Re: [Talk-GB] pub defined as a relation

2017-10-24 Thread Dave F 

Oh Dear.
I've always been hesitant to call out specific contributors by name, but 
user 'mentor' has been a repeated thorn in my side whenever he's (male?) 
'contributed' in my locale. Those edits can, at best, be described 
'assumptive' (either that, or he's widely travelled within the UK, 
whilst blindfolded).


For this specific example: From aerial images, I would tag the whole 
area, including rear patio area/car parking as amenity=pub, name=* etc & 
combine the full extent of the building as building=pub. Both relations 
appear unnecessary.


Additionally the residential area could be tweaked around the shops/pub 
& landuse=retail be added.


Your 2nd point:
Coincidentally I've just noticed that it only returns the first option 
(swap nodes with ways to see). I'm unclear if it's by design or a recent 
update error. I'd be interested to know the answer.


Try:

{{geocodeArea: Brighton and Hove}}->.searchArea;
(
node["amenity"="pub"](area.searchArea);
way["amenity"="pub"](area.searchArea);
relation["amenity"="pub"](area.searchArea);
);
(._;>;);
out body;

DaveF


On 24/10/2017 17:35, Jez Nicholson wrote:
Just preparing an Overpass query for the OSM workshop I am running in 
Brighton. Naturally I queried pubsthen wondered whether I need 
bother with relationsand found 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3216899


Seems a bit of a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

While i'm here, can anyone tell me why 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/szG does not return nodes and 
ways-and-their-nodes? It is very similar to the example


area[name="Brighton and Hove"][admin_level=6];
(
  node(area)[amenity=pub];
  way(area)[amenity=pub];
);
(._;>;);
out body;

- Jez


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] pub defined as a relation

2017-10-24 Thread Jez Nicholson 
Just preparing an Overpass query for the OSM workshop I am running in
Brighton. Naturally I queried pubsthen wondered whether I need bother
with relationsand found http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3216899

Seems a bit of a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

While i'm here, can anyone tell me why http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/szG does
not return nodes and ways-and-their-nodes? It is very similar to the
example

area[name="Brighton and Hove"][admin_level=6];
(
  node(area)[amenity=pub];
  way(area)[amenity=pub];
);
(._;>;);
out body;

- Jez
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS/OSM comparison tool now includes graphs

2017-10-24 Thread Gregrs 
I've been in touch with the FSA and I'm glad to say that the geocodes 
for many establishments in Copeland, Middlesborough, Sedgemeoor, 
Portsmouth and South Tyneside are back, so their data can be accessed 
using the comparison tool (http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs) 
again.


Stirling is still missing a large number of geocodes, I'm afraid, but 
this has been a long standing issue as shown on 
http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/district-334.html.


Thanks,
Greg


On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:52:20PM +0100, Gregrs wrote:

Several authorities (Copeland, Middlesborough, Sedgemeoor, Portsmouth 
and South Tyneside) seem to have removed geocodes for a large number of 
their FHRS establishments recently, as shown by the sharp dropoff 
towards the end of the first graph on this page: 
http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs-stats/summary-graphs.html. I'm 
planning to contact the FSA regarding this as the comparison tool 
relies on these geocodes in order to place establishments into a 
specific district and show their approximate location.


--
Twitter: @gregrs_uk
http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org
PGP key ID: 64907C8A
Fingerprint: EBD1 077F CCDD 841E A505 3FAA D2E8 592E 6490 7C8A



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] Nottingham pub meeting October

2017-10-24 Thread SK53 
Just to confirm this meeting will take place next week (rather than
tonight) on Halloweeen 31st October at our ususl venue, the Lincolnshire
Poacher.

Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Pub_Meetup

Regards,

Jerry
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb