Re: [Talk-GB] Proposal: Import EV charging point data

2020-08-18 Thread Steven Hirschorn
So to address the main issues so far:
Could the data be "tainted" by being derived from a copyrighted map:
- Is it just Google that is the risk here? If SourceLondon used
Ordnance Survey maps to determine the node locations, would there not
be a similar issue? So the only circumstance where the data wouldn't
have been tainted is if it had been captured locally as a co-ordinate
from a GPS device?
- If it turns out the data is tainted in this way, I can't import the
nodes into the main OSM database (wouldn't even uploading a note at
the location break licensing terms?), but can I provide it as a
geojson file that local surveyors could load into a mapping app and
use to do a local survey, manually placing the nodes in the
appropriate place?

What is the quality of the data?
- I could upload a geojson file which a small number of volunteers
could download and sample the points. Is there any app/site that
facilitates collaborating on sample outcomes? This would give an
impression of the quality of the data. I see that user jnicho02 on the
wiki sampled one data point and found it to be on the wrong side of
the road, but clearly visible from where the map marker had been
placed. Could that be within the GPS margin of error of the capturing
device? Is a marker which is placed a few metres out of place worse
than no marker at all? Is data that is slightly inaccurate at the
point of import worse than the thousands of nodes and ways that
inaccurate by not being maintained by anyone?

In the previous thread about chargepoints from a couple of months ago,
someone questioned whether having this data in OSM would be more
useful than the dedicated apps by the infratructure providers which
would also be able to indicate whether the point is currently in
service and currently in use. I still like the idea of having this
data in OSM for a number of reasons:
- It would be nice if OSM became the most complete source for all
charging points, with open data on all providers
- It would allow users to compare the available infrastructure from
each provider in their area from an impartial source
- We can record the ID number from each provider which might later
allow someone to mash data from OSM with data from the provider API on
chargepoint status.

Thanks for the feedback so far. It feels like a lot of work for one
provider in one area, but I'm hopeful this will scale up quickly, and
this one provider alone will quadruple the number of charge points
listed on OSM in London.

Steven

On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 13:58, Mateusz Konieczny  wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Aug 18, 2020, 13:18 by steven.hirsch...@gmail.com:
>
> And what would the conflation exercise be? Are we allowed to put the
> points on a non-OSM map to ask local mappers to survey?
>
> It would be better to put location on OSM map and ask mappers to
> survey there.
>
> As long as they survey and enter data based on what they surveyed
> and external source will be used solely to plan trip - AFAIK it should be 
> fine.
>
> With non-OSM map there is risk that some of them will start copying such map.
>
> (there is risk that some of mappers will start copying just marker
> positions, without survey, that is why it should be limited to more
> experienced mappers and done in way encouraging actual survey
> - so no putting such data into Maproulette and so on)
>
> Of course I won't begin an import without seeking consensus first -
> this was the start of such an attempt!
>
> +1
>

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Proposal: Import EV charging point data

2020-08-18 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB



18 Aug 2020, 16:28 by aamac...@gmail.com:

>
>
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 09:09, Rob Nickerson <> rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com> > 
> wrote:
>
>> For me, once licencing issues have been fully resolved, it comes down to 
>> accuracy of data. 
>>
>> For example the TfL cycle data is great as it has been collected by ground 
>> survey and with two photos of everything. Some other third party data has 
>> been less accurate. At this point it becomes tricky as we've no agreed 
>> threshold. We all know that OSM is not perfect but less clear on what level 
>> of accuracy we require for imports.
>>
>
> Wouldn't this be partially dependent on the level of mapping in the area in 
> question? 
>
And on preferences of a local
community.

I am not aware about any such case,
but local community may even have
stance "we are against all imports"
>
> In sparsely mapped regions even relatively coarse data might be an 
> improvement. In areas where individual gas lamps have been accurately placed 
> higher precision would be required to avoid misleading entries. 
+1___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Proposal: Import EV charging point data

2020-08-18 Thread Alan Mackie
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 09:09, Rob Nickerson 
wrote:

> For me, once licencing issues have been fully resolved, it comes down to
> accuracy of data.
>
> For example the TfL cycle data is great as it has been collected by ground
> survey and with two photos of everything. Some other third party data has
> been less accurate. At this point it becomes tricky as we've no agreed
> threshold. We all know that OSM is not perfect but less clear on what level
> of accuracy we require for imports.
>

Wouldn't this be partially dependent on the level of mapping in the area in
question? In sparsely mapped regions even relatively coarse data might be
an improvement. In areas where individual gas lamps have been accurately
placed higher precision would be required to avoid misleading entries.

>
> As for tools, consider Ilya's OSM Conflator tool. Works well for node data.
>
> Rob
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Proposal: Import EV charging point data

2020-08-18 Thread Cj Malone
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 12:18 +0100, Steven Hirschorn wrote:
> Are we allowed to put the points on a non-OSM map to ask local
> mappers to survey?

Legally I think it's a bit ambiguous, but current practice is to do
exactly that. See tools like [1] where most of the data isn't
compatible with the ODbL but they are overlaid for local mappers to
survey and add them selves [2]. At a certain point it may be easier to
"import to notes", but the current way at least has plausible
deniability if any data provider was upset that there dataset was used
to inform surveys.


Cj

[1] https://osm.mathmos.net/defib/
[2] https://osm.mathmos.net/defib/progress/NE/


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Proposal: Import EV charging point data

2020-08-18 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB



Aug 18, 2020, 13:18 by steven.hirsch...@gmail.com:

> And what would the conflation exercise be? Are we allowed to put the
> points on a non-OSM map to ask local mappers to survey?
>
It would be better to put location on OSM map and ask mappers to
survey there.

As long as they survey and enter data based on what they surveyed
and external source will be used solely to plan trip - AFAIK it should be fine.

With non-OSM map there is risk that some of them will start copying such map.

(there is risk that some of mappers will start copying just marker
positions, without survey, that is why it should be limited to more
experienced mappers and done in way encouraging actual survey
- so no putting such data into Maproulette and so on)

> Of course I won't begin an import without seeking consensus first -
> this was the start of such an attempt!
>
+1

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-GB] Proposal: Import EV charging point data

2020-08-18 Thread Steven Hirschorn
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 12:01,  wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:53:00 +0100
> From: Jez Nicholson 
> To: David Woolley 
> Message-ID:
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> It is possible that the initial data from SourceLondon is licence tainted
> as they manually created the points by using Google Maps. This would block
> a straight import, but might allow for a conflation exercise.

Hi Jez,

Good point regarding the original source data, I'll try to find out
how it was created. What happens if I don't get a completely
unambiguous answer?
And what would the conflation exercise be? Are we allowed to put the
points on a non-OSM map to ask local mappers to survey?

In response to Chris, I see that there was talk two months ago about
adding Charging Points but it wasn't necessarily discussed as an
import task until the national registry was discussed, and then there
were questions about data quality. I'm happy to analyse the data
quality of the provider datasets by sampling.

Of course I won't begin an import without seeking consensus first -
this was the start of such an attempt!

Steven

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Proposal: Import EV charging point data

2020-08-18 Thread Jez Nicholson
Hi Steven,

Nice work getting hold of SourceLondon, and for getting it on the wiki.

It is possible that the initial data from SourceLondon is licence tainted
as they manually created the points by using Google Maps. This would block
a straight import, but might allow for a conflation exercise.

Regards,
 Jez

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:19 AM David Woolley 
wrote:

> On 18/08/2020 00:11, Steven Hirschorn wrote:
> > I'm hoping to import a dataset of EV vehicle charging points in London.
> > I've created a wiki page here:
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SourceLondon
> >
>
> There was a lot of discussion about importing EV charging station data
> recently, so the first thing you should do is go through the list archives.
>
> Also, note that you need the agreement of the community before you start
> any import.
>
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Proposal: Import EV charging point data

2020-08-18 Thread David Woolley

On 18/08/2020 00:11, Steven Hirschorn wrote:
I'm hoping to import a dataset of EV vehicle charging points in London. 
I've created a wiki page here: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SourceLondon




There was a lot of discussion about importing EV charging station data 
recently, so the first thing you should do is go through the list archives.


Also, note that you need the agreement of the community before you start 
any import.



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Marton, Shropshire

2020-08-18 Thread Andy Mabbett
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 00:44, Philip Barnes  wrote:

> https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.62023=-3.07049#map=18/52.62023/-3.07049

Wonderful; thank you.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands


Re: [Talk-GB] Proposal: Import EV charging point data

2020-08-18 Thread Rob Nickerson
For me, once licencing issues have been fully resolved, it comes down to
accuracy of data.

For example the TfL cycle data is great as it has been collected by ground
survey and with two photos of everything. Some other third party data has
been less accurate. At this point it becomes tricky as we've no agreed
threshold. We all know that OSM is not perfect but less clear on what level
of accuracy we require for imports.

As for tools, consider Ilya's OSM Conflator tool. Works well for node data.

Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb