Re: [Talk-GB] B72 is a wrap
On 14 February 2011 13:31, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@gmail.com wrote: http://blog.mappa-mercia.org/2011/02/whats-in-postcode.html I've tried to emulate your work, but my fences aren't rendering: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.551978lon=-1.891105zoom=18layers=M what have I missed/ done wrong? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] B72 is a wrap
Looks like you fixed it? Perhaps just needs to be rerendered. Cheers Andy -Original Message- From: Andy Mabbett [mailto:a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk] Sent: 16 February 2011 3:50 PM To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] B72 is a wrap On 14 February 2011 13:31, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@gmail.com wrote: http://blog.mappa-mercia.org/2011/02/whats-in-postcode.html I've tried to emulate your work, but my fences aren't rendering: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.551978lon=- 1.891105zoom=18layers=M what have I missed/ done wrong? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3446 - Release Date: 02/15/11 ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] B72 is a wrap
In the last few minutes; yes, thanks - I'd used boundary:fence instead of barrier:fence - doh! On 16 February 2011 16:13, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like you fixed it? Perhaps just needs to be rerendered. Cheers Andy -Original Message- From: Andy Mabbett [mailto:a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk] Sent: 16 February 2011 3:50 PM To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] B72 is a wrap On 14 February 2011 13:31, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@gmail.com wrote: http://blog.mappa-mercia.org/2011/02/whats-in-postcode.html I've tried to emulate your work, but my fences aren't rendering: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.551978lon=- 1.891105zoom=18layers=M what have I missed/ done wrong? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] B72 is a wrap
On 16 February 2011 16:33, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: In the last few minutes; yes, thanks - I'd used boundary:fence instead of barrier:fence - doh! There is a slight problem under mapnik with this use of barrier=* http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3395 At the moment its only true for barrier=hedge. As I mention in the ticket rendering of area barriers is now inconsistent, and at least that inconsistency needs to be resolved. At the moment I think reversion would be best. I've certainly made plenty of use of barrier=wall as a boundary. http://osm.org/go/eutD1wknt-(I must get around to adding postcodes based on the method outlined in the thread) Tangentially, I have had some discussion with another mapper (achadwick) in Oxford about the correct way to tag residential gardens; which lead to another mapnik ticket: http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3302 I don't really have a strong position on this, but neither leisure=garden+access=private or landuse=residential+residential=garden, seem satisfactory. I'm not happy with these as extending them to handle other types of garden is really not elegant, e.g.: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/80833972 Any thoughts? Cheers, Craig ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
