On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 12:01, <talk-gb-requ...@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:53:00 +0100 > From: Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> > To: David Woolley <for...@david-woolley.me.uk> > Message-ID: > <CALBgsih29XbBN=eupy8wu6egmpofgzfl4vt1ourgactfqag...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > It is possible that the initial data from SourceLondon is licence tainted > as they manually created the points by using Google Maps. This would block > a straight import, but might allow for a conflation exercise.
Hi Jez, Good point regarding the original source data, I'll try to find out how it was created. What happens if I don't get a completely unambiguous answer? And what would the conflation exercise be? Are we allowed to put the points on a non-OSM map to ask local mappers to survey? In response to Chris, I see that there was talk two months ago about adding Charging Points but it wasn't necessarily discussed as an import task until the national registry was discussed, and then there were questions about data quality. I'm happy to analyse the data quality of the provider datasets by sampling. Of course I won't begin an import without seeking consensus first - this was the start of such an attempt! Steven _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
