Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Conflator

[Rob Nickerson]

Many thanks for this. I shall add some clarifying remarks to the post.

Best,
Rob

On 31 Jan 2018 8:06 a.m., "Ilya Zverev"  wrote:

> I wrote up part 1 of my experience with OSM Conflator and the Community
Validation tool. This first part focuses on OSM Conflator explaining what
it does and the main components of it.
>
> http://www.mappa-mercia.org/2018/01/osm-conflator.html

Thank you Rob, I enjoyed reading your post. I hope it drives more people to
do their POI imports with the Conflator.

I have a single comment about "it assumes the third party data is correct
and more up to date than any OSM data it is replacing". The third party
data does indeed need to be correct, otherwise we should not import it into
OSM. But in the profile "master_tags" property you choose a range of
attributes that override these mapped by OSM members. For example, if you
consider postcodes in OSM better than in the third party data, you don't
add the "addr:postcode" to that list.

Also, nodes and areas are almost never moved, never for the initial import.
Locations from OSM are considered to be the most precise. Of course, with
the Community Validation tool mappers can adjust some locations to match
these from a third party dataset.

Ilya
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Conflator

[Ilya Zverev]

> I wrote up part 1 of my experience with OSM Conflator and the Community 
> Validation tool. This first part focuses on OSM Conflator explaining what it 
> does and the main components of it.
> 
> http://www.mappa-mercia.org/2018/01/osm-conflator.html

Thank you Rob, I enjoyed reading your post. I hope it drives more people to do 
their POI imports with the Conflator.

I have a single comment about "it assumes the third party data is correct and 
more up to date than any OSM data it is replacing". The third party data does 
indeed need to be correct, otherwise we should not import it into OSM. But in 
the profile "master_tags" property you choose a range of attributes that 
override these mapped by OSM members. For example, if you consider postcodes in 
OSM better than in the third party data, you don't add the "addr:postcode" to 
that list.

Also, nodes and areas are almost never moved, never for the initial import. 
Locations from OSM are considered to be the most precise. Of course, with the 
Community Validation tool mappers can adjust some locations to match these from 
a third party dataset.

Ilya
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] OSM Conflator

[Rob Nickerson]

Hi all.

I wrote up part 1 of my experience with OSM Conflator and the Community
Validation tool. This first part focuses on OSM Conflator explaining what
it does and the main components of it.

http://www.mappa-mercia.org/2018/01/osm-conflator.html

Best regards,
*Rob*
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb