Re: [Talk-GB] Essex appearing in various London address nominatim results
Martin wrote: > >>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/26450045 > > >>I think there will be a polygon for Essex, thus the above node can > simply > >>be deleted. This is the case in a lot of similar cases, as more exact > >>data is now available." Ed Avis replied: > It has been discussed and agreed on this list before that these > nodes can be > junked now that we have county boundaries as polygons. So please > go ahead. In case it was also a contributory factor, the two Essex boundary relations (administrative and ceremonial) weren't closed - I've just joined the ends together so they should be OK now. This might also fix Cambridgeshire but I haven't checked those relations with the relation analyser. Links: Fixed here: http://osm.org/go/0EQLGf@WA-- Essex relations analysed from http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Essex I have not deleted the Essex county node: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/26450045 as I wasn't sure whether the gns information was something that first needed moving to one or both of the Essex relations. Ed ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Essex appearing in various London address nominatim results
Martin - CycleStreets writes: >>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/26450045 >>I think there will be a polygon for Essex, thus the above node can simply >>be deleted. This is the case in a lot of similar cases, as more exact >>data is now available." It has been discussed and agreed on this list before that these nodes can be junked now that we have county boundaries as polygons. So please go ahead. -- Ed Avis ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] Essex appearing in various London address nominatim results
Essex seems to be coming up in lots of place searches in the London area in Nominatim - we've just had a bug report about it. This problem seems to have started a few weeks ago, I think. However, I'm not confident enough with data editing to fix this - could someone take a look? http://open.mapquestapi.com/nominatim/v1/search.php?q=greenwich,+london Shaun has said to me: http://open.mapquestapi.com/nominatim/v1/search.php?q=greenwich,+london and click details which gives: http://open.mapquestapi.com/nominatim/v1/details.php?place_id=151927 You will see that the node: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/26450045 is mentioned in bold, which means that it is taken into account and used. I think there will be a polygon for Essex, thus the above node can simply be deleted. This is the case in a lot of similar cases, as more exact data is now available." but this sounds a bit scary to me, especially as the Essex node seems to be quite well-established. I can't see how it is affecting Greenwich, and I can't see that "London" is being included for Greenwich. Would someone kindly be able to have a look at this? Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists Developer, CycleStreets ** http://www.cyclestreets.net/ ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
