Re: [Talk-GB] Use of PRoW Definitive Statements from Hertfordshire, Oxfordshire, Worcestershire

2012-06-26 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM)
On 22 June 2012 07:06, Richard Fairhurst  wrote:
>> Does anyone know who is able to edit the text on [5]?)
>> [5] http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
>
> You can send a pull request via github with
> https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#sending-the-patches .
> Failing that I'd guess a trac ticket would be the way to go.

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll see if I can work out how to do the
pull request...

> For clarity and conciseness I'd think the extra attribution would be best
> expressed as an additional sentence within the 'United Kingdom' bullet
> point.

I don't think adding the attributions directly to the copyright page is
a particularly scalable solution. There are over 80 councils in
England that could potentially allow us to use their Definitive
Statements under OGL, and that's just one type of document for a
single country.

Whether or not we provide any extra attributions directly on
http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright , I think it would be sensible
to provide a link from that page to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors . I think that would
be fine legally for less significant sources that require attribution
for our use, but I guess that's something LWG will have to work out.
Even if it's not, I think it's still a useful link to have, since it
helps people find more information about the sources that we've used.

Best wishes,

Robert.

-- 
Robert Whittaker

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-GB] Not my patch, but why's this a tertiary_link

2012-06-26 Thread Richard Mann
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/114413014

My guess is that it should be a highway=unclassified, but maybe someone in
Brighton/Lewes can provide some local knowledge?
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Not my patch, but why's this a tertiary_link

2012-06-26 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I know that area. That road is a typical minor country road. The A27
is divided at that point by a central barrier. It can only be entered
from Lewes, and exited to Beddingham.

Stephen


On 26 June 2012 10:00, Richard Mann  wrote:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/114413014
>
> My guess is that it should be a highway=unclassified, but maybe someone in
> Brighton/Lewes can provide some local knowledge?
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Not my patch, but why's this a tertiary_link

2012-06-26 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I believe it is wide enough for two cars, and is used to access Glynde IIRC.
Stephen

On 26 June 2012 11:11, Richard Mann  wrote:
> Sounds like it needs a turning restriction, not to be a tertiary_link. Do
> you have a view on whether it should be a tertiary (ie clearly wide enough
> for two-way traffic, and forming a clear link between places) or an
> unclassified?
>
> Richard
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Stephen Colebourne 
> wrote:
>>
>> I know that area. That road is a typical minor country road. The A27
>> is divided at that point by a central barrier. It can only be entered
>> from Lewes, and exited to Beddingham.
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>>
>> On 26 June 2012 10:00, Richard Mann 
>> wrote:
>> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/114413014
>> >
>> > My guess is that it should be a highway=unclassified, but maybe someone
>> > in
>> > Brighton/Lewes can provide some local knowledge?
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Talk-GB mailing list
>> > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>> >
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Not my patch, but why's this a tertiary_link

2012-06-26 Thread Richard Mann
Roads either side are unclassified/residential, so I've made it
unclassified & added turn restrictions

Richard

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:

> I believe it is wide enough for two cars, and is used to access Glynde
> IIRC.
> Stephen
>
> On 26 June 2012 11:11, Richard Mann 
> wrote:
> > Sounds like it needs a turning restriction, not to be a tertiary_link. Do
> > you have a view on whether it should be a tertiary (ie clearly wide
> enough
> > for two-way traffic, and forming a clear link between places) or an
> > unclassified?
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Stephen Colebourne <
> scolebou...@joda.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I know that area. That road is a typical minor country road. The A27
> >> is divided at that point by a central barrier. It can only be entered
> >> from Lewes, and exited to Beddingham.
> >>
> >> Stephen
> >>
> >>
> >> On 26 June 2012 10:00, Richard Mann 
> >> wrote:
> >> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/114413014
> >> >
> >> > My guess is that it should be a highway=unclassified, but maybe
> someone
> >> > in
> >> > Brighton/Lewes can provide some local knowledge?
> >> >
> >> > ___
> >> > Talk-GB mailing list
> >> > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> >> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> >> >
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Talk-GB mailing list
> >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> >
> >
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb