - 
and even raise this as a test case at their clinic, if they have that 
kind of flexibility.

Bob, i did forward Chris and Petr the original mail from Frederik lasy 
week, if there's any followup I'll definitely cc you (and look forward 
to meeting on Thursday!)

I could also *try* asking JISC Legal, it would be useful to get stable 
advisory words wrt ODbL from them.

cheers,


jo
--





___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] GB Chapter

2010-05-09 Thread Simon Ward
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 12:46:09PM +0100, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) 
wrote:
 I do not know why, but this email (12 days old) has only just popped up in
 my Inbox.  Perhaps it was stuck in the ether and that is why there are only
 a few responses to the Doodle.
 
 I cleared some mail that was pending administrator check. Mostly they are
 spam but occasionally there is an OSM related one from someone who is not
 subscribed to the list, I usually let those though, even if they are a
 little old.

Same for talk-gb-thenorth.  I usually let seemingly legitimate OSM mail
from non‐subscribers through, but it will be delayed until an admin can
attend to it.

For posting anything, especially time dependent mails, across different
lists I recommend subscribing to the lists to reduce delays.  If you
want to post, but not receive email from a list you can always set the
appropriate option using the web interface (Mail delivery: disabled).

Simon
-- 
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that works.—John Gall


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] FW: State of play of OS Vector data

2010-05-09 Thread Seventy 7
Thanks everyone.

When streetview came out last month there was talk about not rushing to trace 
buildings but from what I've read this doesn't seem to be the case any more.

Is streetview the best building level detail we have from the OS? There is no 
aerial photography where I am.

Thanks,
Steve


 -Original Message-
 From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org
 [mailto:talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Chris Hill
 Sent: 02 May 2010 18:01
 To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] State of play of OS Vector data
 
 The Meridian data is pretty crude and incomplete. The residential level
 roads seem to be largely missing, especially in rural areas. The curves
 are chunky and crude. Similarly the woods and water are not fully
 represented and are chunky. The admin borders have chunks missing.
 
 I just ignored it as worthless.
 
 I am strongly in favour of surveying on the ground where possible. I'm
 trying to use the OS data for things we can't gather, such as boundaries
 and inaccessible things such as docks, some waterways and some railways.
 
 Tracing the StreetView, with a suitable source tag, seems to me to
 provide a way for people who can't survey on the ground to add
 something, but the data you miss by doing this (shops, maxspeed, pubs,
 schools, churches, post boxes and so on, as well as stuff OS got
 wrong/missed/have changed) still makes this a poor, second rate job.
 
 Using such a tracing to then walk/cycle/drive around to add the POIs
 does add a lot of value.
 
 Cheers, Chris
 
 
 Graham Jones wrote:
  Hi Chris,
  That is a really good summary of what the dataset contains thank 
  you - the woodland areas will certainly be useful for countryside 
  maps.
 
  Do you know how this data compares to the Meridian data that OS 
  released last month?  I know many people were unimpressed with 
  it, but I think that it contained street names didn't it?   If so 
  maybe that would be a more useful 'first pass' import?
 
  I am thinking of some areas where I know there are housing 
  estates, but I have neither the time nor inclination to cycle 
  around them to do a proper survey -  Having something in the map 
  for these seems better than nothing to me.
 
  If we were to import such data (via an editor as discussed before 
  - not a bulk import!), we could tag it as 'verified=no' and get 
  the renderers to show them in a lighter colour until someone 
  checks it and takes the 'verified=no' tag off?   This could 
  alleviate the concerns that people had that users will not survey 
  an area if it looks complete on the map?
 
  Regards
 
 
  Graham.
 
  On 2 May 2010 13:14, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net 
  mailto:o...@raggedred.net wrote:
 
  Seventy 7 wrote:
   Can someone tell us what's happening with the latest release of
  OS data please? When streetview came out there were quite a few
  emails about tiles being rendered for tracing etc but this time
  it's all been very quiet!
  
   I presume someone somewhere is doing the vector data, but what
  about the others?
  
  I've just written a blog about VectorMap http://is.gd/bQUgR
 
  Cheers, Chris
 
  ___
  Talk-GB mailing list
  Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
 
 
 
 
  -- Dr. Graham Jones
  Hartlepool, UK
  email: grahamjones...@gmail.com mailto:grahamjones...@gmail.com
 
 
 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb




-- 
___
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] National Map Library of Scotland API

2010-05-09 Thread Bob Kerr
Superb and thanks,
Open Knowledge Scotland is the perfect venue to go forward with this
Cheers
Bob

--- On Sun, 9/5/10, Jo Walsh j...@frot.org wrote:

From: Jo Walsh j...@frot.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] National Map Library of Scotland API
To: Bob Kerr openstreetmapcraigmil...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Date: Sunday, 9 May, 2010, 15:34

dear Bob, all,

On 08/05/2010 18:17, Bob Kerr wrote:
 Hi, I have been in touch with them and they are keen that we should be
 allowed to use their data so that we can create derived information that
 we can use for Openstreetmap. They have told me that they are willing to
 use the Open Database Licence with OSM they may just need some
 clarification of some minor details

 Is there anyone on the list that has experience with licensing that
 could get in touch with them. I am happy to be an intermediary and I
 have met them more than once and they know me. I would just like a
 little backup because this could be very beneficial to us in
 openstreetmap and to the Library. It would be beneficial to the library
 because they get more interest and recognition for their work

Okay, Chris Fleet (the Map Librarian at NLS) will be presenting this service at 
Open Knowledge Scotland, and relevantly, Charlotte Waelde and Andres Guadamuz, 
old colleagues of Jordan Hatcher (of Open Data Commons/ODBL) at SCRIPT, they'll 
be doing a clinic on open data licensing issues.

So we can make sure everyone meets - Bob i see you're on the okscotland 
attendee list already which is great because we're well overcapacity - and even 
raise this as a test case at their clinic, if they have that kind of 
flexibility.

Bob, i did forward Chris and Petr the original mail from Frederik lasy week, if 
there's any followup I'll definitely cc you (and look forward to meeting on 
Thursday!)

I could also *try* asking JISC Legal, it would be useful to get stable advisory 
words wrt ODbL from them.

cheers,


jo
--







  ___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] FW: State of play of OS Vector data

2010-05-09 Thread Micah
On Sunday 09 May 2010 19:16:41 Seventy 7 wrote:

 When streetview came out last month there was talk about not rushing to
  trace buildings but from what I've read this doesn't seem to be the case
  any more.
 
 Is streetview the best building level detail we have from the OS? There is
  no aerial photography where I am.

Mastermap is the best building level detail Ordnance Survey offer but OSM 
can't use it. So Ordnance Survey Street View is best from them OSM can trace 
for buildings. 

I just looked at the OS Vector District tiles in QGIS ( http://www.qgis.org/ ) 
and found that they have added noise with often curious artifacts to the 
buildings to fill in a little up to the roads often, and within blocks of 
buildings . So ok for looking at lower scalesto give the built up area but not 
represent reality of individual buildings (and speces) on ground at higher 
scales. OS Street View seems a bit better.

I may put up some side by side screenshot examples on my blog some time, 

The water features and woodlands in OS Vector District on other hand seem good 
to go, comparing very well with what I know on the ground and I am for 
importing them, after a little clean up, at least on tile by tile basis or 
feature by feature with a little local vetting. But I notice some tiles have 
some water features as per Street View and other tiles have are missing 
similar ones present elsewhere.
Tide lines look pretty good, matching up well with GPS track I took of path 
that followed tile line, and off shore islands and costal features look pretty 
good.

I am still getting to grips with QGIS have yet to work out how to convert once 
identified area I want to using Open Street Map. But I am in no great rush. I 
only want to mess about with small areas of specific features I have some 
direct knowleage of.

cheers,

Micah

-- 
http://blog.j12.org/
--


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb